[Adam Fag]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I don't have multiple rows of massive teeth.
I also think you don't have those.

Land sharks don't need them. We have hands. We kill [sea] sharks for fun and eat them. We don't need fins or gills, we don't lay eggs. That's why it's such fun to be a "land shark"

And lions.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Maybe he is talking about the Finns.

To be honest I think he probably took so many hallucinogens before posting that he might honestly have thought he himself had multiple rows of sharp teeth and fins and was swimming through the air.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I don't have multiple rows of massive teeth.
I also think you don't have those.

Maybe he is talking about the Finns.

[Thomas Dalton]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

WE are the land sharks

I don't have multiple rows of massive teeth.
I also think you don't have those.

[Roberta]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I guess if you say so... .

[Adam Fag]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I don't feel like reading all 85 pages....but I'll play along...

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

There is no set of rules for how evolution works. Mutation happens purely by chance. Sharks remain largely in the same form that they did millions of years ago because it works. Mutations only survive to produce change if they are advantageous. However given the diversity in sharks (consider the hammer head) show that there have been changes and what works well sticks around (e.g. fusiform shape). Sharks didn't need to evolve to land animals because they had plenty of food in the sea. Here is an example of a possible explanation for fish out of the sea... One species of fish was being out competed by another species. It found that plants near the shore were more abundant. It and its progeny spent more time near the shore. The progeny that were able to get a little bit closer to the land and spend more time out of the water were better able to get those plants. Over several (thousands) of generations mutations that encoded longer fins allowed those individuals to get more food in turn survived and reproduced, propagating those mutations. Eventually they made it onto land. New niches were found and species in turn began to specialize. Several species of fish, arthropods, etc. Without taking a whole 10 pages to explain this further, you would have also had carnivorous fish that followed. Former herbivores may have turned carnivorous. But sharks who already dominated their food chain wouldn't necessarily need to follow the migration to land.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/
There is plenty of evidence that a great flood did take place on Earth. Flood myths are prevalent among all creation myths suggesting that it may have occurred. What does that have to do with Mars?

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
I often wonder that myself.... How are you still surviving? But the simple answer is that stupidity doesn't prevent humans from reproducing. If they can make it to reproductive maturity and they can find someone who is willing to have sex they can have kids and if they can manage to keep them alive to sexual maturity, the cycle can continue. In fact I would venture to say that stupid people tend to reproduce more effectively than smart people.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Maybe one day we will...but most likely not. Human evolution is a victim to our own intelligence. Why do we need a third arm when we can build a machine to do the work of a third arm? We may end up choosing our own evolution. Perhaps our evolution is fated to be through intelligence and creativity and not through physical adaptation. But we can see evidence of evolution in humans. Skin color, eye color, face shape etc. is seen in different races. Dark skin was advantageous to native africans. Blue eyes and light hair most likely developed through preference by sexual partners in Northern Europeans.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Why do hamster's eat their young? Often because the hamster instinctively feels it is not able to care for its young. Same with humans, although it is a conscious choice. Again we are a victim of our own sentience.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

Decay and decomposition, the cycle of life. Cremation. Humans don't always bury their dead. Same reason we don't have millions of animal remains around.


Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Well angles and demons are mythical creatures. Sorry but they are. They are not part of our ecosystem and therefore cannot have a common ancestor to us.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
The snake didn't talk. Animals don't talk. Except in Harry Potter. Which is fiction. And so is most of the bible. I won't say the rest of what I'm thinking.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
There is no proof that the Loch Ness monster exists. It is very doubtful that it does given that the lake could not sustain a breeding population. But no biologist who has half a functional brain believes in Nessie.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Gravity, resource limitation, the ability of trees to grow above certain elevations due to gas limitations (think about the tree line in alpine areas).

