[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Here's a site with the answers to all of the questions...

...you religious zealots have about evolution:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

These debates get pretty one sided when the only "proof" of creationism is the Bible. "God did it" isn't an intelligent response to anything. The Bible is a great story, so was To Kill a Mockingbird. That doesn't mean that it was true. A Spider-Man comic book is a better chronicle of history than the Bible.

We are not interested in your satanic websites. This is a Christian forum where we uplift the teachings of the Holy Bible.

Please make a thread of your own in the "Introductions" section of the forum, so that we can properly greet you. Tell us about yourself, your church, and how you came to find Jesus.

And if you're here to flame us, better take a look at THIS before making an even bigger ass out of yourself.

[Sparky]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
Simple- sharks are incredibly well to live under water. Their lungs, fins and even skin is adapted to be efficient in their environment. Why would they move on to land when they are in the perfect environment for them to live in?

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/
Don't know enough about floods on Mars to tackle this one
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
Because as humans well look after each other. I mean, there's a whole bunch of you guys on this forum who all stick up for each other, and that's what happens in real life too

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
Evolution takes time, especially something complex like growing a whole new, perfectly functioning spare arm. Besides, we are the dominant species on the planet, so clearly our current form is quite successful without an extra arm

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
It's not really a pathological desire; most people see abortion as a last option, knowing that they can't successfully bring up the child

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

The nitrogen cycle- when you die, worms etc eat away at your body and break into it's components, just like when you eat meat. These nutrients are returned to the soil, taken up by plants and so on. Google "Nitrogen cycle". Also don't forget that a lot of our bodies are made up of water, so that also goes into the soil.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
Clearly a Darwinist wouldn't answer these questions since they don't believe that they exist

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
Clearly a Darwinist wouldn't answer these questions since they don't believe that they exist

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
Get me a Loch Ness monster to study and I'll tell you

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
Trees need water. To get water to the top they rely on the adhesive nature of water to transport water to the leaves via small tubes. The taller the tree, the harder it is to get water to the top. Also, there are energetic costs associated with growth- why use energy for unnecessary growth?

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben
See above
Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

Because we have evolved? I'm not really sure where you're going with this question, I thought it was obvious? Think of it like this- a mouse acts differently from a monkey, we act differently from a monkey... it's just how we are
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
All organisms have a niche. We as humans are adapted to live in the environment we live in now, in my case in a house etc etc. Monkeys are adapted to live in the trees, and are better at that than we are, since we have taken different evolution pathways
Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

I don't think evolution theory says that. Unforeseen major events, human interaction, or just lack of food sources can account for sudden extinctions
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
Seriously? You are aware that these don't exist, right?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
Since fossils records indicate that Homo sapiens were around before the Bible was written, maybe it wasn't a necessary part of the story

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
*through
Maybe the spider "updates" its venom so the anti venom can't catch up, or maybe it#'s because no spiders survive the venom, meaning that none can pass their venom-surviving genes onto the next generation


How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
Firstly, the English Royal family aren't deformed, idiot.
Or it could mean that Cain wasn't real, and then the whole evolution thing would kind of explain why we're not all imbred

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
According to you couldn't you trace the genealogy of everyone back to Adam and Eve? Also I want to see some science here
Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
a) They are made up
b) If I treat this like I serious question, I would guess probably like deer have antlers to use for defence and also so that the males can compete for female attention in mating season

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
What, do you mean they should be in the fossil records or that there should still be some around now? I will answer the question once you clarify

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
That's not quite how it worked love

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Bug spray is relatively simple. Our brains are incredible; they are made of neurones, hundreds of cells and a lot of perfectly aligned and balanced chemicals. It's not the same as bug spray

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

Hope that helps guys!

[Sparky]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Loch Ness isn't even a lake, and it certianly hasn't ever been drained.

It is said to live in a lake (or loch if you're going to be clever about it). Therefore, if the lake has been drained and it isn't there..... maybe it doesn't exist? That's the obvious answer anyway

[Dirk]

Re: Here's a site with the answers to all of the questions...

...you religious zealots have about evolution:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

These debates get pretty one sided when the only "proof" of creationism is the Bible. "God did it" isn't an intelligent response to anything. The Bible is a great story, so was To Kill a Mockingbird. That doesn't mean that it was true. A Spider-Man comic book is a better chronicle of history than the Bible.

