[Basilissa]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

A hyperbole is an extreme exaggeration. The parts of the bible that you shouldn't take literally are well thinking you are superior for one thing.

I see that you have written your answer without reading my post. Please do that before I answer your question again.

[Fireburp (Quarantined)]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

I see that you have written your answer without reading my post. Please do that before I answer your question again.

I did read what you wrote you etheir thought I meant a mathematical curve or a biblical city? Don't know what the heck the first part is. Anyways I did and do mean hyperbole- an extreme exaggeration of an event or person used as a form of description in literature.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

It is not a sin of the bible. Burning books is a sin of humanity. If you want a related biblical sin then how about thou shall not kill.

So humanity can send one to the very fiery pits of Hell now?

[Basilissa]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

I did read what you wrote you etheir thought I meant a mathematical curve or a biblical city? Don't know what the heck the first part is. Anyways I did and do mean hyperbole- an extreme exaggeration of an event or person used as a form of description in literature.

Fantastic. Now, can you read the second part of the same post? Because I asked you another question there. (And I also used a parable there, to make my point easier to understand).

Thank you for making the effort to read, though.

[Fireburp (Quarantined)]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Feel free to post the Scripture that backs up your claim. KJV only, please.

You want scripture how's this for scripture. I beg you read it all before you judge.

Your children are not your children they are the sons and daughters of life longing for itself. They come through you but not from you. And thought they are with you, yet they belong not to you. You may give them your love but not your thoughts. For they have their own thoughts. You may house their bodies but not their souls, for their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow which you cannot visit not even in your dreams. You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you. For life goes not backwards nor tarries with yesterday. You are the bows from which your childrenas living arrowsarevsent forth. The archer sees the path of the infinite, and He bends you with his might that His arrows may go swift and far. Let your bending in the archers hand be for gladness. For even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves the bow that is stable.

- Gibran Khalil

FYI this man was a musilum.

[Fireburp (Quarantined)]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Fantastic. Now, can you read the second part of the same post? Because I asked you another question there. (And I also used a parable there, to make my point easier to understand).

Thank you for making the effort to read, though.

A. Already answered it in my first resort the whole superior thing.
B. Not sure if that's sarcasm but if it is; uncalled for.

[Basilissa]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

A. Already answered it in my first resort the whole superior thing.

Oh. Can you explain me, then, who decides which part of the Bible should be taken literally and which not? Maybe the parts where Jesus talks about God's love should not be taken literally as well? Or the crucifixion and resurrection and other elements of Jesus' biography? Or maybe the 10 Commandments? Or maybe the parts which talk about God Himself?

Basically, where do you draw the line between what should be taken literally or not? And - based on what authority?

B. Not sure if that's sarcasm but if it is; uncalled for.

No sarcasm, dear. Just pure Christian love and curiosity.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Yeah, that baloney sounds like the rantings of your garden-variety pee-drinking mudslime.



When someone says Scripture (notice the capitalization!) here they are referring of course to the sweet, sweet words of God and Jesus as inerrantly captured in the King James Version Holy Bible.



Yours in Christ (NOT MOHAMBONE),

Z. Smyth

[Fireburp (Quarantined)]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Oh. Can you explain me, then, who decides which part of the Bible should be taken literally and which not? Maybe the parts where Jesus talks about God's love should not be taken literally as well? Or the crucifixion and resurrection and other elements of Jesus' biography? Or maybe the 10 Commandments? Or maybe the parts which talk about God Himself?

Basically, where do you draw the line between what should be taken literally or not? And - based on what authority?

No sarcasm, dear. Just pure Christian love and curiosity.

I believe where to draw the line is up to the individual. Yeah yeah I know what your gonna say.

[Fireburp (Quarantined)]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Yeah, that baloney sounds like the rantings of your garden-variety pee-drinking mudslime.



When someone says Scripture (notice the capitalization!) here they are referring of course to the sweet, sweet words of God and Jesus as inerrantly captured in the King James Version Holy Bible.



Yours in Christ (NOT MOHAMBONE),

Z. Smyth

First I know what your talking about when one says scripture. Second if you can qoute your book I can qoute mine.

[JewPincher]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Anything written by that heathen Dawkins. What a joke, I don't know how anyone can take him seriously with all that EVILution garbage. The only book I need is the

[Basilissa]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

I believe where to draw the line is up to the individual. Yeah yeah I know what your gonna say.

Do you? I'll say it anyway.

Out of all cherry-pickers, this is the worst line of defense ever. It implies that there is no right or wrong way of reading the Bible. Therefore (according to your own logic) your wishy-washy "interpretation" which throws away 99% of the Bible is equally valid as our 100% literal understanding. Therefore, you have no grounds to criticize us.

Quod erat demonstrandum, my dear.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Never burn books. Books are our own safeguard keeping us from jumping off cliffs.

Does that include books about how to jump off cliffs?

It is not a sin of the bible. Burning books is a sin of humanity.

I see you have internalised the concept of sin. Where does that come from..?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

That Outlandish series.

What a load of garbage. With over 10,000 depraved whores on amazon slobbering all over themselves to relive a story that could never be, they mock Jesus and reject His Truth and in turn try convert others to Satan's Lair.

Truly disgusting. They've even made a series on the television.

It should be burned. Kilts should be burned, too.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Books that deserve the fire

Never burn books. Books are our own safeguard keeping us from jumping off cliffs. Books are the greatest thing we made. You burn a book you burn the soul not only that of the writers but of your own as well. If you burn any books I hope you burn in hell. Burning books is the worst sin one can do.

What if it was a book belonging to certain Catholic priest depicting how to rape clean limbed young youths?

How could you possible want to keep them?

YIC