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

Uh, cause we evolved. Behavior evolves as well as form.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Evolution of one form does not mean extinction of another. Also we do not evolve from a species, it's more of a splitting off. Why do we have to crush the "weaker" species? Evolution theory says nothing about eliminating the predecessor. Our evolution took us one way, monkey's another.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

The Dodo was hunted to extinction. Catastrophic events. A volcano erupts and wipes out the habit of a species who lives only in it's path. Think about this one a little harder and don't say that God is the source of all natural disaster and he wanted it that way. That's is the lamest excuse ever. Like calling electricity magic.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

Cause they are mythical creatures. Hard to find fossil evidence of something that never existed.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Cause the bible was written by man. I know what you are going to say, save it. Neanderthals and Homo erectus came a long time and died out long before written history.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

Spiders haven't caught up in the evolutionary arms race yet. There may not be a compound that a spider could produce to protect them that would not also kill the spider as well. "Them" spiders may eventually catch up. Or not.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
Well I don't think that Cain and his sis weren't the only ones. Really they were not, I swear. We can trace the genetic history of our race to a bottleneck event were there were as few as a couple hundred individuals. And even if it came down to two indivuals, there are these wonderful thing scall segregation, independent assortment, variation and mutation. Lethal and detrimental mutations in that era would prevent them from reproducing. Genes would mutate through generations and produce variation.


The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

It was political. Make up some documents to say that you are descendant from the first man and people will agree that you really should be King.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Again, mythical creature. But narwhals....well I don't know much about their behavior so I can't tell you a practical use. It may be as simple as preference by the other sex. There are plenty of features on animals that are completely useless save to attract the opposite sex. Like plumage on a peacock.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Well...fossilization is a very rare event. Otherwise we would have fossils from every form of life, but the requirements for it to occur are not common. Pair that with something that is microscopic and tends not to fossilize at all unless you have trillions of cells together and the physical evidence was never preserved.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

This question is so stupid I have a hard time not yelling at my computer screen. Well mud is what happens when you mix water with dirt. So why is there still dirt...well we would have much to stand on if it disappeared now would we? In fact with out rock, dirt, metal, etc. we wouldn't have a planet. We wouldn't be able to sustain life.

What I think you are asking is about what we call the "primordial soup". When the earth was young it was a mix of chemicals, elements and such. With the right temperature, available elements and pH they will spontaneously bond due to their chemical properties. They bond in ways that they like to bond. They create amino acids, nucleic acids, lipids, membranes, proteins and DNA. Through billions of years they eventually were incorporated with each other. It is mysterious and wonderful, complex and confusing. And we can reproduce some of these early events in a lab.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Why don't plants think? Cause they lack a brain. A organized group of specialized cells communicating through biochemistry producing electrical impulses.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

We went the opposite direction, we had clothing (fur) but we evolved them away.

What was the "evolutionary advantage" of Adam's extra rib?
Why do women have an extra rib than men like the Bible tells us. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

While there are instances of an extra rib (http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/19/1/105.full.pdf) and even more interestingly it is more prominent in females, it is a genetic deformity. I for instance do not have an extra rib.

What is the evolutionary advantage of demonic possession
Please explain how demonic possesions humans, horses, dogs and pigs helps them to be a more successful species. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Well....if you choose to believe in the paranormal, that is something that is completely asside from evolution. It is other wordly, inexplicable. It is not something that can be explained by evolution because it is mutually exclusive from evolution. Apples and oranges.

Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms?
Christ earthly ministery was 2,000 years ago, a more primitive time than now. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
By slugs and worms, I assume you mean the poor people who live off of welfare and don't work. Well yeah they irritate me as well. That is a cultural change. And if I could blame anyone for them, I blame Christ. Christ taught us to be charitable, to help those in need. If we quit helping them they will eventually starve to death or get off their lazy behinds and work. But that wouldn't be very Christian of us, would it?

Fitness as a term is misunderstood. It doesn't mean that they can go run a mile. It means that they have the mutational advantage to obtain food, survive in their environment, survive to reproduce and the most important, but also most left out is that their PROGENY survive to reproduce.


What did the rocks and lightning evolve from?
According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

transitional forums....uh....we did not evolve from rocks and lightening, please provide reference of a biologist who knows their rear from a (well...you know the rest... )who claims this.

