[Brother Temperance]

Re: A question for Wickers

Well aren't I lucky only Rachael's seen my tongue then. I don't care how old the earth is but where in the bible does it say the exact words: God created the earth 6000 years ago. If it doesn't say that in plain English then how can you believe it? I also have another question, why is slipping my tongue out so bad? It's a nicely toned muscle, it gets a lot of work.

Dammit boy, read your Bible! The earth was created in 3987 BC and that's all there is to it!

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

Dammit boy, read your Bible! The earth was created in 3987 BC and that's all there is to it!

Sorry that's just so funny. HAHAHAHAHA How can the earth have been created in 3987 BC? I mean really! The system of time is man made, you do understand that don't you. The earth would have had to be created in the year 0. The very first Earth year. It's like when you're born you are not years old so the Earth must have been created in the year 0. Wow, that really made my day, I needed a good laugh . Thanks bro.

[Enobarbus]

Re: A question for Wickers

Sorry that's just so funny. HAHAHAHAHA How can the earth have been created in 3987 BC? I mean really! The system of time is man made, you do understand that don't you. The earth would have had to be created in the year 0. The very first Earth year. It's like when you're born you are not years old so the Earth must have been created in the year 0. Wow, that really made my day, I needed a good laugh . Thanks bro.

You simply go back 3987 years from the Birth of Christ and that is when the earth was created. It was created in 3987 BC. About 6000 years ago.

What year were you born in? 1989? Or should we say that you were born in the year 0?

BC means that you count the years backwards from the birth of Christ. You can measure anything in the past on this scale. What could be more senseless than saying that the earth was created in the first earth year? The first earth year was 3987 BC. Secular scientists say that it was billions of years BC, but they are wrong.

Your reasoning is quite odd.

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

Do you not realise how illogical that is though? The first earth year would be the year 0, then year 1 year 2 etc until you reach however many years BC and start again at 0 AD after Jesus died or was born or however that works out.

Saying the world was created at such a random year isn't logical because man created the system of time. Logic dictates that at the begining of time it was the first day of the first year. What had happened those first three thousand years? It's just illogical.

[Jesus is Lord]

Re: A question for Wickers

Do you not realise how illogical that is though? The first earth year would be the year 0, then year 1 year 2 etc until you reach however many years BC and start again at 0 AD after Jesus died or was born or however that works out.

Saying the world was created at such a random year isn't logical because man created the system of time. Logic dictates that at the begining of time it was the first day of the first year. What had happened those first three thousand years? It's just illogical.

LOGIC? Who said God always does what is "logical", let alone humans? We are not logical creatures. If we were then everybody would follow God and there would be no need for war, etc.

The year was not chosen at random, it is figured from the Holy KJV 1611 Bible, the Word of God. God made the Earth and wrote down how and when in the Bible and who better to know how long ago it was created than the Creator?

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

We are not logical creatures.

*raises hand* I'm logical. I can't function without logic which is why I'm not religious. If there were a god and there was a devil there would have to be a third player. No religion is based in logic, not even scientology is logical and by definition it really should be.

We are not logical creatures. If we were then everybody would follow God and there would be no need for war, etc.

I disagree, I think war is perfectly logical. People go to war because they're aggressive and territorial. It's completely logical. Even people who disagree with war have the basic instinct to protect what's theirs, if someone broke into your house you would do whatever it took to get them out whether you believe in violence or not. It's human nature, it's the way people deal with conflict. I believe humans are very logical.

The year was not chosen at random, it is figured from the Holy KJV 1611 Bible, the Word of God. God made the Earth and wrote down how and when in the Bible and who better to know how long ago it was created than the Creator?

I'm sorry but I can't accept that. I don't understand it. I'm not being stupid or immature or anything. I truely don't understand how you can base your existance on something that was wirtten by men. I realise you believe god wrote it and who am i to say otherwise but I mean I could write a bible. People make up religions all the time and persuade others to pay them money to join it. I don't see how Christianity is any different. I'm sorry if that offends anyone but that's how I feel.

EDIT: >_< Sorry for the typos if anyone read it before I edited it. My spelling has gone down hill, I'm a little annoyed about some stuff and it's ruining my ability to write accurately.

[Enobarbus]

Re: A question for Wickers

Do you not realise how illogical that is though? The first earth year would be the year 0, then year 1 year 2 etc until you reach however many years BC and start again at 0 AD after Jesus died or was born or however that works out.

Saying the world was created at such a random year isn't logical because man created the system of time. Logic dictates that at the begining of time it was the first day of the first year. What had happened those first three thousand years? It's just illogical.

What on earth do you mean by "until you reach so many years BC?

