A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

**Ezekiel Bathfire** · 05-17-2008, 07:49 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by Glendora Christianson View Post

I'm sorry, but I just couldn't bring my self to type Homosexual Weddings in the title thread . . . (recovering from a shiver) . . . Anyway, in order to keep our weddings pure and church approved, we must get this subject out of the way right now. Then we can move on the the fun stuff! YOUR THOUGHTS???

Well Sister Glendora, I suppose you are starting from the generous and humble proposition that any same-sex marriage is a vile, disgusting, abominable, travesty; a blasphemy of the highest order and a crime against God and that it is so unholy that you are surprised that the catick church isn’t making money out of it?

That said, we must ensure that homers and lezbeans do not soil Landover with their lisping, limp-wristed prancing or, respectively, their ugly fat-chick transvestism, whilst at the same time not offending same such that ACLU would cause us the expense of having to sick our expensive joo lawyers on to them.

I have a thought: First we do not advertise same-sex marriage, this will narrow the intake. Next in distinguishing between Godly, pure and True Christian™ man/woman applicants and these slimy morally bankrupt toads, bent on spreading disease, we must be careful that God does not bless any such festering “coming together”.

To that end I suggest that, as a security measure, we lower prices for “same sex marriages” (my apologies for this evil phrase) by ½% but insist on videoed proof of their perversions so as to qualify for the generous discount.

We will openly admit that all the videos will be placed on YouTube on the grounds that we wish to expose the video to a broad base of experts who can ensure that no trickery has taken place to obtain a cheap wedding and that the video is genuine.

In the few instances where the pornographic-scum applicants actually slither as far as this stage, we will only conduct the “ceremony” through a third party preacher outside of the State of Iowa. Zebulun has a contact in the Garbage Disposal business, a Mr Surprino, and he has a landfill site on the outskirts of Detroit – this would make a suitable setting.

**Bobby-Joe** · 05-17-2008, 08:05 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by Glendora Christianson View Post

I'm sorry, but I just couldn't bring my self to type Homosexual Weddings in the title thread . . . (recovering from a shiver) . . . Anyway, in order to keep our weddings pure and church approved, we must get this subject out of the way right now. Then we can move on the the fun stuff! YOUR THOUGHTS???

What next, raging mobs of bigots beating people to death in the streets when the mode takes them? That's the kind of America the gays are creating with their disgusting agenda.

**JennyD** · 05-17-2008, 08:33 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

I'm so grateful that it's only in Californicatia that this has happened. Well, and Masturbachusetts.

The good news is that Godly Californians (there are quite a few, it seems) voted overwhelmingly to ban same-sex marriages with the state law the court struck down, and are now organizing to amend their state constitution!

Californians by and large don't care what Gavin Newsome says; Sacramento is the capital, not San Fransissyco!

**~~AubreyO'Connel~~** · 06-03-2008, 10:02 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Im gay, and im proud... Ye are just jelous ye dont suck lovely ***** like me, yummy

**Bob4God** · 06-03-2008, 10:19 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by AubreyO'Connel View Post

Im gay, and im proud... Ye are just jelous ye dont suck lovely ***** like me, yummy

That kind of filthy language shouldn't even be ALLOWED anywhere NEAR this forum!

And please, who could possibly be jealous of sucking, well, whatever it is that you enjoy sucking so much, you hell-bound homo!

**Eugene Hackwith** · 06-11-2008, 02:52 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

I thank the LORD that I live in the Midwest, where the homos are limited to having "commitment ceremonies". I wish it was still the 1950's, when homosexuality was still considered a mental illness. Then we could have proper commitment ceremonies...a celebration of putting homers in the psychiatric hospitals, where they belong!

**Glendora Christianson** · 06-11-2008, 03:36 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by Eugene Hackwith View Post

I thank the LORD that I live in the Midwest, where the homos are limited to having "commitment ceremonies". I wish it was still the 1950's, when homosexuality was still considered a mental illness. Then we could have proper commitment ceremonies...a celebration of putting homers in the psychiatric hospitals, where they belong!

This reminds me of an idea I had . . . a combination mental hospital for homers and a doily factory! Remember I thought of it first!

Attached Files

**Eugene Hackwith** · 06-11-2008, 03:47 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by Glendora Christianson View Post

This reminds me of an idea I had . . . a combination mental hospital for homers and a doily factory! Remember I thought of it first!

Great idea! It's an activity that they can enjoy and engage in in between their electro-shock treatments and group therapy.

**Talitha** · 06-11-2008, 09:21 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

This kind of thing is even worse than a Nigra Buck marrying a True Christian™ innocent Virgin.
It's there just to mock the Holy Union of a heterosexual white Man and a heterosexual white Woman, and adds to the persecution of Christians everywhere.

Jesus Weeps.

**Daisy Mae Johnson** · 06-11-2008, 02:05 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

I thin even Satan threw up in his mouth a little bit when these homely faggits got "married".

Attached Files

**SUV** · 06-11-2008, 02:16 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

And to think some sinners still contemplate voting for that Baraaaaaaaack! after he done did this (that's him on the left, as usual)

These demonrats will do anything to get votes, I Swear Jesus:

**Pastor Isaac Peters** · 06-18-2008, 04:24 PM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

True Christian™ men may wish to preview this post to determine whether it is suitable for the women and children over whom they have headship.

Since the lezbertarians have booted men out of their lives, they now have to get uppity with one another. Behold the lezbianese Bridezillas!

Saying ‘I Do,’ Making History, Planning a Party

HAILE HAYDEN didn’t grow up eating bland chicken breasts and steamed vegetables, so she certainly wasn’t going to feed them to the 120 people coming to her wedding in July.

Ms. Hayden, who is from New Orleans and lives in northern California, plans to serve food that fits her rustic-chic theme. She wants bold dishes that guests can eat standing up. She wants tapas.

“Like appetizers?” the caterer asked her at a recent menu meeting.

“No,” she recalled telling him. “Something more substantial. Tapas.”

“Right,” he said. “Like appetizers.”

Ms. Hayden fumed, at which point the other bride-to-be jumped in. “You don’t know my wife,” said the other half of the couple, Jill Benson. “You have to call them tapas.”

**Virginia Day Templeton** · 06-19-2008, 01:31 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

I'm not aware of a single decent argument for allowing sodomites to "marry." Not one. In the end, it all comes down to the emotionalist appeal of hurrrrrrrrrrrr they love each other! Yeah? A lot of people say they love their cars. Should I be able to divorce Gary and tie the knot with my Lexus IS 200?

**Pastor Isaac Peters** · 06-19-2008, 01:50 AM

Re: A Comment on Homosexual We__ings

Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View Post

I'm not aware of a single decent argument for allowing sodomites to "marry." Not one. In the end, it all comes down to the emotionalist appeal of hurrrrrrrrrrrr they love each other! Yeah? A lot of people say they love their cars. Should I be able to divorce Gary and tie the knot with my Lexus IS 200?

Excellent point, Sister. I don't lightly quote unsaved Hellyweird entertaineresses, but what's love got to do with it?

Exodus 21:7-8: And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her.

Deut. 22:28-29: If a man find a damsel [that is] a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

Does anyone imagine that the woman who is bought as merchandise loves her purchaser or that the rape victim loves her rapist? God doesn't care. Their marriages are sacred in God's eyes, and the sacred institution that encompasses those marriages must be protected from homer "marriages."