[mohammed_1]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Sharks have no need to evolve, they have no natural predators

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

Mars once had vast oceans and in turn, Icecaps, as Earth does today. Mars experienced global warming, much like Earth, and the caps melted causing mass floods

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Humans adapt, simple. Stupidity isn't enough to counter our dependency on technology to survive

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Why do we need three arms? Evolution only occurs when needed.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Other genetic desires have greater lure than mothering a child, like the idea of freedom

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

a human body only takes about 1 year to completely decay, leaving only microbes and minerals

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

umm non existant...show me proof of angels/demons

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

They never had the ability to speek. Snakes are and always have been devoid of a voicebox

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

show me proof of Loch Ness? last time i checked, it was a myth

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

You may notice that trees die over time. this means that trees will reach a maximum height that they can reach in their lifetime.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

Because we evolved

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Thats happening, many species of apes are close to extinction

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

Some species have the unfortunate event of disease, natural disaster etc. Eg: the dinosaurs were killed in a second by an asteroid. Also Tasmanian Devils (an Australian animal similar to a small dog), have come close to extinction within only 10 years due to the emergence of a facial tumor.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

All mythical creatures

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

the fact that carbon dating proves the earth is over 1.5 billion years old kind of dismisses that question.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

The spiders are the weak link there, the process of natural selection may well see them become extinct

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

or maybe Cain never existed

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

Many aristocrats and nobles have been well known for 'buying' ancestory. In fact, during the Glorious Revolution, it was legal in France to buy nobility and lineage

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

the role of a mythical creature

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

bacteria and viruses are only around 100 cells

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

life ORIGINATED in mud, not life is MADE from mud. the mud provided the perfect ignition source for life: water, light, warmth, air and small amounts of electric charge

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

because our brain consists of billions of cells, diodes, anodes. gasoline is just a chain of carbon atoms

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

because we dont need to evolve, we made the clothes ourselves

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

,

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

,

Thank you for your answers Mohammed_1 but I have the same problem I had with the previous replier; you answers fit the question almost to well. It is like you all are selecting your positions to conform to what ever information happens to be presented to you. As a rational TRUE Christian I find this pandering to the facts quit distasteful.

Were is the passion?

[mohammed_1]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I give you the facts as I have studied them, I am just trying to provide my opinion. I hold a bachelor of Physics, Anthropology and a PhD in Cosmology. What are your views on Evolutionism? Do you hold a stance on Uncertainty Principal, I would delight on discussing these topics.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I give you the facts as I have studied them, I am just trying to provide my opinion. I hold a bachelor of Physics, Anthropology and a PhD in Cosmology. What are your views on Evolutionism? Do you hold a stance on Uncertainty Principal, I would delight on discussing these topics.

Well try my best, since I am only a lay person and not a proper Christian scientist.

Evolution: micro evolution is clear enough, just look at disease. Obviously Jesus set micro evolution up to thwart doctors from trying to stop God's Righteous plagues from killing sinners. However macro evolution is absurd; men into monkeys. Come on, why not say some 530 million year old sea worms turned into men while you are at it?

The Uncertainty Principal sounds like a way for secularist to weasel out of admitting that angels make electrons move.

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Sharks have no need to evolve, they have no natural predators

So? According to evilution, predators and prey co-evolve. It is a ridiculous assertion that only prey would evolve. After all think about it: sharks that are able to hunt on land in addition to the sea have an advantage. Evilution teaches that creatures with an advantage are selected preferentially. Why didn't it happen?

Mars once had vast oceans and in turn, Icecaps, as Earth does today. Mars experienced global warming, much like Earth, and the caps melted causing mass floods

So you admit that mass floods can occur?

Humans adapt, simple. Stupidity isn't enough to counter our dependency on technology to survive

According to evilution, humans have been around for millions of years, while technology only a few thousand. If we are so dependant on technology, how did we survive those millions of years we didn't have it? Wouldn't stupidity have evolved away by then? You seem rather ignorant about your own theories, my muslim friend.

