[Helper]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Anyway, I hope that these verses convince you that there are cases when killing of babies (even the unborn, Hosea 13:16) is justified in the eyes of God, and therefore not murder.

Perhaps.
But God also ordered the killing of entire towns.
Does that mean that the killing of any random town without orders from God is justified?
Of course not.

[Basilissa]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Perhaps.
But God also ordered the killing of entire towns.
Does that mean that the killing of any random town without orders from God is justified?
Of course not.

Indeed. Genocide is justified killing only when it is God's Will. I'm glad we agree on this.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

They also missed the part about "Thou shall not murder"
If God knew us before we were even formed in the womb, why do you think he is fine with us being murdered before we get a chance to live?

Dear person,

You're probably referring to the verse(s) that in its more correct form is written as follows:
Exodus 20:13
Thou shalt not kill.

Deuteronomy 5:17
Thou shalt not kill.

What a difficult passage,as allegedly Christian authorities have for millennia struggled to contain both this verse and their practices of capital punishment, war, and wanton disregard for famines, poverty, and related issues while maintaining a facade of following Jesus. Many of them have taken the same easy way out that you also seem to prefer: to distinguish "murder" from all taking of life. In the process, they've failed to look at other parts of the Bible. That was mostly taken care of in the previous posts by our Sister Basilissa. May Jesus Praise her for her unrelenting work among the sinner population.

Now let us look these two identical verses. In the Hebrew version they are both as follows:

• לֹא תִּרְצָח

Qal imperative with the archaic negation using לֹא. The triconsonant root is רצח, a difficult one, a root with diverse meaning including not only killing and murder but also other kinds of wanton destruction. Which one to take. One possible guide is to listen to those who lived during an era, when Hebrew was - if not a vernacular - at least a language with an active living legacy reaching back to the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:9) and beyond to Creation (Genesis 1:1). I am, of course, referring to the LXX, where it is stated as follows:

• οὐ φονεύσεις from the verb φονεύω

Not much help here, both "murder" and "killing" are appropriate translations according to linguist experts. So, what does it mean? It means that when you just utter this verse in relation to your opinion (we'll discuss abortion in a minute), it is inadequate in the complexities of the Christian society unless you consider also other passages in the Bible.

Also within the secular swarm, many people have to balance between "greater and lesser evils" and this has led them into confusion when it comes to abortion. Many alleged Christians claim that saving a woman's life or dignity (in case of rape, which however is solved in Deuteronomy 22:29) takes precedence and the lesser evil of abortion can be performed.

These people seem to think that Jesus would be so stupid that He would not be able to assess this beforehand. He is not and He has. Abortion is evil but God has shown us that there are even greater evils when this lesser evil becomes acceptable.

Property rights, specifically, the rights of a husband.

Numbers 5:11-27
And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him, And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled, and there be no witness against her, neither she be taken with the manner; And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled: Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance. And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the LORD: And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water: And the priest shall set the woman before the LORD, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse: And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse: But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband: Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell; And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water: And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter. Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the LORD, and offer it upon the altar: And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water. And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.

A long passage, too much for most false Christians to read let alone understand. Basically. If a woman is suspected of adultery, the husband has the right to investigate the matter, to know if the fetus is his or a bastard. This is done by making the woman drink bitter water. If she is guilty, the water will do its wonders, terminate the pregnancy and cause infertility. If she is not guilty, everything will process business as usual. As, as the Biblical text tells us, the LORD does this ("the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot"). Because of this, no human agency is responsible for this sin of killing the child in its fetal state. God takes the responsibility, exactly as He does when he orders genocides (as in 1 Samuel 15:3 as helpfully cited by Sister Basilissa, Bless her!). THERE IS NO SIN IN THIS! לֹא תִּרְצָח does not apply!



