[BelieverInGod]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

I don´t want to insult creationist theologists, but I think it´s wrong to call them scientists. The very term science is the observation of nature from an empirical and objective point of view, and thus creating theories that must be strengthened by proof.

Theologists are people who try to prove the existence of god, but they have not as of yet supported this theory with any empirical evidence. Therefore these theories cannot properly be called science.

So in other words to be a scientist you have to be an atheist.

Want to explain that to all the other atheists who come here and tell us otherwise?

[Traveler]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

So in other words to be a scientist you have to be an atheist.

Want to explain that to all the other atheists who come here and tell us otherwise?

I made no such claim. I just said that a theory is only scientific if it is supported by empirical evidence.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

I hope you all know, that you are atheists, too. Or do you believe in Zeus, Hermes or Thor??
You see, you are atheists, too. We are just one god further then you.




Satanic spam deleted

Welcome, godmocking spammer. Why not venture into the introduction forum and let us know when you started to commune with Satan and why you think God has inspired you to come here to be saved.

[Roseluck]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

The title of this thread is wrong. It is not 'Bo's Law', it is actually called 'Poe's Law'.

Here are some references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poe's+Law

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law
conservapedia.com/Poe's_law

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

There's been 48 contributions to this thread and then there's your rantings. If 48 posters were happy with Bo's Law, why aren't you?

I see this act of pointless rebellion in the same way as your denying Christ; you do it simply because 99% of Americans accept him.

Not only do you hate America, you seem to hate yourself.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

The title of this thread is wrong. It is not 'Bo's Law', it is actually called 'Poe's Law'.

Here are some references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poe's+Law
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law
conservapedia.com/Poe's_law

Dear Retard -

Bo's Law is not Poe's Law.

Note the title of the thread: "how to tell real atheists from false ones". That should be an indication.

The first post is pretty clear:

Bo's Law States:

It is impossible to tell through the internet whether a person or organization is legitimately Atheist or is simply a person or organization making fun of Atheism.

Bo's Law In Detail:

Bo's Law relates to Atheism and the difficulty of identifying legitimate Atheists and their organizations because it is so hard to tell fake Atheism from the real thing. The law also works in reverse because as Christians, we know in actuality, there is really no such thing as "Atheism." So in fact, "real Atheists" can also be indistinguishable from "fake Atheists" because there are people and organizations who claim to be Atheist, while we know that is quite impossible, since there is no such thing as a real Atheist. All sane and rational people believe in God, whether they deny it or not. The Bible says that people who say there is "no God" are "'ivveleth (ihv-vel-LETH)" which translates to "mentally insane" (Psalm 14:1) Thus, people who claim to be Atheists are suffering from a mental delusion that can be cured in many cases by steadfast prayer, and/or mild electro-shock therapy coupled with approved medications prescribed by an authorized Christian Psychiatrist or experienced Pastor.

So the dilemma is: Are the web-sites and blogs that claim to be Atheist, really web-sites created by Christians who are parodying Atheists or by people and organizations who are so deluded to think they are Atheist, but in fact not, and thus lending to the extended parody of Atheism and mental delusion?

Maybe it would be wise to actually read the thread (or at least ALL of its title) before telling us how stupid we are. What do you think?

[esquisite]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)

Only a real sicko would try to turn religion (or the lack thereof) into a satire. Real atheists, fake atheists, I say stone them all and let God sort them out.

That is soooo Christian of you...

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)

That is soooo Christian of you...

Can you show me where the Bible says we should not kill those who deny God?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)

That is soooo Christian of you...

That is quite a compliment. Thank you!

[Imainbowser]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

In the book of Exodus it quotes.

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed. (Exodus 22:19 NA

Proof that Atheists are going to burn in hells eternal fire. Those Atheists sicken me.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

In the book of Exodus it quotes.

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed. (Exodus 22:19 NASB ).

Proof that Atheists are going to burn in hells eternal fire. Those Atheists sicken me.

First of all, you've got the verse number wrong: that's Exodus 22:20.

Exodus 22:19 is something COMPLETELY different (sexual relations with an animal!!!).



