Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

[Elmer G. White]

With genetic entropy, almost all of the Earth's population now have inferior intelligence and they will buy and believe anything that the atheist astrologers try to sell us. The latest "discovery" is perhaps the most ridiculous yet. By combining the make-belief "data" from cosmology, tellyscopes, luminosity measurements and calculus, they have now "determined" that there is an "exoplanet" orbiting the closest star to our Sun, Proxima centauri!

We'll soon assess this implausible claim and bust this myth of an exoplanet once and for good!

Yes, there is a new planet. Yes, it’s only slightly more massive than Earth. Yes, it’s in Proxima Centauri’s habitable zone, meaning there’s a potential for liquid water to exist on its surface.
The long-sought world … orbits its cool red parent star every 11 days and has a temperature suitable for liquid water to exist on its surface. This rocky world is a little more massive than the Earth and is the closest exoplanet to us — and it may also be the closest possible abode for life outside the solar system.

They have even taken "photographs" of this alleged planet :



Now, let us examine their "evidence"!

1. No-one has ever seen this star called Proxima centauri. It is invisible!

Proxima, of 11th magnitude, is a red dwarf star.As seen from Earth, the system is the fourth brightest star (after Sirius, Canopus, and Arcturus); the red dwarf Proxima is invisible

2. The whole concept of "Proxima centauri" is racist! A "red dwarf", when you could be a bit more polite and refer to it as "vertically challenged Native American"! However, that would not save the day as even with their notorious stamina, Native Americans would not survive the conditions close to the Firmament (Genesis 1:6).



3. An invisible vertically challenged star with an even smaller "planet" - thus also invisible. Now we have two invisible objects, the existence of which we're supposed to believe based on hearsay and some ancient texts. No object can be reliable if it cannot be seen! Please, ask your atheist acquaintances who promote this story the following question:

Were you there?

• If they weren't or if they claim and lie that they were there, you can dismiss them! Do not believe in the invisible things! Demand eyewitness testimony at all times!

Only when we have reliable ancient texts can we believe in the unseen! In our case, regarding True Christian(tm) Faith, we do have reliable eyewitness testimony, that of God and His Scribes!

Colossians 1:15
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

Verily, God was made visible by His Revelation as Jesus who is God (John 10:30). We can always trust God in His magnificence and in Jesus Christ!

1 Timothy 1:17
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Does THIS look reliable to you? Of course NOT! It isn't!



What about THIS!? It is about Jesus! Yes, We can Trust Him™!




Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Alvin Moss]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

These are the same people who claim to have space men flying around the firmament and going to the moon in space ships. They are constantly making bizarre and absurd claims. This one is no different.

[Nobar King]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Be prepared to tell your legislator to vote no on the next bill to send some crap to Proxima Centauri.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

We'll soon assess this implausible claim and bust this myth of an exoplanet once and for good!They have even taken "photographs" of this alleged planet :

Let me guess, it was the same photographer who took this picture :

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

The King James Bible uses the word "planets" only once, and only to tell Godly people what not to do:

2 Kings 23:5 KJV: 5 And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.

[Basilissa]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

The King James Bible uses the word "planets" only once, and only to tell Godly people what not to do:

2 Kings 23:5 KJV: 5 And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.

Is rocket fuel a sort of incense? Because that would make all of these rockets they've been sending to make holes in the firmament idolatrous.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Is rocket fuel a sort of incense? Because that would make all of these rockets they've been sending to make holes in the firmament idolatrous.

Dear Sister,

It is most charming that you are innocent of the more gruesome facts of this repulsive Earthly existence.

"Rocket fuel" is an euphemism for the anti-sobriety liquid that many quite manly men with less well established economical circumstances have to consume. Some of these can be True Christian™ Brethren of good and Godly manners and discipline within their households.



This product does have some side-effects, though, due to which it is a relief that there will be no more mooning as this Firmamental source of Divine Light (Genesis 1:16) will no longer shine in the very, very near future + 1000 years!



Revelation 21:23
And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon , to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[handmaiden]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Wow. The things atheist scientists will claim. And yet they insist that all our truths -- handed down directly by the revealed Word of God -- are "out there".

Head Shakingly Yours,


Handmaiden

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Be prepared to tell your legislator to vote no on the next bill to send some crap to Proxima Centauri.

I see it was found by some Mexicans. I say we make them take in any illegal aliens.

During the first half of 2016 Proxima Centauri was regularly observed with the HARPS spectrograph on the ESO 3.6-meter telescope at La Silla in Chile and simultaneously monitored by other telescopes around the world. This was the Pale Red Dot campaign, in which a team of astronomers led by Guillem Anglada-Escudé, from Queen Mary University of London, was looking for the tiny back and forth wobble of the star that would be caused by the gravitational pull of a possible orbiting planet.

- from link

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Just what exactly is that maniac doing ! ? ! ? ? ! !

