[Brother D. Thomas]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

___________________

Why are you still talking heretic? You actually want us to believe the ladies will protect you from gods wrath? If that's the case you just admitted to being a heratic commie Sinner.

__________________

Vengeance Puriel,

Like I have stated, you obviously have never seen in how a woman can act in her premenstrual stage, at the time of menstruation, and subsequent to their menstruation. Subjectively, this time period takes up the entire month where the woman turns into Satan incarnate!

Now, the "Ladies of the Night" that I am in contact with at the Nevada brothels, hold me dear in my continued efforts to turn them towards Jesus instead of always laying down on the job. As we speak, they are forming a "Harlot Squad" that will make Landover's "God Squad" look like a Boy Scout picnic with chaperones!

Which reminds me, I have to start packing so I can return to Nevada in my godly attempts in saving the Jezebels for Christ Jesus.


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


___________________

[Red Army]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Engels and Marx were comparing the actuality of supposed exploitation of the proletariat in matters of the libido with the need for seduction of wives among the bourgeois. If the wives were in fact common property, as you seem to be suggesting, there would be no need for seduction would there.

It is backwards, seduction would be free from the chains of monogamy, so we can start seducting each other. You as a woman will have enormous power over those who want to lay with you. And your love could be spread (sexually, romantic, friendly, as you want!) to each and every men on Earth. But only the ones who you choose! And when you say NO, it is NO!!!.

Hothouse dilettantes such as Karl Marx lack the need and the desire for contact with reality. The result is failure to distinguish between various strata of the bourgeoisie from factory owners to doctors, university dons, lawyers and so on. Communism therefore could not distinguish between millionaires and the nobility when a nasty Tsar took over from his liberationist predecessor, the true cause of this half-baked ideology ever being considered as a form of government.

Technically speaking, doctors, lawyers and so on are not bourgoise. Only factory owners are bourgoise.
And you are explaining the revolution because of one factor, I did not think you were so narrow minded, Sister!

And although some animals were more equal than others at least they took an egalitarian approach to murder. Of course the whole thing went belly up. Murder based systems never do well.

I find it hard to follow your line of thought sometimes. I hope is not something you have, but my old age kicking in.


I agree, murder based systems never do well. Communism is based on love for humanity, with an occasional murder, and then another one, isolated, maybe a progrom or two. Maybe a little bit more, very close to a genocide. But the fundamentals are the love for humanity.


Christianity, on the other hand...


Deuteronomy 2:33-34
33 And the Lord our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people.


34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain:



And that is only from the top of my mind, I know there are worst verses than this particular one!

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

It is backwards, seduction would be free from the chains of monogamy, so we can start seducting each other. You as a woman will have enormous power over those who want to lay with you. And your love could be spread (sexually, romantic, friendly, as you want!) to each and every men on Earth. But only the ones who you choose! And when you say NO, it is NO!!!.

Technically speaking, doctors, lawyers and so on are not bourgoise. Only factory owners are bourgoise.
And you are explaining the revolution because of one factor, I did not think you were so narrow minded, Sister!

I find it hard to follow your line of thought sometimes. I hope is not something you have, but my old age kicking in.

I agree, murder based systems never do well. Communism is based on love for humanity, with an occasional murder, and then another one, isolated, maybe a progrom or two. Maybe a little bit more, very close to a genocide. But the fundamentals are the love for humanity.

Christianity, on the other hand...

Deuteronomy 2:33-34 …

And that is only from the top of my mind, I know there are worst verses than this particular one!

Yes; well taking your last comment first, in Deuteronomy the reasons are given by Moses as part of his review of history up to the time of writing. God was providing livestock for His Chosen People and so unmitigated savages as Og the Bashanite king, even the Zamzummim before them, opposed God wholeheartedly. In every case these were dealt with appropriately.

Communism also opposed God, handing out murder by diktat quite indiscriminately. Perhaps the bourgeoisie was not proposed to include the upper middle classes, as you suggest, but did that detail filter down to the Stalins or Molotovs or Trotskys of the day? No. Little thought is required however to appreciate that Russia's cohort of factory owners was not large during the 19th century from which to draw wives or gigolos as the case may be. Marx became envenomed in England you will recall, funded by Engels who at least knew what industry could achieve, but England was a century ahead of Russia. Very often, in conversation, you must have been surprised at who considers themselves "middle class" and only to eager for afternoon champagne parties coupled with other bourgeois decadence as they imagine it to be.

