[Bible Student]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
DNA is a hoax. This is how it really works: PROOF: Genetics are nonsense. Just look around during sex!.

Your famous proofs are worthless and points to nothing but ridicule statements.

What about people who has sex with animals (I don't support this act, but let's take it as a example), what about that? Will they have weird children as you say? If people watch an animal during sex, will they have animal-like children?

How do you explain these people?

No, that's ridiculous, you have nothing that proves this crazy idea, exept some crazy story about a certain Jacob or something.

A picture is worth a thousand words. And you just saw them.

Genetic has been proven by many experiments and observations, look it up, I don't have to point it out when this information is right in front of you.

And those experiments are a bit more proffessional than watching two animals breeding. Maybe you do it all the time, but real scientists don't.

You certainly have insurmountable blind faith in prevaricating scientists, don't you? It would me much better for your immortal soul that you put more faith into those God-breathed words, the 1611 King James Bible.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

This is all so very true Brother BS. Here is a photograph of Diligence Mortimer's baby. Note the gross red blob on its head. This was a direct result of her dropping a jar of strawberry jelly whilst pregnant with said child.

Fortunately, we were able to have the shameful child placed in an orphanage and Brother Isaiah Mortimer was granted a divorce from her. So there was a happy ending.

[Sheldon the Swede]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

How do you explain these people?


















A picture is worth a thousand words. And you just saw them.



You certainly have insurmountable blind faith in prevaricating scientists, don't you? It would me much better for your immortal soul that you put more faith into those God-breathed words, the 1611 King James Bible.

Yes, a beautiful drawn picture, very convincing, and if they LOOK LIKE an certain animal they MUST be a proof of that crazy old dude or wath's his name.

Please, show me studies, photographes, actual writings of those claims, some people have a weird face, does it absolutely proof of that guy's crazy statement? From where, when, by who, from who are those drawings? Were those people actually mating while watching an animal like you claim to be?


I don't mean that I don't want to see the proof, but this means nothing, drawings are no proofs of such claims.

By the way, it's not because you think it looks like an animal, he actually is from an animal. It's like looking in the clouds, you see wath you want to see, no more, no less, assholes.

It looks like it, no more, crazy fools.

[God's Flaming Sword]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes, a beautiful drawn picture, very convincing, and if they LOOK LIKE an certain animal they MUST be a proof of that crazy old dude or wath's his name.

Please, show me studies, photographes, actual writings of those claims, some people have a weird face, does it absolutely proof of that guy's crazy statement? From where, when, by who, from who are those drawings? Were those people actually mating while watching an animal like you claim to be?


I don't mean that I don't want to see the proof, but this means nothing, drawings are no proofs of such claims.

By the way, it's not because you think it looks like an animal, he actually is from an animal. It's like looking in the clouds, you see wath you want to see, no more, no less, assholes.

It looks like it, no more, crazy fools.

While you are here as a guest in our Christian forum you will obey our rules and instructions. We have tolerated your constant ridiculing of God and his facts and proofs.

Never matter if you are agreeing or disagreeing with anything there are good True Christian ladies here who should note have to listen to your foul-mouthed rants.

Take your blasphemous tongue and go until you can behave in a proper manner least we cut it out or you.

Apologise immediately for your lack of respect and gutter mouth.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Your famous proofs are worthless and points to nothing but ridicule statements.

What about people who has sex with animals (I don't support this act, but let's take it as a example), what about that? Will they have weird children as you say? If people watch an animal during sex, will they have animal-like children?

No, that's ridiculous, you have nothing that proves this crazy idea, exept some crazy story about a certain Jacob or something.

Genetic has been proven by many experiments and observations, look it up, I don't have to point it out when this information is right in front of you.

And those experiments are a bit more proffessional than watching two animals breeding. Maybe you do it all the time, but real scientists don't.

However much time you devote to watching animals copulate doesn't change the fact that God already knows how characteristics are psssed on. For example, although Staffordshire Bull Terriers wil co-operate with human females in exhibitions of depravity, as visiting lesbians to this forum already know, they will not deliver some sort of chimera, in the fulness of time - or at all. These things are no more than myths produced by cynical criminals in their scheme (apparently quite a successful one) to accumulate all the best in their society for themselves at the direct expense of their superstitious stooges.