What kind of Godhating site is that? This is a Christian forum!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

It is said to live in a lake (or loch if you're going to be clever about it). Therefore, if the lake has been drained and it isn't there..... maybe it doesn't exist? That's the obvious answer anyway

Maybe? We Christians don't deal on speculation. Nearly hand waving it away on some personal belief that the Loc Ness monster doesn't exist doesn't cut it.

Prove the Loc Ness Monster doesn't exist friend.

[Sparky]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Maybe? We Christians don't deal on speculation. Nearly hand waving it away on some personal belief that the Loc Ness monster doesn't exist doesn't cut it.

Prove the Loc Ness Monster doesn't exist friend.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster

The best part of the article:
Searching for the Loch Ness Monster BBC (2003)
In 2003, the BBC sponsored a full search of the Loch using 600 separate sonar beams and satellite tracking. The search had enough resolution to pick up a small buoy. No animal of any substantial size was found whatsoever and despite high hopes, the scientists involved in the expedition admitted that this essentially proved the Loch Ness monster was only a myth.[59]

[James Hutchins]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

The BBC... a G'ment run propaganda machine. And facts coming from a country with a Queen. Please, let's be just a tad more realistic.
Quote scripture, Sparky, or it is not true.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster
The best part of the article:
Searching for the Loch Ness Monster BBC (2003)
In 2003, the BBC sponsored a full search of the Loch using 600 separate sonar beams and satellite tracking. The search had enough resolution to pick up a small buoy. No animal of any substantial size was found whatsoever and despite high hopes, the scientists involved in the expedition admitted that this essentially proved the Loch Ness monster was only a myth.[59]

So in other words these "scientists" (who are obviously aware that the Loch Ness monster contradicts evolution) just happen to find "nothing". All very convenient, don't you think? They just can't find the thing that messes up their little theory. Kind of like Mafioso saying "What Mafia?".

[Sparky]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So in other words these "scientists" (who are obviously aware that the Loch Ness monster contradicts evolution) just happen to find "nothing". All very convenient, don't you think? They just can't find the thing that messes up their little theory. Kind of like Mafioso saying "What Mafia?".

Pretty sure that nessie could fit with evolution, if it exists and if anyone ever gets close enough to study it's morphological and physiological features
Also, the BBC are broadcasters, not scientists. It would have been more of a coup for them to get footage of nessie than to prove the lack of its existence

[Tommy2B]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So in other words these "scientists" (who are obviously aware that the Loch Ness monster contradicts evolution) just happen to find "nothing". All very convenient, don't you think? They just can't find the thing that messes up their little theory. Kind of like Mafioso saying "What Mafia?".

So true. Whenever we find Noah's Ark, evil scientists come up with "evidence" that "proves" it was a "hoax". I mean, even unsaved Chinamen from Noah's Ark Ministries couldn't deny the Truth of the Ark.

Any scientist who refuses to confirm God's divine oscillating plan (create/kill/save/kill/save/mostly kill heathens) as revealed in KJ1611 is a demon.

[Sparky]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So true. Whenever we find Noah's Ark, evil scientists come up with "evidence" that "proves" it was a "hoax". I mean, even unsaved Chinamen from Noah's Ark Ministries couldn't deny the Truth of the Ark.

Any scientist who refuses to confirm God's divine oscillating plan (create/kill/save/kill/save/mostly kill heathens) as revealed in KJ1611 is a demon.

Err what- how many times have you "found" Noah's Ark?
Also, why hasn't anyone responded to any more of the points that I made in my original post? You know, the stuff about unicorns etc

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Err what- how many times have you "found" Noah's Ark?

And? It was a big boat. The largest wooden ship ever built.

Also, why hasn't anyone responded to any more of the points that I made in my original post? You know, the stuff about unicorns etc

We have the Romans who talked about unicorns as well as The Bible. Is that good enough for your closed minded anti-Christian pro-Muslim bigotry???

[xenochrist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

if god created everything then who created god?

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

if god created everything then who created god?

Has no one told you that before? God was always there!

[Phoenix]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

if god created everything then who created god?

Sir,

God created time, therefore has no beginning or end. Time was created along with the heavens, in order that, coming into being together, they might also be together dissolved, if ever their dissolution should take place.

God was acting before time, and His purpose is predetermined,

Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought:
But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:
Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
~ I Corinthians 2:6-9

God has no need to be created, since God existed before all things, and created all things,

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
~ John 1:1-5

I hope this answered your question.

With respect.