Originally posted by Christina Nickson
View Post
One war I was asked about was Viet Nam. The US feared the Domino Effect: if Viet Nam fell to the Communists, the whole region would fall under USSR domination and become a market for Soviet goods and services (including military hardware).
Earlier I was told to read a Wikipedia article about Saddam Hussein. Eventually I had my attention drawn to parts of the article that drew attention to the financial causes of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Before that I was assured that Iraq was already a market for US goods and services, although in fact Saddam used Soviet made Scud missiles.
If anyone wants to dispute the proposition that all wars are about money, I would be grateful if they would deal with the argument rather than employ devices that circumvent the issue in question. I take all evasions to be a rather unkind way of admitting that all wars are about money.
Is that okay?
Leave a comment: