[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

First things first, both English Google and Arabic Google both have the same International Castrate-A-Boy-Day logo. I guess having a complete and total monopoly on internet navigation means you get to ignore the claims of Islamophobia that they must be facing right now.

English Wikipedia on the other hand, has a big purple banner ad urging us to "close the knowledge gap" regarding, something, I don't know. But whatever it is, it's not on Arab Wikipedia so Muslim women are not invited.

Wikipedia's slogan-for-the-day is "mind the gap". I googled it and this is the least-immodest image I could find:



With a bit of shaving and hair-bleaching any Muslim woman could have done this. So why not invite them to the party? Why commit "violence of exclusion" against Muslim women, by conspicuously snubbing the top victims of actual misogynistic violence from participation in a day that is supposed to be against, you know, actual misogynistic violence?

Could it be because feminism is not opposed to misogyny, but rather, feminism is opposed to males who aren't misogynistic enough?

[Dennis Lukes]

Outside of making women cover their heads when they're not in church (1 Corinthians 11:4-13), I don't see anything un-Biblical about the status of women in the Mudslime world. I've always been an outspoken anti-Islamophobe, because it is plain as day that if only those heathen terrorist savage beasts were taught the Bible instead of the Koran (which even some Mooslims accept was ghostwritten by Satan) and made a few minor lifestyle adjustments, they would be Heavenbound Bible-believing True Christian Republicans like us.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond

English Wikipedia on the other hand, has a big purple banner ad urging us to "close the knowledge gap" regarding, something, I don't know. But whatever it is, it's not on Arab Wikipedia so Muslim women are not invited.

With a bit of shaving and hair-bleaching any Muslim woman could have done this. So why not invite them to the party? Why commit "violence of exclusion" against Muslim women, by conspicuously snubbing the top victims of actual misogynistic violence from participation in a day that is supposed to be against, you know, actual misogynistic violence?

Could it be because feminism is not opposed to misogyny, but rather, feminism is opposed to males who aren't misogynistic enough?

I cannot really understand the inner workings of a liberal mind, but my understanding is that they believe "oppressing women is bad" unless "oppressing women is an inherent part of a non-western culture" in which case "oppressing women is good."


Like I said, I don't really understand it, but this is what they seem to believe.

Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes

I've always been an outspoken anti-Islamophobe,

In other words, anti-anti-Semite, as Arabs speak a language that belongs to the same Semitic language family as Hebrew and Aramaic.