I'm putting this is the lounge because it's just a half-constructed thought - a "Mr. Jingles" so to speak. It goes like this:
Shouldn't the USA and Europe trade their illegal immigrant populations?
Both the USA and Europe need illegal immigrants - they both need cheap, uncomplaining labor forces, an ethnically divided inferior class, and someone to blame for economic distress.
My point is that we both have the wrong immigrants. America has hispanics, while Europe has Muslims. Both groups would be perfect across the Atlantic.
Hispanics would fit right in with Europe - they already speak a European language, have a European religion, and have females with big bottoms, something Europe has a shortage of.
Muslims, on the other hand, would fit in right here. I know this sounds strange, but consider that on almost every issue out there, Muslims agree with conservative Christians. The only things we disagree on are "should we invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity". And they don't seem to mind when we kill their leaders, so that brings the disagreement down to "Should we invade their countries and convert them to Christianity". Minor differences, that can be delt with easily - especially once we've invaded their countries and converted them to Christianity.
Shouldn't the USA and Europe trade their illegal immigrant populations?
Both the USA and Europe need illegal immigrants - they both need cheap, uncomplaining labor forces, an ethnically divided inferior class, and someone to blame for economic distress.
My point is that we both have the wrong immigrants. America has hispanics, while Europe has Muslims. Both groups would be perfect across the Atlantic.
Hispanics would fit right in with Europe - they already speak a European language, have a European religion, and have females with big bottoms, something Europe has a shortage of.
Muslims, on the other hand, would fit in right here. I know this sounds strange, but consider that on almost every issue out there, Muslims agree with conservative Christians. The only things we disagree on are "should we invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity". And they don't seem to mind when we kill their leaders, so that brings the disagreement down to "Should we invade their countries and convert them to Christianity". Minor differences, that can be delt with easily - especially once we've invaded their countries and converted them to Christianity.








Comment