[James Hutchins]

Re: My Introduction

I am humbled and honored by your questions, Sir.


As with Sheshan (1 Chronicles 2:34) I have not provided sons, only two daughters. Neither daughter has married yet, thus no grandsons. I have a deep reservoir of remorse, making formal confession weekly and within prayer daily. As for serving Him, I endeavor to steer my daughters to a proper marriage, towards the Lord and away from secularism, to keep them well disciplined and acting as the Lord commands. However, I feel blind to the means I may serve Him beyond that and am in need of guidance in this matter.

So for all intents and purposes, you are barren. May Satan have mercy on your soul.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: My Introduction

I have a deep reservoir of remorse, making formal confession weekly and within prayer daily.

[Basilissa]

Re: My Introduction

I have a deep reservoir of remorse, making formal confession weekly and within prayer daily.

Wait, Sister, let's not assume the worse, yet. Maybe she means it in James 5:16 sense, in which community members confess sins to each other, rather than to some pedophile priest?

[Dana723]

Re: My Introduction

I am humbled and honored by your questions, Sir.


As with Sheshan (1 Chronicles 2:34) I have not provided sons, only two daughters. Neither daughter has married yet, thus no grandsons. I have a deep reservoir of remorse, making formal confession weekly and within prayer daily. As for serving Him, I endeavor to steer my daughters to a proper marriage, towards the Lord and away from secularism, to keep them well disciplined and acting as the Lord commands. However, I feel blind to the means I may serve Him beyond that and am in need of guidance in this matter.

Wow, that's a shame. I myself have born five wonderful, clean-limbed, glorious, handsome boys for Christ's service. However, I shall attempt to not look down on you, a poor widow, with only two daughters. How old are your daughters? Why have they not been married off yet? Just like Ruth, they could bear sons for you so that you will not have to bear shame.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: My Introduction

Wait, Sister, let's not assume the worse, yet. Maybe she means it in James 5:16 sense, in which community members confess sins to each other, rather than to some pedophile priest?

It was the word formal that made me leap to the obvious conclusion, Sister B. I have never considered our private discussions as any form of confession - they're more a mutual cry for help.

[BrotherLarry]

Re: My Introduction

As a certified equine gnathologist, it isn't hard for me to see that our new friend here has responded to pretty much everyone that has posted on this thread EXCEPT ME. This tells me that she hates horses - and that's something the LORD GOD will not tolerate. It's like denying the white stallion on which Jesus will lead the armies into Armageddon to defeat the foes trying to win the world over for satan.


This doesn't bode well, I'm afraid. I wouldn't be surprised if there truly is a priest to whom she makes this formal confession.


BrotherLarry


PS There is NO excuse for rudeness.

[btgrossman]

Re: My Introduction

As a certified equine gnathologist, it isn't hard for me to see that our new friend here has responded to pretty much everyone that has posted on this thread EXCEPT ME. This tells me that she hates horses - and that's something the LORD GOD will not tolerate. It's like denying the white stallion on which Jesus will lead the armies into Armageddon to defeat the foes trying to win the world over for satan.


This doesn't bode well, I'm afraid. I wouldn't be surprised if there truly is a priest to whom she makes this formal confession.


BrotherLarry


PS There is NO excuse for rudeness.

Sir:


I deeply apologize for not responding to you. It was indeed rude. There is no excuse.


I was, and still remain, ignorant of equine gnathologogy. However, allow me to assured you that I have no hate for horses, neither in my heart nor in my action. I am an ignorant woman on many subjects and am guilty of such.

[btgrossman]

Re: My Introduction

Wait, Sister, let's not assume the worse, yet. Maybe she means it in James 5:16 sense, in which community members confess sins to each other, rather than to some pedophile priest?

I thank you for your reference to James 5:16 for that is the exact manner in which my confession transpires. I meet weekly with a senior member of my church for Male counsel and instruction (Proverbs 19:20). These meetings are "formal" insofar as they take place regularly, with seriousness, at a consistent time and place.

