Doubtful

[gueritol Waiting for Email Confirmation]

I was reading the Leviticus and encountered this. Though I have no child of my own, I was wondering about all those sinner that repent.

Leviticus 26:27-30
If in spite of this you still do not listen to me but continue to be hostile toward me, 28 then in my anger I will be hostile toward you, and I myself will punish you for your sins seven times over. 29 You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters."

Do they need to eat their children even if they repent?
Does the nature of the sin need to be applied to the child?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Doubtful

What would the children need to repent for? In you info light scenario the children have done nothing wrong.

And if the children are to be eaten because of continued hostility the hastily described senario ends.

Hope that helps.

YIC
Posted via Mobile Device

[gueritol Waiting for Email Confirmation]

Re: Doubtful

So the siner doesn't need to eat his children as the Leviticus commands?

I fully understand what you say, what do the children of a siner have to do with the sins of the father? It was my 1st reaction, but then the better part of my self came back to its' senses and I realized: "Who am I to question which part of the Bible to follow and not!"

I also tought that this opens the door to some degenerate out there that could say: Well my father is jew/black/gay, my mother is jew/black/gay and i was raised to be a jew/black/gay and I had nothing to do with it, it's the sin of my parents, why should I pay and be tormented for it?

And we really want nothing to do with that.

Psalm 121:7 The LORD shall preserve you from all evil: he shall preserve your soul.
Psalm 140:1 Deliver me, O LORD, from the evil man: preserve me from the violent man;

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Doubtful

When God commands you to eat your children, this is a loving warning from Him that you are Hellbound. It is His way of saying, "repent while there is still time." But you must of course obey the command.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Doubtful

Why do these unsaved always look for a loophole in God's commands?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Doubtful

Why do these unsaved always look for a loophole in God's commands?

I don't know what children taste like, but I would imagine it is something like veal, which is not so bad. I think the reason for not wanting to eat your children as God commands is sheer laziness. Westerners these days want all of their nourishment prepared for them, and they know if they eat their children they would have to prepare it themselves. It is important to be self-sufficient, so that we are not dependent on the Jew media for our food.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Doubtful

Why do these unsaved always look for a loophole in God's commands?

While quoting a false bible... (note lack of capital)

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Doubtful

While quoting a false bible... (note lack of capital)

Anyway, he's questioning scripture which makes him probably an atheist pretending to be a fluffy bunny Christian to mock God and troll us to see if we stand by our Lord even when scripture gets nasty.

Bring it on!

[gueritol Waiting for Email Confirmation]

Re: Doubtful

Anyway, he's questioning scripture which makes him probably an atheist pretending to be a fluffy bunny Christian to mock God and troll us to see if we stand by our Lord even when scripture gets nasty.

Bring it on!

It's still no answer ... just fuzzy, fuzzy ... how did you put it? Yippy Yappy or something like this.

THERE ARE NO LOOPHOLES IN GOD'S SCRIPTURES!!!
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

You're then one that told me not to pick and choose? Correct or not?
Now you're not so sure? Be a man!, be a Christian!

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Doubtful

It's still no answer ... just fuzzy, fuzzy ... how did you put it? Yippy Yappy or something like this.

THERE ARE NO LOOPHOLES IN GOD'S SCRIPTURES!!!
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

You're then one that told me not to pick and choose? Correct or not?
Now you're not so sure? Be a man!, be a Christian!

What ARE you on about? If God actually comes right out and tells you to eat your children then you munch away. That's not what He is doing here.

27And if ye will not for all this hearken unto me, but walk contrary unto me; 28Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins. 29And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat. 30And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you. 31And I will make your cities waste, and bring your sanctuaries unto desolation, and I will not smell the savour of your sweet odours. 32And I will bring the land into desolation: and your enemies which dwell therein shall be astonished at it. 33And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste.

It's not a command to eat their flesh; it's a statement that you will be so wretchedly destroyed you will stoop this low for being a wretched heathen.

What you're doing is resorting to the sceptics annotated Bible or some such and trying to catch us out. This is not original and your troll colours are showing. Try harder.

40If they shall confess their iniquity, and the iniquity of their fathers, with their trespass which they trespassed against me, and that also they have walked contrary unto me; 41And that I also have walked contrary unto them, and have brought them into the land of their enemies; if then their uncircumcised hearts be humbled, and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity: 42Then will I remember my covenant with Jacob, and also my covenant with Isaac, and also my covenant with Abraham will I remember; and I will remember the land. 43The land also shall be left of them, and shall enjoy her sabbaths, while she lieth desolate without them: and they shall accept of the punishment of their iniquity: because, even because they despised my judgments, and because their soul abhorred my statutes. 44And yet for all that, when they be in the land of their enemies, I will not cast them away, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break my covenant with them: for I am the LORD their God. 45But I will for their sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the heathen, that I might be their God: I am the LORD.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Doubtful

Be a man!, be a Christian!