This is the time when the greater evil (trespassing the rights of the husband) has to be avoided by causing a lesser evil (termination of an adulterous pregnancy). If we take some arbitary number and say that the greater evil has, for example, 50 points of badness and abortion 30 points, then the world is saved 20 points of pure evil. And with no human sin committed. The LORD does it! This is how the Bible supports its own message. Thou shalt not kill/murder but sometimes killing is the lesser evil. Its the same with genocides that God ordered and it will be the same when Jesus in the very near future first decimates...

Revelation 9:18
By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.

...and then personally kills sinner in the billions.

Revelation 19:21
And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Of course, as the designer of the World and the Law, He is above them. Let us also look at the final verse in my post in its Greek form, as the past tense in a sentence that describes future events is most interesting, isn't it?

καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ ἀπεκτάνθησαν ἐν τῇ ῥομφαίᾳ τοῦ καθημένου ἐπὶ τοῦ ἵππου τῇ ἐξελθούσῃ ἐκ τοῦ στόματος αὐτοῦ, καὶ πάντα τὰ ὄρνεα ἐχορτάσθησαν ἐκ τῶν σαρκῶν αὐτῶν.

ἀπεκτάνθησαν: Aorist indicative passive 3rd person plural. Aorist, a tense we lack in American, describes past (but not only past) events in a straightforward manner. In this case, in indicative, that it simply happened. It is our (near) future but for Jesus it already happened. It is history. It will take place exactly as told. He will kill and is killing and has killed the sinners. No human sin committed in this killing. No wonder the translations of false Christians are messed up with the ambiguities of Greek and Hebrew verbs: We're so lucky that Jesus eventually gave us the KJV with clear instructions!

It's the same with abortions. Countless of fetuses experience agonizing spontaneous abortions every single day without human intervention. Jesus feels that it is best not to prevent them. He knows best. Countless people die because of natural disasters but even more survive them and do not die. Both are decided by Jesus. He did them and is doing them and will be doing them in the timeless existence of His Divinity that we'll share very soon (1 Thessalonians 4:17).


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Helper]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Stuff

Uh hu......
And say, what happens if it's the husbands baby and they get an abortion? Does God take the responsibility?


Also, the old testament also ordered you to stone adulterers.
Yet Jesus wouldn't.
Jesus repeatedly changed the old law's punishments.
He kept the rules.
But he changed the results of breaking them.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Numbers 5:11-27
And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him, And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled, and there be no witness against her, neither she be taken with the manner; And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled: Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance. And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the LORD: And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water: And the priest shall set the woman before the LORD, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse: And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse: But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband: Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell; And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water: And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter. Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the LORD, and offer it upon the altar: And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water. And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.

A long passage, too much for most false Christians to read let alone understand.

Uh hu......
And say, what happens if it's the husbands baby and they get an abortion? Does God take the responsibility?

Also, the old testament also ordered you to stone adulterers.
Yet Jesus wouldn't.
Jesus repeatedly changed the old law's punishments.
He kept the rules.
But he changed the results of breaking them.

Thank you for your questions. The answers were available above in the passage I quoted. I am going to quote it once more highlighting the words that are relevant to answer your question.

Numbers 5:11-27
And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him, And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled, and there be no witness against her, neither she be taken with the manner; And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled: Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance. And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the LORD: And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water: And the priest shall set the woman before the LORD, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse: And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse: But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband: Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell; And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water: And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter. Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the LORD, and offer it upon the altar: And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water. And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.

A long passage, too much for most false Christians to read let alone understand.

You could also have shown some initiative and read the whole chapter, as in the very next verse your questions will be answered.

Numbers 5:28
And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.

This is how God works and how we are unable to work. Only if the fetus has been conceived as a bastard, will our Lord God terminate the pregnancy. As for Jesus and adultery, no-one is stoning anyone here. The woman lives and only becomes infertile if she has trespassed. However, we must remember that Jesus took adultery much more seriously than the OT priests. For Him, the actual act of carnal relations was no worse than adultery of the mind!

Matthew 5:28
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

The acquittal of punishment in John 8:7 is, in fact, probationary.

John 8:11
She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

Please be also informed that the punishment described in Numbers is a punishment that is given by God, not by human hands.

