[FriendlyAtheist]

Re: Hi!

Hello godpower97!

Yes, I know this is one of the harsher Christian forums. But I decided I'd give it a go anyways and see if I can contribute to some topics here or show members that not all atheists are bad people. You seem like a very tolerant, compassionate and kind Christian. You truly try to live like Jesus.

Kind regards godpower97,

FriendlyAtheist.

[FriendlyAtheist]

Re: Hi!

It's time for me to say goodbye now! Just saw this thread.

Truly, you are the sickest bunch of animals I have ever had the displeasure to communicate with. I don't believe in God, but if there is a God, you'll burn in hell. Horrible fucking maggots. Except you godpower97, you're a good christian. The rest of these guys are racist monkeys that haven't evolved into human beings yet.

And for people that are against homosexuality, you sure talk about anal sex a lot. Perhaps there's something you'd like to share? Again, smother and drown, you piffleing rapist boogers. And to the women here: You truly are dogs and allow yourselves to be treated as such.

Jesus wouldn't even look at one of you.

piffle you all entirely, and may you die slowly and painfully, arsehole of the earth,
Regards,
An Actual Human Being.


TL DR; I hope a tornado blows through your cesspool of a Bible Belt and forces you to beg for welfare. May children disown you when they're older and more intelligent.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hi!

While I don't actually believe that Jesus existed, I do believe that the man described as Jesus in the Bible is the greatest human to have ever lived.

Please reconcile how someone you don't believe ever existed could also be "the greatest human to have ever lived".

Then explain how, since you don't believe Jesus brought the remission of sins, Jesus was a better human being and did more for humans than your "heroes" of science, like Jonas Salk, or great politicians like Ronald Reagan, or heck, even liberal trash like Bill Clinton, who fed millions of starving people and helped people with AIDS get medicine (in direct violation of God's Will, but you don't care about such things).

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hi!

It's time for me to say goodbye now! Just saw this thread.

Truly, you are the sickest bunch of animals I have ever had the displeasure to communicate with. I don't believe in God, but if there is a God, you'll burn in hell. Horrible f*cking maggots. Except you godpower97, you're a good christian. The rest of these guys are racist monkeys that haven't evolved into human beings yet.

And for people that are against homosexuality, you sure talk about anal sex a lot. Perhaps there's something you'd like to share? Again, smother and drown, you f*cking rapist c*nts. And to the women here: You truly are dogs and allow yourselves to be treated as such.

Jesus wouldn't even sh*t on one of you.

F*ck you all entirely, and may you die slowly and painfully, arsehole of the earth,
Regards,
An Actual Human Being.


TL DR; I hope a tornado blows through your cesspool of a Bible Belt and forces you to beg for welfare. May children disown you when they're older and more intelligent.

Wow, the "liberal tolerance" shows itself so soon! ("I respect your right to believe anything you want, as long as I agree with it completely.")

Could you kindly explain, using Scripture, why the multiple occasions of Godly men sending their daughters (or concubines) out to be gang-raped in order to distract angry mobs is not a Biblically-acceptable practice?

You see, your "but I think it's a mean thing to do" doesn't cut it. God's opinion is all that matters. He didn't punish anyone for sending out his daughters (or concubines) to be gang-raped; this suggests strongly that it is a Godly practice.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Hi!

Wow, the "liberal tolerance" shows itself so soon! ("I respect your right to believe anything you want, as long as I agree with it completely.")

So much for the one "friendly" atheist on the internet!

[godpower97]

Re: Hi!

Come on guys, can't you understand FriendlyAtheist? Cranky Old Man is saying that it is BIBLICALLY SOUND to let you daughters get raped! This is WRONG. The Bible says repeatably to flee from all sexual immorality. Does raping a little girl with no breasts consititute as sexual immorality? I think so! Can you father's and mother's possibly be saying you would let some guy rape your daughters? And that the Bible backs you up?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Hi!

Come on guys, can't you understand FriendlyAtheist? Cranky Old Man is saying that it is BIBLICALLY SOUND to let you daughters get raped! This is WRONG. The Bible says repeatably to flee from all sexual immorality. Does raping a little girl with no breasts consititute as sexual immorality? I think so! Can you father's and mother's possibly be saying you would let some guy rape your daughters? And that the Bible backs you up?