We are discussing how long ago the earth was created. There is simply nothing illogical about it at all. If it was created 6000 years ago then it was created about 3987 BC. That is not illogical at all. If it was created billions of years ago, it would be created billions of years ago BC.

What on earth does saying that it is created in the year 0 tell us? Now that is funny, because it's meaningless and gives us no idea at all of when it actually was created. When was the year 0? I'll tell you. It was about 6000 years ago or 3987 BC. There is nothing random about it. Ask your big brother or teacher or daddy. They'll explain.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: A question for Wickers

*raises hand* I'm logical.

No, you aren't. You cannot even grasp the concept of logic boy. Your brain is probably full of holes from sniffing glue or smoking crack. If you were a logical person, you would have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour by now.

But I'm glad that you are raising your hand before you speak. That shows that you acknowledge the pastors here as your superiors.



I'm sorry but I can't accept that. I don't understand it. I'm not being stupid or immature or anything. I truely don't understand how you can base your existance on something that was wirtten by men. I realise you believe god wrote it and who am i to say otherwise but I mean I could write a bible. People make up religions all the time and persuade others to pay them money to join it. I don't see how Christianity is any different. I'm sorry if that offends anyone but that's how I feel.

Your ignorance does not offend us, so long as you are respectful to Jesus and the True Christians™ here, no one will be offended.

You claim to be a logical kid, yet you reject God. You reject anything "written by men", but where do you think the concept of logic comes from? And you reject the Holy Bible as written by men, when the Bible was dictated by God Himself. HERE is a simple explanation that even a kid like you might be able to understand.

EDIT: >_< Sorry for the typos if anyone read it before I edited it. My spelling has gone down hill, I'm a little annoyed about some stuff and it's ruining my ability to write accurately.

Jesus has revealed to me that the reason you are annoyed is that the demons in you are throwing a tantrum because you are hearing God's Word for the first time in your miserable life. Keep up the good work, boy! The next step might me to stop being a homer sissyboy.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: A question for Wickers

*raises hand* I'm logical. I can't function without logic which is why I'm not religious. If there were a god and there was a devil there would have to be a third player.

Oh. You mean like in chess?

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

Oh. You mean like in chess?

What I meant was you can't just have good adn evil because it's not that black and white. You have to have the middle man, someone who's neither good nor bad. The third player, the observer. The keeper of balance.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: A question for Wickers

I disagree, I think war is perfectly logical. People go to war because they're aggressive and territorial. It's completely logical.

So going off to fight and be killed by a complete stranger in the name of Allah or the Fatherland is more logical than sitting around at home eating cookies and preaching the Word of God to misled Catlick schoolgirls? You have a very queer conception of logic, my friend.

You have to have the middle man, someone who's neither good nor bad. The third player, the observer. The keeper of balance.

So you can't have a balance between two things, but you can have one between three? You really should accept Christ, because secular "logic" really isn't working out for you.

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

So you can't have a balance between two things, but you can have one between three? You really should accept Christ, because secular "logic" really isn't working out for you.

That's not what I said, it's like you have a log and the very center of the log is placed on a rock, on either side of the log you have an equal amount of weight. If you out ways the other the log will fall and break so someone has to make sure that the weights stay equal. Is that more clear? It's not something that affects the outcome becuase it's not a part of the structure but it holds everything together becuase it sees through uncorrupted eyes. It doesn't see good or evil but it see balance.

I don't expect you to understand.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question for Wickers

What I meant was you can't just have good adn evil because it's not that black and white. You have to have the middle man, someone who's neither good nor bad. The third player, the observer. The keeper of balance.

Why were there be such a thing? God Himself alone created the universe and in it. That means there can not be a power even equal to Him much less greater. On of the reasons Satan is so evil is Satan knows what he does is futile, that God can always undo what ever Satan does. In other words Satan's evil is for the pure maliciousness of it, like a child having a temper tantrum

[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: A question for Wickers

I told you, you wouldn't understand. If there was just good and evil adn good was as powerful as you say it is then the whole world would be consumed by it and vice versa. Which implies that there is a third being something that can't touch reality but lingers there. Perhaps it's your conscience, maybe it's something else but it's there.

[SUV]

Re: A question for Wickers

Sirs, Demon ACLUtard:

Do you really expect our Godly Pastors to accept "wisdom" from Adolf-Hitler-peering-over-his-sunglasses-and-then-his-avatar-turns-this-real-Homer!istic-PINKY COLOR?!!

Other than that, Jesus Loves You and I don't think you're half-Bad myself.

MERRY CHRISTIAN CHRISTMAS!!!

(Oh, Foo! I just couldn't resist coloring that in and spoiling your fun. However, you are Perfectly welcome to turn the colorization back to black and then color it in any way your little heart Desires!!)