[btgrossman]

Re: My Introduction

How old are your daughters? Why have they not been married off yet? Just like Ruth, they could bear sons for you so that you will not have to bear shame.

They are eighteen and twenty-one. They have both been smitten to some degree by secular culture, the elder far more than the younger. I have home hope that the younger will marry soon. The elder is more defiant. I pray daily for sons from them both.

[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: My Introduction

I thank you for your reference to James 5:16 for that is the exact manner in which my confession transpires. I meet weekly with a senior member of my church for Male counsel and instruction (Proverbs 19:20). These meetings are "formal" insofar as they take place regularly, with seriousness, at a consistent time and place.

Is the Church ⛪ you attend Catholic by chance?

[btgrossman]

Re: My Introduction

Is the Church ⛪ you attend Catholic by chance?

No, Sir. IFB.


I am sorry for the confusion I have caused. I did not mean to imply the involvement of a priest or a confessional.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: My Introduction

Grossman is a Jewish name. Are you sure you're worshiping Jesus, and not trying to kill Him?

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: My Introduction

I did not mean to imply the involvement of a priest or a confessional.

That is always worthwhile to confirm. Romish liars often tell one another they're "Christians" but the merest glance at The Bible shows that they're no such thing. Of course they may not ever have read The Bible and so would be ignorant of what God has revealed and what Jesus Christ Himself taught. Quite apart from His example and the reasons He gave for His death at Calvary.

Liars, on the other hand, HAVE read God's word. It's their job to do so and priests are among their number. Popes are maximally deceitful in that not only do they know what God teaches and then do the exact opposite, such as if God commands DON'T DO THIS then they launch a sect based precisely on doing EXACTLY THAT, but also tell everyone that God "told them this new thing" on their exclusive telephone line.

The saddest part is God's "new ongoing revelation" always amounts to I GOD AM A BIG FAT LIAR because as we know from reading The Bible, God is Jesus and what He says is always true.

You can always trust The Bible. Without it, where would we be?

[Isabella White]

Re: My Introduction

The saddest part is God's "new ongoing revelation" always amounts to I GOD AM A BIG FAT LIAR because as we know from reading The Bible, God is Jesus and what He says is always true. You can always trust The Bible. Without it, where would we be?

Oh, you are so right here, dear Sister Mitza. Amen and Amen!! This "new ongoing revelation" is the very same bunch of lies that those "New Age" religions teach -- they make it up as they go along! But we, the believers in the Grace and Salvation of the , the , know the -given Truth, as found within the pages of the blessed . I've had many discussions with those papist ring-kissers, and at no time did any of them confess to having opened the pages of this glorious Book. They seem to think that as long as they curtsy at the cross and then trot up to receive their cracker and wine, they're saved. What a shock they will receive on the Day of Judgment!

Matthew 25:41 "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels".

A blessed day to you, dear Sister Mitza,
Sincerely, Isabella W.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: My Introduction

Sometimes I've read Matthew 25 and wondered how it can sit with Christ's words in Matthew 7 where He explains:

MATTHEW 7:19-23 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Everlasting fire of torment is a consistent theme which, being revealed Truth, it always will be but in that eternal conflagration will there be exorcists? Yes: obviously if they really did cast out devils. Your post encouraged me by highlighting (for me) that the two verses are discussing different things. Satan pretending to be Jesus could command a devil to anything he fancied because the devil would know it was not actually Jesus.

Tumescences of every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit who pretend to be following Jesus for public effect—and I want to be clear here, they must know what they're doing; protestations of innocence are just the next stratum of their deceptive façade, peeled back deliberately to deceive others, they have NOT deceived themselves—were never casting out devils in Jesus’ name.

Matthew 7 and Matthew 25 are addressing different things, which I hadn't noticed before. God is always consistent. No-one has to like it but if they say they don't agree Him (very easy to determine) why oh why do they claim to be Christians? Surely, according to them, Christianity has done enough "harm" to be jettisoned along with Aphrodite, Dagon and L. Ron Hubbard?