[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

So if God made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made the aliens who made life on earth why couldn't God have just made life on Earth?

Or if you're suggesting the aliens just made us, why couldn't God have just made us.

Are you familiar with Occam's razor?

We all came from somewhere (and that includes non-human life). Also, the conditions for life on Earth aren't just limited to Earth. I also said I'm not a scientific genius, so asking me to scientifically prove anything is not the wisest thing to do because you're asking me questions that can't even be answered yet with the technology that we have.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

We all came from somewhere (and that includes non-human life). Also, the conditions for life on Earth aren't just limited to Earth. I also said I'm not a scientific genius, so asking me to scientifically prove anything is not the wisest thing to do because you're asking me questions that can't even be answered yet with the technology that we have.

Although there is one thing that does come to mind and that's the theory that what we require in order to live might not be what extraterrestrials require in order to live. Oh, and before I head into the land of dreams, I will ask you all a question which you must try to scientifically prove (just so you can how it feels to be asked something you don't know the answer to)...

How were omnipresent beings created?

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

We all came from somewhere (and that includes non-human life). Also, the conditions for life on Earth aren't just limited to Earth. I also said I'm not a scientific genius, so asking me to scientifically prove anything is not the wisest thing to do because you're asking me questions that can't even be answered yet with the technology that we have.

I'm not asking you a scientific question. I'm asking why your more complicated explanation is better than the current less complicated explanation. Does it explain more things? That would be a philosophical question I think.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Which, shortened, would make you an Anglo Celtsy Nazi.

Ashkenazi is a branch of Judaism and has nothing to do with being a Nazi. It share similarities with Sephardic Judaism, and whoever it was that decided to put Nazi in my rank should remove it because I do not endorse the Nazi way of life.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

I'm not asking you a scientific question. I'm asking why your more complicated explanation is better than the current less complicated explanation. Does it explain more things? That would be a philosophical question I think.

My explanation is not better than anybody else's. As for explanations, I wouldn't know, although I'd likely say yes if I did know because I don't have to turn to a book. As for complication when it comes to explanations, I'd be more inclined to say that you guys have the more complicated one, as it is physically (and medically/scientifically) impossible to create a man from dust and then a woman from his rib. Between that and aliens, aliens would be more plausible, unless they had the technology to do what you believe happened, which would make both plausible.

And I mentioned the whole thing about science because it's obvious that some people here think that I'm a science professor who can just pull information out from thin air (something that I wish I could do but can't).

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Although I know what the scientific explanations are, and there are many ranging from Pythagoras to Neil deGrasse Tyson, God explains that their explanations are false. He does so here:

I TIMOTHY 6 . KJV . look up
20 Keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith.

He reminds us again how fortunate we are to have been chosen and not abandoned to secularist mumbojumbo, changing from day to day from year to year ever changing while God does not change. He is the rock in a turbulent sea:

EPHESIANS 4 . KJV . look up
14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15a But speaking the truth in love..
17 This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
18 Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:

[Basilissa]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Ashkenazi is a branch of Judaism

No it's not.

It's a term referring to ethnicity, not to dogmatic/religious difference.

Protip: when you're in class, try listening to the teacher and taking notes instead of playing with your phone all the time.

[Dolores de Barriga]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Norse Mythology may have been written by a modern author but it is full of Eddas,

How can a modern book be "full of" medieval ones? Are you saying the author cut up the manuscripts in pieces? Or is he plagiarizing/summarizing/simplifying for the simpleton minds out there? Assuming the latter is true, do you always prefer to read the synopsis rather the actual text?

That would explain a lot, actually.

as Neil did a fair bit of research, and thanks to him, I now know that Thor's hammer (amongst many other things) was made by dwarves, and that they have their own version of Adam and Eve (Ask and Embla), plus other things which I had no idea about.

I still don't understand, why read a rip off when there's a perfectly understandable translation (1, 2) of the original? Do you have trouble comprehending written text and need it to be dumbed down or something?