The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;

Similar to all righteous capital punishments, the human hands are just tools of Jesus. It is Jesus who makes the curse and, in this case, causes the rot of the woman's loins but only in case she is guilty. It is very elegant and righteous.

As I mentioned earlier, this is all peanuts compared to the End of Days when Jesus leads His armies to slay the sinner population. Also in that case He will be Merciful (Jonah 4:2) and not force His troops perform the killings. Eventually, He takes the justice into His own hands as I explained earlier (Revelation 19:21).

In the case of Numbers 5, there is no human agency that would "stone" the woman".

John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

The one "casting the stone" (the punishment) is God ("The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;"). Is He, in your opinion, without sin, and thus eligible to perform the task?


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Helper]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Thank you for your questions. The answers were available above in the passage I quoted. I am going to quote it once more highlighting the words that are relevant to answer your question.
You could also have shown some initiative and read the whole chapter, as in the very next verse your questions will be answered.

Numbers 5:28
And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.

This is how God works and how we are unable to work. Only if the fetus has been conceived as a bastard, will our Lord God terminate the pregnancy. As for Jesus and adultery, no-one is stoning anyone here. The woman lives and only becomes infertile if she has trespassed. However, we must remember that Jesus took adultery much more seriously than the OT priests. For Him, the actual act of carnal relations was no worse than adultery of the mind!

Matthew 5:28
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

The acquittal of punishment in John 8:7 is, in fact, probationary.

John 8:11
She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

Please be also informed that the punishment described in Numbers is a punishment that is given by God, not by human hands.
Similar to all righteous capital punishments, the human hands are just tools of Jesus. It is Jesus who makes the curse and, in this case, causes the rot of the woman's loins but only in case she is guilty. It is very elegant and righteous.

As I mentioned earlier, this is all peanuts compared to the End of Days when Jesus leads His armies to slay the sinner population. Also in that case He will be Merciful (Jonah 4:2) and not force His troops perform the killings. Eventually, He takes the justice into His own hands as I explained earlier (Revelation 19:21).

In the case of Numbers 5, there is no human agency that would "stone" the woman".

John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

The one "casting the stone" (the punishment) is God ("The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;"). Is He, in your opinion, without sin, and thus eligible to perform the task?


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

I could care less if you give her bitter water.


And again.
Planned parenthood, if you're unaware, does abortions for anyone who wants them.
Not just if they committed adultery.
Therefore, who takes the blame then?




God is eligible to do what ever he wants.
You on the other hand, are not.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

I could care less if you give her bitter water.

And again.
Planned parenthood, if you're unaware, does abortions for anyone who wants them.
Not just if they committed adultery.
Therefore, who takes the blame then?

God is eligible to do what ever he wants.
You on the other hand, are not.

Oh dear, you're moving the goalposts. None of us True Christians™ have ever expressed any sympathy towards Planned Parenthood. We only wished to explain to you that God has a very specific set of rules when it comes to termination of pregnancy. All based on the Bible. Not even one Chapter required.

What you've done is, in fact, the straw man fallacy. Instead of acknowledging your careless reading of the Bible and assessing our explanations you attack a position (Planned Parenthood) that was never the position of any True Christian™, nor ever mentioned by yours Truly™. Also, by referring to them and True Believers™ together, you're committing the fallacy of guilt by association. Abortion is hideous, as it sends unsaved babies into the Furnace (Matthew 13:42), but if God wants to perform it every now and then to prevent a greater evil, who are we to debate Him (Exodus 3:14 is the pivotal verse in this context).

These argumentative strategies were not unknown to God. He just has another name for these fallacies.

Exodus 20:16
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

However, I am most pleased that you now agree that Bitter Water is appropriate if a victim of property crimes (the husband) wishes to appeal to God's Justice. You're taking small steps towards Heaven! Still, I would care if a sin had been committed and the wife had violated the rights of her husband. It would mean a hard and tortuous path towards atonement. I don't really understand why you "could [not] care less". I was under the impression that you were here to learn and educate yourself but now I am afraid that you are here in an attempt to gain some kind of victory in debate.

