[Brother Baconeater]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I was being chased by bee the other day, and I'm sure it landed in the middle of my back because I felt it sting. It got me thinking, that if evilution were true, why would lose our tail? I couldn't reach the bee with my arms, but if I had a tail, I could have swatted it dead before it committed suicide on my back.
Evilution makes no sense.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I was being chased by bee the other day, and I'm sure it landed in the middle of my back because I felt it sting. It got me thinking, that if evilution were true, why would lose our tail? I couldn't reach the bee with my arms, but if I had a tail, I could have swatted it dead before it committed suicide on my back.
Evilution makes no sense.

Very true Brother, I was thinking about how useful a monkey tail would be for me as a woman. I could use it to keep small children entertained while I did the dishes. I could carry extra bags of groceries with it rather than having to do an extra trip to the car.If anything we would have longer, stronger tails.

[Brother Baconeater]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Very true Brother, I was thinking about how useful a monkey tail would be for me as a woman. I could use it to keep small children entertained while I did the dishes. I could carry extra bags of groceries with it rather than having to do an extra trip to the car.If anything we would have longer, stronger tails.

Yeah, if evilution were true, our tails would probably have evolved a hand at the end of it so we could scratch our own backs, and if we fell backwards if drunk or if attacked by an atheist, we could brace our fall with it.

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yeah, if evilution were true, our tails would probably have evolved a hand at the end of it so we could scratch our own backs, and if we fell backwards if drunk or if attacked by an atheist, we could brace our fall with it.

Or we can drink coke, driving while tuning the radio at the same time. Or we can go shopping with two big plastic bags of stuff on both hands and open the door with our tail

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Or we can drink coke, driving while tuning the radio at the same time. Or we can go shopping with two big plastic bags of stuff on both hands and open the door with our tail

Yep a tail with a hand at the end of it would definitely be a wonderful evolutionary advantage.

[jennabenna]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
Because there was no reason for them to. there was plenty of fish for them to eat right where they were. Sharks are the perfect fish-death machine, so why mess it up?

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/
what does mars flooding have to do with the (real) story of Noah's ark?
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
Because natural selection hasn't been working the way it was meant to since the dawn of modern medicine. Now that we know how to heal people and keep them alive, nature gets little say in it.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
Evolution will give you no more and no less than you need. Humans managed to survive quite well with two arms.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
Embryos are not the same as babies. And humanity seems to be surviving quite well even with the abortions.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
Because bodies rot and turn into compost.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
They're not real.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
The tree of life incident never happened.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
Who said that Nessie was real?

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
Because stupid humans keep cutting down our trees, our life givers.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
Because (most of us) evolved to be smarter than that.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
Because chimps are a perfectly good design as well, and humans aren't quite to the point where we kill absolutely everything in our path.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
Because those were just stupid creatures that were total failures.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
Why are you so obsessed with mythical creatures being real? Let me put it simply: Dragon=genuine. Satyr=not real. Unicorn=fairy tale

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
Why do you think that talking about the bible is going to convince atheists? We believe that the bible isn't real. Don't trivialize out intellect with fruitless arguments

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
Or maybe, not every single spider in the world was killed by wasps. Honestly, it's not THAT common.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
Once again, if you know that we don't believe in the bible, then why do you try to use it to ''prove'' things to us?

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
Um, yeah. They want to believe that their royal family is so perfect. If the english are so inbred and deformed, than why are you so willing to use their scrolls as evidence of a fallacy?

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
Unicorns. Aren't. Real.
Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
If you would actually do research, then you would know that there ARE such things. They are being studied as I type.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
Because the mud isn't the life. The life is contained in trillions of single celled organisms inside the mud. The mud is just tiny pieces of extremely weathered rock, which was then happened to get wet. And as for tails, humans don't have tails because we don't need them. Evlolution took our tails.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Simple. They are just not the right chemicals.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
We used to. Our ancestors, the apes, had some called fur, but as humans began to make our own clothing, evolution removed it.

