X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LeVey666
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Flat, eh? Then how do planes fly around the world? How do boats sail around the world? Do they just...fall off and then miraculously appear on the other side? Why don't they get sucked into space? By the way, Bobby-Joe, that group you belong to, Citizens United and Not Timid, ever notice what it stands for? CUNT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magikarp
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by Ahimaaz Smith View Post
    Nobody is changing anything, you are just paranoid-delusional. Trust me, we don't care enough about your opinions even to read what you say, so why would we bother editing it?
    He's right, you know.

    Besides, if someone were to edit your post, it would say at the bottom: Last edited at xxxxxx by xxxxx. Reason:xxxxxx

    No one is editing your posts, Jimi.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ahimaaz Smith
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by James Genesis View Post
    to all of you 'true christians', you all seem to believe that the world was made in 6 days by god, yet science proves that the world was made from 'the big bang'
    God put that evidence in the sky to test your faith. I'm sorry to see that you didn't pass the test. If you want to discover the truth about the lie that is the "Big Bang," I suggest you read the thread that we already have on that topic, rather than discussing it in the Flat Earth thread.

    if it meant going into surgery and sticking to modern day science or holding together youre hands and praying ...youd pick science..
    think about it.
    Science has proved again and again that having churchmates, family, and friends praying improves medical outcomes significantly. But if you want to be the only guy praying when you face a major illness, be my guest.

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    He said mormon!!
    I said moron, not mormon. Can't you read?

    Change what he said, just like you did it to me!!!!!
    Nobody is changing anything, you are just paranoid-delusional. Trust me, we don't care enough about your opinions even to read what you say, so why would we bother editing it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by James Genesis View Post
    to all of you 'true christians', you all seem to believe that the world was made in 6 days by god, yet science proves that the world was made from 'the big bang', so therefore you all should be againt all of the scientists who enforce this idea as they are arguing against the bible . so therefore , to all of you christians , you should want nothing to do with these men and women right ?
    No, we want to save them from Hell. If it means torturig each and every one of them until they beg for Christ’s forgiveness for teaching EVILution so be it. We love these people.

    Originally posted by James Genesis View Post
    you'll think again when its science saving youre arse and not jesus.
    anyway wat im getting at is that youre all 2 faced because you only choose to believe in the bible as long as you have to, but if it meant going into surgery and sticking to modern day science or holding together youre hands and praying ...youd pick science..
    think about it .
    Since Jesus loves us a TRUE Christian™ never get sick. Doctors are only perverts out to undermine the suffering decreed by God.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonesy
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    A very valid point you have made james. Lets see how they responed to this.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Genesis
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    to all of you 'true christians', you all seem to believe that the world was made in 6 days by god, yet science proves that the world was made from 'the big bang', so therefore you all should be againt all of the scientists who enforce this idea as they are arguing against the bible . so therefore , to all of you christians , you should want nothing to do with these men and women right ?

    you'll think again when its science saving youre arse and not jesus.
    anyway wat im getting at is that youre all 2 faced because you only choose to believe in the bible as long as you have to, but if it meant going into surgery and sticking to modern day science or holding together youre hands and praying ...youd pick science..
    think about it .

    Leave a comment:


  • just Jimi
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by Ahimaaz Smith View Post
    If you ever make up your mind on this issue, please let us know. Otherwise, everyone in here will think you are some kind of moron.
    He said moron!!
    Change what he said, just like you did it to me!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ahimaaz Smith
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by Jonesy View Post
    People could still take photos of other planets before 1946.
    What the Hell do pictures of other planets have to do with whether the Earth is flat?

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    I said mormons and not mormons!
    If you ever make up your mind on this issue, please let us know. Otherwise, everyone in here will think you are some kind of moron.

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    I must say I find your contradictions quite amusing:
    loe and behold! The topic where you al say the Earth is round
    Stop lying about what we True Christians™ believe. Here is what Pastor Pistle said:

    Originally posted by Pastor Al E Pistle
    The LORD caused rain for forty days and forty nights. The pagans drowned. The earth filled with water like a sponge and became round.
    Where in there does it say that the Earth is still round? It became round because it was waterlogged like a sponge. When the waters of the Great Flood receded, it became flat again. No True Christian™ thinks the Earth remained round, since, if that had happened, how could the Devil have taken Jesus to a mountain from which He could survey all of the nations of the Earth in Matthew 4:8? How could the four angels stand on the four corners of the Earth in Revelation 7:1?

    Lo and behold, another lie by Peter. What shock.

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    I curse and swear when I want! I know enough words and you cannot change them all!!!
    Your parents must be very proud of your large vocabulary!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonesy
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    HALLOWED ARE THE ORI!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    just you wait mr..........
    just you wait.......
    You'll sick the none-existent Belgium army on me?

    Leave a comment:


  • just Jimi
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    just you wait mr..........
    just you wait.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    Stop changing what I say!! I curse and swear when I want! I know enough words and you cannot change them all!!!
    Not on our forum. Remember you are the guest here.