Why do we need three arms? Evolution only occurs when needed.

According to evilutionists, we once were primates, fighting with each other till we determined who was the dominant male. A third arm would be a huge advantage in such a brawl, and allow for much greater spread of genes. The absence of it effectively disproves evilution.

Other genetic desires have greater lure than mothering a child, like the idea of freedom

What? Don't you realize this is completely ridiculous?

"Planned" families nowadays produce a lot less children than healthy Christian families with at least eight children. So, families of people who do not desire to murder their offspring produce more offspring (duh) and therefore should have an evilutionary advantage, while the desire for infant murder would evolve away. That is didn't happen proves that evilution is a lie of the devil.

a human body only takes about 1 year to completely decay, leaving only microbes and minerals

Then why aren't we buried under a pile of microbes and minerals? And why do we find fossils?

umm non existant...show me proof of angels/demons

http://hellandjustice.com/spirits_ghosts.htm

They never had the ability to speek. Snakes are and always have been devoid of a voicebox

Bible Science tells us otherwise, friend. Are you suggesting that you know more than God?

You may notice that trees die over time. this means that trees will reach a maximum height that they can reach in their lifetime.

Why don't they evolve faster growing rates and longer lifespans then?

Some species have the unfortunate event of disease, natural disaster etc. Eg: the dinosaurs were killed in a second by an asteroid. Also Tasmanian Devils (an Australian animal similar to a small dog), have come close to extinction within only 10 years due to the emergence of a facial tumor.

So you admit that long timespans are not necessary for species to go extinct?

All mythical creatures

Again, Bible Science tells us otherwise. I would trust the Word of God always over the word of a muslim.

the fact that carbon dating proves the earth is over 1.5 billion years old kind of dismisses that question.

Wait, now carbon dating proves the earth is 1.5 billions of years old, while all other scientists maintain that:

1. C14 has a halflife of 5700 years, and therefore can't be used to date things older than several tens of thousands of years.
2. The earth is 4.5 billion years old, not 1.5 billion years?

Are you too stupid even to get your own theories right?

Anyway, carbon dating, like all other forms of dating, is full of holes. What kind of idiot asks atoms how old the earth is? How could those atoms know? Wouldn't God know it better then the atoms? Even if atoms would exist, they would still have no mind.

The spiders are the weak link there, the process of natural selection may well see them become extinct

I understand that, dummy, that's what evilution predicts. But they are still alive, which disproves this hypothesis.

or maybe Cain never existed

Again, you are contradicting God. He knows everything, you know. Do you?

Many aristocrats and nobles have been well known for 'buying' ancestory. In fact, during the Glorious Revolution, it was legal in France to buy nobility and lineage

Nonsense. You cannot "buy" a lineage, it is dependant on who your father and mother are.

bacteria and viruses are only around 100 cells

You must be exceptionally stupid. According to hellbound microbiologists, bacteria are one-celled creatures, and viruses aren't even cells, but just strands of DNA with some proteins! Only "eukaryotes" can be multicellular. I mean, I don't even believe in this stuff, and I know these things better than you. How comes you know nothing either of basic True Biblical Biology™ or basic false secular biology?

life ORIGINATED in mud, not life is MADE from mud. the mud provided the perfect ignition source for life: water, light, warmth, air and small amounts of electric charge

Really? Then what is life made from, if not from mud? Did it just pop into existence from nothing? Is it made from air?

Again, you completely contradict the very science you try to defend.

because our brain consists of billions of cells, diodes, anodes. gasoline is just a chain of carbon atoms

So you agree with me that our brain is not made up of chemicals, but is governed by supernatural forces? Because, you see, I've never before heard someone claim that those anodes, diodes and cells aren't made up of chemicals.

because we dont need to evolve, we made the clothes ourselves

What? When did this cloth-making start then, according to you?

