[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Can you please elaborate on what you mean? If you are meaning to say that "evolution is wrong because there have been no crocodile-duck hybrid fossils found" then you have very little comprehension of the subject that we are talking about.

I have all the comprehension I NEED, thank you very much! One measly hybrid fossil isn't too much to ask for, is it? Well, apparently it is too much. And to think evolutionists put stock in this nonsense!

[gm jack]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I have all the comprehension I NEED, thank you very much! One measly hybrid fossil isn't too much to ask for, is it? Well, apparently it is too much. And to think evolutionists put stock in this nonsense!

It's a series of hierarchical decisions. Once birds evolved, it is damn near impossible for them to then become a lizard. However, they can easily become other types of birds.

Like a tree, once a branch forms, it doesn't then grow into another branch and fuse. Ducks do not suddenly be put under selections pressures to become a crocodile.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

It's a series of hierarchical decisions. Once birds evolved, it is damn near impossible for them to then become a lizard. However, they can easily become other types of birds.

Like a tree, once a branch forms, it doesn't then grow into another branch and fuse. Ducks do not suddenly be put under selections pressures to become a crocodile.

You don't understand evolution as all; according to your THEORY crocodiles evolved into ducks. Logically at some point there should be some creature with the body of the duck and the head of a crocodile as the transitional forum.

Can you show us one?

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Like a tree, once a branch forms, it doesn't then grow into another branch and fuse. Ducks do not suddenly be put under selections pressures to become a crocodile.

Never heard of grafting I see. Doesn't the fact that we can show you evidence against all of your arguments proof that we're right?

Get right with God boy, before it's too late.

[Logan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

It's a series of hierarchical decisions. Once birds evolved, it is damn near impossible for them to then become a lizard. However, they can easily become other types of birds.

Like a tree, once a branch forms, it doesn't then grow into another branch and fuse. Ducks do not suddenly be put under selections pressures to become a crocodile.

You haven't a clue what you are talking about. Do you even know the difference between Transcription and translation in regards to DNA/RNA?
How can you claim evolution to be true when you don't even understand it?

[GrantMeSerenity]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Gladly! You see there are two possibilities.
First: just because a single group of fish managed to evolve and gain the capability to breathe on land does not mean that all fish would have been so lucky. A shark never needed to adapt to breathe out of water because it still had plenty of food without doing so. The only way that a shark would need that adaptation is if there were only one kind of fish. None of us are ignorant enough to believe there is only one kind of fish.

Second: Let's say that there was one kind of fish and one kind of shark. The shark would need to adapt to breathing air as well. Evolution would cause other adaptations as well, not just the ability to breathe air, legs, etc. I would then say sharks would have evolved into tigers, lions, etc.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

Excuse my ignorance on exactly what you are referring to here, but I'll give it a shot. When the universe was created, all matter shot from a singularity into space. The heat caused would have been enormous, melting ice on Mars. As it moved farther away from the singularity, it froze, but not before rushing across the planet in a giant flood.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

I mean no disrespect, but my answer to this is religion. Often churches are sanctuaries for those who are unable to care for themselves, and run homeless shelters and orphanages, as many religions believe it is sinful to turn away any who are in need. Also medical advances, along with the fact that we no longer have to hunt for our sustenance allows those with less than optimal abilities to survive, and even procreate.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

If you believe (as most of us arguing for evolution do) that the universe is some 13 billion years old, humans have been around for hardly the blink of an eye. We are evolving which by its very definition is a slow process (not an instantaneous thing as many of you try to represent it as). Third arms would be cumbersome at the moment, and not allow that person to procreate, as they would be undesirable. Thus the trait dies off. We are slowly evolving toward "perfection" though the term is ambiguous.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Here you use the actions of a few to vilify many. No one gets pregnant because they "want to kill a baby" or have an abortion.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

This argument makes no sense at all, but I'll try to argue it anyway. The current population of the earth is at the largest it has ever been at around 6 billion people. What source are you using to estimate 150 billion over 150,000 years?
Also, for the first (I'll be generous here) lets say 100,000 years, humans did not bury the dead in 3' x 6' graves. This would take far to long and take far to much energy. Instead they were left in shallow graves at best, which were prey to scavengers and other predators. Bodies that weren't defiled by animals quickly decayed in their graves.
Next, the human body is about 60% water. This means that 60% of our weight is reclaimed quickly after we die, which cuts your estimate by at least 60%. I would say that due to decomposition and animal activity, we can discount about 90% of the first 145,000 years of our existence (which is probably more like 98% or 99% if I would do the research) so we're looking at a number very much smaller than what you have posted.


Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Here we will probably get into a cyclical argument, but I'll chance it. I ask for proof of angels and demons. My guess that your response will be something along the lines of "they're in the Bible, YOU prove they don't exist" (which is a common Creationist concept meaning "I can't") or you'll simply point me to the Burden of Proof post. I can't prove they don't exist, you can't prove they do. Let's move on.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Snakes never had, nor likely ever will have the ability to speak. Reading Genesis, my understanding of it is that Satan took the form of the snake. Therefore, the snake did not talk, Satan did.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

The Loch Ness monster does not exist. I'll argue this point if you can prove that it does.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Natural selection would force them to compete only if they were not receiving enough sunlight. Since they receive enough sunlight, they have no reason to "evolve" and grow taller. Also, actions of man remove the need for this competition. When we cut down trees, we remove competitors, thus slowing or removing the need for evolution.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
We have larger brains than our simian friends and have evolved socially to where this is unacceptable behaviour. We are brought up in a society that teaches us a different code of ethics than is available to primates (also a much more complex one than they could comprehend).

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

This shows your lack of understanding of what evolution is. It is "survival of the fittest" not "extermination of the weak." Back when our evolutionary paths diverged, we had no need to compete with them for resources, largely due to the smaller population of that time. Had we needed to compete with them for resources, then it is likely we would have exterminated them, but only in order to survive.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

Again this is either not understanding evolution, or narrow-minded interpretation of it. According to evolution, all things equal, it would take a species a very long time to go extinct, barring some horrific plague. However, what you do not (and evolution does not account for here) is the action of a dominant species such as humans. Dodo's became extinct quickly because of humans, and humans alone.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
I admit that I am not fully up to date on the KJV of the bible, so I had to research this one a bit. According to this site, and a few others I found, references to unicorns seems to be a widely accepted mistranslation, that should be more along the lines of "wild ox." Secondly, references to satyrs seem to point only to the worship of satyr idols, not references to the creatures themselves. Finally, dragons, from what I remember and can find, are always allegories for Satan, or the form Satan chooses.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Scientific data dates the first cro-magnon man (the first true "modern" humans) to about 35,000 years ago. This leaves a 29,000 year gap where cro-magnons either wiped out the neanderthals and homo-erectus' or they became slowly assimilated.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

Again, narrow-minded interpretation shows itself. Your scenario could only exist if there was one type of spider and one type of wasp. Neither of us are ignorant enough to believe that. Then the spider would likely evolve an adaptation to prevent it from being hunted by the wasps (not necessarily anti-venom in its blood). The adaptation could be anything though, such as greater speed to avoid being caught, better camouflage, or smaller size. Whose to say that several species of spiders haven't evolved these adaptations and are no longer targeted by these wasps? To assume that there is only one adaptation that could happen shows a misunderstanding of evolution.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

You are asking evolution to explain a story from the Bible. Moreover you are asking evolution to explain a specific belief that you have (that sins lead to birth defects). Therefore, the only answer I can offer you on this is: man evolved to use language; man wrote the bible; you read and interpret the bible.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

This, in my opinion, has nothing to do with evolution. This could be forged, or made up, or falsified in any manner of ways. I would be happy to accept this as proof however if you did the research, and historically verified and offered solid proof that the genealogy is real. I however, do not have time.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

