[Londron]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

First of all, thanks for the creationisits for giving me a few hours of entertainment here. Way to much is blocked on my school and reading this was a nice change from reading the newspaper.

I never really got the entire argument of theists.

They wanne "disproof" evolution. Well let me tell you something. Science is all about disproving current theories. I can garantie that right now a fiew hunderd if not thousand bioligists are trying to disproof evolution. Yet these educated people fail at it.

Furhtermore how does this Godthing commes in? What God? Why that God? Because of that specific book? Why? What's your evidence? Ow yea, that book again(circular reasoning FTW)

If theists wanne disproof evolution, give it all you got, get those papers published and do whatever you can. I'm sure scientists would be trilled by it because it might get us closer to what really happens(mainobjective of scientists pretty much) But none of that makes creationism even one bit more likely.

I simply look at my parents and I see I'm different.
My children will be different from me and even more different from my parents.(I look more to me parents then my grandparents).
This to me makes evolution pretty obvious.

One thing I wanne add is that "fittest" doesn't always mean the strongest or the fastest. We didn't had either so many thousand years ago, we learned co-operation and helping eachother.

[Janine Walker]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I simply look at my parents and I see I'm different.
My children will be different from me and even more different from my parents.(I look more to me parents then my grandparents).
This to me makes evolution pretty obvious.

Um.. I don't think that's what evolution is.. I hate to give you education on something I know is false but.. I must because you are insanely uninformed.

You say two crooked teethed humans bred to make you, which is TRUE but we are not denying the existence of breeding mechanisms(a lot of us have horses, breed dogs and do a lot of things around farms.) Everyone knows if you want a champion AKC puppy, you breed two champion AKC dogs. Everyone knows breeding a pomeranian and a toy poodle will give you a pom-a-poo.

What evolution suggests is that horses have came from microscopic organisms and that you have came from a monkey which in turn has came from a microscopic organism.

Last I checked when two monkeys had sex they don't make you or me, they make more monkeys!

[Wide-Open]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I simply look at my parents and I see I'm different.

I'm sorry to hear you are gay friend. But remember, being a homer is a choice, and has nothing to do with evolution.

I look more to me parents then my grandparents.
This to me makes evolution pretty obvious.

No, that's simply due to aging.

And don't forget that even evilition scientists would call that "micro-evolution". You didn't exactly "evolve" into a new species now did you?

[Londron]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Um.. I don't think that's what evolution is.. I hate to give you education on something I know is false but.. I must because you are insanely uninformed.

You say two crooked teethed humans bred to make you, which is TRUE but we are not denying the existence of breeding mechanisms(a lot of us have horses, breed dogs and do a lot of things around farms.) Everyone knows if you want a champion AKC puppy, you breed two champion AKC dogs. Everyone knows breeding a pomeranian and a toy poodle will give you a pom-a-poo.

What evolution suggests is that horses have came from microscopic organisms and that you have came from a monkey which in turn has came from a microscopic organism.

Last I checked when two monkeys had sex they don't make you or me, they make more monkeys!

(Why do people always have to make fun of one another is beyond me, can't even have a decent discussion on here)

Then I wanne see what mechanic exactly limits what DNA can and can't change.

If appearance can change over time(dogs being an obvious example) what exactly stops them from evolving further away from eachother?

With other words, what stops micro evolution from becoming macro evolution.

Like I said, a few thousands of scientists try to "disproof" evolution every day. And you guys would have the answer? Ow please grow up.

[Londron]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Um.. I don't think that's what evolution is.. I hate to give you education on something I know is false but.. I must because you are insanely uninformed.

You say two crooked teethed humans bred to make you, which is TRUE but we are not denying the existence of breeding mechanisms(a lot of us have horses, breed dogs and do a lot of things around farms.) Everyone knows if you want a champion AKC puppy, you breed two champion AKC dogs. Everyone knows breeding a pomeranian and a toy poodle will give you a pom-a-poo.

What evolution suggests is that horses have came from microscopic organisms and that you have came from a monkey which in turn has came from a microscopic organism.

(Why do people always have to make fun of one another is beyond me, can't even have a decent discussion on here)

Then I wanne see what mechanic exactly limits what DNA can and can't change.

If appearance can change over time(dogs being an obvious example) what exactly stops them from evolving further away from eachother?

With other words, what stops micro evolution from becoming macro evolution.

