[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Ladies, I fail to see why you are arguing with this person.

He claims to have spent five years translating the Bible. This means he must be very well-educated, and know Koine Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Aramaic.

He will not give his name. He will not list his credentials. He will not provide any sample of his "amazing" Bible version "for copyright reasons" . . . even though anyone with the most basic, one-minute-Google-based knowledge of copyright law knows that substantiated Internet publication is copyrighted on a footing equal with hard copy printing.

He will not provide any of these things, or even acknowledge my repeated requests for them, for one simple reason: He is a fraud.

The boy can't even write in proper English, yet claims to be fluent in three dead languages! I realize you are females, but come on . . . even a female should be able to figure out that someone fluent in three dead languages must be highly educated, and thus able to write properly in the pre-eminent language in the world today. He can't even manage proper capitalization, ladies!

How could he translate any other language into English, if he can't write fluently in English?

He is only here to try to convince you that there is some flaw, no matter how small, in the KJV, God's Perfect Word. This, he hopes, will lead you to question the rest of it, then God's existence.

Please don't let him fool you with his forked tongue; this God-mocking antichrist only seeks to mislead you so you join him in Hell.

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

BelieverInGod, you do not and are not showing any fruits of the Spirit. Your using slurs insults unclean language and derogatory remarks to exhibit your frustration, which appears to be based in pride and not articulate facts and sensible reasoning.Your wasting my time, go away!
Now i ask all detractors this, why did the king james translators translate two different greek words as exactly the same English word. 'If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him." Paul used two different greek words and yet the king james scholars apparently have license to miraculously "DECIDE" that Paul acciodently spelt the two words differently. There are so many occasions of this in the king james it equates to a "Total debacle" of the highest order. If you want an accurate bible that displays and conveys the deepest affections of Paul and God toward believers, disciples, and saints, then simply wait for my version and you will see that for some reason God waited till now to get it out through me.

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Since when does not sharing your deluded belief about the king james bible constitute God-mocking Mr Rodimer. You are no different than the Pharisee's who accused jesus of casting out demons by the king of demons. Nasty finger pointing based in blind self-righteous pride is very much an infraction of Christian meekness and God is frowning on you. I do not see any evidence of "faith working through love" coming from you. Every cheap quick-fire rebuttal in here constitutes, well, "Nothing really", so cut the crap false accuser (Isn't that one of Satan's titles?) and get off your high horse. I'm the one who God has used to being the truth of His word to the modern world, not you, so it's about time you took a more decent approach in conversing with me because God is watching Mr. Cynical (untrusting of other peoples nature's), skepticism (tending to look on the negative side of things), and nonchalance (cold, hard, and unfeeling) are not God sanctioned attitudes, and yelling from the sidelines will get you nowhere, so get a life and come back and talk to me when you know what you're talking about...

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

ducking diving blah blah. Blasphemy skipped over.

You are receiving infractions because you continue to avoid my questions.

A. What Greek manuscript are you using for your supposed translation?
B. The source of your alleged Aramaic Bible.

We can start from there any time you want to. Failure to answer these will result in limited access.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Ladies, I fail to see why you are arguing with this person.

He claims to have spent five years translating the Bible. This means he must be very well-educated, and know Koine Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Aramaic.

He will not give his name. He will not list his credentials. He will not provide any sample of his "amazing" Bible version "for copyright reasons" . . . even though anyone with the most basic, one-minute-Google-based knowledge of copyright law knows that substantiated Internet publication is copyrighted on a footing equal with hard copy printing.

He will not provide any of these things, or even acknowledge my repeated requests for them, for one simple reason: He is a fraud.

The boy can't even write in proper English, yet claims to be fluent in three dead languages! I realize you are females, but come on . . . even a female should be able to figure out that someone fluent in three dead languages must be highly educated, and thus able to write properly in the pre-eminent language in the world today. He can't even manage proper capitalization, ladies!

How could he translate any other language into English, if he can't write fluently in English?

He is only here to try to convince you that there is some flaw, no matter how small, in the KJV, God's Perfect Word. This, he hopes, will lead you to question the rest of it, then God's existence.

Please don't let him fool you with his forked tongue; this God-mocking antichrist only seeks to mislead you so you join him in Hell.

Awww....... but I was having fun playing with the idiot toy.

Okay, last one Reverend, I promise.

BelieverInGod, you do not and are not showing any fruits of the Spirit. Your using slurs insults unclean language and derogatory remarks to exhibit your frustration, which appears to be based in pride and not articulate facts and sensible reasoning.Your wasting my time, go away!

Uh, this is my home, not yours. You don't like it here, you leave. I'm a True Christian(TM)woman and a proud member of this board. As for "fruits of the spirits" are you talking about wine, because you're right, I'm not drunk. Not sure the same could be said for you.

By the way, how is it prideful to say that I consider the capability to read commonplace? I'm not exactly bragging about my reading abilities if I don't consider it anything special. I just think that this up and coming generation is a bunch of retards because public schools are more interested in teaching liebral lies than reading, writing and mathematics.

Now I ask all detractors this, why did the king James translators translate two different Greek words as exactly the same English word. 'If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him." Paul used two different Greek words and yet the king James scholars apparently have license to miraculously "DECIDE" that Paul accidentally spelled the two words differently.