The drawings posted above depict humans having some of the characteristics of certain animals, as would be the expected outcome where barnyard activities were involved during an otherwise normal conception. There seems to be no limit to the wanton harlotry of unsaved women who will as eagerly prostitute their daughters as themselves and conjure unspeakable depravities in their unremitting lustful imaginations to offer as "extras" should anyone be interested. They always are, of course.

However God has communicated the actual mechanism of inherited &/or acquired characteristics via His blessing Jacob and increasing his livestock holdings - and the evidence presents itself boldly before us. Here's two pictures:



Jacob's sheep are very popular with hand-spinners (I do spin quite a bit of wool myself and this breed is not available in Australia (despite the large number of sheep milling around everywhere). I import the fleece from England when I visit and have some experience with the animals more generally, so can assure doubting "geneticists" that whatever molecular phenomena they "observe" do result from the mechanism employed by Jacob, something that has not been undertaken here (in Australia) yet - but where God's hand is active the breed, and the descendants of Jacob, prosper still.

The breed is available in America.

But as for interspecies erotica - why do heathens keep intruding their obscene wishes into our Godly forum? Don't they have anything else to think about!

[Chia909]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hey. I'm an Atheist and will do my best to answer your questions. An evolutionist I've never been called, although I think that's the most sound reasoning behind where we are today.
Firstly: Land sharks. Evolution isn't a guarantee to happen as drastically as it did with us with all mammals. Sharks do predate us, by quite a bit, however they weren't around (in their current form: see megalodon) during the time that fish or sea life evolved into land creatures. We didn't evolve directly from fish, but from sea-life in general (there are specifics I just don't know them). Sharks evolved at their own pace of necessity and didn't need to chase our particular species onto land, as they still had plenty of food in the oceans via other sea-life. Even If we were (we weren't) the main absolute THIS IS WHAT SHARKS ONLY EAT, and we, over time, evolved into land creatures, they would either adapt to change with us, or just go after other food. The latter part of that statement is much less taxing to the species, thus they would have opted to go for other food.
Mars flood If theres evidence of a flood on Mars, I have no idea what that has to do with the happening or lack of happening of a great flood on earth. Sorry I don't see your point please restate your question.
Account for fools This should be one of the easier ones to answer. The movie Idiocracy does an excellent job of explaining this as well. Evolution, favors survivability and reproductive capacity. So, even though there are many fools and stupid less-than-the-fittest people, they are not going to starve to death from it because our society won't let them. If being stupid absolutely stopped you from eating your fill, then over time your genes would disappear. Secondly, evolution happens over many millions of years, our current Genus and Species of Homo and Sapiens have only been around for a couple million years.
Explain why humans aren't perfect (why don't we have a third arm): Simply because we're not a perfect species. A third arm coming out of..somewhere else.. wouldn't exactly favor survival or reproductive capacity in the least. Seeing as our current two handed system is working well for the continuation of our genes, Evolution says, if it ain't broke don't fix it. Evolution doesn't actively change, it responds to changes in the environment with changes that would benefit us only after the changes in our surroundings start hurting us.
Explain infant murder: This is referring to abortion I believe. If not sorry for the following text. Plainly it is a question of interpretation. You clearly interpret that to mean that abortion is literally killing children. Other people feel that its not and thus are morally okay with abortion. Personally I'm for a one and done law, which would bar repeat abortions. Better than nothing right?
Why no bodies? I'm not sure why this is a question, or if you're kidding, but I'll answer it. You see, organic matter decomposes. If bodies didn't decompose at all then you'd be exactly right and we'd be buried in dead organic matter. Bacteria, however, break down remains of humans and animals alike. that's why theres not mountains of bodies.
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life? : I would firstly like to point out your little typo. Where* do angels and demons. And the fact is that angels and demons do not fit into the tree of life, as a body of an angel or demon has never been recovered, and there is no feasible evidence for their existence. Show us a body or evidence that isn't just writing and we'll show you some transitional forms!
Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution. : There is no evolutionary explanation for a talking snake. However, because there is no vocal cords of snakes doesn't mean your theory is correct. You still have to prove that indeed you had a snake that talked or provide remains of a talking snake. Also, the serpent you are referring to was the devil in disguise you believe. So supernatural powers such as speech would be available to him, I would think. Snakes do, however, have hips and leg bones. Explained by evolution as being left over as they made their transition to belly-movers.
Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution: Nessy is a lie. There have been multiple Loch-wide excursions with Sonar to detect Nessy and nothing has been found. The photos and witness reports you are referring to have since been proven fraudulent by the witnesses themselves and the photographers who took the photos.
If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere? : Trees don't stretch into the stratosphere because they don't have the nutrients to. Of course they would love to be up there with all that unbroken up light from the sun, but they can't support themselves nutritionally or structurally. They're also competing with other trees for light and growth speed. To get that high would be a waste of energy which could be better spent expanding their root system, or broader leaves to catch more light, or more flowering seasons to spread their seed.
Why don't we act like monkeys: We don't act like monkeys because, number one, we're not monkeys. Nor are we evolved from monkeys. Us and modern primates are related, we're cousins. The great apes and the Bonobo are our closest relatives. Monkeys and humans are different species and thus behave differently. Humans also have a much larger brain capacity than monkeys, with complex problem solving skills and the like available to us, we needn't be throwing feces around.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
ChristianSoldier, firstly evolution doesn't predict anything. It especially doesn't predict that stronger species would crush and exterminate the weaker species. Again, we didn't evolve from monkeys. We.Did.Not.Evolve.From.Monkeys. The question is flawed in that evolution doesn't make predictions. Least of all the paradox put forth by you Christian Soldier.
Please account for quick extinctions. Again. Evolution does NOT say in any context that extinctions take millions of years. Quick extinctions are very easy to occur, and oftentimes do. They're usually caused by a change in the environment that the species in question cannot adapt to quickly enough, thus they die out. I would ask the question to this site, if all species were created by God in symbiosis, Why then are 99% of the species that have ever lived extinct?
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn? Thats a good question, I have no idea. This tells us that those things don't and never did exist.
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible? : If you believe that then there is no way I can convince you otherwise. Maybe because the writers of the bible didn't know about them?