My explanation is not better than anybody else's.

Correct. It is, in fact, much worse.

As for complication when it comes to explanations, I'd be more inclined to say that you guys have the more complicated one, as it is physically (and medically/scientifically) impossible to create a man from dust and then a woman from his rib. Between that and aliens, aliens would be more plausible, unless they had the technology to do what you believe happened, which would make both plausible.

So the question asked by Miss Lizalor remains: who did create aliens?

If God created aliens, then you believe the same thing as creationist Christians, just with an additional step in the middle: God created aliens who created people. Christians have the Bible as their evidence, you have nothing.

If aliens evolved from single cell organisms, then you believe something which is very close to what science says, except that you're adding an extra step for which there is no scientific evidence whatsoever.

Out of curiosity - at which level of evolution do you believe that the aliens interjected with their creation? You can use as a visual aid our primate family tree here, and our overall all species family tree here.

Also - how did they hide their creation so seamlessly that all living organisms on Earth seem to be related without separate creations?


I'm asking because I'm sincerely interested in understanding how does your brain work.

And I'm not a scientific genius.

Sad, but true.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

No it's not.

It's a term referring to ethnicity, not to dogmatic/religious difference.

Protip: when you're in class, try listening to the teacher and taking notes instead of playing with your phone all the time.

I left school 7 years ago.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

How can a modern book be "full of" medieval ones? Are you saying the author cut up the manuscripts in pieces? Or is he plagiarizing/summarizing/simplifying for the simpleton minds out there? Assuming the latter is true, do you always prefer to read the synopsis rather the actual text?

That would explain a lot, actually.

I still don't understand, why read a rip off when there's a perfectly understandable translation (1, 2) of the original? Do you have trouble comprehending written text and need it to be dumbed down or something?



Correct. It is, in fact, much worse.

So the question asked by Miss Lizalor remains: who did create aliens?

If God created aliens, then you believe the same thing as creationist Christians, just with an additional step in the middle: God created aliens who created people. Christians have the Bible as their evidence, you have nothing.

If aliens evolved from single cell organisms, then you believe something which is very close to what science says, except that you're adding an extra step for which there is no scientific evidence whatsoever.

Out of curiosity - at which level of evolution do you believe that the aliens interjected with their creation? You can use as a visual aid our primate family tree here, and our overall all species family tree here.

Also - how did they hide their creation so seamlessly that all living organisms on Earth seem to be related without separate creations?


I'm asking because I'm sincerely interested in understanding how does your brain work.



Sad, but true.

My opinion is equal to yours no matter what you say. Just like you're entitled to yours, I'm entitled to mine. Don't like that? Well that's (sadly for you) tough. Also, nobody knows what other life is out there, and nobody knows how they would evolve. I personally believe that apes etc were already here, but then aliens came and mixed their DNA with the DNA of apes in order to create us.

And I've also never claimed to be a scientific genius, and (fun fact) even the people that we call scientific geniuses nowadays are still learning things and trying to figure things out.

And we still haven't found out if there are humans elsewhere in space either.

[Dolores de Barriga]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

I left school 7 years ago.

If I could make a friendly suggestion: you might consider going back, and using it for learning purposes this time. It may not make you a scientific genius, but at least it might give you some knowledge of actual scientific evidence which could be used to have actually informed views about the world.

My opinion is equal to yours no matter what you say. Just like you're entitled to yours, I'm entitled to mine. Don't like that? Well that's (sadly for you) tough.

I don't care about opinions. If you want to have an opinion that the color of the sky is neon green, I don't care.


The only thing I'm interested in is the evidence which leads you to having an opinion.

Also, nobody knows what other life is out there, and nobody knows how they would evolve. I personally believe that apes etc were already here, but then aliens came and mixed their DNA with the DNA of apes in order to create us.

So why we don't have the evidence of that in the genes?


Also, why we don't have evidence of apes existing in the past? I'll give you this one: because they are our cousins, not ancestors.