I give you the facts as I have studied them, I am just trying to provide my opinion. I hold a bachelor of Physics, Anthropology and a PhD in Cosmology. What are your views on Evolutionism? Do you hold a stance on Uncertainty Principal, I would delight on discussing these topics.

I don't believe for a moment that you actually have any of those degrees. Even a secular university still demands some intellectual proficiency of its students. I've disproved many "answers" before in this thread, but I've very seldom come across such amazing ignorance of your own secular science. After all, you've claimed that:

- predators do not evolve, only prey
- carbon dating is used to determine the age of the earth
- the earth is 1.5 billion years old
- bacteria are multicelled
- viruses are multicelled
- life wasn't build from materials available in that "primordial soup" scientists talk about. It was build from water.
- cells aren't made of chemicals, just like anodes and diodes

All of which are in direct contradiction to the claims of secular science. Have you invented your own kind or something? I mean, I don't even believe in all the nonsense of secular science, and yet I know much more than you do. A few hours of reading, and anyone will know these things.

And you claim to have a Bachelor's Degree? Does your father know that you are posting here, kid?

[gm jack]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yeah, mohammed-1 wasn't very good at the whole understanding what he is talking about thing. As excellently pointed out, you can not use carbon dating to date something as supposedly old as a planet. They use uranium, with a half life in the billions of years.

On the predator/prey relationship, the sharks, while would be at an advantage if they could walk as well, simply do not need to. There are still many species of prey in the oceans, so while a few have got onto land, other species simply become more populous, the shark simply has less variety (which could be ended with more speciation) and goes on as though nothing has happened.

they simply do not have any pressure to get onto land. There is enough food in the water, and as it stands, they are very good where they are. All they do nowadays is refine their basic design.


As for chemicals not thinking, no individual chemical of an organism has consciousness, and no chemical means much on its own, It is the way things are put together that gives what we term life. It's life the lego bricks in a model. On their own, they represent nothing, and just exist. When they are arranged in specific ways, you can make something that shows far more.

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yeah, mohammed-1 wasn't very good at the whole understanding what he is talking about thing. As excellently pointed out, you can not use carbon dating to date something as supposedly old as a planet. They use uranium, with a half life in the billions of years.

Thank you. The point remains, of course, that those atoms could impossibly know how old the earth is.

On the predator/prey relationship, the sharks, while would be at an advantage if they could walk as well, simply do not need to. There are still many species of prey in the oceans, so while a few have got onto land, other species simply become more populous, the shark simply has less variety (which could be ended with more speciation) and goes on as though nothing has happened.

they simply do not have any pressure to get onto land. There is enough food in the water, and as it stands, they are very good where they are. All they do nowadays is refine their basic design.

I have to disagree with you here. This is because evilution claims that species try to be as successful as possible. In your hypothetical scenario, there might have been enough food for the sharks, but if they evolved to be able to hunt those fishes on the land, there would have been room for even more. A shark with the possibility to hunt on land would have access to more food, would be more healthy, and would raise more offspring. Therefore, evolution predicts that the sharks able to hunt close to the land would survive, and land-sharks would eventually evolve. That it didn't happen means evilution is a lie.

Additionally, if there was enough food for the sharks in the ocean, how could there be not enough food for those supposed "ancestral" fishes, driving them unto dry land? Either there is enough food, or there isn't.

As for chemicals not thinking, no individual chemical of an organism has consciousness, and no chemical means much on its own, It is the way things are put together that gives what we term life. It's life the lego bricks in a model. On their own, they represent nothing, and just exist. When they are arranged in specific ways, you can make something that shows far more.

Last time I checked, lego structures weren't able to think.

[imbackf$ckers]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

hey true, tell me how a thought processes through the neurons. go on, explain yourself. explain how neurotransmitters cause emotions in the human brain. come on, think. use those couple hundred brain cells you have up there.