There. I answered all of your questions. What do I win?

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Few more qeustions:

1. What's your belief on?
2. So which one is the right one?
3. Have you start to call apes grandpa?

4. Where does music evolve from?
5. Where does language evolve from?
6. How bunch of chemicals form male and female?
7. Where does feelings, emotions evolve from?

Evidences please.

[Logan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missi...

(gibberish)
...hing, evolution removed it.

There. I answered all of your questions. What do I win?

You are just playing word games, get real: Get with Jesus.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
Why do you think that talking about the bible is going to convince atheists? We believe that the bible isn't real. Don't trivialize out intellect with fruitless arguments

Friend,
Please remember the purpose of this questionnaire is to convince me of the validity of your ideas. Not the other way around.

There. I answered all of your questions. What do I win?

Since you clearly misunderstoand the purpose of this questionnaire and the use of an nearly unreadable font color; no.

[jennabenna]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Friend,
Please remember the purpose of this questionnaire is to convince me of the validity of your ideas. Not the other way around.


Since you clearly misunderstoand the purpose of this questionnaire and the use of an nearly unreadable font color; no.

Firstly, in case you couldn't tell, I was trying to convince you.
And as far as the font goes, it was an honest, human mistake. Because, even though I'm black, I qualify as a human being as far as the average person is concerned. Perhaps you consider yourself above average?
And what is the purpose of the questionnaire? I took the title as a challenge. I answered all of the questions to the best of my ability. And my closing sentence was a joke. Friends? I Guess not.

[Levi Jones]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Firstly, in case you couldn't tell, I was trying to convince you.
And as far as the font goes, it was an honest, human mistake. Because, even though I'm black, I qualify as a human being as far as the average person is concerned. Perhaps you consider yourself above average?
And what is the purpose of the questionnaire? I took the title as a challenge. I answered all of the questions to the best of my ability. And my closing sentence was a joke. Friends? I Guess not.

You should really meet this lady. I suspect being 2 of maybe a couple hundred black lezbeans in the world, you two may already know each other.

[paula]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Evolution=Not religion.

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Because that would completely contradict evolution. Sharks are extremely fit to live in the ocean...but would be natural atrocities on land because they wouldn't be able to do much efficiently. They would die off very quickly and become extinct.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?

Except that the supposed Great Flood would only have swallowed Earth. also, here's a picture of Mars:


See the white stuff? That is ice. Frozen water. That is proof that water once existed on Mars. Long ago, many, many, many years ago (millions to billions) there was large amounts of water on Mars. The waters carved canyons and whatnot.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Because we guard those humans. What do we do to the mentally retarded and cognitively impaired? We put them in institutions and protect them. Furthermore, a lot of mental impairments are genetical and based on recessive traits that show up rarely, or, in the case of some Syndromes such as Down Syndromes, natural factors (for example, women who have children at an older age have higher chances for having a child with down syndromes.

As for normal stupidity, that actually has nothing to do with evolution. You can only be knowledgeable if you choose to be, knowledge is not passed down through generations because information is not encoded into your gametes (reproductive cells). It is not genetic, it is something of choice.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Evolution would say that we would never be perfect. There is no such thing as a creature perfectly fit for it's enviroment as it can always adapt and must adapt to face new threats such as new predators.

Furthermore, a third arm would be unbeneficial for humans, it would make our balance a pain to deal with, as would it make us less aerodynamic and make running harder. It would also be harder to coordinate and move the said arms without interfering with one another. Third Arm=Bad.

Furthermore, human evolution itself has been slowed because of our dominance over the planet. Because we control the world and our tools have made us the very top of the food chain, survival of the fittest no longer applies to humans as it once did. Instead, survival of the fittest is now a socio-economic phenomena for humans.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

Bones decay and break down into minerals. Bodies and soft tissue decays. A non-issue. Also, cremation helps.

