[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

let me just spin your statement around a bit.

non-christians exist - - therefore christianity is false.

is this proof enough for you?

or will i get a response of "well gods word is the truth and he says evolution isnt true. and no one can argue with god"

First of all, this is NOT a debate forum. Please read THIS thread before making an even bigger fool of yourself.

Secondly, while the internets might seem to be "free" to you, this particular corner of the internets is a privately owned Christian forum. The rights you have on this forum are listed HERE. Please contact a Pastor immediately if you feel that any of your rights have been violated.

Finally, your unsaved opinions or tantrums are not even slightly of interest to us. We follow the Holy Word of God TO THE LETTER, and make no apologies for that. One of the most important commandments in the Bible tells us to avoid unsaved scum such as yourself. You wandered in here uninvited, and unwelcome.

I will pray that the Holy Spirit enter you and chase the demons out of your rectum and let Jesus fill you with His Grace. If you use your God-given free will to reject Christ and His temporary death on the cross for my sins, then you are sending yourself to hellfire.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes, those are stories atheists tell to their children because they refuse to believe God causes earthquakes.

Science fabricates evidence, there is a difference. Just Google climategate or look at: PROOF scientists are liars (The Times).

so 2 incidints of scientists being wrong or trying to get money out of people is enough for you to throw out science as a whole?

well i can think of various things christians have done wrong in the past so does that mean that the bible is false? let me guess... no its not because gods word is truth

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

non-christians exist - - therefore christianity is false. is this proof enough for you?

That proves nothing. You exist therefore you are an idiot on the other hand proves that you are an idiot.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That proves nothing. You exist therefore you are an idiot on the other hand proves that you are an idiot.

if you hadnt noticed that was my reply to someones elses comments.

you still havent answered my question:

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
Yes, those are stories atheists tell to their children because they refuse to believe God causes earthquakes.

Science fabricates evidence, there is a difference. Just Google climategate or look at: PROOF scientists are liars (The Times).

so 2 incidints of scientists being wrong or trying to get money out of people is enough for you to throw out science as a whole?

well i can think of various things christians have done wrong in the past so does that mean that the bible is false? let me guess... no its not because gods word is truth

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i'll reiterate my question in case anyone missed it

The bible was written around 1450 bc. If adam and eve existed in around 4000 bc then why is it that In 6000 bc there already existed a story similar to the modern day bible.

And also in addition to that question if the earth was (in the bible) created in 4000bc then why are there carvings and stories (similar to the bible) from 6000bc? Surely if the earth didn’t exist this could not be true? Yet it is

[James Hutchins]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Scripture or it did not happen. Show me in the wonderus Bible, where these dates are given.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Scripture or it did not happen. Show me in the wonderus Bible, where these dates are given.

so using that logic. TV's and the internet are not mentioned in scripture. does that mean they dont exist?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

so using that logic. TV's and the internet are not mentioned in scripture. does that mean they dont exist?

That's not what he said.

Why are you so hateful? What did God ever do to you?

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That's not what he said.

Why are you so hateful? What did God ever do to you?

i'm not hateful and god (is she exists) hasnt done anything to me as far as i know.

you wanted questions answering so i answered.

he said "Scripture or it did not happen."

so by that logic if it doesnt appear in the bible then it never happened. correct?

so the invention of the car isnt in the bible. did this not happen?

or the invention of the lightbulb. did that not happen?

my point being just because it isnt in the bible doesnt mean it never happend or is false

[grantedgrace]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Everything you said was correct however the Dodo Bird became extinct because it was hunted.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Everything you said was correct however the Dodo Bird became extinct because it was hunted.

thanks. i'm sure i put it was hunted.....

[grantedgrace]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

thanks. i'm sure i put it was hunted.....

You misunderstand. I was referring to friend Bobby-Joe, when he stated

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct.

That is so silly. Earth is only about 6000 years old.

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evolution predicts no such thing. You are assuming things about evolution that have not even been said.

Yes, it does. According to evolution, predator and prey co-evolve in an "Arms Race." There is no sufficient explanation for why there are no land sharks.

And. The sea is full of marine life. Enough to keep a shark happy so that’s why he hasn’t changed.

If sharks evolved to live both on the sea and the land, there could even have been more sharks kept happy. Why didn't this happen?

It could quite easily have been an underground river that burst to the surface. Ever heard of tectonic plates?

1. Mars is tectonically inactive
2. How would that water become locked under the ground? Who put it there?

Well you survived. But seriously doctors know what there doing.

Yes, but stupid people don't. That was more or less my point.
You yourself are living proof that evolution is a lie, as someone so argumentative yet oblivious to reality like you would have been eaten out of existence by tigers long ago if there really had been an "Age of Prehistoric Man."
If someone would shout: "There's a tiger!" someone with your genes would either say: "of course not, that's a lion, you idiot," and get eaten, or fail to see that there is any feline predator at all, and get eaten.

But we never needed to. Two arms are just fine. You have used the example of a third arm because it is more obvious.

According to lying evilutionists, the individuals with the highest "fitness" would survive. It doesn't matter if something works, if something else works better, like three arms vs only two arms, the better design would survive.
As we have only two arms, we can say with great certainty that evolution is a dumb myth.

No. the desire to have an abortion hasn’t been around long enough to evolve anything towards it.

What? How do you know that? And why would that desire "evolve" in the first place?

I never said it destroyed matter. all the matter from decomposition has been buried and compressed down into the earth.

