[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Brother Bob4God, your message is spreading like wildfire!

CHRISTIAN COUPLE ABSTAIN FROM SEX AFTER MARRIAGE FOR TWO YEARS

“If it was holy before, it must be double-holy afterwards,” Darla says. They have now completed 25 months of marriage without any sexual contact, going about their normal lives, jobs and social calendar with no hint of relational strain. Sometimes after dinner they will kiss in the kitchen and “start having bedroom thoughts,” Darla says, but they never fail to pull back. Darla breaks away to spray cool, misted water on her face. Jon eats a whole raw potato to take himself out of the mood.

http://www.martinkem.com/2013/04/christian-couple-abstain-from-sex-after.html

Man and Wife, Still Virgins

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

As if anticipating such vows secularist laws would hold such a couple not to be married at all. Homosexuals can sodom-it-up as much as they like and be regarded as so wed they can never divorce. But if either of those two looked for a divorce they would be laughed out of court! They could probably get an annulment as failed miscegenists..

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Did anyone inform them sex is needed to make children? This way they are ignoring God's commandment to create children (Genesis 1:28). If they refuse to make children they will burn in Hell for breaking God's laws (James 2:10).

I know sex is a horrible, horrible activity. But God demands it from us, so we have to comply!

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Brother Bob4God, your message is spreading like wildfire!

http://www.martinkem.com/2013/04/christian-couple-abstain-from-sex-after.html

Man and Wife, Still Virgins

Ya know..... he does look A LOT like Mr. Potato Head.

They are both spitting in GOD'S face by not giving Him new little soldiers for Christ. For Christ's Sake!

It would be over in a few minutes. She should get a sheet and cut out a hole that is 2" x 2" for her nether regions. She could lay it over her. When he climbs on to do his GODLY deed she could hold her breath to make it seem quicker. Wham bam, thank you maam a new Soldier for Christ is born!

They are very selfish.

[Mary Thompson]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Ya know..... he does look A LOT like Mr. Potato Head.

They are both spitting in GOD'S face by not giving Him new little soldiers for Christ. For Christ's Sake!

It would be over in a few minutes. She should get a sheet and cut out a hole that is 2" x 2" for her nether regions. She could lay it over her. When he climbs on to do his GODLY deed she could hold her breath to make it seem quicker. Whamy, clammy a new Soldier for Christ is born!

They are very selfish.

The idea is to stay a virgin UNTIl marriage, then on marriage night, start doing God's will, the sooner you do it, the more Soldiers for Christ there will be. But in two years you could have two Soldiers for Christ and another on the way, I agree with you, they are indeed very selfish.

[Bob4God]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Two years after being married is a long time to go without having sex. But is it necessarily a bad thing?

We know 1 Corinthians 7:1says that "it is good for a man not to touch a woman."

I am aware that 1Timothy 2:15 says that women are saved through childbirth, but honestly, whose salvation is more important? The man or the woman's?

If a man is not comfortable having sex with his wife, I do not see why he should jeopardize his angelic virginity that the LORD admires so much just so Heaven can have one more wench to scrub the Heavenly dishes.

[A Follower]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

As a father of several girls I would be absolutely furious if I did not receive at least some bloody sheets as proof of what happened on the wedding night. Of course I would prefer an actual high definition video of my daughters having intercourse, because a careful examination of such videos would be much more likely to show any sort of tampering that would be hard to detect on just bloody sheets.

I do this only because I want to protect my daughter , if I cannot show proof of my daughter getting it on with her husband to whoever wishes to see it, the husband could just have my baby girl named a whore at any time and I would be forced to stone her as directed by Deut. 22. That is _not_ something I want.

Deut 22: 13-21
[13] If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her,
[14] And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid:
[15] Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate:
[16] And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her;
[17] And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.
[18] And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him;
[19] And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.
[20] But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
[21] Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

sheets

Sheets have the advantage that you can have them checked (by one of the Creation Scientists) to see whether raspberries had been used. I mention this in confidence, since you do actually have daughters and this is one of the tricks recommended privately amongst harlots (for an occasion like this). About ¼ - ½ punnet (depending on nationality).

So watch out for any surprise raspberry soufflés around the nuptial dates. A sure sign.

