[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The Lord's Supper

Don't you see? That was a MASS going on! (kinda like the Last Supper was)

This just under scours the theory that you Catholics are really worshiping the first Pontus Maximus Julius Caesar. Caesar was craved up into a bloody mess by his followers.

[Dr. Otto Bond Sr.]

Re: The Lord's Supper

What will be taken literally is our law suite against you and the Iowa State Police for your bigoted, anti-Christian, harassment of Sister Talitha.

Praise, Brother! We can't be having these anti-Christians roaming the streets like free Americans(tm) are allowed to! Those cathyolics have screamed persecution at us for the past 50 years and I think it's time we return the favor!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The Lord's Supper

tsk, tsk...no True Christian would make fun of Jesus' words!

Besides, how do you know it was metaphorical when everything else is literal to you? Because you WISH it was metaphorical-Well, it ain't. Jesus really meant what He said in John 6.

Of all the stupidities that the Mother of Whoredoms saw fit to commit at the direction of Satan, transubstantiation is the worst. It is unholy, pagan and atavistic – this is what the Bible says:

Lu:22:19: And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
He asks the disciples to break bread and think of Him– He doesn’t ask them to perform a miracle.

Lu:22:20: Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. How plain does it have to be? Christ has not yet shed His blood – it is symbolic!

1Co:11:24: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
1Co:11:25: After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

“Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you:” how obvious is it that it was His body “symbolically”? At that time His body was NOT broken. Here Christ is saying to anyone, who looks beyond the dogma of the anti-Christ, “This bread symbolizes my body. My body will be broken that the faithful may have Salvation™.”

“this do in remembrance of me.” Christ asks that when breaking bread (an every day occurrence) we are to think of Him.

“1Co:11:25: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me”. “it” is the wine. He sups of it – it is wine – Why would He drink His own blood? Simple, He wouldn’t. Here He asks that when drinking wine, (an everyday occurrence) we should think of Him.

There is nothing that I can see that in anyway states that the wine becomes blood or the bread flesh.

In fact, if there had been a change in the composition, would not the disciples have noticed it and mentioned it in the Gospels?

I mentioned to a papist that, should he wish, at my own expense, I would have the bread and wine forensically tested by the “scientists” in whom he erroneously put his faith and, if it came back anything but bread and wine, I’d turn the Bathfire fortune over to the vicar of Rome and join a monastery. Funnily enough, he did not take me up but did mutter some whining weasel words.

Ofc Martin, when you catch your escaped brother, get together and decide to put your lives to use by renouncing the Beast and accepting the Lord in the complete Word of the Bible.

[SUV]

Re: The Lord's Supper



JESUS but there's that face again!!!

Ossifer! Ossifer! I Swear I have not been drinking alcohol! So please don't try to suck my Blood or make me blow you!!!

By the way, your eyes look a little glazed - have you been eating Doughnuts?