[Basilissa]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Please note that I have found that using several periods to end a sentence helps to end a sentence... For any of me who need a pare of glasses, it helps distinguish between comas, period ...

Hello Gilbert and to our friendly forum!

Since you seem to have problems distinguishing between periods and commas, do you think that praying to God to heal your poor eyesight would help (Mark 11:24)? It would certainly be easier than looking for a pair of glasses, don't you think? (Not to mention that inability to distinguish between a dot and a line is not something that can be solved just with glasses, there seems to be something seriously wrong with your eyesight).

Or maybe that's a problem which can be solved by cleaning your computer screen? In which case you could probably do it yourself rather than ask God to to it.

Just trying to be helpful.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

An ellipsis is a set of three periods ( . . . ) indicating an omission . . . In informal writing, an ellipsis can be used to represent a trailing off of thought.

Can it also be used to represent the complete absence of a point, Brother Larry? Because this seems to approximate to the usage inflicted on us by our new friend here.


Matthew 12:36

[BrotherLarry]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Can it also be used to represent the complete absence of a point, Brother Larry? Because this seems to approximate to the usage inflicted on us by our new friend here.


Matthew 12:36

I am not sure if his language, Canadian, allows for that or not. I do pray that the LORD GOD of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob heals him so he can use proper punctuation before I scream Jesus Mary and Joseph - using the holy family's names in vain.


Your loving brother in JESUS,
BrotherLarry

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Hello, and welcome to our friendly forums! I'm so glad Jesus led you to us! We're always happy to fellowship with other Christians who anticipate the Glorious Day when Christ tosses all the unsaved into the Lake of Fire and they begin an eternity of torment and unfathomable pain and agony!

I'd love to hear more about your opinion regarding Hillary. Perhaps the Holy Ghost has spoken to you personally about her and you can give us some more insight here: Hillary Clinton: Witch or Demon?

[docscience]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Since people are so very concerned with extra periods, points , how does one get the "forum gods" to give powers of editing posts ?

For those who do not know, A reliable source had said that the information was directly from Bill Clinton, a few years back, that Hillary had been involved in witchcraft for many years. It is on a youtube video, but I have no idea where to find that, now.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Since people are so very concerned with extra periods, points , how does one get the "forum gods" to give powers of editing posts ?

I see you're asking for favors using passive aggressive jabs and backhanded compliments. I don't think you quite know how civilized conversations work.

For those who do not know, A reliable source had said that the information was directly from Bill Clinton, a few years back, that Hillary had been involved in witchcraft for many years. It is on a youtube video, but I have no idea where to find that, now.

Are you suggesting we accept your assurances simply because you say so? You've not shown yourself to be a man of any character, your reputation thus far is bleak. I'll pray on it, and if the Holy Ghost assures me Himself, then I'll trust you. In the meantime, if you have some actual knowledge, that would be nice, too.

[docscience]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

I have no Idea now, where to find the video.
But I do have a link to a related video.
youtube.com/watch?v=gAwHYSHjqXw
( Hilary Clinton Sacrifices Chickens to Moloch! )

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

I have no Idea now, where to find the video.
But I do have a link to a related video.
youtube.com/watch?v=gAwHYSHjqXw
( Hilary Clinton Sacrifices Chickens to Moloch! )

Wow! The naysayer will say that's naught but photoshop probably created in 4chan. After all anyone can write the words and claim they came from an email. But who cares? That's scary and it fits what I believe to be true anyway, so it must be true!

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

I suppose, Sister, that in the case of the Clinton woman and witchcraft one could apply the Duck Test? Similarly, we at Landover tend to apply it to many of Unsaved Trash who come here to torment us, using what (in my country) we might call the Complete and Utter Prat Test.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

I Corinthians 10:25
Paul is talking about food or meat offered to idols in this passage ....
That is what this whole discussion is about, both before it and after it....

1 CORINTHIANS 10 . KJV
23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.
24 Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth.
25 Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
26 For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof.
27 If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake.

The passage in questions covers a couple of points you raised. The verse I included refers to buying food in The Shambles, a sort of shopping area. You might like to comment on verse 23.

