What do you people define as racism then if this thread is not racist??
Are you seriously trying to tell us that black people don't look like apes from a scientific point of view?
sigpic
Isaiah 34:6 The sword of the LORD is filled with blood, it is made fat with fatness, and with the blood of lambs and goats, with the fat of the kidneys of rams: for the LORD hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, and a great slaughter in the land of Idumea.
John 5:46,47For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
How unusual to meet an Australian who is not mental.
And I will assume you have verified medical publications which back these claims that you make? Having a mental illness is no small thing, nor a laughing matter.
Are you seriously trying to tell us that black people don't look like apes from a scientific point of view?
Watch out pal, the term "black people" as you just said is considered racist by some of your peers on this forum. I think the definition of racism here is not a widely accepted boundary which everyone on here unanimously agrees apon.
On a purely observational view (no scientific), it is true that people of african decent in particular, as well as aboriginal Australians do have particular physical features which are certainly slightly more ape like than what a white man has. But so what? You people aren't stating this observation purely for the sake of it! The racial undertones jump out with the subtlety of a bull in a china shop, they smack you right in the face.
This thread clearly intends to further denigrate people of darker skin pigmentation as nothing more than primitive savages and closer to apes and human beings. Theres no doubt that the behaviour of these people sometimes leaves a lot to be desired, but hey, from what I've heard about some of the behaviour of people in the politically conservative parts of the USA, drug f__ked and for the most part, some could draw the long bow and say that white people act like white monkeys.
But you'd just say they had the devil inside them, right?
And I will assume you have verified medical publications which back these claims that you make? Having a mental illness is no small thing, nor a laughing matter.
Mark 9:18 And wheresoever he taketh him, he teareth him: and he foameth, and gnasheth with his teeth, and pineth away: and I spake to thy disciples that they should cast him out; and they could not.
Mark 9:17 And one of the multitude answered and said, Master, I have brought unto thee my son, which hath a dumb spirit;
Job 16:9 He teareth me in his wrath, who hateth me: he gnasheth upon me with his teeth; mine enemy sharpeneth his eyes upon me.
Hosea 6:1 Come, and let us return unto the LORD: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up. Nobody's laughing, friend. Possession by demons is deadly serious.
God's the only way to heal your soul for Heaven, man.
sigpic
Isaiah 34:6 The sword of the LORD is filled with blood, it is made fat with fatness, and with the blood of lambs and goats, with the fat of the kidneys of rams: for the LORD hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, and a great slaughter in the land of Idumea.
John 5:46,47For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
Watch out pal, the term "black people" as you just said is considered racist by some of your peers on this forum. I think the definition of racism here is not a widely accepted boundary which everyone on here unanimously agrees apon.
I'm just asking if from a scientific point of view black people look like apes. Do you not know any science? Because I do and I reckon any scientist would say that they do.
It's a shame when flamers need actually educating in the scientific method they reckon to uphold.
sigpic
Isaiah 34:6 The sword of the LORD is filled with blood, it is made fat with fatness, and with the blood of lambs and goats, with the fat of the kidneys of rams: for the LORD hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, and a great slaughter in the land of Idumea.
John 5:46,47For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
Watch out pal, the term "black people" as you just said is considered racist by some of your peers on this forum. I think the definition of racism here is not a widely accepted boundary which everyone on here unanimously agrees apon.
I personally prefer the term "negro", just like Martin Luther King did.
On a purely observational view (no scientific), it is true that people of african decent in particular, as well as aboriginal Australians do have particular physical features which are certainly slightly more ape like than what a white man has. But so what? You people aren't stating this observation purely for the sake of it! The racial undertones jump out with the subtlety of a bull in a china shop, they smack you right in the face.
Wait, so you're saying you completely agree with us (and science). Then you have the nerve to call us and science "racist", even though you agree? Maybe the real racist here is you....
This thread clearly intends to further denigrate people of darker skin pigmentation as nothing more than primitive savages and closer to apes and human beings. Theres no doubt that the behaviour of these people sometimes leaves a lot to be desired, but hey, from what I've heard about some of the behaviour of people in the politically conservative parts of the USA, drug f__ked and for the most part, some could draw the long bow and say that white people act like white monkeys.
Yes, I was correct. Would you honestly say "the behaviour[sic] of these people sometimes leaves a lot to be desired" in the company of a negro? Would you even call them "these people"? No, you wouldn't because you recognize that as racist thinking and you don't want to show your racism. But, I'm sure with your fellow whites, you talk all you want about those "ape-like coons".