Apart from everything else, this kind of sexism is quite revolting.

As always, the troll lets its real color shine through.

Sad.

[gueritol Waiting for Email Confirmation]

Re: Doubtful

What ARE you on about? If God actually comes right out and tells you to eat your children then you munch away. That's not what He is doing here.

27And if ye will not for all this hearken unto me, but walk contrary unto me; 28Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins. 29And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat. 30And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you. 31And I will make your cities waste, and bring your sanctuaries unto desolation, and I will not smell the savour of your sweet odours. 32And I will bring the land into desolation: and your enemies which dwell therein shall be astonished at it. 33And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste.

It's not a command to eat their flesh; it's a statement that you will be so wretchedly destroyed you will stoop this low for being a wretched heathen.

What you're doing is resorting to the sceptics annotated Bible or some such and trying to catch us out. This is not original and your troll colours are showing. Try harder.

40If they shall confess their iniquity, and the iniquity of their fathers, with their trespass which they trespassed against me, and that also they have walked contrary unto me; 41And that I also have walked contrary unto them, and have brought them into the land of their enemies; if then their uncircumcised hearts be humbled, and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity: 42Then will I remember my covenant with Jacob, and also my covenant with Isaac, and also my covenant with Abraham will I remember; and I will remember the land. 43The land also shall be left of them, and shall enjoy her sabbaths, while she lieth desolate without them: and they shall accept of the punishment of their iniquity: because, even because they despised my judgments, and because their soul abhorred my statutes. 44And yet for all that, when they be in the land of their enemies, I will not cast them away, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break my covenant with them: for I am the LORD their God. 45But I will for their sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the heathen, that I might be their God: I am the LORD.

Again the assumptions and the very fuzzy left or right when it's convenient.
Are you or not a Bible reader and believer?

Children carry the original sin, they are all sinners!

Don't believe me? Please peek into Romans 5

I'm beginning to understand that You can question what works and interpret and it is OK. But when somebody else does it's wrong? What's wrong with that picture? it's bias and incorrect.

You are or not are. You wrote about lukewarm people ... be or not be, but please be not stuck in the middle.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Doubtful

Again the assumptions and the very fuzzy left or right when it's convenient.
Are you or not a Bible reader and believer?

Children carry the original sin, they are all sinners!

Don't believe me? Please peek into Romans 5

I'm beginning to understand that You can question what works and interpret and it is OK. But when somebody else does it's wrong? What's wrong with that picture? it's bias and incorrect.

You are or not are. You wrote about lukewarm people ... be or not be, but please be not stuck in the middle.

Friend, you sound like you're getting a little worked up here. Perhaps you'd like to take a deep breath and read Redeemed Papist's post again. In no way is he biased or incorrect, he's very simply bringing the Word of God into the discussion so it can speak for itself.

You sound exhausted. Spiritually exhausted. Would you like to confess your sins and let the Holy Spirit enter into your soul so you too can understand God's Word?

[gueritol Waiting for Email Confirmation]

Re: Doubtful

Apart from everything else, this kind of sexism is quite revolting.

As always, the troll lets its real color shine through.

Sad.

Dear Sir,
Go search the forums here. Your Christian group has written the same things. I didn't invent it.

It's even in the signature of a few of the loyal posters here! Haven't read you go postal on them and offend them.

Are you or not aligned amounts yourselves? Or again it's only when its convenient? God is not a choice!

Now, your definition of Troll its beyond incorrect, it's my own thread? how can I troll my thread?

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Doubtful

Again the assumptions and the very fuzzy left or right when it's convenient.
Are you or not a Bible reader and believer?

Children carry the original sin, they are all sinners!

Don't believe me? Please peek into Romans 5

I'm beginning to understand that You can question what works and interpret and it is OK. But when somebody else does it's wrong? What's wrong with that picture? it's bias and incorrect.

You are or not are. You wrote about lukewarm people ... be or not be, but please be not stuck in the middle.

What is wrong with you? Why did the putting of your quote into context thus making you look like an idiot worry you so much?

Original sin? Are you a Catholic? Is that what this is all about?