[docscience]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

concerning 1-corinthians 10:23-27
-
I have read both sides of the argument.
I know both sides of the argument.
Therefore I need to figure out if one is correct, or if both can be correct.
-
Isaiah 66:15-17 makes it clear that those eating unclean THINGS will become toast, when the Lord will come with fire, and with his chariots.
-
So Is Isaiah correct or is Paul correct ??
We have very good confirmation that Isaiah has not changed and is correct.
-
-
2-Peter 3:16--as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things ; in which are some things hard to be understood,
which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction.
-
We do know that peter says that Paul's writings are sometimes hard to understand.
There are a couple reasons for this.
One reason is that sometimes Paul is writing in response to questions, and so we get a one sided conversation.
Another is that Paul is addressing a specific issue, and items that are not specifically related to that issue, are not included.
Paul knows the OT very well and would have known about Isaiah 66.
-
-
-
In this case, 1-corinthians 10:23-27 are referenced.
-
-corinthians 10:28 --But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols,
Verse 28 makes it clear that the issue in the previous verses is about meat offered to idols.
-
-
-corinthians 10:25 -Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience’ sake :
Verse 25 --The explanation that I have heard is that when you buy meat, where ever, it is always, in normal circumstance, labeled as to the type of meat.
There is no need to ask what it is, because that would be labeled... So they would just NOT buy those unclean things.
But steaks, for example, a clean food, would not be labeled weather it was sacrificed to idols, therefore Paul means -do not ask if it is sacrificed to idols,
because the idols that they are sacrificed to, are not living things but just stone objects, and therefore meaningless, and does not effect the meat.
-
The verses before vrs 23 again talk about food sacrifices and idols.
The whole passage topic is concerning and references food and idols.
-
Paul would be well aware that swine is not food, and that this would be well known, because anyone going to a synagogue anywhere, would learn this message.
There would be no need for Paul to mention that unclean things are not food.
This same theme is related to all other Bible passages where Paul talks about eating.
-
-
Paul says this in Acts 24:14 - so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets : .
This means that Paul would never contradict a prophecy, nor eat unclean animals, and never teach to eat unclean animals.

-
Your choices are that you either accept that this is correct, OR
the alternative is that either Paul is wrong, or Isaiah is wrong.
-
IT IS YOUR CHOICE, IF YOU WANT TO CALL ISAIAH A FALSE PROPHET, BECAUSE JESUS DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ISAIAH.
-
-
If for any chance the food laws section were done away, it would not effect me in the least.
I find it very easy to just NOT buy pig or the particular sea foods.
It is not a burden to keep the dietary laws, nor does it put anyone "under the law" to do so.
-
IF as it has been shown, the food laws are still in effect, according to Isaiah 66, millions of people are
living in perpetual habitual lawlessness, and will be killed by the wrath of God. (toast in that future day).
lawlessness is also iniquity.
-
-
-
If you know of a better explanation, then please write or post a link.
I have given the alternative explanation, that makes it all cohesive and logical.
How do you want to roll your dice.
-
-
There is much more, but this is long as it is.
Here is a video that is an hour long, and gives related Biblical explanations.
youtube.com/watch?v=PgyhEEQz0PY
-
-
Sincerely ,
Gilbert Schmidt .
.

[docscience]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

If anyone wishes to contact me,
My email ***personal contact intormation removed*** com

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

If anyone wishes to contact me,
My email is <redacted>

Why would anyone wish to contact you? This is not some online pre-teen dating agency.

[docscience]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

For one reason, I do not have a clue how to contact people using any messaging on this system, if I wanted to ask them a question without posting it.
Also, I do not know how someone would contact me likewise.
The easiest way seems to just post in the thread, but I never know if someone would be checking that thread and see the question.
Does that answer the question.
Thankyou for asking.
Gilbert Schmidt .

[Des]

Re: My brief introductory comments as requested to do so.

Hello, Dilbert.

I see that you are in luck, because Jesus has seen it in His heart to lead you here among the True Believers. And just in time, too, because the end days are nigh upon us!


Make no mistake, the end times are drawing near just as surely as transgenitaled homers stalk playgrounds and porta-potties! And if you haven't found Jesus before then, well, you may as well be in the bottom of one of those porta-potties along with the transhomer pedophiles, because even that will be a luxury suite compared to where you'll be heading if you keep following the teachings of the paganistic Pestertarians.


Get your affairs right with Jesus, and do it quick. And boy, you better come correct! Because in Jesus' fair and loving estate there are no manors reserved for the unworthy. Not even a McMansion.


Glory on High onto He whose blood was spilled to deliver the worthy onto the kingdom of heaven!