    Leave a comment:


  • just Jimi
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by just Jimi View Post
    I said mormons and not mormons!
    Thou shall not change words of other people!!
    Stop changing what I say!! I curse and swear when I want! I know enough words and you cannot change them all!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ahimaaz Smith
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    Originally posted by F. Nietzsche View Post
    Dark, though, is merely the abscense of light, not a state in of itself.
    Two responses. First, how are we to go about sorting the world into "states in of themselves" and "states not in of themselves?" That distinction puzzles me. Second, let's take a close look at the chronology of the First Day:

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. Genesis 1:1-5

    We see that there was darkness originally and then there was light, and only after that did God divide the light from the darkness. So, at some point in the First Day, the darkness and the light were all mixed together. So I can't support the statement that darkness is merely the nonexistence of light.

    If light and darkness exist prior to the sun, there must be some other source of energy capable of emitting sufficent levels of luminosity to provide for day night cycles.
    True enough. That source of energy is God.

    I don't think it's feasible to perform a redshift calculation for an object so close,
    Relative velocity and the nature of the medium through which the light travels explain redshift, not the distance. But I think what you're saying is that we should be able to measure the redshift of the light from the Sun as it moves through the sky. Unfortunately, you are still making the false assumption that the light of day comes from the Sun. The light of day has NOTHING whatsoever to do with the Sun. The Sun isn't the source of "sunlight," it is just the orb that God created to rule the day. Of course, since it is only visible during the day, it has to be very bright to be seen.

    I don't see how the Bible could be any clearer on this point. Day existed before God created the Sun.

    Coronal mass ejections, essentially large eruptions from the sun's surface are readily visible shortly after they occur as per the observation of the sun (within 8 minutes),
    How do you know it is 8 minutes? Has somebody been standing on the "surface" of the Sun with a stopwatch?

    and their immediate speed is possible to measure, to an extent, equally, the time it takes for the particles expelled in a CME to reach us is measureable in hours.
    CME travel time is measured starting with the assumption that the Sun is millions of miles away. That assumption is wrong, so the conclusion you reach on velocity is wrong.

    Suffice to say, a 50 mile distant sun would at speeds of CMEs (20km/s-2700km/s) hit the Earth within seconds of being observed, rather than the hours it currently takes in the differential between observed eruption and impact to the Earth's magnetosphere.
    I'm still puzzled by why you think you know when the CME left the "surface" of the Sun.

    I apologize, it's my rhetorical style, not necessarily me being dismissive.
    OK. Although you are just wrong about the astronomy, I must say you seem an intelligent enough chap, and it is a pleasure debating you, so I will try not to focus on your rhetoric and instead stick to the science. Truth be told, I'm guilty of the occasional rhetorical flourish myself, and generally not to my credit.

    There's a variety of means that could be used to show Polaris is in fact much more distant than a mere 50 miles. Redshift is one, parallax is another. If you want me to give you the math for these, I will, along with a further explination.
    Redshift and parallax are real phenomena, and the math isn't very difficult, so I think we can skip that (simple wave mechanics and trigonometry, respectively). But they must be caused by the refraction of the atmosphere, not by motion of/distance of various heavenly bodies.

    Not necessarily me copping out, just more along the lines of not wanting to turn this discussion into an overly technical one.
    But without the evidence and the give and take of debate, how will we discover the truth? Sure, we can discover the truth by reading the Bible, but, unfortunately, that doesn't seem to convince a lot of the non-Christians in the Landover Forums, and I wouldn want them to think that we haven't carefully considered the science.

    Effectively, if the Earth was as you claimed, the difference in observed vs mathematically consistent acceleration is about 80, meaning objects would fall about 80x slower than observed if your model was correct.
    Ah, now I see your error. You are ignoring the pull of gravity from Hell (particularly the Lake of Fire), which is below the Earth. Add that mass back in, and your formula works perfectly the rate of descent of objects in the gravitational field near Earth.

    I was going to also go into hydrostatic equilibrium as a means for showing the Earth being impossible except in rounded form, sadly, it uses PDEs in the process and I've never gone beyond Calc II in terms of mathematics (of that, even, I remember very little). So I won't even bring it up any further.
    Earth is too stiff because of the adamantine skeleton. I agree, if there were no framework holding the flat Earth in place and the full gravitational mass in the vicinity of the Earth were due to the Earth itself, and not to Hell, too (which accounts for the vast majority, it turns out), the equations would yield an energy minimum (and therefore the equilibrium) with a nearly spherical Earth. But factoring in Hellish geometry and the unique stiffness of the metallic floor of the Earth, a flattened Earth is easily possible.

    Anyway, no need to apologize for not having studied more math, you can be proud of making it through Calculus II.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: Flat Earth? Hell Yes!

    A reply composed of numbers drawn from statistical analysis of data by so-called "scientists" and a whole mess of arbitrary man-made units is hardly going to be much proof before The Word of The Lord, is it?

    “The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine man in the bonds of Hell.”
    -- St. Augustine (354-430)

    Leave a comment:

Working...