[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Im sorry But all i see is scientific proof to what we know instead of the 'god did it' approach i dont think religion is for me. Thanks for the help and sorry it didnt work for me. I will not post again so no need to reply to this. Just promise you dont try to force your religion onto anyone, for if they want to burn in hell let them Regards mr athei5t

Maybe as an atheist, you see nothing wrong with innocent people burning in Hell for all eternity, just because they couldn't suspend disbelief. For me, however, as a True Christian(tm) with a fully calibrated moral compass, I will discourage curiosity and reason wherever it rears its ugly head.

[Jedediah]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Im sorry But all i see is scientific proof to what we know instead of the 'god did it' approach i dont think religion is for me. Thanks for the help and sorry it didnt work for me. I will not post again so no need to reply to this. Just promise you dont try to force your religion onto anyone, for if they want to burn in hell let them Regards mr athei5t

We have all the scientific proof you need right here. For my part, I will obey the LORD and spread the Gospel, not follow the unsolicited advice of unsaved trash like yourself.

II Timothy 4:5
But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Im sorry But all i see is scientific proof to what we know instead of the 'god did it' approach i dont think religion is for me. Thanks for the help and sorry it didnt work for me. I will not post again so no need to reply to this. Just promise you dont try to force your religion onto anyone,

Hey dummy, show me one instance of us forcing someone to come here to learn about the sweet, sweet love of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

for if they want to burn in hell let them Regards mr athei5t

Wow, you are one sick individual. I suppose if someone was about to get run over by a garbage truck you wouldn't try and warn them, huh?

Nice.



Yours in Christ (NOT DARWIN),

Z. Smyth

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Wow, you are one sick individual. I suppose if someone was about to get run over by a garbage truck you wouldn't try and warn them, huh?

Brother, you forget that atheists have no compassion or love of others.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Athei5t, I'm a bit confused about your stated premise. Why would you be trying to find salvation if you weren't already a believer? For most atheists, salvation doesn't even exist as a concept, and it's certainly not something they would acknowledge needing.

What was it, friend, that made you suspect you needed to be saved? Was it the empty feeling you got when sitting on the edge of a flea-bitten mattress in an hourly motel after committing un-Godly acts upon a doe-eyed, nubile young prostitute? Just what-all did you do with her? Please be as detailed as possible.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

Pastor, with all due respect, I'm a little concerned, as the description of this video contains the following words:

Religion, sign, Allah, Cloud, Human like, face, islam, christ, convert, miracle, truth.

Worse yet, the video contains an image of the so-called "Face on Mars," which is presumably part of NASA's Mars mission hoax, designed to keep the tax payer money streaming into that agency's coffers.

I suppose Joe Taxpayer is quite happy to fund NASA missions as long as he believes Mars is an average of 140 million miles away and big enough for people to stand on.

[Thinks Design]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Being an atheist is good in a sense because they can ask questions without being scared of angering the invisible sky man who will send you into a firey abyss. This place can be proven by the 100% true book of stories of the chronicles of the invisible sky man and his son jesus who's mother was raped by the invisible sky man for his own benefit Amen

You are far better off looking to science for an answers. The Design Inference clearly shows how specified complexity and deferred reductionism indicate the conclusion that there simply has to be a God.

The bible can be seen as primative man's first attempt to know the god of the bible (the Designer) and his the very rocks of the Earth are testimony to his existance.

ThinksDesign

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

You are far better off looking to science for an answers. The Design Inference clearly shows how specified complexity and deferred reductionism indicate the conclusion that there simply has to be a God.

The bible can be seen as primative man's first attempt to know the god of the bible (the Designer) and his the very rocks of the Earth are testimony to his existance.

ThinksDesign

Quit trying to confuse us with big words.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Quit trying to confuse us with big words.

You prefer to be confused by little words?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

I suppose Joe Taxpayer is quite happy to fund NASA missions as long as he believes Mars is an average of 140 million miles away and big enough for people to stand on.

How do you think they're going to pay the Obamacare Death Panels?

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Im trying to find salvation, but first i need proof

How do you think they're going to pay the Obamacare Death Panels?

The last thing NASA wants to admit is that Mars is, at most, a few hundred miles from the Earth. Because if they admit that, then the obvious question is why would they need billions and billions of dollars to get there? How much rocket fuel do you have to burn to cover a few hundred miles? Very little, obviously.

Heck, you could probably build a device with an electric motor or steam engine that swims through the firmament and burns no rocket fuel at all!

[Thinks Design]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Quit trying to confuse us with big words.

I'm not trying to confuse anyone!

Fundemental reductionism simply pertains to (not withstanding external ontological factors) that the Bible can be viewed as from the lens of it's temporal aspect.

Qualitative analysis will always show bias so a quantised orthogonal take on the themes and factors is more useful than the first hand inferences of the witnesses to the events in the bible.

We can then juxtapose this with modern inference based on (for example) specified complexity and Information Theory (after Shannon).

My point is that science leads us inevitably to the Design Inference.

ThinksDesign.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I'm not trying to confuse anyone!

Fundemental reductionism simply pertains to (not withstanding external ontological factors) that the Bible can be viewed as from the lens of it's temporal aspect.

Qualitative analysis will always show bias so a quantised orthogonal take on the themes and factors is more useful than the first hand inferences of the witnesses to the events in the bible.

We can then juxtapose this with modern inference based on (for example) specified complexity and Information Theory (after Shannon).

My point is that science leads us inevitably to the Design Inference.

ThinksDesign.

Science leads us to thinking we're a type of clever upright walking chimp that's distantly related to pond scum and that stuff just happens with no interference from God.

You need to stop trying to confuse those of stronger faith.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Fundemental reductionism simply pertains to (not withstanding external ontological factors) that the Bible can be viewed as from the lens of it's temporal aspect.

First, lern 2 spel.

"Fundamental".

Second, learn the difference between "its" and "it's".

Third, this sentence makes no sense. "pertains to that the Bible can be viewed as from the lens of its temporal aspect"