Tweet
Are the Jigs and Sand Nigras right about FGM?
There's this hot topic among Godless heathens at the moment about the grubby habits of Sand Nigras and Jigs in Africa. While the racism of the liberal so-called intellectuals is well known, they seem particularly keen on interfering with one habit of theirs in particular - that of removing the parts of a woman's sexual organs that induce sluttish behaviour. They simply cut all the bits away that cause a woman (without the proper discipline to consider the act of procreation disgusting and sinful and best done dry) to experience actual pleasure during the act of procreation.
Obviously, among the lesser races, who haven't felt the firmness of Jesus' intervention in their bedroom duties, there is bound to be some fumbling inaccuracies in their correct suppression of animal lust. This means that their women are bound to be so slutty that perhaps surgery is the only option. Anyone who has ever been anywhere near a nigra woman in the heat of her lust will know how seductive they try to be and how much of a beating is sometimes necessary among the domestic staff in order to keep fornication to a minimum. It can be most disconcerting. Anyway, I digress...
So, alas, even among good white True Christian™ families we can occasionally witness slutty behaviour among the most well beaten of our girl children. What woman of Landover would not appreciate the absence of those parts pertaining to a woman that cause unseemly lust?
So, I appeal to my brethren. Can a Biblical justification be found for taking Landover's girls and lovingly administering this treatment to them? I truly hope so.
I invite all Landover men with an interest in suppressing the female sexual wanderings to join me in some diligent research and the implementation of this practise we may have mistakenly thought of as a heathen abomination.
A slut, just the other day. Is this what we want for our girl children?
Obviously, among the lesser races, who haven't felt the firmness of Jesus' intervention in their bedroom duties, there is bound to be some fumbling inaccuracies in their correct suppression of animal lust. This means that their women are bound to be so slutty that perhaps surgery is the only option. Anyone who has ever been anywhere near a nigra woman in the heat of her lust will know how seductive they try to be and how much of a beating is sometimes necessary among the domestic staff in order to keep fornication to a minimum. It can be most disconcerting. Anyway, I digress...
So, alas, even among good white True Christian™ families we can occasionally witness slutty behaviour among the most well beaten of our girl children. What woman of Landover would not appreciate the absence of those parts pertaining to a woman that cause unseemly lust?
So, I appeal to my brethren. Can a Biblical justification be found for taking Landover's girls and lovingly administering this treatment to them? I truly hope so.
I invite all Landover men with an interest in suppressing the female sexual wanderings to join me in some diligent research and the implementation of this practise we may have mistakenly thought of as a heathen abomination.
A slut, just the other day. Is this what we want for our girl children?