2 Corinthians 12:20
For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, envyings, wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults:


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

*profanity redacted* this *profanity redacted* I'm out of here.

Sorry, friend, but you lost a lot of points for failing to stick the flounce. Maybe you can make up for it in the long program.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

WTF? Pardon my French, but some twit on here seems to have derailed this thread and turned it into a discussion of crime, punishment, abortion, genocide and adultery - definitely unappetizing when it's supposed to be dedicated to banning foods in True Christian™ households. I don't have time to read it all right now, but I intend to get to the bottom of it - and believe me there will be punishment.


So to get this back on track here, we need to talk about olives. Olives are mentioned numerous times in the Bible (KVV1611), and all the things produced from the olive trees. Things are made from olive wood in the Bible (KJV1611), and the oil made from olives is used for numerous purposes - including burning it in lamps. Jesus loves olives, and so do I.

Imagine my surprise the other day when I opened a jar of olives to discover someone had stuffed them with pimientos. Now I can't find anywhere in the Bible (KJV1611) where it instructs us to stuff one of God's creations with pimientos, so I can safely assume that Jesus doesn't approve. Moreover, I can't imagine anyone that can find the time to sit around all day stuffing pimientos into olives and putting them into jars - unless it was Martha Stewart passing time while she was in prison.

This pimiento stuffing is definitely a drain on the economy, if not being totally useless - and really, who in their right mind would consciously buy pimiento stuffed olives except some of the gluten-free hipsters in Portland.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Imagine my surprise the other day when I opened a jar of olives to discover someone had stuffed them with pimientos. Now I can't find anywhere in the Bible (KJV1611) where it instructs us to stuff one of God's creations with pimientos, so I can safely assume that Jesus doesn't approve. Moreover, I can't imagine anyone that can find the time to sit around all day stuffing pimientos into olives and putting them into jars - unless it was Martha Stewart passing time while she was in prison.

This pimiento stuffing is definitely a drain on the economy, if not being totally useless - and really, who in their right mind would consciously buy pimiento stuffed olives except some of the gluten-free hipsters in Portland.

AMEN!

My own suspicion is that sodomites hire illegals to stuff them, and take some sort of perverse delight in watching them still little red things deep into those... Well, you can only imagine what it looks like.

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

After a special meeting of the Ladies of Landover, it has now been determined to ban the following foods from True Christian™ households. Bear in mind this is as well as all Biblical prohibitions, so don't start boiling those lobsters yet!

To avoid encouraging sodomy
Papist wafers

That's no wafer, but the body of Christ.

We're AMERICANS, so no fancy foreign stuff!
Tacos
Burritos
Kiwi fruits
Brussels sprouts
Guacamole
Red peppers
French fries (Freedom fries are acceptable and welcome!)
Pizza (especially if it has pepperonis (see above))
Lucky Charms cereal
Snails
Frog legs
Rice
Sushi
Burger King French Toast Sticks or any French Toast
Keilbasa (Polacks are also papists!)
Choriszzo (I don't even know what this is, but according to Sister BTB it belongs on the list twice!)
Haggis
Curry
Couscous
abuelita-granulado

Why is Kebab not on the list, considering that his secret ingredient is rat feces?

Because nobody likes them anyway
Squid

Very wrong, everyone love this:

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

I don't know if this better falls in the category of peppers, or GMO foods, but as soon as dirty heathens start modifying food to look like a man's glory, it won't touch my lips or the lips of anyone in my family!

[Esther B.]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Nachos. They're unAmerican and use foreign ingredients.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Nachos. They're unAmerican and use foreign ingredients.

Foreign includes just about anything served as food. Take Romeo Rovagnati's Spaghetti al nero di seppia una ricetta facile e gustosa. Like me, you probably lost interest at about the third gabble but honestly would you eat something that looks like tapeworms boiled in ink? Intestines hold a particular fascination for damned nations everywhere so I was not really surprised recently to be served intestine soup at a meeting I unfortunately was obliged to attend.