This is a common mistake for people who try to Google their way to salvation (I hope that isn't what you are doing) instead of simply reading the Bible cover-to-cover. They try to come up with something clever or something they feel is relevant, and they come off looking like fools.

Second, you should be using the KJV Bible. Here is how the verse you selected SHOULD read:

(Exodus 22:20) "He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed."

Not "doomed" or some other namby-pamby nonsense, but UTTERLY DESTROYED.

When people fool around with the Bible and water it down and try to make it all peace and love and understanding, they doom entire generations to an eternity of flames and ass-rape by demons.

Do you want that? I sure hope not!

Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[AdamFinMO]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

There are no "real" atheists. The truth of God is written on the hearts of men (women have to be taught). All atheists are just backward homos that refuse to stop buggering each other and recognize that the love of Christ will burn their sin out of them.

[AdamFinMO]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

The title of this thread is wrong. It is not 'Bo's Law', it is actually called 'Poe's Law'.

Here are some references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poe's+Law

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law
conservapedia.com/Poe's_law

Perhaps you should spend more time reading the Bible and less time messing around with all that Liberal clap-trap.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

Perhaps you should spend more time reading the Bible and less time messing around with all that Liberal clap-trap.

You're about 6 months late to the party, Adam. Hosehead is in Quarantine, and has already had her behind handed to her over her stupidity.

Have you been over to the Introduction forum yet? Howdy!

[krunsch]

Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)

see that idiot heathen Heisenberg.

Do you understand this:
[x, p]=2*pi*h

If yes, congratulations. You have started mastering basic quantum mechanics. Otherwise STFU and GTFO!

So you believe in a huge universe as science tells you, where there are billions of planets and statistically there must be life on some of them and it's so big that anything is possible, except God?

Not anything is possible, but basically, yes, that's atheist belief.

Here's a conundrum for you: If beer is so great, why is it only available on Earth? Huh? You don't have an answer for that, do you? We were blessed by God with the holy mead. There is no other explanation for it.

How do you know it's only available on earth? Have you been to other planets that support carbon based life?

There are people who claim to be atheists and they are really good at bashing and mocking Christianity. Some even have websites that bash and mock Christianity but it is interesting how these so called atheists rarely bash other religions. Why is that?

My guess is that they are American immigrants or Americans themselves and there are these annozing militant christians all around them, whereas other religions occur much more seldom. If they lived in a country where the Islam was the dominant religion, which at the same time would grant free speech and the infrastructure of a developped country, meaning fast internet virtually everywhere, that would be no problem, too.

The taste of mead is just another one of God's many reminders that he's there.

If you can taste God's work, how can people deny him?

If you taste him, you probably drank too much.

Nonsense! All this "blame your parents" crap that has been invented by hippies and democrats doesn't fool God at all! Everyone is responsible for his own actions, so if a child refuses to believe in God, he will burn in Hell. It's as simple as that!

The Holy Bible is extremely clear on this: Mark 16:16 "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."

Please note God doesn't make any exceptions like "except when your parents are atheist liars" here. No believer? Hell!

I can't beleive I agree with you again, COM. But yes, if there was something like the christian god in the bible, in that case, you would still go to hell.

I don´t want to insult creationist theologists, but I think it´s wrong to call them scientists. The very term science is the observation of nature from an empirical and objective point of view, and thus creating theories that must be strengthened by proof.

I do, but that's another thing. Anyway, they are not natural sciences. Natural sciences have some kind of theory, then you go out there and look for evidence to support it. Or there is some data and you try and find a connecion, once you found one you go out there and try to find evidence to support it further, if there is something speaking against it, you abandon or refine it.

The humanities are a different field. They take a text, then they imagine something that might be in there and then they write it down and they graduate.

From my choice of words you may conclude that I thing they are complete hokum, and you would be right. Nevertheless they qualified as some different kind of .... well, forget what I said. You are right. They aren't science.

I see this act of pointless rebellion in the same way as your denying Christ; you do it simply because 99% of Americans accept him.

Rougyly 10% of all Americans are without religion. And the rest of them does include jews, muslims, hindus and all other stuff as well.

Can you show me where the Bible says we should not kill those who deny God?

10 commandments? It doesn't say Thou shalt not murder, unless they don't believe in me, it says thou shalt not murder.