Well since I'm sure you mean transitional FORMS....and you can't have transitional forms for something that can't reproduce. I'll just leave it at that.



Please show the disorder inherent in evolution
Scientific "laws" regarding thermodynamics and entropy say that things go from ordered to disordered. ?]How do you explain evolution in light of this. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Well those are laws regarding physics/chemistry and are talking about energy, particularly transfer of energy. Evolution as a process is not subject to those laws. I would recommend actually reading a little bit more about the subject of Scientific laws before attaching them to everything in science.

Where are those transitional forms???
asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

It is indeed surprising that we have as many transitional forms as we do. Fossilization is incredibly rare, and then finding those fossils is not easy to do either...Think of all the places on earth we have to look! Fortunately we have geologists who study the earth's rocks and sedimentary layers to help us. But we do have extant species that we can get DNA from. We can look at closely related species and track the mutations. We can determine the function of a protein encoded by a gene and see how it changes the form of a species. It would be wonderful to have a video to watch how every species on earth has changed, but we don't. So like a detective at the scene of a crime we must work backward from what we do know to glean the answer.

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers. __________________

I'm sure you will call me a heathen, evil and that I am going to hell for this. I am not an atheist. I believe in a higher power, the mysterious and unexplainable. My personal spiritual journey will be to find out what that is. Until then I cannot live my life to conform to some archaic thinking, but live my life as a kind and honest person. My Christian upbringing taught me that Christ knows we are "only human" and that we will make mistakes. He preached forgiveness and a loving God. Guess I'll find out when I die won't I? The good news is that if I face eternal damnation so does everyone I love so we will be in the pits of hell together. I digress....

Looking forward to your response to my answers...

WE are the land sharks

[handmaiden]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

There was far too much information bandied about by the smart-pants science to actually read, but I did see something about the dodo bird not being able to survive the time of the dinosaurs.

First of all, we only have a few weird-looking mineral deposits to support the whole "dinosaur" theory, the rest is just Hollywood special effects.

Second, the dodo is no longer, that is, it has ceased to be and is , in effect, an ex-dodo because it was delicious. It was hunted by humans and didn't lay enough eggs or whatever to keep up with demand. Or maybe its eggs were tasty, too. But its status had nothing to do with evolution and your fairy tale dinosaurs.

Therefore, because of this one mistake, you clearly have to be wrong about everything and there is no real reason to read anything that you post.


Decidedly Yours,

Handmaiden

[Benjamin Over]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Bla..bla... .

Hey harlot, I can't be bother reading most parts of your unholy posts, but I'm guessing that your whole purpose to post here is to deny our biblical faith in favor of that queer Charles Darwin, right? Right!

Unrelated to that...Even if you can prove I'm wrong, that doesn't automatically mean that you're right.

You're right?? Is that so? well ..

If evolution is the truth, why then, did JESUS died on the cross for your sins?

[lucifer's lesbian daughter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

1) I never said I believed in a divine being. Not sure where you pulled that from.
2) Just because I do not think that life came out of rocks, does not mean that I believe in a divine being. It just means I believe that there are other places for life to have come from.
3) Why does a divine being have to automatically kill everyone who doesn't believe? Your god doesn't.
4) I think your logic is flawed. I think a divine being would be more likely to kill the unbelievers if the majority of the people on earth believed. There would be less people to kill, and less people to resist. It would be in his best interest to kill unbelievers, since it would be much more convenient.= for him and his believers.
It seems more likely that it would be a god of a small religion that does not kill people, because if he did, then there would be very little people left after he was done, so it would be in his best interest to keep them alive.
4) Since when does being the largest religion automatically make you right?

Unrelated to that...Even if you can prove I'm wrong, that doesn't automatically mean that you're right.

[Thomas Dalton]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I don't need to read your whole post to show you that you're wrong, so I didn't.