Like I said, a few thousands of scientists try to "disproof" evolution every day. And you guys would have the answer? Ow please grow up.

Last I checked when two monkeys had sex they don't make you or me, they make more monkeys!

Sure you ain't mixing up definitions?

Evolution: Slow changes over time
Revolution: Sudden changes

And even when all that is said and done. How is yours more likely?

Disproof evolution and we're back to a simple "we don't know". Most grownups ain't afraid to say that.

Ow and don't worry, I live in Europe and the only reason i got here was because I read this term "creationists" somewhere in the newspaper here(something to do with Palin) and was curious what it was, they explained it a bit in the newspaper itself though as nobody here knows that term.

It turned out to be pretty entertaining watching morons on youtube like the famous banana man. Me and my classmates are laughing our asses off at the stupidy of it.

But hey, only in America I'm I right?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evolution: Slow changes over time
Revolution: Sudden changes

And even when all that is said and done. How is yours more likely?

Disproof evolution and we're back to a simple "we don't know". Most grownups ain't afraid to say that

Our does take the non-existence of something else for it to happen. The THEORY of evolution requires God not to exist. Until you prove God doesn't exist you have no bases for claiming evolution does exist.

And we have a The Bible. You just have something written by some old guy who lived by himself.

But hey, only in America I'm I right?

Yes. We're God's favorite country.

[inSincere Sucker]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Ow and don't worry, I live in Europe and the only reason i got here was because I read this term "creationists" somewhere in the newspaper here(something to do with Palin) and was curious what it was, they explained it a bit in the newspaper itself though as nobody here knows that term.

It turned out to be pretty entertaining watching mormons on youtube like the famous banana man. Me and my classmates are laughing our asses off at the stupidy of it.

But hey, only in America I'm I right?

No, creationism is more widespread in the USA than anywhere else, but we have quite a few of them here in Australia. I've given up trying to argue with them because every discussion just gets back to "The Bible says...." and gets nowhere.

You said that nobody where you are knows the term creationists. Do you mean everybody accepts that evolution happened? What country are you from, if you don't mind me asking.

By the way, did you mean morons, not mormons?

[inSincere Sucker]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Our does take the non-existence of something else for it to happen. The THEORY of evolution requires God not to exist. Until you prove God doesn't exist you have no bases for claiming evolution does exist.

And we have a The Bible. You just have something written by some old guy who lived by himself.


Yes. We're God's favorite country.

With all respect, Bobby-Joe, no it doesn't. I know lots of people who believe in God and Christ and in evolution. God can do things any way He likes, so he could have chosen to use evolution.

If you mean Darwin, he didn't live by himself, he was married and had children.

[Pastor J.C. Manning, M.D., Ph.D.]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Dear "inSincere Sucker",

With all respect, Bobby-Joe, no it doesn't. I know lots of people who believe in God and Christ and in evolution. God can do things any way He likes, so he could have chosen to use evolution. If you mean Darwin, he didn't live by himself, he was married and had children.

You are right in assuming that God could have chosen to use evolution as there is no limit to what God can do. "And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God." (Luke 18:27)

However God, in His unlimited wisdom, decided otherwise. He decided to take 6 days and create everything as we now know it. He could have done it in 6 seconds as well, but He decided to take His time. The proof for this is in Genesis, which is conveniently located at the beginning of your Holy Bible.

Yours in Jesus Christ,

Pastor J.C. Manning, M.D., Ph.D.

[Dr. Boob]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Sharks are already the top predators in their environment, changing would cause sure extinction.
Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

The sun is slowly cooling down, that means that millions of years ago it was hot at the perfect temperature to allow liquid water on mars. In this period of time, the solar system was full of comets which are mainly made of ice. Mars' gravity attrcated a lot of these comets, eventually flooding it.
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Brain mutations, simple as that.
Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

A third arm would cause a lack of balance. As for the main question, as we evolve so too do the other species. This means that there will never be any "perfect" life form.
Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Again, brain mutations. All it takes is one person with a slightly-off chemical balance to breed and then there are more.
Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

Because Earth isn't wafer thin and is getting thicker due to the number of meteors constantly bombarding our atmosphere, these would also bury bodies. And as anyone knows, bodies decompose.
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Demons are fallen angels, angels are holy humans.
Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

Snake is merely a metephor for evil. It was a demon in the garden of Eden.
Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