[Fred Ettish]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Im sorry, but the first time I laid eyes on Mrs.Ettish's genitals, well, um, I couldnt do it. Picture a fleshy axe wound sorrounded by singed wiry hair. It looked like a tarantula inspecting an autopsy. You get the idea.

Three months of reading the HOLY GOSPEL and heavily meditating on our Lord's order in Genesis made me reconsider. Since then we do "it" twice a year (her birthday and our anniversary) but only with the lights off and my socks on. To be honest, for the past three years I've been wearing my flannel pajamas and just unbuttoning the fly. We're not the young spring chickens we once were anyway.

[tlars699]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

That's not going to get you far, maggot.

Enjoy hell. I know that Jesus and I can't wait to watch you burn in hell for all eternity. Oh, how we'll laugh at you as you scream in agony! Shout Glory!!

I have a question: How can you put the "stud" back in "Bible Study"? Is this not simply against your own faith?
If you adhere to the idea that sex is wrong, why would you make a winking avatar, and use the word "stud", which implies you are out to have sex and be sexy, and procreate with the females of your species?

Could you not be aesthetically pleasing in a different manner on this forum?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

I have a question: How can you put the "stud" back in "Bible Study"? Is this not simply against your own faith?
If you adhere to the idea that sex is wrong, why would you make a winking avatar, and use the word "stud", which implies you are out to have sex and be sexy, and procreate with the females of your species?

Could you not be aesthetically pleasing in a different manner on this forum?

You sound confused, friend. How can sex be "wrong" if the LORD commanded us to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 9:7), and gave us sex as the only means of multiplication? In the meantime, you are most welcome to introduce yourself HERE so we can greet you properly! You can read all kinds of helpful information ON THIS THREAD for newcomers like yourself. If you’d like to share your opinion, kindly provide the Scriptural Support where we can see how wonderfully God said it first. Finally, your rights on our forum can be found HERE.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

I have a question: How can you put the "stud" back in "Bible Study"? Is this not simply against your own faith?
If you adhere to the idea that sex is wrong, why would you make a winking avatar, and use the word "stud", which implies you are out to have sex and be sexy, and procreate with the females of your species?

Could you not be aesthetically pleasing in a different manner on this forum?

What makes you think sex is wrong? Unless you mean anal sex but why the Sam Hill would you bring that up? What are you kind of pervert?

This is a Christian website not a two bit pick up joint in Daresalam

YIC

[James Hutchins]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

I have a question: How can you put the "stud" back in "Bible Study"? Is this not simply against your own faith?
If you adhere to the idea that sex is wrong, why would you make a winking avatar, and use the word "stud", which implies you are out to have sex and be sexy, and procreate with the females of your species?

Could you not be aesthetically pleasing in a different manner on this forum?

Missy, I can assure you, Pastor Ezeikel does not engage in sex with any females. He is betorthed to Daisy Johnson and will be setting the date any day now.
Why do harlots like you think everything has to be dirty and filthy.

[tlars699]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

Missy, I can assure you, Pastor Ezeikel does not engage in sex with any females. He is betorthed to Daisy Johnson and will be setting the date any day now.
Why do harlots like you think everything has to be dirty and filthy.

Goodness! A harlot?!
"Setting the date"... a flimsy excuse for not behaving as Jacob would, and establishing dowry and timeline forthwith. In the meantime, his avatar is winking suggestively at any passersby.


I find my thoughts sullied and offended by such.

[tlars699]

Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

You sound confused, friend. How can sex be "wrong" if the LORD commanded us to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 9:7), and gave us sex as the only means of multiplication? In the meantime, you are most welcome to introduce yourself HERE so we can greet you properly! You can read all kinds of helpful information ON THIS THREAD for newcomers like yourself. If you’d like to share your opinion, kindly provide the Scriptural Support where we can see how wonderfully God said it first. Finally, your rights on our forum can be found HERE.

I am told by the folks on this very forum page, and by my Bible, that procreation within marriage should be met with dignity, repose, and a certain amount of God's Will and fortitude, to withstand such an attack by the devil on my system.
To see such lamblasted by a practitioner of the faith is bordering blasphemous.