I know those wretches have very restricted imaginations but surely there are limits, even for them!

On the other hand there is always the French:

The propellants used, the weight of which is 700Kg, were fuming nitric acid and Diesel oil, fired by a hypergolic igniter consisting of furfuryl alcohol.
Recently, excellent results have been obtained by using turpentine.
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/...ournalCode=jjp

[ILikeGod'sMeme]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

With genetic entropy, almost all of the Earth's population now have inferior intelligence and they will buy and believe anything that the atheist astrologers try to sell us. The latest "discovery" is perhaps the most ridiculous yet. By combining the make-belief "data" from cosmology, tellyscopes, luminosity measurements and calculus, they have now "determined" that there is an "exoplanet" orbiting the closest star to our Sun, Proxima centauri!"

Um sorry but how is using a telescope and mathematics to calculate and observe objects from Earth "make believe data"? I'm christian btw, and shouldn't humans be encouraged to use observation to see what beautiful creations God has to offer? Or am I wrong?

[ILikeGod'sMeme]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

also the title doesn't make sense. the planet in question isn't invisible because it has been observed by telescopes. If something is observable, then it isn't invisible. Or is there something I'm getting wrong here?

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Um sorry but how is using a telescope and mathematics to calculate and observe objects from Earth "make believe data"? I'm christian btw, and shouldn't humans be encouraged to use observation to see what beautiful creations God has to offer? Or am I wrong?

also the title doesn't make sense. the planet in question isn't invisible because it has been observed by telescopes. If something is observable, then it isn't invisible. Or is there something I'm getting wrong here?

Dear Sinners,

There are two kinds of data:

1. Reliable, Truthful™ data that is only available in the Bible.
2. Suspicious data, i.e., everything else, the Truth™ value of which has to be determined by comparing the observations to the known Truth™ that is, as explained above, the Bible.

In addition, it is well known that our perception is flawed. Both our senses and memory cannot be trusted. . Why should we then trust tellyscopes and other Godless Instruments? The narrative of the Bible refutes the world view of any planets above the Firmament (Genesis 1:6). Thus, these data have to be discarded. Why do these data exist, you may ask? Because God punishes those who dismiss His Word by sending them further into the vortex of damnation by bombarding them with false images that may be beautiful but that are ultimately harmful.

2 Thessalonians 2:11
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

Thus, you believe a lie. God can just as easily fool the astrological instuments that the atheist scholars use to scan the Firmament for X-rays, pulsators and ultraviolent light.

All information must be assessed based on the Bible. In this case, the incompability is too great. Thus, there is no planet. There never was. It was not included 6000+ years ago when God Created this world (Genesis 1:1-2).


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[ILikeGod'sMeme]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Ok so the planet in question is invisible. But how can we take a photograph of something that is invisible (camera's used on satellites are designed to capture photos of physical objects, and if an object is invisible then the camera wouldn't render the image of the object).

The best answer I can come up with is "God created this image to test our faith", can you come up with a better one?

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Planet and Life at Proxima Centauri?! Really? An Invisible "Planet" around an Invisible "Star"?

Ok so the planet in question is invisible. But how can we take a photograph of something that is invisible (camera's used on satellites are designed to capture photos of physical objects, and if an object is invisible then the camera wouldn't render the image of the object).

The best answer I can come up with is "God created this image to test our faith", can you come up with a better one?

Dear Sinner,

Even the atheist astrologers themselves are clever enough not to claim having taking photographs of this "planet". Basically, they've just taken photos of this "invisible star".

As a planet goes about its orbital business, its gravity tugs ever so slightly on its star, causing the star to wobble. Larger planets naturally produce bigger wobbles. Smaller, Earth-mass planets tug almost imperceptibly on their stars, requiring long observing campaigns with extremely sensitive instruments to detect.

Observations taken sporadically between 2000 and 2014 had hinted at the presence of a planet in an 11-day orbit around Proxima.

There is no photo. There is just a "wobbly star" that cannot be seen with the human eye. Still plausible? Moreover, why would anyone need an answer that would be "better" than God. God is always the ultimate answer as He Created everything (genesis 1:1). How could any answer be better than the one God gave Himself and that I have cited also previously.

Isaiah 66:4
I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

Of course, there is another answer, more sinister and frightening. That of deliberate deceit by sinners to lure unsuspecting youths, such as you, away from Jesus. The computers can be made to generate any image. Let us look at one exoplanet from the "Star Trek" Universe.



They admit it is fiction. Still it looks real. Here's another, called "Toth".



These look extremely plausible, yet they're delusions. Why bother doing Spiritual self-abuse with these harmful images, when Jesus is going to Return soon (Revelation 22:21) and the wonders in Heaven that follow thereafter are much more spectacular than any of these? Jesus is always the answer.




Yours in Christ,

Elmer