X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Lannah Aikens View Post
    Wow. If any of you actually read your bibles or even the verses I posted, you would understand. Sit down to the scripture and read the TRUTH! You have perverted what God has made holy. Have any of you read any of Solomon's writings? I post them but like the blind, you overlook them. Fornication is DEFINED as sex outside of marriage! Someone even posted that definition! You sons and daughters of snakes, why have you added and taken away from the Bible? The verses I posted show that it is COMMANDED to engage sexually! And to the one who said that a man who looks at a woman with lust, he has committed adultery in his heart- do you not know what adultery is? It is lusting for someone whom God has not givento you to be bound at the soul. The Bible clearly says that if you live lustfully and long for sex, you should marry so that you do not sin by having sex unmarried! Look it up!
    The Song Solomon is about God's love for MAN! It has nothing to with a woman. Do you think The Lord is just some pervert who only wants to spoog between some harlot's dirty pillows?

    Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.

    Hot Must ReadThreads!


    Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!

    Comment


    • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

      It is written as from a female's perspective in parts and a male's in others, or did you skip that part?
      Look at the last three verses I posted, though. I want your opinion on those three in particular.
      Ecclesiastes 4:5 The fool foldeth his hands together, and eateth his own flesh.

      Comment


      • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

        Originally posted by Lannah Aikens View Post
        It is written as from a female's perspective in parts and a male's in others, or did you skip that part?
        Look at the last three verses I posted, though. I want your opinion on those three in particular.
        It only APPEARS to be written from a female and then male perspective. But The Lord isn't some confused middle age transvestite, The Lord is a MAN so in TRUTH(tm) it's written from a MALE perspective about God's love for a MAN

        There is nothing perverted about it.

        Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.

        Hot Must ReadThreads!


        Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!

        Comment


        • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

          I'm still waiting for a reply concerning the other 3 verses.
          Concerning what you are saying, though, if this is the love between man and God, shouldn't this also be emulated between husband and wife which is the literal meaning of the piece. The literal meaning is that it is love between two lovers. If this love is such an example holy enough to symbolize the love between man and God, then how can you call it unholy if it is the love blessed by GOD?
          Moving on, though, tell me what you think about those earlier 3 verses I posted.
          Ecclesiastes 4:5 The fool foldeth his hands together, and eateth his own flesh.

          Comment


          • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

            Originally posted by Lannah Aikens View Post
            My confusion really comes from readings of Song of Songs (or Song of Solomon) which rejoices in a couple taking pleasure in each others body as they make love. If this sort of thing is describe as holy in the Bible, why is it wrong?
            Because it is an allegory of Christ and the Church...

            Song of Solomon 2:1-4:
            "1 I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys.
            2 As the lily among thorns, so is my love among the daughters.
            3 As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.
            4 He brought me to the banqueting house, and his banner over me was love."


            Ephesians 5:25-32: "25Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. 29For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: 30For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. 32This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church."

            You aren't here looking to use Jesus' Holy Religious Text as a means of sexual sin are you?

            Pastor Ed

            Comment


            • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

              That is actually widely debated by theologians, so don't say you know with absolute certainty that this is what it means. There are generally four sides to the debate. One of them is the allegory which you suggest that it is an allegory for Christ and the Church. At the time of its writing, though, it would most likely have been God and Israel. The other three ideas are that it might have been a script for a dramatic romance, a typifyication where Solomon represents Christ and the Shulamite (female) represents the Church, and the third (and most widely agreed belief) is that it is simply wrtten as a lyrical poem "to extole human love and marriage."
              Ecclesiastes 4:5 The fool foldeth his hands together, and eateth his own flesh.

              Comment


              • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

                Originally posted by Lannah Aikens View Post
                and the third (and most widely agreed belief) is that it is simply wrtten as a lyrical poem "to extole human love and marriage."
                That doesn't make any sense, dear, as the Holy Spirit worked through the Jews who had no concept of love within marriage. For them it was, and still is, naught but a commercial union through which two families' wealth is joined. To suggest otherwise is to suggest the LORD didn't know the Jewish people or how to best reach them. That's silly, as they were His chosen ones, after all.
                Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.

                Comment


                • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

                  Wow. Ignorance really is bliss. I can't take much more of this. You can't get anything through your thick skulls can you? I gave you verses specifically declaring pleasureable sex with your wife/husband as holy and basically commanded by God! If you don't believe me, do some research to find places in the Bible where it is explained, but stop putting your blasphemous words into his mouth. Add words to the Bible and you can burn in Hell.

                  Is this website all a divine revelation? I thought it was not as good as heroin and bukkake at first, but now I'm sure it is divinely inspired.
                  I'm almost certain now that you guys are the best Christians ever. Thank you for turning me on to Jesus!
                  Ecclesiastes 4:5 The fool foldeth his hands together, and eateth his own flesh.

                  Comment


                  • Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

                    Originally posted by Lannah Aikens View Post
                    Wow. Ignorance really is bliss. I can't take much more of this. You can't get anything through your thick skulls can you? I gave you verses specifically declaring pleasureable sex with your wife/husband as holy and basically commanded by God! If you don't believe me, do some research to find places in the Bible where it is explained, but stop putting your blasphemous words into his mouth. Add words to the Bible and you can burn in Hell.

                    Is this website all a divine revelation? I thought it was not as good as heroin and bukkake at first, but now I'm sure it is divinely inspired.
                    I'm almost certain now that you guys are the best Christians ever. Thank you for turning me on to Jesus!
                    Sex is pleasurable, and if kept in the procreative confines of marriage, it is blessed by God...

                    Hebrews 13:4: Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled, but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

                    It's all right there in the Bible, dear.

                    Pastor Ed

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X