[Redeemed Papist]

The problem with these internet free speech rights blowhards is that they seem to really have a problem with the free speech of Christians saying we should all follow Biblical law.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

...I am actually defending my rights by fighting SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act.)...

WTF does SOPA have to do with the topic at hand, idiot?

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

WTF does SOPA have to do with the topic at hand, idiot?

Look, you foul atheist freak, can you just for once let other atheists make total fools of themselves without trying to save their blushes!

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

Look, you foul atheist freak, can you just for once let other atheists make total fools of themselves without trying to save their blushes!

I just get so frustrated when the "voices of logic and reason" know so little about logic and reason. The internet is vast repository of knowledge and information on so many subjects, yet they refuse to avail themselves of this wonderful resource. Research that used to take weeks (even months) of library trawling, and correspondence with fellow researchers by snail mail, can now be accomplished with a few mouse clicks.

But that's "too hard" for these morons.

They'd rather wail about non-existent rights while there are genuine abuses taking place every day that they don't recognize, because they haven't taken the few minutes to actually familiarize themselves with their legal rights and obligations.

So I guess I should apologize for derailing the thread with this rant. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.

[HemlockHomo]

So we return to the beating of the child and the unrightful act of the man beating the child. I am glad that we have finally returned to the original subject of this thread.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

I just get so frustrated when the "voices of logic and reason" know so little about logic and reason. The internet is vast repository of knowledge and information on so many subjects, yet they refuse to avail themselves of this wonderful resource. Research that used to take weeks (even months) of library trawling, and correspondence with fellow researchers by snail mail, can now be accomplished with a few mouse clicks.

But that's "too hard" for these morons.

They'd rather wail about non-existent rights while there are genuine abuses taking place every day that they don't recognize, because they haven't taken the few minutes to actually familiarize themselves with their legal rights and obligations.

So I guess I should apologize for derailing the thread with this rant. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.

Yeah I know. It's like they haven't got an original thought in their head and just parrot barely understood nonsense written by others that fits what they wish were actually true.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

So we return to the beating of the child and the unrightful act of the man beating the child. I am glad that we have finally returned to the original subject of this thread.

So do you have an actual contribution to make, or just more tedious and inane gum-flapping?

[HemlockHomo]

Havent i already stated my point that you other users have increasingly ignored and forced to change to a different subject. I joined because that man was wrong in beating that poor girl. He had no right to beat her. Parenting should be up to a child's parents not someone else unless the circumstances apply where the are permanently unable to be a parent.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

Havent i already stated my point that you other users have increasingly ignored and forced to change to a different subject. I joined because that man was wrong in beating that poor girl. He had no right to beat her. Parenting should be up to a child's parents not someone else unless the circumstances apply where the are permanently unable to be a parent.

Yet another one who has confused us with people who care what you think.

This forum, as has obviously eluded your fine grasp of semantics, is about the Bible, not you.

If you feel that the True Christians™ here have erred in their reading of God's Will as laid out in the King James Bible, then please, raise your concerns with proper Scriptural citations. Or STFU. Thanks.

[HemlockHomo]

I am utterly disgusted with the way that you treat people on this site that dont share the same view points as you. You cast us away as though we are trash and street scum. you believe you are the benevolent power and that you have the power to control the world by being ignorant assholes and no even considering everyone else's view on something. You must have been raised to respect other people. The way you act and from the utter disrespect I am given i seriously doubt you have any respect for anyone besides others who rant on with the same psychobable as you. Do you listen to what you say or is your head so far up an asian's asshole that you cant hear yourself? Honestly have respect.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by HemlockZero

I am utterly disgusted with the way that you treat people on this site that dont share the same view points as you. You cast us away as though we are trash and street scum.

Did you somehow miss the header, on each and every page, which says "UNSAVED UNWELCOME"?

UNSAVED = YOU.

UNWELCOME = NOT WANTED HERE.

Comprende, amigo?

Hablas Ingles?

you believe you are the benevolent power and that you have the power to control the world by being ignorant assholes and no even considering everyone else's view on something.

Who here said that?

GOD is the ultimate power, and no True Christian™ would ever claim He is omnibenevolent. He loves those who love Him, and that is all.

Get a clue, Sparky.

You must have been raised to respect other people.

When did the Bible tell us to 'respect' nonbelievers?

Acts 10:34-35

34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Oh, right. It doesn't.

The way you act and from the utter disrespect I am given

UNSAVED UNWELCOME.

This means you.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by lukasekman

The daughter was 13 years old, short hair so I assume she is lesbian. She was alone on her room, and cut herself in front of her webcam. She bragged about it to another emo girl she chatted with. I had to address her shocking behavior immediately. I punched her six times hard in her belly, so she had her wind removed and the demon inside her couldn't even moan. I took her knife and disposed it. Afraid of being possessed too, I escaped the house, disposed my clothes and poured holy water over myself.

