[grey goose]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I'm sorry you feel this way, but we must make a distinction between philosophical differences and personal attacks.
I am explaining myself as best I can without causing offence. I think some people on this board are deliberately going out of their way to cause offence, even when it is not directly related to the point under discussion.

anything you do that does not Glorify Jesus causes me offense. You still cant answer my question can you?

Read Genesis if you want to know where we came from. I dont know why science made microscopes and telescopes and all that stuff when all you need are your eyes. Read, heathen friend.

[Asha28]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Thanks Goose,

If evolution were real, dinos would have evolved into humans (logically) and we'd have dino traits.

Evolutionary theory does not suggest that there is a single line of decent, from micro-organisms to flatfish, to fish, to amphibians, to dinosaurs, to monkeys, to humans. Instead, it is more of a network pattern, or tree. At certain points a population may undergo speciation, producing two separate species, unable to reproduce together (Think rats and mice). These can then evolve separately, and through genetic drift become very different from each other. This accounts for the existence of many species at the same time. Mammals are the descendants of Therapsids, a sister group which speciated off the dinosaur lineage 285 MYA. In this way, dinosaurs are a cousin species (albeit distant) of humans. Have a lookie at this...

If creation isn't real, why do we look like God???? He created us in his image, therefore i guess you could say we "evolved" from God.

Interesting. Could you please tell me what God looks like. Is there a description in the Bible that describes his features? I must admit, Although I've read quite a few books of the Bible, I've never gone all the way through it.

[Asha28]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You still cant answer my question can you?

Sorry, I was trying to be comprehensive. Which one did I miss?

Asha28

[Petal]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Have a lookie at this...

i be lookin but i not see no crocoduck betweens the crocodiles an the birdie . it silly cuz the pickture say that dinosaws an birdies kinda be the sames, an that not true!

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Because they have evolved to hunt in water. Which they are perfect for.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

Well considering noah’s flood (if it occurred. I still have questions as to: well if the great flood happened because god was displeased then why hasn’t it happened again?) happened in around 4490bc and the flood on mars occurred some 3.5 billion years ago I don’t think they are related.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Medical advancements. I know someone has said “well they cant afford it” etc etc but medical advancements have helped them. And before medicine existed people who were retarded or disabled were killed at birth. But that does mean that evolution to stop disability cannot happen because those people were killed much like the spider you ask about later on.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Do we need a third arm? Who’s to say we aren’t perfect already? We may make bad decisions and such but that’s not to say our bodies and design aren’t perfect

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature (I assume you meant to say nurture?) our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

If you were raped by a serial rapist who is known for his violence. Would you like to have his child? No you wouldn’t. and for those who have abortions who haven’t been raped. That’s their decision and I don’t like it either but if they KNOW they cant raise that child properly then why would you keep it?

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

One word: decomposition.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Do you have proof (other than the bible. For example a fossil or something?) that they did exist? Evolutionists have fossils to show that there were dinosaurs and Neolithic himans etc.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Maybe adam and eve spoke snake?

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

Watch planet earth: caves. This shows that there are entire species living in a single pool.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Because trees have a life span. Also when you go so far up theres not enough oxygen.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

By service ourselves I assume you mean tossing off?

Well monkeys and humans have a shared common ancestor. Monkeys went one way in evolution and we went the other.

(see the post by Asha28)

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Do you want to kill monkeys? You sicko! But seriously. Evolution does predict that the stronger of the species can exterminate the weaker but why do we need to? We don’t. that’s why they are still around.


Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

Dodo’s were hunted to extinction.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

Again whats to say dragons and unicorns existed? This is just a joke question.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

The bible was started in around 1450Bc. Neanderthals existed 200,000 years ago. Its extremely possible that humans at the time of the bible simply didn’t know of Neanderthals.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

Spiders do have an anti-wasp poison. They just need to bite the wasp first and what you’ve asked would be reversed. The spiders would/could lay their eggs in the wasp.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

I’m no genealogist. But it could have happened like this. Incest occurred in the family. People went there separate ways to various parts of the world then after X amount of years they joined again after having “evolved” slightly differently.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

And? Whats to say it stopped at adam and eve? Maybe that’s just as far back as they can go before records stop.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Fighting.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

They decayed and dissolve. Just like the 150billion humans in your other question.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

Darwin never said “a pile of mud turned into a fish, then into monkeys etc etc”. a muddy environment was probably the ideal place fro things to grow. Water, warmth, and various other chemicals and such

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

I don’t know why don’t they? Bug spray and gasoline are a mixture of maybe up to a hundred chemicals. The human mind is made up of thousands and thousands of different chemicals. Nobody has explained thought just yet. There are a few more ideas that lean towards the fact that the synapses are where our thoughts can originate from.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Because we don’t need it as we have clothes.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i be lookin but i not see no crocoduck betweens the crocodiles an the birdie . it silly cuz the pickture say that dinosaws an birdies kinda be the sames, an that not true!

Also, primates are the best kind of animal because they're the most similar to us (this is especially important for monkey-worshipping evilutionists). So logically, the best animal should be at one end of the diagram. According to that image, either sharks or dinosaurs and birds are the best animal and the most similar to humans, which is clearly untrue. What utter rot.

[grey goose]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I see lots of words, Michele, but no scripture. God didn't copy and paste when he wrote the Bible!

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I see lots of words, Michele, but no scripture. God didn't copy and paste when he wrote the Bible!

and neither did i. you wanted some answers so i answered.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I'm sorry you feel this way, but we must make a distinction between philosophical differences and personal attacks.
I am explaining myself as best I can without causing offence. I think some people on this board are deliberately going out of their way to cause offence, even when it is not directly related to the point under discussion.

i hear you my friend.

[grey goose]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i hear you my friend.

What you don't realize is that its rather offensive for you to tell me that Jesus isn't real. There are two sides to this, and I'm secure in my belief in Jesus

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Because they have evolved to hunt in water. Which they are perfect for.

How often do we need to rebuke this one?
Sharks were the natural predators of other fishes. If some fishes would crawl on the land, sharks that could do the same would gain an advantage. Evolution predicts that sharks therefore should grow legs. The absence of such creatures disprove evolution effectively.

Well considering noah’s flood (if it occurred. I still have questions as to: well if the great flood happened because god was displeased then why hasn’t it happened again?) happened in around 4490bc and the flood on mars occurred some 3.5 billion years ago I don’t think they are related.

The point is that floods on Mars could only be caused by God.

Medical advancements. I know someone has said “well they cant afford it” etc etc but medical advancements have helped them. And before medicine existed people who were retarded or disabled were killed at birth. But that does mean that evolution to stop disability cannot happen because those people were killed much like the spider you ask about later on.

Hogwash. Stupid people are more prone to take the wrong kind of medicine, or take too much or too little of it, because they are stupid. According to evolution, they should die out because of this. They didn't.

Do we need a third arm? Who’s to say we aren’t perfect already? We may make bad decisions and such but that’s not to say our bodies and design aren’t perfect

If we had three arms, we could, for example, hold one more stick, and in the case of evolution's supposed "ancestral humans," it would be useful to hold one more stick than your opponent, as it would win you fights and gain you access to females. As we haven't evolved a third arm, this means evolution is wrong.

If you were raped by a serial rapist who is known for his violence. Would you like to have his child? No you wouldn’t. and for those who have abortions who haven’t been raped. That’s their decision and I don’t like it either but if they KNOW they cant raise that child properly then why would you keep it?

This doesn't disprove in any way that you have the desire to kill those babies. According to evolution, girls who tend to keep their babies will have more offspring than girls who do not, and as such the desire to have abortions, even in cases like this, should have died out long ago. Evolution loses again.

One word: decomposition.