Furthermore, we do not say that the human race is 150,000 years old, it's actually much older

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

First give me non-biblical, solid, material, non-bias proof that they exist.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

By the Grand Theory of Evolution (all six forms of evolution from Cosmic to Micro combined into one theory), none of that would exist....

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

Loch Ness Monster has yet to be proven. In fact, the majority of the proof actually says it's genuine

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

Because then they would collapse underneath their own weight and height.

We can't make steel structures that are that high without extremely complex and strong support systems. Trees can't either. Also, at such a height, trees would have trouble getting carbon dioxide. The majority of Carbon Dioxide exists near the ground because that's where living things are. CO2=Tree's 02, and vice-versa.

[QUOTE=Bobby-Joe;72111]

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Just responded to that above.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

What? Monkeys actually have very complex brains. Some species of monkeys and apes are able to use and make simple tools. Monkeys are a social animals with entire societies that even have hierarchies. There are even some species of monkeys that display tribal and war-like behavior with each other.

Also, do not forget that through evolution the mind evolves as well as the body.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Because we haven't exterminated them yet? Evolution is not even relevant here. We could easily destroy all monkeys on Earth with what we have now. Monkeys have no defense against ballistic, high kinetic-impact, high-explosive, and nuclear weapons.

This is a non-issue as well.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

No. According to evolution, some species die of slowly. This is not always true. Also, the Dodo was made extinct do to over-hunting by humans. Up until then, the Dodo hadn't even been discovered. The majority of the Dodo species went exist over time except one very isolated population which was overhunted and killed off quickly by humans a few hundred years ago. This has nothing to do with evolution.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

We have no proof they exist either except drawings and stories from a time where things made no sense... Such as that the Earth was flat, or that heavier things fall faster than lighter things (disproved by Galileo), and that the Earth was flat and everything revolved around it. All of those are wrong.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Except that the Bible was made, written, and organized by men. The whole thing. You can have your "divine" inspiration thingy, but that's about it.

Furthermore, Neanderthals and Homo Erectus didn't exist 6,000 years ago. They were already long dead by then.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

Because spiders haven't adapted to that yet. Humans have resistance against that, although it is most likely do to genetic differences not built resistances.

However, you seem to be ignoring the fact that as the spider develops resistances that wasps also develop new neuro-toxins. Any wasps that don't change and develop new neuro-toxins that the spider cannot resist die off.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

Simple: He doesn't. There is no proof outside of the bible for that, and as such, cannot be quantified.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

No, he doesn't. At all. We have genetic proof that the human species dates back much farther than that. DNA evidence. That geneology has...how much DNA evidence again?

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Already explained it.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Except that that is not how it works at all.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

No, we don't say that. That is quote mining and misconceptions. We say life came from pre-existing organic chemicals and compounds. And you are also jumping around. We say that:
-Organic Materials+Millions/Billions of Years+many other factors=>VERY simple cells=>more and more complex cells=>bacteria, even more complex cells, etc=> even more complex cells and bacteria=>shell-fish like creatures=>fish

Mud is not non-living, nor organic. The rocks and mud were eroded by water, mineral was added into the "primordial soup" (the medium through whihc life came to be) and the minerals needed for life came from them, as rocks are made from minerals and erosions takes them from them. The minerals, that is all rocks had to do with it, other than acting as a basin for water to collect and make large oceans.

Also, the "If a exists, why does b still exists" is a logical fallacy as it makes absolutely no sense. Evolution never says that. It says that the most fit species is most likely to live. And it says that species that cannot adapt to it's life will die as it will be killed off/starve.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Because those chemicals aren't organic. Also, you're confusing an extremely complex biochemical structure with simple chemicals. It would be like me comparing a rock to a watch and asking why can't the rock tell me what time it is down to the second.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Because clothing is man made. We already have natural clothing=skin. Anything else would only be excess weight and unbeneficial to us. Evolution would instead give us a very complex form of skin that is stronger, lighter, and thinner; i.e. the Titanium Alloy of skin.