[mr religion?]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You say questions evolutionist ccan't answer but why use things from your mainly full of crap bible

[Ezekiel 2517]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

These ridiculous heathens can't just accept that God, an OMNIPOTENT DEITY, did it all! Makes me SICK.

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

hey true, tell me how a thought processes through the neurons. go on, explain yourself. explain how neurotransmitters cause emotions in the human brain. come on, think. use those couple hundred brain cells you have up there.

Neurons do not exist, you stupid idiot. The mind resides in the heart:

Isaiah 10:7:
Howbeit he meaneth not so, neither doth his heart think so; but it is in his heart to destroy and cut off nations not a few.

You say questions evolutionist ccan't answer but why use things from your mainly full of crap bible

The Bible is the Inspired and Infallible Word of God. Read this for more information.

These ridiculous heathens can't just accept that God, an OMNIPOTENT DEITY, did it all! Makes me SICK.

Amen, Brother. Some people just lack both the intelligence and the Love to understand the Bible. They will have their part in the Lake of Fire:

Revelation 21:8:
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Meanwhile, at this forum we have a rule, which asks new users to introduce themselves in the Introduction Forum, telling us about their church, their Pastor, their favorite Bible Verse and other things they wish to share with us.

[TomatoSoup]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Sharks are pretty well adapted to the ocean and wouldn't gain any benefit from living on land any more than you would from living in the ocean. Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

I wasn't aware there was any great flood on mars. Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Because smart people keep saving them. Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

There's no survival benefit from another arm. Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

I see abortion as acceptable in two scenarios. If the mother will die from giving birth, it's the choice between killing the baby or both the baby and the mother If the mother is simple incapable of providing for the baby, well, that's similar to the first scenario. Either the mother abandons the baby or they both starve to death. Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
People decay. Plants absorb the decomposed remains for nutrients. Insects eat the bodies. Assuming the Earth is even just 5000 years old, it can't possibly hold all of the dead humans, plants, and animals.
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

I suppose the best answer to this would be to say that everything earthly came about from evolution and everything heavenly was intelligent design. Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

That's assuming the snake really was a snake and not a demon in disguise. See above. Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

This is better suited to a conspiracy theorist's website. Having said that, a very slow metabolism along with isolated conditions may have allowed a prehistoric creature that lives very long to survive with few numbers. Then again, this is assuming Nessie exists at all. If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Same reason we can't build skyscrapers as tall as we want. Beyond a certain point, the building material is too heavy to hold itself up. Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
We evolved. Flinging feces and servicing ourselves was no longer beneficial to the species.
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

That's assuming humans are so much stronger that they can successfully eliminate the opposition. Same reason there's still other religions: Either they excel where we don't or there's too many. Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
Floods, migration of predators, so on.
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
That's assuming these creatures exist. I'm also inclined to say that belief in these creatures is heresy and witchcraft.
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Or he hadn't discovered them yet. Or maybe, in his infinite wisdom, decided that primitive humans didn't need to worry about them yet? Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

For evolution to work, the creature with benefits has to live to reproduce. If they keep getting killed before they can reproduce, they can't pass on the beneficial genes. How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

There's no significant genetic anomalies from one generation of incest. Presumably, the children had enough genetic diversity that they could reproduce, with help from the previous generation, safetly. I'm not informed enough on this particular piece, so I can't say for sure. But one generation of incest does not instantly create horrific mutations. The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

That's not saying they were THE Adam and Eve. Even then, you're implying they weren't real people. I do have to question how well kept those records are, or if the Royal Family was making stuff up to promote their God given right to rule. Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Probably to defend itself from predators. Again, assuming unicorns exist. Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
The smaller the fossil, the less damage it takes to erase. You're also saying that we have the ability to properly see a 50 cell fossil, or that a one million cell organism is tough enough to leave a fossil behind.
Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

I've never heard this claim. Sounds like a gross simplification of simple organisms coming out of mud. Mud itself is biologically inert and cannot evolve. Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

The brain has specialized chemicals and structures. Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Why would we see a benefit in growing natural clothing when we always wear it? The closest thing to natural clothing is hair, which we evolved out of.