You are very wrong. Decomposition does not destroy matter, that is physically impossible. It changes matter into other kinds of matter, which would have covered the earth by now.

Do you have proof (other than the bible. For example a fossil or something?) that they did exist? Evolutionists have fossils to show that there were dinosaurs and Neolithic himans etc.

The phrase "proof other than the bible" is an oxymor-on. Only God knows everything, so His Word is the only absolute proof there is. And the Bible speaks of Angels and Demons.
However, many sightings of these are reported yearly, so even without the Bible, there is proof.

Let me ask the same question to you then: do you have proof (other than science) that evolution happened?

Maybe adam and eve spoke snake?

But my dear atheist, who would have taught them that?

Watch planet earth: caves. This shows that there are entire species living in a single pool.

The Loch Ness Monster doesn't live in a cave, but in a lake. Are you stupid?

Because trees have a life span. Also when you go so far up theres not enough oxygen.

Why didn't they evolve a longer lifespan then? And adaptations to oxygen poor environments?

By service ourselves I assume you mean tossing off?

Well monkeys and humans have a shared common ancestor. Monkeys went one way in evolution and we went the other.

This is not an answer to the question. I've never in my life thrown feces at other people. If evolution were true, I would have.

Do you want to kill monkeys? You sicko! But seriously. Evolution does predict that the stronger of the species can exterminate the weaker but why do we need to? We don’t. that’s why they are still around.

No, we do not want to kill monkeys. The point is, if humans evolved from monkeys, then, according to evolution, it would apparently be advantageous for monkeys to evolve into humans.
As other monkeys haven't evolved into humans, this means that evolution fails the test again.

Dodo’s were hunted to extinction.

So? Are you saying animals didn't hunt long ago?

Again whats to say dragons and unicorns existed? This is just a joke question.

Biblical Proof, girl, Biblical Proof. Evolution, however, cannot account for these creatures, as they are chimaeras, which cannot exist according to evolution.

The bible was started in around 1450Bc. Neanderthals existed 200,000 years ago. Its extremely possible that humans at the time of the bible simply didn’t know of Neanderthals.

What did it matter whether humans knew anything? They didn't know how the world originated until God told them how. If there were Neanderthals, why wouldn't God have told his children about them?

Spiders do have an anti-wasp poison. They just need to bite the wasp first and what you’ve asked would be reversed. The spiders would/could lay their eggs in the wasp

Why didn't a spider evolve that could paralyze the wasp, but is immune to the wasp poison?

I’m no genealogist. But it could have happened like this. Incest occurred in the family. People went there separate ways to various parts of the world then after X amount of years they joined again after having “evolved” slightly differently.

Of course not. They would all have carried deformities in their genes. These are the result of lack of genetic variation, according to geneticists. They weren't, and this proves that things were quite different back then.

And? Whats to say it stopped at adam and eve? Maybe that’s just as far back as they can go before records stop.

The Biblical records stop there as well. Isn't it an amazing coincidence that Henry's genealogy stopped exactly at the same point as Biblical genealogies?
I'd say that, if Adam and Eve weren't the first people on earth, at least one of these genealogies would start earlier or later than another. However, they start with the same people, so this means that they really were the first people on earth.

Fighting.

You can't fight well with one horn. If evolution were true, unicorns would have evolved either two horns or antlers or something.

They decayed and dissolve. Just like the 150billion humans in your other question.

Being stupid, you misunderstand the question, of course.
The point is, if we gradually evolved from one-celled ancestors, than why are there so many one-celled ancestors around, but so few two- or three celled? Why do only one-celled and many-celled organisms exist? The only explanation is that God liked it more that way. Evolution fails again.

Darwin never said “a pile of mud turned into a fish, then into monkeys etc etc”. a muddy environment was probably the ideal place fro things to grow. Water, warmth, and various other chemicals and such

But those "things" you babble about would originate from mud. If it was advantageous for mud to evolve into "things," why hasn't all mud evolved into "things" by now?