The Loch Ness Monster is a cryptid, a creature that supposedly exists but there is no scientific evidence to prove it.
If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Surface Area: Volume ratio my dear friend. Trees gather energy and air with their leaves, if a tree gets too big, it doesn't have enough leaves to collect enough air or light to live.
Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better


Because the smartest of the monkeys evolved, and the smartest of that group evolved until we had civil human beings.
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Because even though they aren't top predator, they're good escape artists. Ever try to catch a monkey?
Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

Possibilities include in-breeding, a localized disaster, an outbreak of their main predator etc
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

Again, cryptids.
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

God created the animals did he not? Monkeys are an animal, and evolved into humans.
Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

This is a blatant falsity, the spider would only pass on immuntiy to the venom if it survived, which they never do.
How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

Ants all breed with 1 queen, yet they survive.
The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

Ofcourse Adam and Eve existed, if they didn't then humans never would have.
Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Cryptid.
Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Single celled organisms don't fossilize easily, just look at any fossil. They are always missing cells.
Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

Meteors constantly being turned to dust by our atmosphere.
Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Thought is nothing more than electrical impulses sent by the brain to different nerve endings.
Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Because we made our own, creatures evolve out of necessity.

You're all inteligent people, I think you'll find these answers satisfactory.

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

16. If we would dig a hole, how deep would it be before reaching the spot where we would fall down and would we find the Hell on the way while digging?

How far down have we dug?

It has actually happened before. I read a story about some miners in Siberia who dug too deep (about 9 or 10 miles, IIRC). The temperatures were over 2000 degrees and they recorded human screams from deep inside the Earth. I listened to the audio file and it is incredibly disturbing.

I just googled and found that sound file again. You can listen to it here: http://www.av1611.org/sound/misc/dighell2.ram

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Surface Area: Volume ratio my dear friend. Trees gather energy and air with their leaves, if a tree gets too big, it doesn't have enough leaves to collect enough air or light to live.

But don't you evolutionists believe that the Earth is roughly spherical? As I'm sure you know, the formula for the surface area of a sphere is 4πr^2. The taller a tree grows, the larger r is, and the more surface area is available. This means even more incentive for trees to grow taller and taller.

Friend, you just shot yourself in the foot with your surface area argument, unless you are prepared to admit that the Earth is flat.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Single celled organisms don't fossilize easily, just look at any fossil. They are always missing cells.

Like I said to KirovH in this very same thread when he said the very same thing, I wasn't looking for fossils when I asked that question. I'm looking for surviving descendants of two, five, or twelve celled organisms. I was wondering why all modern life either has one cell or has millions/billions/trillions of cells, and there's nothing in the middle with dozens, hundreds, or thousands of cells. There doesn't seem to be any evidence at all of any link between unicellular and massively multicellular life.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Gabriel Reproba]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

blah blah blah

tl;dr

Answer me this: If evilution is true, where is the crocoduck?

[Levi Jones]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

With all respect, Bobby-Joe, no it doesn't. I know lots of people who believe in God and Christ and in evolution. God can do things any way He likes, so he could have chosen to use evolution.

Why do you hate the Ten Commandments?

Exodus 20 1And God spake all these words, saying,
2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13Thou shalt not kill.
14Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15Thou shalt not steal.
16Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
17Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

[Dr. Boob]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

But don't you evolutionists believe that the Earth is roughly spherical? As I'm sure you know, the formula for the surface area of a sphere is 4πr^2. The taller a tree grows, the larger r is, and the more surface area is available. This means even more incentive for trees to grow taller and taller.

Friend, you just shot yourself in the foot with your surface area argument, unless you are prepared to admit that the Earth is flat.


Like I said to KirovH in this very same thread when he said the very same thing, I wasn't looking for fossils when I asked that question. I'm looking for surviving descendants of two, five, or twelve celled organisms. I was wondering why all modern life either has one cell or has millions/billions/trillions of cells, and there's nothing in the middle with dozens, hundreds, or thousands of cells. There doesn't seem to be any evidence at all of any link between unicellular and massively multicellular life.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

In response to the first point, a tree isn't Earth. Thats like counting the stem of an apple in it's radius.

In response to the second point, I'm not a biologist or a paleantologist, I don't have an fossil evidence.

At Gabriel, I fail to see what a "crocoduck" has to do with evolution.