Worse even than sprinkling vowels everywhere and waving your arms around like a broken semaphore machine are the squawks and chirrups passing for language where this muck originates. The illustrations help me to explain but will not prevent your mind from boggling when I tell you that each intestine is served with the natural filling and relished the more for that. The first picture shows the primary ingredient. Raw intestines filled to popping with all the contents intestines are noted for, anyone who's ever dissected a toad or ferret will recognise this bowlful immediately. It's the stuff you throw away. Unless you have an unusually debased cat. This picture is marked with a large 1.

2. The second picture shows what you get when the intestines are parboiled with assorted wriggling things and a few noodles. Cut into medium sausage-lengthed pieces, these chewy delicacies might almost be boiled pastries but check out the surface of the broth. See those little lumps floating around particularly catching the light bottom right? And the other lumps still in the intestines? It is not sago. Where has it come from?

3. Another way to serve these is parboiled without the wriggling stuff, cut shorter and served with stems from unidentifiable plants probably harvested from the car-park. I checked. There was nothing left. But here you can see the origin of all those floaty bits. Apparently how far along the intestine this bilge has got makes a big difference to its culinary suitability. The intestines in this recipe look larger than in the other two, probably moving it up in the price hierarchy from regions where if something's likely to straight out kill you it is the most expensive food of all.



This is just one example of how foreign ingredients set out to mock Jesus. He has no interest in the contents of intestines and has gone out of His way to make it quite plain:

DEUTERONOMY 23 . KJV . look up
12 Thou shalt have a place also without the camp, whither thou shalt go forth abroad:
13 And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee:
14 For the LORD thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee; therefore shall thy camp be holy: that he see no unclean thing in thee, and turn away from thee.

The mere sight of a single bowel evacuation is sufficient to turn God away from an entire nation, even from the nation He loved. Earlier in Deuteronomy it was explained that nations are damned outright.—.Ammonites and Moabites are mentioned specifically.—.as I referred to and as we can see has happens when people turn their back on Jesus collectively. And for someone who's explained about what's inside intestines and how much He doesn't want to see any, someone who'd reject a whole nation on exactly that basis, someone who was willing to be murdered for me even though I didn't deserve it, what sort of response could I expect if I parboiled the stuff with noodles and slurped it up out a bowl with chopsticks? Why should Jesus not then reject me?

Intestines from any species are never served in any Christian household, even if it's a species no-one's ever heard of. I hope these pictures will help anyone served up with ambiguous soups, none of which I'd recommend eating, all of which you can dissect in the bowl so you have something to do with your hands. But let's be quite clear: anyone who serves intestines eats intestines and anyone who eats intestines eats them with the natural filling. And anyone who prepares this stuff for public consumption does so without any cleaning process. After all, they will tell you, if you removed that there'd be nothing left.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: List of foods now prohibited in True Christian™ households!

Foreign includes just about anything served as food. Take Romeo Rovagnati's Spaghetti al nero di seppia una ricetta facile e gustosa. Like me, you probably lost interest at about the third gabble but honestly would you eat something that looks like tapeworms boiled in ink? Intestines hold a particular fascination for damned nations everywhere so I was not really surprised recently to be served intestine soup at a meeting I unfortunately was obliged to attend.

Worse even than sprinkling vowels everywhere and waving your arms around like a broken semaphore machine are the squawks and chirrups passing for language where this muck originates. The illustrations help me to explain but will not prevent your mind from boggling when I tell you that each intestine is served with the natural filling and relished the more for that. The first picture shows the primary ingredient. Raw intestines filled to popping with all the contents intestines are noted for, anyone who's ever dissected a toad or ferret will recognise this bowlful immediately. It's the stuff you throw away. Unless you have an unusually debased cat. This picture is marked with a large . . .

One more reason to hate Haggis, kilts, bagpipes, and the Scotts in general.