"The Rich" is another ill-defined term. Dukes who've not frittered the stuff away on show-girls, horses and cocaine would qualify I suppose. Not all factory owners are solvent, but those who are are wealthy enough with the odd one or two able to outdo lesser dukes. Engels was no duke but still "The Rich" by certain criteria which, for the lower-middles, certainly includes doctors and lawyers in big houses with nice gardens whether or not they have servants.

The single factor considered by Marx.—.ownership of the means of production.—.does not actually exist. For anyone to think it did there would need to be a recently liberated then cruelly disenfranchised group having little (if any) concept of an industrial revolution. Even if one had been proposed, as happened in China following President Nixon's witness there, it was nipped in the bud by a monstrous ogre following a false religion and hoping to be a god himself. A bigger ogre turned up. His son and his grandchildren were all murdered.

I Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

___________________





__________________

Vengeance Puriel,

Like I have stated, you obviously have never seen in how a woman can act in her premenstrual stage, at the time of menstruation, and subsequent to their menstruation. Subjectively, this time period takes up the entire month where the woman turns into Satan incarnate!

Now, the "Ladies of the Night" that I am in contact with at the Nevada brothels, hold me dear in my continued efforts to turn them towards Jesus instead of always laying down on the job. As we speak, they are forming a "Harlot Squad" that will make Landover's "God Squad" look like a Boy Scout picnic with chaperones!

Which reminds me, I have to start packing so I can return to Nevada in my godly attempts in saving the Jezebels for Christ Jesus.


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


___________________

How dare you call Mary that name, your squad is nothing but your imagination, as well as you fake ministry.

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Dear Mr. D Thomas,


I won't call you brother since we belong to two different religions (something that only indonesians mudslimes realized).


Now, it seems that protestantism is pretty bad for you, since it allows you to mistreathing women. Sure, it is very true that women sins more than mens do, but which women? Those wo are not Christian obviusly. Just look at this photo of a godless feminist whore.



And compare it to a photo of a godly True Christian nun.





Clearly, the verses you are pointing are referred towards non-christian women aka unsaved trash. By claiming that all the womens are whores you are blaspheming Mary and other godly Christian women such as St. Catherina, St. Chiara of Assisi and St. Lucia (which many protestants still celebrate).


However i agree on protestant women being unsaved, since they left the True Church (Matthew 16:18).


Anyway, if you want to repent i suggest you to come to my Church in Rome, confess your sins to me and get baptized.


Amen.

[Brother D. Thomas]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Dear Mr. D Thomas,


I won't call you brother since we belong to two different religions (something that only indonesians mudslimes realized).


Now, it seems that protestantism is pretty bad for you, since it allows you to mistreathing women. Sure, it is very true that women sins more than mens do, but which women? Those wo are not Christian obviusly. Just look at this photo of a godless feminist whore.



And compare it to a photo of a godly True Christian nun.





Clearly, the verses you are pointing are referred towards non-christian women aka unsaved trash. By claiming that all the womens are whores you are blaspheming Mary and other godly Christian women such as St. Catherina, St. Chiara of Assisi and St. Lucia (which many protestants still celebrate).


However i agree on protestant women being unsaved, since they left the True Church (Matthew 16:18).


Anyway, if you want to repent i suggest you to come to my Church in Rome, confess your sins to me and get baptized.


Amen.

________________________

Romeo,

On the contrary, the passages quoted regarding the 2nd class human, known biblically as a "women," are in fact to be treated as so stated!!!

You are forgetting that our Yahweh god was so pissed at Eve when she transgressed his command not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, that he therefore gave her severe pain in childbirth, AND, that her husband was to rule over her! (I don't recall any Garden of Eden marriage ceremonies)

All of the disparaging of women passages are in our Bronze and Iron Age thinking bible, therefore, it is to be followed to the letter regarding women, period!

Obviously I couldn't help but notice the "Nun" that unfortunately is getting "none," and if the tables were turned where she was molesting teen boys instead of priests buggering young girls, Catholic church attendance would skyrocket with young boys, praise!


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas



________________________

[Red Army]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Yes; well taking your last comment first, in Deuteronomy the reasons are given by Moses as part of his review of history up to the time of writing. God was providing livestock for His Chosen People and so unmitigated savages as Og the Bashanite king, even the Zamzummim before them, opposed God wholeheartedly. In every case these were dealt with appropriately.

So God and Communism face opposition with the same tool: murder. It is quite cheap and clean when done properly. Nice! A point in common between God and Stalin!

Communism also opposed God, handing out murder by diktat quite indiscriminately.