Something to bear in mind, friend:

I can see that your heart was in the right place; you were responsible for this young girl's well-being, and acting in the role of parent (since you were her temporary, authorized guardian).

However, the Bible instructs us to discipline using the rod. Not the fist.

Perhaps you would do well to acquire a 1/2" wooden dowel, or perhaps a length of 1/2" PVC pipe. This will serve as a Biblically-appropriate rod.

[lukasekman]

Dear HemlockHero,

Welcome to the forum. I see that you dislike my family values to the extent that you think I am insane. As a conservative parent, corporal punishment is an important aspect of child discipline, see Prov 13:24
It is not insane to follow the True religion. I do however understand that some passages are controversial for liberals, but being controversial is not the same as being insane. If I was insane, I would probably not be able to raise my children.

Prov 13:2 do also justify my actions in the troubled moment. And suppose I didn't interfere with her self-cutting - she would probably hurt herself more than I hurt her. I guess the bruises from my punches healed in a week, but continued cutting would leave permanent scars, and risk an infection.

Sincerely in Christ, Lukas

[HemlockHomo]

You people really have issues. I do not speak any spanish so whatever you said there i have no clue what it means. Ive almost had it with the lack of respect. Is there anything you can respect besides your religion and yourselves?

And thank you lukas. You have finally treated me with some respect. You have not tried to attack me and slandere my name. I am sorry to that i was harsh. It was in a bit of a rage. I have respect for you so being calm in this moment. It is against my way to beat someone else's child though. Parent as you will though.

[Thomas Dalton]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

I am going to address two posts with this single post. Follow along children or you might get lost.

I would like to begin by addressing that you called me a homosexual. On what ground do you have on making such an absurd and vastly wrong statement?

When did I state that AIDS started in 1980? That is when the disease became well known in American society. Humans evolved thousands of years ago. There are known casing in many species of animals.

If you my previous post in this thread you will learn that I was not always atheist and that I was a Christian. I do not know scripture anymore as I found it pointless and moot.

I do not see anywhere in the three verses provided where it says you should not respect the beliefs of someone else. I see in the three verses that you should not keep company with people of different beliefs. Respect is a thing taught in the Bible. I do not know where but I remember learning it.

The point of me asking you what you believe an to be an emo is to find the same point as what you say to be a lesbian. I have been spending my day on here looking at different threads and I find the most amusement with the threads about Lesbians. The only evidence you have on most of them is that they have short cut hair. So i now must ask what you believe to be an emo. It seems like you simply throw this term around without actually having any knowledge of what it means.

The day you rule country is the day I laugh in my grave. You must attempt to rule the country that is. Bachmann is not a contender to be a leader as she is a slut because she is a woman and according to the beliefs I have read on this, she is only good to bear children. You are more likely to run a sense Godless nation based on your inferior ridiculous beliefs than you are to run an actual nation.

I always think it's funny that atheists keep on saying there's nothing wrong with gaysexuals, yet when we call them one, they are always quite insulted.
Hypocrisy, much?

And please post some proof that AIDS existed so many years ago. Hint: That's impossible.

[HemlockHomo]

The reason I defend myself when called a homosexual is because you are calling me something I am not. I am myself. You calling me a hypocrite because I say I am not a homosexual when I am not one is the same as when I would call you something that you are not. You would defend yourself and prove that is not who you are.

http://www.avert.org/aids-timeline.htm
This is the furthest back I could find history on AIDS. I was incorrect on how long it has been around in humans.

[Redeemed Papist]

Hemlock fellow!

Look, as much as it pains me to appear lock step with that atheist, you're missing the point. You can bang on all you like about your own point of view about morality all you want but that doesn't change God's morality one jot.

What does God want you to do? I'll give you a clue: thinking of what feels right will not give you the answer.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

...Honestly have respect.

Wait, WUT? How much respect did you show for the True Christians™ here when you barged into a private forum dedicated to discussing the Bible and started telling people how wrong they are, when you have so little clue as to what the Bible actually says, and hence, what they were saying?

You seem to labouring under the misconception that others somehow HAVE to respect your opinion. It's your right to have a differing opinion, but if that opinion is (even partially) based on falsehoods, bigotry, lies and deception, then it is not deserving of respect at all. Do you see the difference?

so at least you'll know what you're talking about the next time you wish to discuss Christianity with someone.

[HemlockHomo]

Didyus Much i must ask why you have a Porn star for vice president banner

[Zechariah Smyth]

Originally Posted by HemlockHero

Didyus Much i must ask why you have a Porn star for vice president banner

He's a typical Jesus-hating atheist with zero morals and a sick sense of humor (sic). Unfortunately, he is able skirt the rules without ever doing anything explicitly ban-worthy.

It's a very frustrating situation.

YiC,

Zech
Posted via Mobile Device