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

Well, there we go. I have to apologize for the style of the responses. I'm new.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Well, there we go. I have to apologize for the style of the responses. I'm new.

Honestly friend, please try again. I can't figure out were my question ends and your reply begins.

[Abolover]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Let me answer some of your questions...

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

it's not that they've survived, because you can not be born stupid, it's that they are uneducated, or could be born with a disability, and you can't prevent disability in birth.
You believe God created us, so answer this: Why would God create a stupid human being?

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

There is no need for a third arm in our species, there-fore we have not evolved to grow the extra limb.
If you say God created us: Why hasn't God given us third arms, or wings? If he is a perfect being, he would not be able to create imperfect things.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Abortions are only done when a woman feels she is incapable of caring for a child, and does not want to bring a child into the world that will not have a happy life.
Do you believe victims of rape should keep their bastard child? Why?

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

The bodies have decayed under the Earth and become just bones and dust, bones are found everywhere.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Our beliefs say they don't exist, so why would they be included?

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Snakes can not talk, and never could. We do not include stories of The Bible in our science because we do not believe it.
And this same question can be asked to you: Why has God made the snakes lose their speech?

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

The Loch Ness Monster is a mythological creature, explaining it would be the same as explaining a unicorn or a mermaid, Non-Existant.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

The trees have no need to grow that high, this is the same as the question about the thrid arm

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

it's spelt 'faeces' and this is because at one point in time we have taken a different evolutionary path to them.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

See above.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

This is like the question about stupid humans. The Dodo was not an intelligent species and had no way of learning, so they could not survive.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

You could also say where are the fossils of mermaids. Neither Dragons, Styrs or Unicorns exist, and they never have. So why would there be fossils of them?

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

The Bible and Darwin's theory do not share the same beleifs, there fore, THAT'S WHY.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

Why would God do something so horrible?

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

Again, i say, we do not share the same beleifs, so there is no reason whatsoever these two theories to have connections.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

it's either made up by the Royal Family to prove their greatness, or is true, we don't know, and will never know.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

UNICORNS ARE NOT REAL. WHY DOES EVERYONE HERE THINK THEY ARE REAL?

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

The organisms you speak of are so small they can't be seen by the human eye. that's where they are.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

No, if you believe that's what Darwins theory is, then this is your theory:
"God created 2 humans who were naked in a garden and one of them was superior to the other because he had an extra bit of flesh between his legs. then he ate an apple and it got stuck in hut throat. then there was some sex and a talking snake."
Ah, humanity EXPLAINED.


Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

How do you know it doesn't?

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

That's ridiculous, why would that happen? If you believe this should happen, Why hasn't Got given us natural clothing?

Remember, Darwin's Theory is just a THEORY, there is no such thing as proof, nothing can be proved, not even The Bible.

[Seth Campbell]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

What a mess, I'll see if I can clean some of this up...

it's not that they've survived, because you can not be born stupid, it's that they are uneducated, or could be born with a disability, and you can't prevent disability in birth.
You believe God created us, so answer this: Why would God create a stupid human being?

God creates disabled people as punishment, either for their own sins or for the sins of their parents or ancestors. We do not question the will of God. As for why he creates stupid people, well that depends on your definition of stupid doesn't it, anyway God is not to be questioned.

Explain why human's aren't perfect There is no need for a third arm in our species, there-fore we have not evolved to grow the extra limb.
If you say God created us: Why hasn't God given us third arms, or wings? If he is a perfect being, he would not be able to create imperfect things.

I'm not really sure where you're answer starts. God did not create us with a third arm or wings because He does not have a third arm or wings, we are created in His image after all.