Explain wasps with evolution: Those specific wasps are only one species of the entire insect group. Anti-wasp poison is a foolish idea. Such a thing wasn't developed because something that can be biochemically engineered I assure you would also kill the spider.
How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true? : You see, if evolution is true, as your question states, then this question is moot. Cain couldn't because he wouldn't have existed in the sense that the bible mentions.
The Genealogy of Henry III. You as a general fact, think that the earth is 6000 years old, or there abouts. If I am correct in assuming that I can also be sure in telling you that the scrolls are fraudulent. Modern systems of writing weren't around during the time of the Adam and Eve (as you put it). HZeroglyphics came around in about 3000 BC, and modern writing thousands of years after that.
Unicorn Horns: Unicorns don't exist. Never have. Never will
Transitional fossils for single celled organism. : This evolution would've occured in the ocean Billions of years ago. Single cell organisms also cannot leave a fossil because they have nothing hard to imprint onto rock or sand. Just goo.
Why is there still mud?: Mud is by definition dirt mixed with water. So long as those two elements of mud remain on earth and sometimes meet each other, mud will survive.
Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10: Our brains are very specific organs. Firstly, the chemicals you are referring to are deadly to life. So naturally those chemicals wouldn't be able to think. They also don't have a nervous system or a brain to carry the electrical signals to and fro areas. The brain is remarkably complex and I am by no means a psychologist.
Why don't we have natural clothing?: Our original forms didn't. Our ancestors in Africa didn't need it as they were in Africa. As humans moved outwards, they utilized the environment to make clothing for them as they moved into colder and colder places. I can ask the same question to you. We've been wearing clothing forever, Why didn't god make some for us? Was his vision not perfect? Did he not foresee this problem?

[James Hutchins]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hey. I'm an Atheist ................ <<<<<<<< tl;dr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this problem?

Get right with Jesus son, He wants to be your BMF.

Son, if we came from monkeys, where are our tails? You know why, because when God made man, he knew we did not need them., we'd use ladders and safety rigs when climbing.

I am sorry about your problem, if only you'd read the KJV, your problem, nay, all your problems would vanish in a fortnight.

[Bible Student]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hey. I'm an Atheist and will do my best to answer your questions. An evolutionist I've never been called, although I think that's the most sound reasoning behind where we are today.

(Heathen scientists' lies snipped)

Instead of copy & pasting that dribble that we have seen for the 30th time in this thread already, why didn't you read the previous 77 pages of posts before you insulted us with your trash?