Furthermore, you're not only racist against negroes but against White Americans as well. Why don't you release your heart full of hate (typical atheist) and embrace Jesus instead? True Christians(tm) preach love and acceptance; atheists preach hate and racism.
Watch the #1 Televangelist Gospel Hour in the World! "Turn or Burn: Accept Christ or Go to Hell with Rev. Jim Osborne."Check your local cable listings.
Re: Science proves that black people look like apes.
The degenerate forms of humanity have not been cursed to the servitude of servants because of their "skin pigmentation" but because of their behaviour. Well, because of someone else's behaviour actually. They weren't even there at the time.
BUT CHEAP STUNTS LIKE SOME LAWYER FROM THE GUTTER MIGHT GET AWAY WITH IN A SECULAR COURT OF LAW WON'T WORK WITH OUR GOD - THE ONLY TRUE GOD - HE IS TOO SMART FOR THAT
I personally prefer the term "negro", just like Martin Luther King did.
The word Negro is Spanish for black, and black is not an offensive term to describe someone with dark skin pigmentation. Whilst Martin Luther King mentioned Negro in his speech, a lot of black people still objected to the term because they associated it with the long history of slavery. Slavery, something which you people claim is the only reason why they are here, to serve the white man. Those thoughts are true racist thoughts right there.
Wait, so you're saying you completely agree with us (and science). Then you have the nerve to call us and science "racist", even though you agree? Maybe the real racist here is you....
Oh that makes a lot of sense! I must be the real racist even though I never said it to begin with? I just agreed on one small part, which mind you, was never the part which i said was racism to start with. I never said I completely agree with anything, those were your words not mine.
Yes, I was correct. Would you honestly say "the behaviour[sic] of these people sometimes leaves a lot to be desired" in the company of a negro? Would you even call them "these people"? No, you wouldn't because you recognize that as racist thinking and you don't want to show your racism. But, I'm sure with your fellow whites, you talk all you want about those "ape-like coons".
Actually i would, because I have friends of indigenous descent who are decent, honest and hard working people, and I have had many discussions with them about the huge social problem which is a large proportion of the aboriginal race. Petrol sniffing, alcoholism, gang violence are all things which need resolving, but there's no simple answer. To acknowledge that these problems exist, is not being racist.
To acknowledge something through unbiased and unprejudiced observations before you can obtain all the facts there therefore be able to implement a meaningful and worthwhile strategy to counter it. To sit back and simply laugh and mock, and associate with the behavioural attributes of an ape, so therefore they must be more ape than white people, is not only racist, but utterly stupid.
Furthermore, you're not only racist against negroes but against White Americans as well. Why don't you release your heart full of hate (typical atheist) and embrace Jesus instead? True Christians™ preach love and acceptance; atheists preach hate and racism.
I'm not racist against Negroes, that's been addressed above. I'm also not racist against white Americans, as I just made analogy that you could call some white americans white monkeys like you would call a black person an ape if they were displaying the same behavioural attributes as some of those that I was alluding to, which I have personally observed, that white Americans are guilty of.
But since you want to go handing out racism infractions to me for my supposed racism of blacks and whites, does MitzaLizalor get one too for being racist? I mean, she did say and I quote "How unusual to meet an Australian who is not mental." Not only is that racism, it's unfounded racism. Because it was not said based on medically documented facts, there's no basis on which to make such claims. To be devoid of facts is not an excuse to make up rubbish.
Actually i would, because I have friends of indigenous descent who are decent, honest and hard working people, and I have had many discussions with them about the huge social problem which is a large proportion of the aboriginal race. Petrol sniffing, alcoholism, gang violence are all things which need resolving, but there's no simple answer. To acknowledge that these problems exist, is not being racist.
Why is it racists always play this card? "But I have black friends!"
And I will assume you have verified medical publications which back these claims that you make? Having a mental illness is no small thing, nor a laughing matter.
As we know, there is no such thing as "mental illness" but that doesn't mean that a person can't sometimes have addled thoughts. I know I do. If anyone wants to say that is a failing of mine well, I won't disagree. Here's a simple example: I fly a lot in connection with work and always use the same airline. If they don't have a destination then I don't go there. Sometimes I go there. Then I have to choose another carrier. Which one should I choose? They are all dreadful. That is why I've never used them. The last time I did they went on a detour to look at an active volcano. Or I could use a different one. It is so confusing.