Have you read the thread in question? In what way is Cranky Old Man failing to quote the Holy Bible? In what way is he interloping his own point of view? If you can show me where he is, I'll eat my hat.

With regard to "letting" my daughters be raped, there is no way Mr. Etheldreda or I will condone our daughters to behave in such a way as to invite premarital sexual relations, regardless of the circumstances thereof.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hi!

Come on guys, can't you understand FriendlyAtheist? Cranky Old Man is saying that it is BIBLICALLY SOUND to let you daughters get raped! This is WRONG. The Bible says repeatably to flee from all sexual immorality. Does raping a little girl with no breasts consititute as sexual immorality? I think so! Can you father's and mother's possibly be saying you would let some guy rape your daughters? And that the Bible backs you up?

Brother Cranky quoted the relevant Scripture in his original post.

Why don't you use Scripture to refute it instead of making vague generalizations about what the Bible would say, if it said what you think it should say, which it doesn't?

You only make yourself and all the other atheists look extra stupid when you make false claims about the Bible's contents.

Your ignorance is astounding.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Hi!

The atheist tigers always show their hate-filled stripes.

Always.

[godpower97]

Re: Hi!

You want scripture? Alright. I'll quote scripture.
Acts 15:20 But should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from sblood.

Galations 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality.

Collosions 3:5 Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.

I am assuming that raping someone constititues as sexual immorality.

And I am not an atheist. Just because I defend an atheist does not make me one. Jesus did not hang out with the religious authorities of his time, but the prostitutes, tax collectors and sinners. In fact, Jesus's closest friends seem to be simple fishermen who weren't smart enough to be rabbis.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Hi!

In fact, Jesus's closest friends seem to be simple fishermen who weren't smart enough to be rabbis.

Rob Bell fan?

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Hi!

***blah blah blah Jesus did not hang out with the religious authorities of his time, but the prostitutes, tax collectors and sinners. blah blah blah ***

Please show me some instances in the Bible where Jesus "hung out" with whores.

Book, chapter, verse.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hi!

You want scripture? Alright. I'll quote scripture.
Acts 15:20 But should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from sblood.

Galations 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality.

Collosions 3:5 Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.

I am assuming that raping someone constititues as sexual immorality.

What does any of that have to do with daughters being property, and it being repeatedly shown to be perfectly acceptable behavior to toss them out to an angry mob to be gang-raped in order to protect yourself or your houseguests?

Nobody here is saying it's OK to rape someone.

Although God did command it on more than one occasion, but the girls who were raped were to be the wives of the rapists. After their parents and brothers were all slaughtered. See Numbers 31 for an example.

And I am not an atheist. Just because I defend an atheist does not make me one. Jesus did not hang out with the religious authorities of his time, but the prostitutes, tax collectors and sinners. In fact, Jesus's closest friends seem to be simple fishermen who weren't smart enough to be rabbis.

Well, you're certainly no Christian!

Jesus didn't "hang out" with prostitutes, tax collectors and sinners. He witnessed to them.

The physician doesn't visit those who are already well, but those who are ill. Likewise, Jesus spent His time with those in need of guidance, not those who already understood and kept the Law.

[godpower97]

Re: Hi!

I don't know who Rob Bell is. Mind elaborating?

Once again, I have scriptures for you!
First, here is one where Jesus stops the people from stoning a prostitute:
John 8:2-11
And one where he eats with sinners:
Matthew 9:9-13

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Hi!

Come on guys, can't you understand FriendlyAtheist? Cranky Old Man is saying that it is BIBLICALLY SOUND to let you daughters get raped! This is WRONG. The Bible says repeatably to flee from all sexual immorality. Does raping a little girl with no breasts consititute as sexual immorality? I think so! Can you father's and mother's possibly be saying you would let some guy rape your daughters? And that the Bible backs you up?

But the Bible does back us up. Lot was the only man saved from Sodom and Gomorrah and part of the reason for his amazing example of moral upstandingness was that he was prepared to give his most valuable property, his virgin daughters, up for rape by a mob rather than the hot male angels that were his guests. Go and read it.

Lot later impregnated both daughters because they got him drunk and seduced him on two consecutive nights but that's OK with God as well as the races the Israelites later slaughtered needed a forefather and a sinful origin.

Go and read it.