Abortions are only done when a woman feels she is incapable of caring for a child, and does not want to bring a child into the world that will not have a happy life. [/I]
Do you believe victims of rape should keep their bastard child? Why?

So you think that abortion is the same as natural selection? It's a form of evolution to kill a child because it interferes with todays career womans choices? Yes a rape victim should keep their child, or at the very least put it up for adoption, it's a human life created by God, you have no right to commit murder.

[I]The bodies have decayed under the Earth and become just bones and dust, bones are found everywhere.

Huh, that doesn't answer the question. where are all these bones? If dinosaur bones are millions of years old, where are the human bones. Why do dinosaur bones survive if human bones don't?

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?

Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Our beliefs say they don't exist, so why would they be included?

So you just dismiss anything that doesn't fit in with your belief system? How convenient.

Snakes can not talk, and never could. We do not include stories of The Bible in our science because we do not believe it.
And this same question can be asked to you: Why has God made the snakes lose their speech?

So again, you just dismiss something because it doesn't fit. God obviously made snakes lose their speech the same time he took their legs away.
Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

The Loch Ness Monster is a mythological

[I]creature, explaining it would be the same as explaining a unicorn or a mermaid, Non-Existant.

Another denial, this is just sad.

The trees have no need to grow that high, this is the same as the question about the thrid arm

So the peacock needs it's tail? The platypus needs to look that silly? If evolution was true and things only evolved to their "needs" this would be a dull world.

it's spelt 'faeces' and this is because at one point in time we have taken a different evolutionary path to them.

It depends where you live. Feces is the True American spelling. Why would we take a different path?

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

See above.

You didn't answer the question.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

This is like the question about stupid humans. The Dodo was not an intelligent species and had no way of learning, so they could not survive.

So you hate things you believe are below you? How can you call one of Gods creatures stupid?

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

You could also say where are the fossils of mermaids. Neither Dragons, Styrs or Unicorns exist, and they never have. So why would there be fossils of them?

Numbers 24:8 God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows.

Deuteronomy 32:33 Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.

The Bible says you're wrong.

The Bible and Darwin's theory do not share the same beleifs, there fore, THAT'S WHY.

So you admit that it's all beliefs. Not True Biblical Fact.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
Why would God do something so horrible?

We don't question God's will. He created something so "horrible" because that's the way he wanted it.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

Again, i say, we do not share the same beleifs, so there is no reason whatsoever these two theories to have connections.

Well at least you admit that it's only faith that keeps you denying God. If you only had that kind of faith for the LORD.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

it's either made up by the Royal Family to prove their greatness, or is true, we don't know, and will never know.

So now the Royal family are a bunch of liars? Wow is everyone a liar except you?

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

UNICORNS ARE NOT REAL. WHY DOES EVERYONE HERE THINK THEY ARE REAL?

Because the Bible says they are.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

The organisms you speak of are so small they can't be seen by the human eye. that's where they are.

So we can see one celled organisms and billion celled organisms but anything in between is too small to see?

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

No, if you believe that's what Darwins theory is, then this is your theory:
"God created 2 humans who were naked in a garden and one of them was superior to the other because he had an extra bit of flesh between his legs. then he ate an apple and it got stuck in hut throat. then there was some sex and a talking snake."
Ah, humanity EXPLAINED.

What? Again, you didn't answer the question.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

How do you know it doesn't?

You really think that chemicals think? Wow....

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

That's ridiculous, why would that happen? If you believe this should happen, Why hasn't Got given us natural clothing?

Well evolution is the one that says that we came from hairy apes. Why would we loose the hair in order to have to find clothing? Wouldn't it of been easier for us just to keep the hair in the first place?

God made us naked and clothes us because that's what He is like. He wears clothes, so we should too.

Remember, Darwin's Theory is just a THEORY, there is no such thing as proof, nothing can be proved, not even The Bible.

The Bible can be proved.
2nd Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Turn before it's too late