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Frozen water on mars doesn't prove water was there milliong years ago because:

1. No one knows it was ther long time ago. No witness. No evidence. The only piece of accalimed evidence is a picture took by satellite. And NASA has cospiracy history. That picture could be photoshope to further support the stupid Big Bang theory and defies all Physcis Law. Try imagine this. You are at a court and you say "Your Honored, I have one picture with no origin of whether the picture is photoshop or not, and it porve Frozen Water on Mars. Eventhough many disagree and no body was there to testify, I know it is there."

2. No one cares. I mean.. Come on, who cares if there's water on Mars. You can't do much about it. And.. So what, water on Mars doesn't prove anything.

3. The frozen water (which is also, ice) is direct evidence of canopy of water breaks apart when meteorite (which itself was ice shard hurling through the space) that shattered and pieces of it landed on Mars. Or meteorite strikes one Mars.

Again. What can you do about the water on Mars? And... who cares????

And, most of your replies above are based on YOUR assumption. No supports of evidences.

[WickedGame]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/


What does mars have to do with a flood on earth?


Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Because now we have medicine and doctors that enable them to survive. (Unfortunately, because if all of the stupid people died off, I wouldn't be able to talk to you, you would be dead.)


Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Humans are perfect in their imperfection. There is no such thing as "perfect." The perfect human isn't perfect, because there is no such thing. And do you really think that having three arms would make you perfect? Why don't you go get one implanted in your side?



Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

There HAVE been many very old bodies found by archeologists. When you die, your body decomposes and leaches back into the ground. Larvae eat your insides and essentially, you go back to the earth. You become bug and animal food. The bodies from ancient times--besides civilizations that used mummification-- would not be preserved enough to find many of them. We now preserve bodies, but in ancient times they didn't, they had no use for it. Also, many bodies were burned as we cremate people today.


Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Angels and demons don't fit. Evolutionists do not believe in the supernatural! That means they don't believe in angles or demons.


Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Um, evolutionists don't believe that snakes have lost any power of speech; they don't believe that snake could ever talk. I'm not stupid enough to think that a snake ever had the power to speak. Animals don't talk! Children know this!

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

We are killing our planet. With gases and pollutants so we will never know if a tree was supposed to grow that large. I believe that the world will die eventually because of us, not because of the second coming of Jesus or any of that crap, but because of the way we are killing our earth.


Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
[B]

Hmm, I think you act like a monkey.



Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

99.9% of evolutionists do not believe in the bible, so the question is irrelevant. Also, your "god" did not write the bible! Humans did! King James was a lunatic. He probably wrote whatever he felt like adding to the bible.


Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Everyone over the age of 10 knows that there is no such thing as a unicorn. Evolutionists do not believe in unicorns! I can't believe the idiocy of this question.


Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Well, supposedly, our brains have exactly the right combination of, as you put it: biochemistry. Scientists don't believe that bug spray or gasoline can think. Neither has a brain. (Similar to you). If you believe that one being (god) can create a multi-dimensional universe in 6 days and rest on the seventh, then why don't you believe in thinking bug spray? To you, wouldn't thinking bug spray be logical?

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

People have only been wearing clothes for years because some idiot decided that the natural, naked body was bad. Something, that should be hidden. Guess what? It's not. If it were my way, clothing would be optional. You were born nude, there is nothing wrong with being naked, nothing to hide. Also, there is weather, people have gotten soft because of the luxury of houses, umbrellas, and heaters, now we can't stand to be too cold or too wet. We DO have natural clothing, it is our skin, what we were born in.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hmm, I think you act like a monkey.

Have you ever seen monkeys post messages to Internet forums?

King James was a lunatic.

Did you actually meet him or did you just make this up?

Everyone over the age of 10 knows that there is no such thing as a unicorn.

Again, did you actually investigate this, or are you making this up as well?

To be honest I fail to see how you expect to convince anyone of your theories if you are clearly unable to do some simple fact checking.