But that is not what physicians call "mental illness" so let's see what God says:
II CHRONICLES
11 And behold, the actes of Asa first and last, lo, they are written in the booke of the Kings of Iudah and Israel. 12 And Asa in the thirtie and ninth yeere of his reigne, was diseased in his feete, vntill his disease was exceeding great: yet in his disease hee sought not to the Lord, but to the Physicians.
we are not told what particular foot disease Asa had - but he turned his back on God's Healing Might and consulted physicians - lingered for 2 years max., then dropped dead
13 And Asa slept with his fathers, and diedin the one and fourtieth yeere of his reigne.
next they buried him (evidently with some pomp) and it is at this stage that the apothecaries - "chemists" or "pharmacists" as we might call them - swing into action: AFTER DEATH: physicians kill: apothecaries embalm
Having turned his back on God who made him the wretch consults these "physicians" for healing, "apothecaries" for medicine.
It is often said by new age demoniacs that doctors only treat the symptom, not the disease (so not news: doctors say that too).
In the case of new-agers of course, their recommendation is to consult SATAN and eat hallucinogenic plants/amphibians.. but my point
is that doctors who claim to heal or to treat disease are liars in the service of HELL. Doctors are mentioned in The New Testament and
indeed some material was communicated to us by God through the inspiration of Luke .Colossians 4:14. a doctor who knew the difference between illness and demon possession.
An example of Jesus healing an illness (a type of plague). Luke knew that this was an illness, recognised the symptoms, knew that Jesus had healed the woman and that it was a miracle.
Notice how Luke describes this Miracle using the terminology of his profession: he describes the woman's illness in terms of symptoms and her miraculous healing is also described in those terms. It is a professional witness to a miraculous event. Mark is not a doctor. He knows what an illness is though and describes Jesus' Miraculous Healing in terms a layperson could understand.
There are many references to the foulness of demonic possession in The Bible, but I will just post one or two of them with Luke's comments because he would know what he was talking about, as you might see it, because he was a doctor. Modern physicians might very well describe these devils as "mental illnesses" but they are wrong. Jesus knew that, we know that and Luke knew that, too.
Luke tells us that this was possession by a devil, an unclean spirit. NOT such-and-such an illness, NOT some unknown illness NOT a "mental illness". DEMON POSSESSION.
The lies of modern atheistic "medicine" deny the power of Satan and describe a plethora of "mental illnesses" which have no basis in reality.
MORE EVIDENCE
Here is another demon possessed man, described first by Mark.
Now verified medical publications would tell us that this wretch was some "schizophrenic" in "deep psychosis" and here is a quote from one Published by the Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (in other words it's not pop-psychology from some electro-dub DJ off his onion on DMT).
But is this really some sort of "illness"? NO, it is not: it is demon possession. Back to Luke, and his account of this same episode. Luke is a doctor, but not some secularist, God denying "psychiatric" consultant. Luke is a doctor who ACKNOWLEDGES GOD, believes His word and who was a disciple of Jesus and LUKE offers us
PROOF
LUKE 8:27-30 And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the citie a certaine man which had deuils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombes. When he saw Iesus, he cried out, and fell downe before him, and with a loud voyce said, What haue I to doe with thee, Iesus, thou sonne of God most high? I beseech thee torment me not. (For he had commanded the vncleane spirit to come out of the man:
NOTE: Luke does not say "healed him of some sort of undiagnosed mental illness"
Mary Magdalene did not have a dissociative disorder. She was possessed by demons. Luke knew what an illness was, knew that some were incurable. DEMON POSSESSION is not any sort of illness. Luke clearly differentiates between the two. Where symptoms are described, throughout The New Testament they are exactly the symptoms of "mental illness" but they are no such thing. They are evidence of SATAN and DEMON POSSESSION. If you do not believe that you do not believe The Bible: you are calling Jesus a LIAR.
The evidence of Luke, physician and eye witness to Jesus' Miraculous Ministry attests to the reality of demonic occupation. At no stage does he ever equate demoniacs with the infirm (although sometimes a person may be sick and also demon possessed of course). Acceptance of mental "illnesses" is a denial of Jesus, and reliance on the debilitating medications of satanic apothecaries is rejection of The Holy Spirit and earns you a one-way ticket to HELL.
Re: Science proves that black people look like apes.
Bigots.
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Revelation 12:9
Comment