Re: Is Your Child A Goth?
I can certainly confirm that we are aware of William of Occam and are certainly grateful that he put a stop to the Cathylicks inordinate waste of scholarship trying to figure out how many angels would fit on the head of a pin. The use of Bayesian analysis in reference to the existence of God is quite clever, but in the end is tragically flawed in its overly simplistic approach and groundless assertions and assumptions. For starters the author creates a straw man, a false dichotomy between a "natural" and a "super-natural" God universe. The writer is further uninformed of the state of modern physics, particularly quantum mechanics and the collapse of probability waves, not to mention his appeals to out dated reductionism. He even tries to be amusing in making a parallel argument concerning ESP (ignoring a body of experimental data), completely ignorant that Bells Theorem was verified at CERN in the 1980's - meaning that the universe is non-local.
As a practical matter, Bayesian analysis has been recently applied with some degree of success to the problem of SPAM. But as we all know, some of it still gets through or is miss-categorized.
As you pointed out, your argument is not based on the existence of God. The subject here is "Goth", or what you like to call a harmless sub-culture. Perhaps you would like to elaborate on just what is so compelling about this "sub-culture" and why anyone would want to adopt it. Perhaps you would like to explain after some 1,243 posts why anyone has not been able to do so. Given your exuberant hubris, I certainly look forward to your scholarly presentation.
Originally posted by OpiatedEnnui
View Post
As a practical matter, Bayesian analysis has been recently applied with some degree of success to the problem of SPAM. But as we all know, some of it still gets through or is miss-categorized.
As you pointed out, your argument is not based on the existence of God. The subject here is "Goth", or what you like to call a harmless sub-culture. Perhaps you would like to elaborate on just what is so compelling about this "sub-culture" and why anyone would want to adopt it. Perhaps you would like to explain after some 1,243 posts why anyone has not been able to do so. Given your exuberant hubris, I certainly look forward to your scholarly presentation.
Comment