Tweet
Fellow True Christians™ this is a scientist’s view of live and genetic inheritance. (Warning: You may need aspirin as you read it)
OK, happy with that? So, "What’s this Nitrogenous Base of DNA?" I hear you say. Well, this is what them scientists say:
Or there is God’s view:
Ge:2:7: And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Ge:2:8: And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
Ge:2:9: And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Now look at Occams’ Razor:
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor[1]), is the meta-theoretical principle that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) and the conclusion thereof, that the simplest solution is usually the correct one.
OK, who do you reckon is right? Some so-called scientist whose salary depends upon his being able to talk English but never say something you understand, or God, Whose Word is Everlasting?
NB, the scientific bit is taken from the internets as no one in their right mind can write that gibberish and no one really believes it. The verses are God's Holy Words found in KJV1611
A nitrogenous (nitrogen-containing) base is an organic compound that owes its property as a base to the lone pair of electrons of a nitrogen atom. In biological sciences, nitrogenous bases are typically classified as the derivatives of two parent compounds, pyrimidine and purine. They are non-polar and due to their aromaticity, planar. Both pyrimidines and purines resemble pyridine and are thus weak bases and relatively unreactive towards electrophilic aromatic substitution.[2] Their flat shape is particularly important when considering their roles in nucleic acids as nucleobases (building blocks of DNA and RNA): adenine, guanine, thymine, cytosine, and uracil. These nitrogenous bases hydrogen bond between opposing DNA strands to form the rungs of the "twisted ladder" or double mount helix of DNA or a biological catalyst that is found in the nucleotides.
Nitrogen Bases of DNA
- These are rather complex single or double ring structures containing nitrogen and are attached to the carbon of the sugar. Nitrogen bases are of two types based on the number of rings.
Purines
Purines are double ringed nitrogenous bases which are linked to sugar by using nitrogen present at 9' -position. Adenine and guanine come under this group.
Pyrimidines
Pyrimidines are single ringed nitrogen bases which are linked to sugar by using nitrogen present at 1 ' -position. Thymine and cytosine come under this group.
Adenine 6-aminopurine
Guanine 2-amino 6-oxypurine
Cytosine 4-amino 2-oxypyrimidine
Thymine 2,4-oxy S-methyl pyrimidine
Uracil 2,4-oxypyrimidine
Purines
Purines are double ringed nitrogenous bases which are linked to sugar by using nitrogen present at 9' -position. Adenine and guanine come under this group.
Pyrimidines
Pyrimidines are single ringed nitrogen bases which are linked to sugar by using nitrogen present at 1 ' -position. Thymine and cytosine come under this group.
Adenine 6-aminopurine
Guanine 2-amino 6-oxypurine
Cytosine 4-amino 2-oxypyrimidine
Thymine 2,4-oxy S-methyl pyrimidine
Uracil 2,4-oxypyrimidine
Ge:2:7: And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Ge:2:8: And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
Ge:2:9: And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Now look at Occams’ Razor:
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor[1]), is the meta-theoretical principle that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) and the conclusion thereof, that the simplest solution is usually the correct one.
OK, who do you reckon is right? Some so-called scientist whose salary depends upon his being able to talk English but never say something you understand, or God, Whose Word is Everlasting?
NB, the scientific bit is taken from the internets as no one in their right mind can write that gibberish and no one really believes it. The verses are God's Holy Words found in KJV1611
Comment