Oh, yeah, your a master wordsmith, I can tell
Excuse the Wikidpedia sin, but



As for two words meaning the same thing, I take it you've never heard of a Synonym?

common

- 10 of 152 thesaurus results
.slL { cursor: pointer; } Main Entry: common Part of Speech: adjective Definition: average, ordinary Synonyms: accepted, banal, bourgeois, casual, characteristic, colloquial, comformable,commonplace, conventional, current, customary, daily, everyday, familiar, frequent, general, habitual, hackneyed, homely, humdrum, informal, mediocre, monotonous, natural, obscure, passable,plain, prevailing, prevalent, probable, prosaic, regular, routine, run-of-the-mill,simple, stale, standard, stereotyped,stock, trite, trivial, typical, undistinguished, universal, unvaried,usual, wearisome, workaday, worn-out

There are so many occasions of this in the king James it equates to a "Total debacle" of the highest order.

Again,

I mean, you're the first person in 400 years to notice that God screwed it up? Do you really believe that God is so weak that he is incapable of keeping his own words right?

If you want an accurate bible that displays and conveys the deepest affections of Paul and God toward believers, disciples, and saints, then simply wait for my version and you will see that for some reason God waited till now to get it out through me.

Oh, but how will we ever know that it's yours? I mean how could I ever tell the One True Bible from all the other (per)versions out there? Oh, my little female brain can not handle it. Hey, I've got an idea, perhaps I'll stick with the one that has stood the test of time! The one that has been held up for 400 years and nobody found fault until the 1970's. How about that!


Anyway, I promised the Reverend above that this would be my last post on the subject. As a True Christian(TM) I keep my promises.

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Mr Rodimer! Tell me, how does basing all your faith on a flawed translation of the bible, simply to offset your insecurity in the world, constitute godliness. "and they marveled when they noticed the apostles were "unlearned and ignorant men". "God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise". Do i need credentials do i Mr Rodimer, or do you speak in words which reinforce your carnality. "Not in words which mans wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches". Do you have more authority than the word of God! Do you? For i could not speak to you as to spiritual. but as to carnal".

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Since when does not sharing your deluded belief about the king james bible constitute God-mocking Mr Rodimer. You are no different than the Pharisee's who accused jesus of casting out demons by the king of demons. Nasty finger pointing based in blind self-righteous pride is very much an infraction of Christian meekness and God is frowning on you. I do not see any evidence of "faith working through love" coming from you. Every cheap quick-fire rebuttal in here constitutes, well, "Nothing really", so cut the crap false accuser (Isn't that one of Satan's titles?) and get off your high horse. I'm the one who God has used to being the truth of His word to the modern world, not you, so it's about time you took a more decent approach in conversing with me because God is watching Mr. Cynical (untrusting of other peoples nature's), skepticism (tending to look on the negative side of things), and nonchalance (cold, hard, and unfeeling) are not God sanctioned attitudes, and yelling from the sidelines will get you nowhere, so get a life and come back and talk to me when you know what you're talking about...

It looks like you need to spend more time working on your heresy translation instead of coming up with insults.

You aren't that good at them, anyway. Still waiting for your answers to my questions.

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.

And to think you came here whining about how people use ad hominem attacks.

[Didymus Much]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

...and none of it holds weight or credibility...

Wow. You rewrote the whole Bible all by yourself? Yet, when asked (repeatedly) for any supporting evidence, you got nothing? In terms you may be familiar with:

T.I.T.S.* or GTFO

Turn in the Scripture (show us something).

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

I can't answer the questions you pose, so I will resort to calling you names.

Levi Jones.. You are a poopy head!

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Levi, your not a poopy head, your a wanker with no sincerity, or maybe a "lewd fellow of the baser sort" or maybe "a low life" or maybe a "scumbag" or may be "a loser" or maybe "a brigand" or maybe "an indecent fellow of the uncivilized type" or maybe "mommas boy" or maybe "an out and out dropkick" certainly not dinky Di, that's for sure (Dinky Di is aussie slang for "real". Honestly, faggot's have got more chance of into heaven than you. You better change your waaays boooy! LOL

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Levi, your not a poopy head, your a wanker with no sincerity, or maybe a "lewd fellow of the baser sort" or maybe "a low life" or maybe a "scumbag" or may be "a loser" or maybe "a brigand" or maybe "an indecent fellow of the uncivilized type" or maybe "mommas boy" or maybe "an out and out dropkick" certainly not dinky Di, that's for sure (Dinky Di is aussie slang for "real". Honestly, faggot's have got more chance of into heaven than you. You better change your waaays boooy! LOL

Thank you for proving yourself to be nothing, but a fraud.

As always, Jesus wins in the end.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Mr Rodimer! blah blah not responding to your repeated questions blah!

I have asked you for information on your "version" and about you, many times over. I have requested:

Your name, since you must be a scholar of some renown to be fluent in three dead languages.

Your credentials.

A sample of your "version". A chapter or two should suffice, with information explaining how yours is superior.

Why do you refuse to acknowledge, much less respond to, these simple requests?

Is it because you are a God-mocking fraud?

I believe it is.

Prove me wrong.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

You know, after all this, I'm starting to miss Father Martian.

At least he could write coherent sentences and was who he said he was, even if he WAS a Mary-worshiping, ring-kissing, cracker-adoring Papist.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Yeah, whatever happened to him? I didn't have him down as a the first suspect in the abuse investigation but then I might be too trusting... which is just the sort of thing that they want...