I don’t know why don’t they? Bug spray and gasoline are a mixture of maybe up to a hundred chemicals. The human mind is made up of thousands and thousands of different chemicals. Nobody has explained thought just yet. There are a few more ideas that lean towards the fact that the synapses are where our thoughts can originate from.

That's a rather elaborate way to say that, girl. Simply "I don't know" will do.

Because we don’t need it as we have clothes.

You're turning the question on its head now. The point is, if we had natural clothing, we wouldn't need other kinds of clothing.

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

How often do we need to rebuke this one?
Sharks were the natural predators of other fishes. If some fishes would crawl on the land, sharks that could do the same would gain an advantage. Evolution predicts that sharks therefore should grow legs. The absence of such creatures disprove evolution effectively.

Evolution predicts no such thing. You are assuming things about evolution that have not even been said.
And. The sea is full of marine life. Enough to keep a shark happy so that’s why he hasn’t changed.

The point is that floods on Mars could only be caused by God.

It could quite easily have been an underground river that burst to the surface. Ever heard of tectonic plates?

Hogwash. Stupid people are more prone to take the wrong kind of medicine, or take too much or too little of it, because they are stupid. According to evolution, they should die out because of this. They didn't.

Well you survived. But seriously doctors know what there doing.

If we had three arms, we could, for example, hold one more stick, and in the case of evolution's supposed "ancestral humans," it would be useful to hold one more stick than your opponent, as it would win you fights and gain you access to females. As we haven't evolved a third arm, this means evolution is wrong.

But we never needed to. Two arms are just fine. You have used the example of a third arm because it is more obvious.

This doesn't disprove in any way that you have the desire to kill those babies. According to evolution, girls who tend to keep their babies will have more offspring than girls who do not, and as such the desire to have abortions, even in cases like this, should have died out long ago. Evolution loses again.

No. the desire to have an abortion hasn’t been around long enough to evolve anything towards it.

You are very wrong. Decomposition does not destroy matter, that is physically impossible. It changes matter into other kinds of matter, which would have covered the earth by now.

I never said it destroyed matter. all the matter from decomposition has been buried and compressed down into the earth.

The phrase "proof other than the bible" is an oxymor-on. Only God knows everything, so His Word is the only absolute proof there is. And the Bible speaks of Angels and Demons.
However, many sightings of these are reported yearly, so even without the Bible, there is proof.

Let me ask the same question to you then: do you have proof (other than science) that evolution happened?

Science shows evidence. The bible shows a story…. I think I prefer evidence. I’m not saying god doesn’t exist but there are holes in your stories, contradictions in the bible.


But my dear atheist, who would have taught them that?


Maybe they had it naturally and there has been no point in using it since so we lost the ability. You hear of people who talk to horses and dogs. Maybe they are the remnants of our ability to talk to animals.

The Loch Ness Monster doesn't live in a cave, but in a lake. Are you stupid?

No are you? You asked how can a species survive with so few of them. In the cave episode of plant earth you will see that entire species live in a single pool. Its therefore quite possible that a small amount of loch ness monsters have survived in one lake.


Why didn't they evolve a longer lifespan then? And adaptations to oxygen poor environments?

some trees live thousands of years. You also have to take into account gravity.

This is not an answer to the question. I've never in my life thrown feces at other people. If evolution were true, I would have.

Why are you a monkey? No you’re a person with morals and ideals and (I assume) throwing faeces isn’t one of them.

No, we do not want to kill monkeys. The point is, if humans evolved from monkeys, then, according to evolution, it would apparently be advantageous for monkeys to evolve into humans.
As other monkeys haven't evolved into humans, this means that evolution fails the test again.

They haven’t needed to evolve into humans. They are comfortable in their own environment and have adapted as such.

So? Are you saying animals didn't hunt long ago?

No I am not I am saying that some species have been hunted to extinction. Either by humans or other animals.