All of that has already been disposed of in the proper receptacle (if you know what I mean).
I'm always amazed at the huge leap of faith in sekular scientists that atheists make. Now go back through the entire thread and see how badly True Christian™ Creation scientists wipe the floor with your nonsense.

I'm exasperated by Unsaved Trash like you. I am going back to studying my 1611 King James Bible.

[Godsgrace]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hey. I'm an Atheist and will do my best to answer your questions.
Unicorn Horns: Unicorns don't exist. Never have. Never will...

Why didn't god make some for us?

First, please go to the Introductions page and introduce yourself before posting any further. It's common courtesy.

I don't have the time or patience to refute all of you idiotic assertions, so I will keep this simple (as simplicity is the only thing you seem to be able to comprehend)

I want to address the idea that Unicorns are a myth. This is utter balderdash. If they're a myth, why are they in the Holy Bible?

Numbers 23:22

22God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.

Numbers 24:8

8God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows.

Deuteronomy 33:17

17His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Psalm 22:21

21Save me from the lion's mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns

Psalm 29:6

6He maketh them also to skip like a calf; Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn

Psalm 92:10

10But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be anointed with fresh oil.

Isaiah 34:7

7And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness.

Tell me: why would the Bible talk about unicorns if they were a "myth?"

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Instead of copy & pasting that dribble that we have seen for the 30th time in this thread already, why didn't you read the previous 77 pages of posts before you insulted us with your trash?

All of that has already been disposed of in the proper receptacle (if you know what I mean).
I'm always amazed at the huge leap of faith in sekular scientists that atheists make. Now go back through the entire thread and see how badly True Christian™ Creation scientists wipe the floor with your nonsense.

I'm exasperated by Unsaved Trash like you. I am going back to studying my 1611 King James Bible.

What Brother Bible Student just said.

Chia909,

All the proof you have provided is invalid. It depends on observation from skeptical sources so it is just rationalists helping rationalist. That's why we Christians don't pay it any heed.

Now do you have any third party, non-scientific proof for your claims. We would all like to read it Chia909.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes, a beautiful drawn picture, very convincing, and if they LOOK LIKE an certain animal they MUST be a proof of that crazy old dude or wath's his name.

Please, show me studies, photographes, actual writings of those claims, some people have a weird face, does it absolutely proof of that guy's crazy statement? From where, when, by who, from who are those drawings? Were those people actually mating while watching an animal like you claim to be?


I don't mean that I don't want to see the proof, but this means nothing, drawings are no proofs of such claims.

By the way, it's not because you think it looks like an animal, he actually is from an animal. It's like looking in the clouds, you see wath you want to see, no more, no less, assholes.

It looks like it, no more, crazy fools.

Never heard of The Wolf Boys

That's they're website and they make a decent living on the freak show circuit. Who knows what their parents were staring at when that happened.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I am absolutely befuddled by what you're trying to say.

There are ABSOLUTELY birds that eat fish... haven't you ever heard of a pelican?

Here's another one

[Sheldon the Swede]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Never heard of The Wolf Boys

That's they're website and they make a decent living on the freak show circuit. Who knows what their parents were staring at when that happened.

Again, please, they have lots of hair on their face, you think that qualify them as Wolfs?

You're so naive, like I said before, not every 'misconception' is a animal-person, it's not because YOU THINK it looks like an animal it them makes an animal. You're like looking in clouds and saying 'it looks like a bear', it makes the clouds not a actual bear.

Those differences are merely causes of mutations, birth defects, hormone defects, or other.

If you also think those were acts o god / gods, again you're naive and acting stupid.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

If you also think those were acts o god / gods, again you're naive and acting stupid.

I'll ask you to keep a civil tongue, you unsaved trash.

We don't care what you have to say, we care about the Bible. The Bible tells us that what you are claiming is all lies

[Sheldon the Swede]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I'll ask you to keep a civil tongue, you unsaved trash.

We don't care what you have to say, we care about the Bible. The Bible tells us that what you are claiming is all lies

So you admit you live in a fantasy world called the bible? That even reality can't make you change your mind about everything?

Tell me, did god literally wrote the (fucking) bible, o has he 'inspired' HUMAN BEINGS to write the bible, if it is the latter, then you're all naive people.