"What did the rocks and lightning evolve from?
According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting"



Please, Please, PLEASE tell me you are NOT this stupid?? Life did not evolve out of rocks. Rocks aren’t living. This is like your previous question of why there is still mud. Stupid!
Fine. I will explain this to you since you didn’t have a very good science class ever when you were little.
Rocks are a natural thing. Hell, you live on a giant rock. That is what earth is, on the most basic level possible. A really big rock. Also, lightning is a natural force. I’m not going to argue that lightning is even possibly living in the slightest, or has even the tiniest ability to reproduce, which is what the words ‘lineage’ and ‘evolution’ imply, that the creature can reproduce and bear offspring. Which rocks can’t do. And neither can lightning.

Then you believe in a divine being if life didn't evolve out of lifeless material. Since there is a divine being, the religion that most people believe in must be right, or else this divine being would have used its power to smite those unbelievers.
Christianity is the largest religion --> Christianity is right.
Christianity is right --> The Bible is right.
The Bible is right --> Evolution does not exist.
QED. Quite simple really.

[Roberta]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I heard Michelle did (yuck yuck).

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Plus, we didn't evolve from monkeys, we just have the same common ancestor.

Ancestor.com has a wide user community. Can you please show us one person who has found their monkey ancestor in their family tree?

[Titus Templeton]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Please tell me how the venus-flytrap evolved from the first steps until today....im waiting...!

[lucifer's lesbian daughter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

The Bible tells us to preach the Word to everyone. It also tells us that God chooses some people to understand the Word and some people not to understand it. It's a sin to water down the Word to try to make it palatable for those whom God doesn't want to understand it. We are True Christians™, which means that we don't sin.

"This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." Romans 3:22-24

"Here there is not Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free; but Christ is all, and in all." Colossians 3:11

No one is perfect. We are all humans, so we are all SINNERS...
And God wants everyone to be saved. He does not pick and choose.
There is a difference between watering it down, and finding a different way to say it besides shoving it down someone's throat. That's actually one of the worst ways to go.

[WWJDnow]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I am a full believer in God's creation. That said, I am also a believer that those who use abysmally flawed logic in an effort to proselytize damage the global effort to spread the Good News to as many people as possible in hopes that they will be saved.

Who are you going to believe, some atheist wearing a lab coat or your fellow Christians?

When the logic doesn't even add up for fellow Christians, why would a non-Christian "see the light" after reading or upon hearing an argument that makes no sense in terms of the logic in between the premises and the conclusion?

Logic was created by pagans such as Aristotle. Why are you so eager to accept pagan ways of thinking?

The larger impact of such banter is a reinforcement of the bigoted anti-Christian stereotypes... lack the ability to think for (our) selves.

Where exactly does the Bible tell us that we should think for ourselves?

I am urging you to reconsider the strategy involved, and construct an argument that stands to reason.

In other words, you want us to lie about the Gospel. Don't you know that's a sin?

... every word used by the Father... and.... Our Savior Jesus Christ, is consistent with infallible logic that is only substantiated by modern science.

Modern so-called science says the Earth is over four billion years old. Yet, when you add up the time since creation as set forth in the Bible, it works out to around 6,000 years. Modern so-called science says that the Sun causes the day, yet the Bible tells us that day and night existed before the Sun. Now you're taking the word of scientists over that of God.

...I fully stand by the point that I am making, and believe that Christianity would be much better off if those debating its merits did so using sound reasoning in which the conclusion of the argument is a valid sum of the premises used to arrive at said conclusion.

The Bible says that we should not suffer a witch to live. I take it that you do agree with God, that we need to wipe witchcraft off the face of the Earth. Don't you?

We must articulate our beliefs effectively, and we must to so in a way that persuades people we're right, rather than providing them with ammunition with which they can use to discredit us and attack our credibility on the basis of ignorance embarrassingly poor logic.

The Bible tells us to preach the Word to everyone. It also tells us that God chooses some people to understand the Word and some people not to understand it. It's a sin to water down the Word to try to make it palatable for those whom God doesn't want to understand it. We are True Christians(TM), which means that we don't sin.