Biblical Proof, girl, Biblical Proof. Evolution, however, cannot account for these creatures, as they are chimaeras, which cannot exist according to evolution.

Biblical proof? The bible was written by more than 60 people and has been re-written more times than I’ve had hot dinners. There is no proof in the bible. Only belief and faith. So maybe your belief and faith have blinded you and chimeras have never existed.

What did it matter whether humans knew anything? They didn't know how the world originated until God told them how. If there were Neanderthals, why wouldn't God have told his children about them?

Maybe she didn’t want them to know about her previous incarnations of humans.



Why didn't a spider evolve that could paralyze the wasp, but is immune to the wasp poison?

Because they don’t live long enough to pass on any protective genes to their young.


The Biblical records stop there as well. Isn't it an amazing coincidence that Henry's genealogy stopped exactly at the same point as Biblical genealogies?
I'd say that, if Adam and Eve weren't the first people on earth, at least one of these genealogies would start earlier or later than another. However, they start with the same people, so this means that they really were the first people on earth.

Whats to say that there are no records that go back any further than that? Maybe people didn’t keep records before this point. Or maybe they did and they were lost or destroyed.

You can't fight well with one horn. If evolution were true, unicorns would have evolved either two horns or antlers or something.

Or maybe todays modern moose and other antlered animals are unicorns?

Being stupid, you misunderstand the question, of course.
The point is, if we gradually evolved from one-celled ancestors, than why are there so many one-celled ancestors around, but so few two- or three celled? Why do only one-celled and many-celled organisms exist? The only explanation is that God liked it more that way. Evolution fails again.

Or maybe one celled organisms exist because they can exist in the most extreme environments and adapt as they see fit.

But those "things" you babble about would originate from mud. If it was advantageous for mud to evolve into "things," why hasn't all mud evolved into "things" by now?

But mud isn’t “alive” as such.

That's a rather elaborate way to say that, girl. Simply "I don't know" will do.

And do you?

You're turning the question on its head now. The point is, if we had natural clothing, we wouldn't need other kinds of clothing.

I see what your saying but…. We have clothes that we wear. There is no need for us to evolve natural clothes. In fact we have lost out natural clothing (although we retain some of it in the form of hairs on our back and head and private parts etc etc).

Let me put this to you then. The bible was written around 1450 bc. If adam and eve existed in around 4000 bc then why is it that In 6000 bc there already existed a story similar to the modern day bible.

And also in addition to that question if the earth was (in the bible) created in 4000bc then why are there carvings and stories (similar to the bible) from 6000bc? Surely if the earth didn’t exist this could not be true? Yet it is

[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Oh for goodness sake! I am sick to death of evilutionist nonsense. I'll tell you what disproves evolution: catholics! Countless stupid, brain dead ring-kissing catholics simpering before their elderly Head Pedophile -- if evolution were true, that lot would've died out years ago! But oh no, they keep breeding, breeding like flies, swarming around the gilt turd otherwise known as the Vatican.

Catholics exist -- therefore evolution is false!

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Ever heard of tectonic plates?

Yes, those are stories atheists tell to their children because they refuse to believe God causes earthquakes.

Science shows evidence

Science fabricates evidence, there is a difference. Just Google climategate or look at: PROOF scientists are liars (The Times).

[michele]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Oh for goodness sake! I am sick to death of evilutionist nonsense. I'll tell you what disproves evolution: catholics! Countless stupid, brain dead ring-kissing catholics simpering before their elderly Head Pedophile -- if evolution were true, that lot would've died out years ago! But oh no, they keep breeding, breeding like flies, swarming around the gilt turd otherwise known as the Vatican.

Catholics exist -- therefore evolution is false!

let me just spin your statement around a bit.

non-christians exist - - therefore christianity is false.

is this proof enough for you?

or will i get a response of "well gods word is the truth and he says evolution isnt true. and no one can argue with god"