[Freeks-Angel]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

Oh how disgusting. I wouldn't be surprised if does though, seeing as Satan is the Lord of Perversity and likes to manifest as a dragon when the mood suits him.

I was meaning that it could either be a dragon or lizard.

[Petal]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

"See chasevan.
See chasevan wrong.
Wrong chasevan wrong.
See dinosaur.
Look into dinosaurs eyes.
Dinosaur laughs at fool chasevan."

"You are the stupid one."

"(I borrowed that quote from the fags)"

"Are you two tarded', or just 2 parts of an ass?
Butt cheek right side jmlove, butt cheek left side chasevan."

"Final lesson from me to you two twits."

this pickture shows what i saw be in your hart an minds when i reads your post, Mr.fourtwenty

here be bible verse for you, it true

Every prudent man dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open his folly. <--- that be Proverbs 13:16

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

How do Christians explain the dinosaurs?

Please use the "search" function before posting your God-mocking questions. Chances are they have been addressed elsewhere already.

[GOD=life]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

Apparently they can't.

This is your conclusion based on not getting an answer within 3 minutes? You are an impatient one, sheesh.

Re-read his question. You look like a fool.

Personal attack -- fails in rational debate.

Noah was not even around when these things were walking the earth. And the flood is never even proven to have happened and dinosaurs were definitely not killed off by that.

You keep making statements and personal attacks without even a shred of evidence to back it up. Do you honestly believe that if you state lies matter-of-factly and insult people, that you will be seen as intelligent?

Dude, its called science. they can prove TODAY, with SCIENCE from the remains left from the dinosaurs, that they were around WAY WAY WAY before the birth of christ.

So you're saying that science basically validates itself. Wow, bit circular logic there.

But what's your point, really? We can "prove" that people existed before the birth of Christ. He was around 2000 years ago, not 6000. Just because you can prove an obvious fact that we already agree upon doesn't mean that you have proven anything in the realm of that which we do not agree upon. It's a little debate trick that won't fly, sorry.

your ridiculous. why are you even fighting us on this? you have nothing. you have no right to call them 'fags', its disrespectful. you people astound me with your arrogance and stupidity.

And again you go into personal attack mode. Just because you type a lot of words doesn't mean you're making an argument that's not even going to impress people who agree with you. You are also a hypocrite: if you demand respect, how about giving the better example by not calling us True Christians arrogant and stupid...... on our own forum! Do we come to YOUR forum? NO. So what's the big deal?

Please learn some manners, friend.

Would you like to sit down with us and read the KJV 1611 Bible?

[ebilly99]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

What about dinosaures. First there is proof that carbon/uranium testing is wrong. Its half life can not be 18,000 years and 4.6 billion becuse the earth is 6,000 yrs old. Second there are pictures of dinos before we found bones to dinos, Third there is a fossil of a human footprint inside a dinos footprint. What other evidince do I need

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

[...]But what's your point, really? We can "prove" that people existed before the birth of Christ. He was around 2000 years ago, not 6000. Just because you can prove an obvious fact that we already agree upon doesn't mean that you have proven anything in the realm of that which we do not agree upon. It's a little debate trick that won't fly, sorry.

Whoa there boy! Your anger is carrying you at a great speed towards the Gates of Hell.

You are happy to concede that Jesus walked the earth 2000 years ago? Yes?

Then there is nothing that you should really object to about The Bible.

The Bible can be used to establish the day, date and time of Creation, which was 6000 years ago.

We are thus in agreement!

What about dinosaurs. First there is proof that carbon/uranium testing is wrong. Its half life can not be 18,000 years and 4.6 billion because the earth is 6,000 yrs old. Second there are pictures of dinos before we found bones to dinos, Third there is a fossil of a human footprint inside a dinos footprint. What other evidence do I need

None at all I hope, yet the protesting atheists and assorted enemies of God still persist.

[Myron Pollard]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

What about dinosaures. First there is proof that carbon/uranium testing is wrong. Its half life can not be 18,000 years and 4.6 billion becuse the earth is 6,000 yrs old. Second there are pictures of dinos before we found bones to dinos, Third there is a fossil of a human footprint inside a dinos footprint. What other evidince do I need

The only proof you need is written in the KJV Bible.These matters have already been discussed and proven by our LBC leaders.Do yourself a favor and find Jesus today.You will reap the benefits of Heaven and have everlasting life with our Father, Lord Jesus.Praise Jesus and all His glory...

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

What about dinosaures. First there is proof that carbon/uranium testing is wrong. Its half life can not be 18,000 years and 4.6 billion becuse the earth is 6,000 yrs old. Second there are pictures of dinos before we found bones to dinos, Third there is a fossil of a human footprint inside a dinos footprint. What other evidince do I need

Your so-called "carbon dating" is a joke. Creation scientists have known this for years!

[GOD=life]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

You are happy to concede that Jesus walked the earth 2000 years ago? Yes? ..... We are thus in agreement!

Brother Bathfire, we were already in full agreement and will continue to be so

I admit that I used somewhat ambiguous wording to demonstrate that getting us to concede on a point we don't contest is a hollow victory. Although it might make him look like he's gaining ground "look everyone, I got a Christian to agree on something".

YIC

[ebilly99]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

Your so-called "carbon dating" is a joke. Creation scientists have known this for years!

I agree read my post again. I am saying that carbon dating is impossible.

[True Disciple]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

I have posted this one before, but let's do it once again for the atheists who are too lazy to use the search function God provided this forum with. The dinosaur question is answered by Chick et al, 2007. Stop asking silly questions.

[ericleb]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

They can't explain because those who wrote the Bible did not know of the existence of dinosaurs 65 million years ago. It's not their fault.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: So what about Dinosaurs?

They can't explain because those who wrote the Bible did not know of the existence of dinosaurs 65 million years ago. It's not their fault.

But when you wake up in hell it'll be your fault, boy. Don't blame God because you rejected Him.

Rom. 9:22-24: [What] if God, willing to shew [his] wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory, Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?