So according to you, we live on thick layers of decompressed compost? That's stupid. Only a fraction of the earth surface is covered with organic-rich material (soil). Oceans, deserts and mountains aren't. By the way, you should have to compact it really tightly to prevent filling the oceans up with it.

Science shows evidence. The bible shows a story…. I think I prefer evidence. I’m not saying god doesn’t exist but there are holes in your stories, contradictions in the bible.

So I take it that you have no proof of evolution, outside the "proof" your religion (science) offers?
And there are no contradictions in the Bible. Apparent contradictions are the result of the imperfect human mind failing to understand God's Wisdom.

Maybe they had it naturally and there has been no point in using it since so we lost the ability. You hear of people who talk to horses and dogs. Maybe they are the remnants of our ability to talk to animals.

That is pure speculation. People talk to animals because they project human feelings and emotions on those animals. Animals have no language like we have.

No are you? You asked how can a species survive with so few of them. In the cave episode of plant earth you will see that entire species live in a single pool. Its therefore quite possible that a small amount of loch ness monsters have survived in one lake.

The Loch Ness Monster is big. To have a stable population, you need several individuals. Loch Ness is simply too small and too fragile to hold an entire population of Loch Ness Monsters.

some trees live thousands of years. You also have to take into account gravity.

Well, why couldn't they evolve a longer lifespan then, if they needed that? And why didn't they evolve something against gravity (which is a lie, by the way, things fall because of Intelligent Falling)?

Why are you a monkey? No you’re a person with morals and ideals and (I assume) throwing faeces isn’t one of them.

Exactly. That proves I'm no monkey or "primate," as evolution contends. Otherwise, I would still be throwing feces all over the place.

They haven’t needed to evolve into humans. They are comfortable in their own environment and have adapted as such.

If it was more advantageous to live in the forest, then why did our "ancestors" leave that place? If it wasn't, why didn't the monkeys evolve into humans as well?

No I am not I am saying that some species have been hunted to extinction. Either by humans or other animals.

And this proves the evolutionary idea of species dying out over long timespans false.

Biblical proof? The bible was written by more than 60 people and has been re-written more times than I’ve had hot dinners. There is no proof in the bible. Only belief and faith. So maybe your belief and faith have blinded you and chimeras have never existed.

The Bible was written by God. The hands who wrote it were human, but were guided by God. It is irrational to doubt that, because God, being almighty, could have made the humans write whatever He liked. As He apparently likes the Bible as it is now, it means that that is God's story, and therefore the Irrefutable Truth™.

Maybe she didn’t want them to know about her previous incarnations of humans.

1. The Bible is very clear that God is a He.
2. Why would God hide this from us? The Bible clearly speaks about God creating one man, Adam, and one woman, Eve. The Bible leaves no place for other "hominids."

Because they don’t live long enough to pass on any protective genes to their young.


That's just stupid. According to genetics, every creature passes half of its genes on to its offspring, whether they live long or short. If these spiders didn't, how would its offspring know where to put the legs and where to put the eyes? Creatures need genes to exist. Duh.

The Biblical records stop there as well. Isn't it an amazing coincidence that Henry's genealogy stopped exactly at the same point as Biblical genealogies?
I'd say that, if Adam and Eve weren't the first people on earth, at least one of these genealogies would start earlier or later than another. However, they start with the same people, so this means that they really were the first people on earth.

Whats to say that there are no records that go back any further than that? Maybe people didn’t keep records before this point. Or maybe they did and they were lost or destroyed.

Maybe, maybe. You are not really sure of this aren't you? And meanwhile, you skip my main point, which was that there are hundreds of generations between either Jesus or Henry on one hand, and Adam on the other hand. Why do these genealogies, with hundreds of generations to choose from, stop at exactly the same generation? Do you know how small the odds are for that, girl?

Or maybe todays modern moose and other antlered animals are unicorns?

No, they aren't. Unicorns have one horn, not antlers or two horns. If evolution were true, they would evolve into mooses or something like them perhaps. But seeing that they didn't, we can conclude evolution is a falsehood.

Or maybe one celled organisms exist because they can exist in the most extreme environments and adapt as they see fit.

They exist in every environment. But that's beside the question. You haven't explained to me why there aren't hordes of two-, three- or four-celled organisms crawling around, as intermediates between unicellular and multicellular organisms.

But mud isn’t “alive” as such.

Exactly! So how could life evolve from mud, if mud isn't alive? Everyone knows that that can't happen.

And do you?

Yes, I do. Chemicals do not think because evolution is a lie.

I see what your saying but…. We have clothes that we wear. There is no need for us to evolve natural clothes. In fact we have lost out natural clothing (although we retain some of it in the form of hairs on our back and head and private parts etc etc).

What? Why would we have evolved that away? If we had hairs, we wouldn't need clothing, would we? So why would we start wearing clothes then? That makes no sense. Likewise, it makes no sense to start having less hair, as hair is needed for insulation.

Let me put this to you then. The bible was written around 1450 bc. If adam and eve existed in around 4000 bc then why is it that In 6000 bc there already existed a story similar to the modern day bible.

Huh? There was nothing in 6000 BC. That was 2000 years before Creation Day, girl! Who told you those lunacies?

And also in addition to that question if the earth was (in the bible) created in 4000bc then why are there carvings and stories (similar to the bible) from 6000bc? Surely if the earth didn’t exist this could not be true? Yet it is

No it is not. After all, how could you possibly know that those carvings would be 8000 years old?

[grantedgrace]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That is so silly. Earth is only about 6000 years old.

I would appreciate it if you didnt misquote me. I did not say that. If you read what I was saying my friend, you would have seen that I was quoting the main article.