This was addressed above. Unicorns exist only in pagan mythology. They were never a real creature.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Really? I'm sorry, but this is a stretch even for creationists. This reminds me of the creationist "you can't prove *insert fact* so creationism is correct" arguments. So what you are asking for is unequivocal proof of multicellular, transitional organisms from millions or billions of years ago? In return (because you already have it according to most posts here) I ask for unequivocal (that means, no "the Bible") proof of God.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

Sorry, but if you think that evolution says that "a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings" than you are the one being stupid. This argument is so made-up and ridiculous that I can't even argue against it. That's why there is still mud around, and babies do not have tails as we have evolved beyond the need for them.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

You should open a science book sometimes and see the wide assortment of chemicals and substances found in the human body (sorry no gasoline or bug spray). Please do some research on how our brain works, and form this into a viable question.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

You answered your own question! Probably didn't even realize it though. We have no need to evolve "natural clothes" because we have clothes so readily available to us and have for thousands of years. Not to mention we have shelter readily available. For instance, doesn't someone with hypertrichosis actually have natural clothing? However, that trait is not going to be passed along as he is not "attractive" and will likely not procreate, because we have "normal" people with "normal" clothing.

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

I think that about sums up my view.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I think that about sums up my view.

I cannot even read that. But I am sure it is complete nonsense.

[Good Will]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

some forms do seem to be alive i guess.. there's this fish that actually has paw like fins. and still some amphibious creatures. doesn't seem to evolve much though

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

Noah's flood occurred on Earth when God opened up the windows of Heaven... don't know how Mars got involved. Annnddd Mars's floods are nothing to do with evolution. You'd need to ask another branch of science

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Simple, current society supports the meek too, so Natural Selection doesn't apply anymore. People whom would die without this society are now still alive because of it.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

I guess that both evolutionists and creationist would agree that two arms are perfectly fine and a third one would be mockingly rediculous.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Guess not everyone feels like being a mother, though it's hard to explain in any way. it's nothing to do with evolution though. it's an ethical problem.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

Flesh decomposes, even bones decompose overtime when the conditions are right. Or they get crushed in ways.. 150 000 years is a very long time for any corpse to remain intact.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

demons are the angles cast out along with the treacherous Lucifer, thus becoming Satan and his minions. The main difference is their inherent evil and uglyness for the faires of Gods three closest angels got his previlages taken for his attempt at the Throne. Still they all remain creatures that stand apart from eartlhy creation and thus aren't part of any Lineus's catagorisations.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Wasn't the snake actually Satan in a seductive and symbolic form in stead of any given snake in the garden of Eden?

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

Loch Ness monster is a hoax

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

Trees use multiple techniques. Pines are very efficient and stay green all year round, others lose their leaves. Some grow tall though they grow slowly too which makes them vunerable, so most trees grow rather quickly. All in all they are nowadays a perfect team, using any resource the best they can. using it to grow higher without much differences inbetween is a waste of energy. Plus tree hight is only really good for keeping animals from eating the leaves and robbing the tree of it's means to survive

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

that's where animals come into focus. bevers knawling trees down, others eating plants, humans cutting trees down building homes, ships, tools to hack more trees down, furniture, paper... trees are to usefull to let them just stand there we people are very good at keeping trees from overwhelming the world. oh and there are no trees to grow in deserts. no good conditions.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

Because we are humans, not monkeys.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

humans and monkeys each have their strengts. monkeys have better smell and are better armed and more agile. humans are weaker at those points but strongly compensate for brain capacity. Both are still fit to survive in this world. Humans however are more likely survivors for we're superiour adapters. (no monkeys on the north pole and roaming deserts.. humans however are anywhere)

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

the dodo is very easy. It where the Dutch. they came on the island on which the dodo lived without any natural enemies. Making them easy targets and easy hunting. I thought they died out more quickly actually. couldn't keep up with human hunger

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

the biblical dragon refers to Satan, though the mythological dragon is.. myth.. like unicorns, satyrs, tourirs, elves, gnomes, fairies, orcs, Grendel and many many others.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

perhaps it's why Adam and Eve where so succesfull at creating an entire human population. it's know that inbreeding is a likely cause of cancer in offspring. so highly genetical diffrent partners are a very clever way of coping with that human defect.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

there's isn't much to evolve when the spider is dead. only thing are spiders lucky enough to never suffer such fate.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

high genetic diversity. inbreeding defects come from to great genetic similarity. Cain and his sister where indeed very pure.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

It's unlikely someone has been annotating a genealogy for so long. bit still.. don't all humans decent from Adam and Eve?