So you say. There are hundreds of pages from the trials, have you read them? If you did not, then you are speaking from your thoughts, and not about facts.

Perhaps the bourgeoisie was not proposed to include the upper middle classes, as you suggest, but did that detail filter down to the Stalins or Molotovs or Trotskys of the day? No. Little thought is required however to appreciate that Russia's cohort of factory owners was not large during the 19th century from which to draw wives or gigolos as the case may be.

You are misleaded here. We do not want bourgeoise women. We want perfect women, a concept that arises with the birth of the new men, the perfect communist men.
The concept of what is a perfect woman changes over the times, and now is stablished by women themselves. I am old, but seing my younger Comrades, I think now perfect women are perfectly recognizable by the armpit hair, blue colored head hair (you have to clarify "head hair", because there is hair all over) and acid B.O.

Marx became envenomed in England you will recall, funded by Engels who at least knew what industry could achieve, but England was a century ahead of Russia. Very often, in conversation, you must have been surprised at who considers themselves "middle class" and only to eager for afternoon champagne parties coupled with other bourgeois decadence as they imagine it to be.

Yes, false concience, that leads to false ideology. Oh, The German Ideology, one of my favourite books evah!

"The Rich" is another ill-defined term. Dukes who've not frittered the stuff away on show-girls, horses and cocaine would qualify I suppose. Not all factory owners are solvent, but those who are are wealthy enough with the odd one or two able to outdo lesser dukes. Engels was no duke but still "The Rich" by certain criteria which, for the lower-middles, certainly includes doctors and lawyers in big houses with nice gardens whether or not they have servants.

Property defines bourgoise. Otherwise, it would be just envy of those who have more. And it is not.
As exploitation, bourgoise is an objective concepts. You can earn a lot and be exploited, because what you generate is not given to you but taken as profit for the company. Yes, you can be a rich manager and exploited as you generate more than what you get.
Also, you can be poor as poor can be and still be exploiting people, and a bourgoise.

The single factor considered by Marx.—.ownership of the means of production.—.does not actually exist. For anyone to think it did there would need to be a recently liberated then cruelly disenfranchised group having little (if any) concept of an industrial revolution. Even if one had been proposed, as happened in China following President Nixon's witness there, it was nipped in the bud by a monstrous ogre following a false religion and hoping to be a god himself. A bigger ogre turned up. His son and his grandchildren were all murdered.

Can you explain what you are trying to address here? I cannot understand it.


Are you typing from a Chinese made phone or laptop? So, are you profiting from what a Communist worker has done for you, and also criticizing the system that lead to you having the opportunity to own what otherwise was directed ONLY to the bourgoise, as a mean of production? That is called hypocrisy.

[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

________________________

Romeo,

On the contrary, the passages quoted regarding the 2nd class human, known biblically as a "women," are in fact to be treated as so stated!!!

You are forgetting that our Yahweh god was so pissed at Eve when she transgressed his command not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, that he therefore gave her severe pain in childbirth, AND, that her husband was to rule over her! (I don't recall any Garden of Eden marriage ceremonies)

All of the disparaging of women passages are in our Bronze and Iron Age thinking bible, therefore, it is to be followed to the letter regarding women, period!

Obviously I couldn't help but notice the "Nun" that unfortunately is getting "none," and if the tables were turned where she was molesting teen boys instead of priests buggering young girls, Catholic church attendance would skyrocket with young boys, praise!


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas



________________________

Eve was Adam's wife, God made her for that role. He ordained their wedding Himself.


Genesis 2:20-24
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

[Basilissa]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

her husband was to rule over her!

I have highlighted the single relevant part of your post, camerada Thomas. Are you finally learning (as suggested by Brother Gonzalez) that women are private property, or do you still have your grand delusions about all men having to share equal access to and power over all women? In latter case, why don't you get together with that Red Army fellow and get lost from this CHRISTIAN (not COMMUNIST) forum?

[James Hutchins]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

I have highlighted the single relevant part of your post, camerada Thomas. Are you finally learning (as suggested by Brother Gonzalez) that women are private property, or do you still have your grand delusions about all men having to share equal access to and power over all women? In latter case, why don't you get together with that Red Army fellow and get lost from this CHRISTIAN (not COMMUNIST) forum?

True words, young lady.



My wife, Mrs. Hutchins (some of you may remember her, I barely do) was mine until one day she disappeared, no doubt stolen by a racial person. You might ask what is the relevance. Well, if she was not my property, how could someone of taken her from me!