Also, when did that would have happened? Before or after Ardipitecus? How about the Australopithecines? Were they still the products of local evolution or the effect of alien work? How about Homo erectus?


Did you look up Occam's Razor? Local evolution is a much simpler solution than having aliens, created by God-knows-whom, come in and manipulate the DNA in a way which is absolutely impossible to determine, as the DNA they inject is totally indistinguishable from the locally developed DNA shared with eukaryotes, cherry trees, porcini mushrooms, amoebas, lemurs, and us.

And we still haven't found out if there are humans elsewhere in space either.

I thought we both agreed that humans are ultimately an Earth product?

[Didymus Much]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

My opinion is equal to yours no matter what you say...

Just who the heck filled your head with that crap?

The only thing that is "equal" is your right to hold an opinion. Whether that opinion is deserving of any respect at all depends on what it is based on. Evidence would be a very good place to start.

An opinion (like yours with the alien DNA ) based on nothing aside from, "oh, this makes sense to me, because I'm too stupid/lazy to actually investigate and find out just how wrong it is on so many levels", deserves nothing but ridicule, no matter who holds it.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

If I could make a friendly suggestion: you might consider going back, and using it for learning purposes this time. It may not make you a scientific genius, but at least it might give you some knowledge of actual scientific evidence which could be used to have actually informed views about the world.

Dolores, dear, I know you are not entirely familiar with the British "education" system or the mores of the Liverpudlian, so perhaps I can help? When a young person of that class says that they "left school 7 years ago", there is no suggestion that they completed their education then. It is often just an evasive way of saying that, after multiple warnings, that is when they were excluded from school on a permanent basis. There can be many reasons for exclusion: the list is too long to bore you with, but includes persistent bad behavior, causing actual bodily harm to others, extreme mental deficiency and even morbid obesity such that they can no longer get through the doors.

So, someone who left school** 7 years ago may be anywhere between the ages of 12 and 25. My gut feeling is that we are looking at the 13-14 age range here. So you might want to use shorter words.

All the best, dear,
Joanna

** School means education between the ages of 5 and 18, by the way. The British don't call college or university "school". Don't ask why - perversity, presumably.

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Just who the heck filled your head with that crap?

The only thing that is "equal" is your right to hold an opinion. Whether that opinion is deserving of any respect at all depends on what it is based on. Evidence would be a very good place to start.

An opinion (like yours with the alien DNA ) based on nothing aside from, "oh, this makes sense to me, because I'm too stupid/lazy to actually investigate and find out just how wrong it is on so many levels", deserves nothing but ridicule, no matter who holds it.

I respect the opinions of others, and I will expect others to respect mine too. Doesn't matter if I get ridiculed, as at the end of the day, all sides have "evidence" claiming that they are correct, and yet nobody can prove anything (not even the best scientists).

[agnesaliencat]

Re: Agnostic Theist Reporting For Duty

Dolores, dear, I know you are not entirely familiar with the British "education" system or the mores of the Liverpudlian, so perhaps I can help? When a young person of that class says that they "left school 7 years ago", there is no suggestion that they completed their education then. It is often just an evasive way of saying that, after multiple warnings, that is when they were excluded from school on a permanent basis. There can be many reasons for exclusion: the list is too long to bore you with, but includes persistent bad behavior, causing actual bodily harm to others, extreme mental deficiency and even morbid obesity such that they can no longer get through the doors.

So, someone who left school** 7 years ago may be anywhere between the ages of 12 and 25. My gut feeling is that we are looking at the 13-14 age range here. So you might want to use shorter words.

All the best, dear,
Joanna

** School means education between the ages of 5 and 18, by the way. The British don't call college or university "school". Don't ask why - perversity, presumably.

How would I be in my teenage years if I started school in 1998? Answer is simple, as I went to school for 12 full years like everybody else, and I left school 2 months shy of my 17th birthday.

And no, I'm not going back.