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Take a normal horse. Now put the Unicorn in the other corner. The fight starts... whom will win? the horse without or the horse with an enormous spear on his skull? it's like with those sea creatures... dunno the name but there are unicorn sea mammals having the advantage.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

they likely lived in water, and what happens when they die can be found on the bottoms of seas. they decompose fully and turn into some kind of mud. it doesn't leave anything. not then, not even now.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

some babies are born with tails. most don't because a tail on a human is rather useless. And what's wrong with a little soil mixed with water? there will allways be plain soil for plants to grow in and water for them to drink. there's even mud underground for the same purpose. it's keeping the living alive.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

a jellyfish operating from a nerve network doesn't seem to think either. it's merely reacting to stuff.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

The first humans where totally naked. Till they committed the original sin, got bannished and suddenly felt a need to cover their private parts with leaves. Henceforth leaves where replaces with more durable and comfortable alternatives but it's merely all out of shame for nakedness. Humans are however made for mediterrainian climates, nice n warm. The Adam and Eve costume are all the clothing our bodies really really need

[Good Will]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

On top of that you can't also be a Darwinist since both Hitler and Stalin were Darwinist.

don't forget Stalin was also atheist and Hitler a Catholic

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

don't forget Stalin was also atheist and Hitler a Catholic

And? the entire populations of Russia and Nazi Germany were Darwinist. Claiming Stalin was just an atheist doesn't let Darwinism off the hook.

[A Child]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Oooh, this is fun!

• Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms, since He was on Earth at an earlier time than they were?

No, I believe that jesus doesn't exist.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

No, I believe that jesus doesn't exist.

WOW in the entire history of Man Kind no other God Mocker has ever made such an earth shattering statement. What blows me away is that YOU took the time from your busy schedule of beating dumb animals, to log on, create an account, wait for Email confirmation just to make that statement. Simply astonishing, I hear by change my entire belief in God, I turn my back on Jesus. All hail AnAdult!

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

No, I believe that jesus doesn't exist.

Then why are you here, boy? This is a Christian forum. Nobody invited you.

[OpiatedAussieTroll]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
- because there's no need to, they have the correct habitat, diet and living necessities where they are. duh.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?
- well for one thing, there haven't been any floods on mars. BUT, hypothetically if there ever was one, i'd say it's for the same reason we have rain and floods on earth. Atmospheric cycles causing rain. duh.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
- Wal-mart

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
- do we need a third arm for survival? no. So without demand, there is no supply. duh

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
- lets break this steaming hunk of shit down. 1. abortion is illegal after 8 weeks of development. for the first 8 weeks the foetus has no brain or heart and is therefore NOT ALIVE. you cant kill or "murder" something that isn't alive. 2. the foetus is a parasite by definition. If you had lice, ticks or leeches would you not want to remove and kill them? 3. Circumstances. Some people aren't ready for a baby. some people dont want one. some people cant afford one. it's human nature. Human's are the only animal that reproduce for pleasure, so we're the only animal that end up with unwanted babies therefore the only animal who abort pregnancies. Y'all just got piffleed up.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
- that's the stupidest thing i've ever heard in my piffleing life. Decay of corpses straight up, that's all i need to say. theres a million more reasons why, but that's enough said right there. duh

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
- well angels and demons aren't real, so i dont need to. prove to me the existence of an angel, bring me a living angel and i'll tell you what it descended from.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
- garden of eden wasn't real. again. duh.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
- loch ness monster isn't real. duh. you theists are really piffleing thick aren't you? if nessy was real, it'd be the descendant of a dinosaur that survived in oh, say, a deepsea trench? that's IF it were real, which it isn't, show me proof bitch.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
- because tree's die, you pifflewit. they dont just grow forever and ever. they die after a certain amount of time and no amount of evolutionary change in height is going to change that.


Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
-because we EVOLVED, hence we are superior, you stupid shit, please THINK before you speak and maybe look up the definition of evolve before you question it.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
-evolution states we evolved from a different species of monkey, that's kind of like asking "why are there orang-utans AND chimps?" cuz they're the same family, different genus. also, evolution does not "predict" it "states" and evolution does not state anything about one species HAVING TO wipe out their predecessor, for the most part in the animal kingdom animals cant wipe out other species's if they tried, because there is a natural balance. Also, extinction. Humans ARE wiping out their predecessing species, incae you havent noticed. duh.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
- they DIDN'T evolve to cope with their surroundings. Dodo birds went extinct because of an ice age, they weren't equipped to handle tundra conditions and the ice age occured so quickly they couldn't adapt to it, and hence died out QUICKLY. also, humans are killing species's and habitats accounting for QUICK extinction. Now riddle me this, why didn't "god" better equip dodo birds to survive an ice age? i mean, he's god, he must've known the ice age was coming, he MADE it happen didn't he?

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
- none of those animals exist. they're make believe. just like your "god". piffleing idiot.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
- because the bible isnt piffleing real, you cant use it as evidence because it isn't factually based. people used religion to explain the unexplainable, such as why the sky didn't fall on them. NOW we know that the sky stays where it is because it's made of gasses lighter than air. People back when the bible was supposedly written didn't know about their homo-erectus ancestors thousands of years earlier, how could they? so they didn't mention them in their bull shit book. just like they didn't know about, therefore didn't mention dinosaurs. duh

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
- Spiders catch wasps in their webs. Then paralyse them. Then suck them dry and kill them. Many spiders have developed a kind of silk that's almost invisible, they build an obvious web, and an finer web infront of it. The wasp goes for the kill, but gets caught in the second web. Spider beats wasp, process of evoltion. where did god come in again?

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
- well, cain never existed so i dont need to answer this question.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
- unicorns aren't piffleing real, why are you all so stupid?!

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
- a 100 trillion cell amoeba is only just barely visible under the most powerful microscopes in the world. what in the name of piffle makes you think we'd be able to see a 2 cell amoeba?! it's there, you just cant see it. Kind of like the wind. Are you going to debate the existance of the wind next too?

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
- that's just an outrageously piffleing stupid question. life didn't come from mud, life came from the amoeba's LIVING in the mud. 2nd, mud is dirt and water. dirt is dead skin, stray particles, eroded rock, all kinds of shit that you find all over the world. therefore there is still dirt. Water is piffleing everywhere, it's 73% of the world. When dirt and water meet, they make mud, that's why there is mud. As to why babies dont have tails like monkeys, well it's because we EVOLVED, hence changed. we dont NEED tails anymore so we dont have them. Also, several species of monkey's dont have tails. They're known as apes. Why aren't THEY born with tails? evolution pifflewit. duh

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
- "thought" is the reaction of chemicals. therefore chemicals by themselves cannot think. They dont have a nervous system, a control centre, nothing. They're just an element, an atom doing what it's designed to do, like a computer chip. Why can't computer's think for themselves? because they aren't programmed to. Why dont chemicals think? because, by NEED of nature and process of evolution, they aren't designed to. That's like asking "why doesn't bread become toast? why does it need a toaster?" because it just piffleing does, some things are one way and others are another, it's how the world works. duh

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
- why doesn't any animal have natural clothing? oh wait, they do. We have skin. we have hair. natural clothing. every other animal in the world has skin and hair, the only difference between us and an elephant is the elephant doesn't have laws against nudity. Clothes aren't necessary for survival. No demand, no supply so we havent evolved wearing nike's and piffleing Quiksilver T-Shirts. duh

wow, i believe i just answered all your questions, logically, factually and with minimal curse words. I win. Atheists 1 Theists 0. Check piffleing Mate.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

... tl;dr ...

So we have established now you can copy and paste. Did you real think we would not use a search engine on that? http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=3498