[A Follower]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

I am not worshipping god because he does not exist either. And as a reply to your 'evidence' the Harry Potter books are not evidence that wizards exist. Miracles of the ancient world when the bible was supposedly written, were actually just simple demonstrations of science. I do not require Sir Isaac Newton to apoear before me to show that gravity exists as he is simply the man who discovered it, he did not create it. The evidence for gravity is so much that it was declared fact centiries ago. If it were not for the gravity tugging on the Earth from the sun, you would not exist.

The Bible was also declared to be factual many centuries ago. It seems like you have outed yourself as not someone who believes in science, reproducibility, standards of evidence, but as a hypocrit, only interested in furthering your preconceived ideas, ideas whispered into your ear by Satan himself. Please stop lying to us and to yourself and admit you are wrong, admit you came here to lure us into Hell, right with you. Repent, acknowledge God, and be saved!

And of course, if gravity was a fact centuries ago, why did Einstein have to reinvent it altogether? Because it never was nor ever will be a fact.

This is typical of atheism, especially new atheism, misguided youngsters spreading lies instead of relying on the facts written down (by God!) in the Bible.

[Didymus Much]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

Old atheism: Don't believe in god(s).

"New" atheism: Don't believe in god(s), and be an arrogant, conceited, ill-informed jackass about it.

This isn't progress.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

The Bible has never been declared factual, that is just nonsense.

Einstein did not re invent gravity, he furthered Newton's laws about it so that they apply in complex places in space, such as a black hole. And don't tell me you think gravity does not exist, as that is just plain ignorant.

Secularism is all about relying on the facts

[Basilissa]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

The Bible has never been declared factual, that is just nonsense.

Sweetie, something that is factual does not need to be declared as such.

[Alvin Moss]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

The Bible has never been declared factual, that is just nonsense.

I can see that you are a person who insists on formalities, though your sentence structure could use improvement. As a hint, you could use improvement in the area of punctuation. However, I digress. If it will make you feel better, I hereby declare that the Bible is factual. I hope that has eased your angst.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

Just because you declare something, that does not mean it is true. I could declare that the flying spaghetti monster exists, but that does not mean he is real!

[VictoryOS]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

Secularism is all about relying on the facts

Dear, do you even know what those words mean?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

It should come as no surprise to see where this "New Atheism" has gotten us as a society. Once a decent faction of society, the suburban, white housewife, caregiver to future preachers, doctors, politicians, NRA enthusiasts, women are now selling their virtues to make ends meet.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

This might be a controversial opinion, but I will take atheists any day over liberal Cuckstians who go to church twice a year and think their pets are in Heaven, Jesus was a great teacher, and Leviticus plays in the NFL.

[ann the chinaman girl]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

We don't understand how people can think of a world without the Lord. How?? and Why??

Praise him

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

It should come as no surprise to see where this "New Atheism" has gotten us as a society. Once a decent faction of society, the suburban, white housewife, caregiver to future preachers, doctors, politicians, NRA enthusiasts, women are now selling their virtues to make ends meet.

Who's that man on the right? Is he the token gay?

Ec:1:2: Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.
Ec:1:14: I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit.

[WWJDnow]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

Didn't the Feminazis completely take over the New Atheism movement? Serves the atheists right for letting their women speak for themselves. Now maybe they'll start to realize the wisdom of God's laws regarding female obedience.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: The Truth About New Atheism

Mary Eberstadt dropped her latest Truth Bomb in a book called "The First Church of Secularism and its Sexual Sacraments." In this book, she fearlessly exposes the sacraments of sin and spiritual death in the Secular Religion.

Mary shows how Secularists' hatred towards goodness and morality derives directly from Christianity's opposition to the Sexual Revolution. One can see that virtually all of the opposition to Christianity, and to religious liberty today, is in response to Christians raising the alarm to the many confirmed dangers of sexual irresponsibility. Inspired by this hatred, they have developed their own religious dogma, complete with sacraments (unrestrained sex) and holy rites (abortion). This is what I've said from the beginning.

For more than half a century, at least since the invention of the birth-control pill, secularists and progressives collectively, if not always consciously, have been assembling a new, quasi-religious orthodoxy. In place of the Judeo-Christianity of yesterday, and mimicking its outlines to an uncanny degree, this new body of belief has by now a well-developed secular catechism. Its fundamental faith is that the sexual revolution — that is, the gradual de-stigmatization of all forms of consenting non-marital sex — has been a boon to all humanity....

If abortion were truly an exercise of “choice,” one would logically expect its defenders to choose against it sometimes. But this, to repeat, does not happen — and that it doesn’t tells us something about where secularist progressivism is coming from. Abortion is not a mere “choice,” in the value-free consumerist way that rhetoric frames it. No: Abortion within secularist progressivism has the status of religious ritual. It is sacrosanct. It is a communal rite — one through which, it seems safe to speculate, some people enter the secularist-progressive community in the first place....

It embraces an alternative orthodoxy and a well-developed body of beliefs. The fundamental impulse leading to the penalizing of moral traditionalists today is not libertarian. It is instead neo-puritanical — that is, it is aimed at safeguarding its own body of revealed and developed truths, and at marginalizing, silencing, and punishing competitors.

This substitute religion mimics Christianity itself in preternatural ways. It offers a hagiography of secular saints, for example, all of them patrons of the revolution: proselytizers for abortion and contraception, such as Margaret Sanger and Helen Gurley Brown and Gloria Steinem; crypto-scholastics whose work is revered by generation after generation of the faithful and off-limits for intellectual revisionism, such as Alfred Kinsey and Margaret Mead; quasi-monastic ascetics, such as the grim public custodians of the National Abortion Rights Action League and Planned Parenthood; and even foreign “missionaries,” in the form of representatives within progressive charities and international bureaucracies — those who carry word of the revolution, and the secularist sacraments of contraception and abortion, to women in poorer countries around the world....

The so-called culture war, in other words, has not been conducted by people of religious faith on one side, and people of no faith on the other. It is instead a contest of competing faiths: one in the Good Book, and the other in the more newly written figurative book of secularist orthodoxy about the sexual revolution. In sum, secularist progressivism today is less a political movement than a church.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...ual-revolution

bold mine