Tweet
Sperm theory shows once again how inconsistent science is!
Scientists have long held the view that a man's seed contains tiny critters called sperm. These things (you can't see them but they still insist they are there) are supposed to swim up inside your wife when you perform your fathering duty. Apparently millions of them have a race to see who is the fittest and the one that survives gets to make your son (obviously they also think this makes daughters). Does this sound at all familiar? Yes, it's that Darwinian survival of the fittest nonsense.
The sperm critters science says are in your seed
and swim inside your wife's cooter!
So the so-called sperm with the fastest swimming "genes" is supposed to be the winner. Well wouldn't the evolution idea mean that these sperm should have been getting faster over "millions of years" and shouldn't the "genes" they pass on make us into superb swimmers? We should all be swimming faster than the fish if this were true. Of course, the Biblically consistent answer is that this is not true and this is not how the shape and appearance of your son is determined. None of my sons look anything like me at all, for example, though I always service my wife diligently whenever I am back for a few days from travelling to Landover for new materials to witness to the Godless UK with. So much for this stupid heredity idea!
Yes, yet again, if you think about it for a few moments you can see how ludicrous science is without God's hand to guide you through scripture. It's no wonder that neither Jesus nor Moses nor anyone else in the Bible mentions these silly sperm critters or genes even once. Jacob certainly could show these silly geneticists of today a thing or two!
AMEN! Scripture wins again.
The sperm critters science says are in your seed
and swim inside your wife's cooter!
So the so-called sperm with the fastest swimming "genes" is supposed to be the winner. Well wouldn't the evolution idea mean that these sperm should have been getting faster over "millions of years" and shouldn't the "genes" they pass on make us into superb swimmers? We should all be swimming faster than the fish if this were true. Of course, the Biblically consistent answer is that this is not true and this is not how the shape and appearance of your son is determined. None of my sons look anything like me at all, for example, though I always service my wife diligently whenever I am back for a few days from travelling to Landover for new materials to witness to the Godless UK with. So much for this stupid heredity idea!
The Bible once again shows the way!
Genesis 30:37-43 37And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and chesnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white appear which was in the rods. 38And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that they should conceive when they came to drink. 39And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted. 40And Jacob did separate the lambs, and set the faces of the flocks toward the ringstraked, and all the brown in the flock of Laban; and he put his own flocks by themselves, and put them not unto Laban's cattle. 41And it came to pass, whensoever the stronger cattle did conceive, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the cattle in the gutters, that they might conceive among the rods. 42But when the cattle were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's. 43And the man increased exceedingly, and had much cattle, and maidservants, and menservants, and camels, and asses.
Genesis 30:37-43 37And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and chesnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white appear which was in the rods. 38And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that they should conceive when they came to drink. 39And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted. 40And Jacob did separate the lambs, and set the faces of the flocks toward the ringstraked, and all the brown in the flock of Laban; and he put his own flocks by themselves, and put them not unto Laban's cattle. 41And it came to pass, whensoever the stronger cattle did conceive, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the cattle in the gutters, that they might conceive among the rods. 42But when the cattle were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's. 43And the man increased exceedingly, and had much cattle, and maidservants, and menservants, and camels, and asses.
Yes, yet again, if you think about it for a few moments you can see how ludicrous science is without God's hand to guide you through scripture. It's no wonder that neither Jesus nor Moses nor anyone else in the Bible mentions these silly sperm critters or genes even once. Jacob certainly could show these silly geneticists of today a thing or two!
AMEN! Scripture wins again.
Comment