[WorldFinancialCenter]

Re: More proof of the Flood

Seeing as you people can't bother to read, here is a diagram:

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: More proof of the Flood

Seeing as you people can't bother to read, here is a diagram

We are aware of those theories, but we think they are wrong for two reasons. One reason is that it would take milions of years for something like that to happen and the Bible clearly states everything is about 6000 years old. Another reason is that God created the mountains when he created earth. More details on this are in Genesis.

[True Disciple]

Re: More proof of the Flood

We are aware of those theories, but we think they are wrong for two reasons. One reason is that it would take milions of years for something like that to happen and the Bible clearly states everything is about 6000 years old. Another reason is that God created the mountains when he created earth. More details on this are in Genesis.

Additionally, why would there be convection of "magma" under the earth? What would be driving it? Of course, no evolutionist who bothers to answer such a worthy question.
This is because the theory of Plate Tectonics is a lie of Satan! All there is below the earth is Hell, and them volcanoes are just childish tantrums of Satan when another person escapes his clutches and accepts Jesus as his Lord and Saviour(tm)!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: More proof of the Flood

I think that the drawing that WFC did is saying that Everest is a volcano and magma is made of seashells. It's an interesting thought but a little far-fetched for my liking.

[True Disciple]

Re: More proof of the Flood

I think that the drawing that WFC did is saying that Everest is a volcano and magma is made of seashells. It's an interesting thought but a little far-fetched for my liking.

That's what you get from sending your kid to a public school.

[Aristotle]

Re: More proof of the Flood

I think that the drawing that WFC did is saying that Everest is a volcano and magma is made of seashells. It's an interesting thought but a little far-fetched for my liking.

I think he claims that the continents are like some giant cruse ships floating on this magma. I, for one, am glad its nonsense as I get seasick real easily.

[James Dewitt]

Re: More proof of the Flood

I think he claims that the continents are like some giant cruse ships floating on this magma. I, for one, am glad its nonsense as I get seasick real easily.

If these plates we live on are floating around why don't we move to a warmer climate? We could tie lines to tug boats on pull the US to say where Hawaii is, now that would be much warmer than Iowa

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: More proof of the Flood

The fossil evidence of seashells on top of Mt. Everest, the highest land in the world is clear evidence that the Biblical deluge happened. This corresponds perfectly with the Bible.

Genesis 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.

So here we have a case of fossil evidence confirming the reality of the literal Genesis creation and what do the atheist scientists come up with to counter it? "Plate Tectonics", a truly laughable theory.

I ask you atheist scientists out there, if plate tectonics is true, then how come it was suppressed and ignored for many years? I did my research on it. It was invented by a German weatherman named Alfred Wegner. So here we have a theory started by a guy who doesn't even specialize in the field of geology. Now, the theory started floating around and the scientific establishment laughed at it. Then, suddenly in the 1960's, you started to accept it. Why?

Seems to me that if the theory was so logical and explained geology so well, scientists would grab at it in a heartbeat.

The second point I want to mention is how the theory defies common sense. So basically continents are giant plates floating on an ocean of magma. But from what I understand, magma is the same thing as lava, and you can't float on lava. If you were to jump into a pool of lava, you wouldn't be able to stand on it -- you would sink and burn instaneously. Now imagine how many billions and billions of tons heavier a continent is! How can a continent float on lava when everything sinks in lava? Also, wouldn't the lava melt away the continent eventually?

Think about it. If you throw a rock into a pool of lava, it sinks and melts. Yet these scientists are saying, No, this rock will float on the lava and not melt.

Who are you going to believe? The Bible which is backed up by fossil evidence...or scientists who come up with absurd theories which make no sense when put under the scrutiny of common sense?

[Aristotle]

Re: More proof of the Flood

The fossil evidence of seashells on top of Mt. Everest, the highest land in the world is clear evidence that the Biblical deluge happened. This corresponds perfectly with the Bible.

Genesis 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.

So here we have a case of fossil evidence confirming the reality of the literal Genesis creation and what do the atheist scientists come up with to counter it? "Plate Tectonics", a truly laughable theory.

I ask you atheist scientists out there, if plate tectonics is true, then how come it was suppressed and ignored for many years? I did my research on it. It was invented by a German weatherman named Alfred Wegner. So here we have a theory started by a guy who doesn't even specialize in the field of geology. Now, the theory started floating around and the scientific establishment laughed at it. Then, suddenly in the 1960's, you started to accept it. Why?

Seems to me that if the theory was so logical and explained geology so well, scientists would grab at it in a heartbeat.

The second point I want to mention is how the theory defies common sense. So basically continents are giant plates floating on an ocean of magma. But from what I understand, magma is the same thing as lava, and you can't float on lava. If you were to jump into a pool of lava, you wouldn't be able to stand on it -- you would sink and burn instaneously. Now imagine how many billions and billions of tons heavier a continent is! How can a continent float on lava when everything sinks in lava? Also, wouldn't the lava melt away the continent eventually?

Think about it. If you throw a rock into a pool of lava, it sinks and melts. Yet these scientists are saying, No, this rock will float on the lava and not melt.

Who are you going to believe? The Bible which is backed up by fossil evidence...or scientists who come up with absurd theories which make no sense when put under the scrutiny of common sense?

M.E. Clark and Henry Voss have demonstrated by experiment the scientific validity of the Flood, proving the sedimentary layering caused by the Flood that we see on every continent. Voss is some kind of computer scientist and Clark is Professor of Emeritus at University of Illinois.

[stever the believer]

Re: More proof of the Flood

A little more research needs to be had on Alfred Wegener. He was a christian and he was the one to suggest that the continents were once one land mass. A large group of creationists believe this as well because of Genesis where God separated the land from the waters into one place. We believe the continents broke apart during and after the global flood.

I wouldn't dismiss Plate Techtonics as a whole so quickly either. That theory by itself is not just an evolutionist idea. Where do you think earthquakes and volcanic activity mostly occur? Along the edges of the techtonic plates as they bump together.

Evolutionists do try to say that the ocean floor is being pushed up but that's the best they can do. The Grand Canyon is a great example of the existance of the flood. The layers of sediment laid down during that period ... the evidence of mass erosion as the waters went down.... there are sections of rock layers actually BENT not broken where the land was pushed up as the techtonic plates were moving during the flood while the sediment was still soft. If it took millions of years, there is no way that would have happened. You can't bend rock. And don't throw magma as a theory for that either. It will not work and there is no evidence for it.

[Myron Pollard]

Re: More proof of the Flood

A little more research needs to be had on Alfred Wegener. He was a christian and he was the one to suggest that the continents were once one land mass. A large group of creationists believe this as well because of Genesis where God separated the land from the waters into one place. We believe the continents broke apart during and after the global flood.

I wouldn't dismiss Plate Techtonics as a whole so quickly either. That theory by itself is not just an evolutionist idea. Where do you think earthquakes and volcanic activity mostly occur? Along the edges of the techtonic plates as they bump together.

Evolutionists do try to say that the ocean floor is being pushed up but that's the best they can do. The Grand Canyon is a great example of the existance of the flood. The layers of sediment laid down during that period ... the evidence of mass erosion as the waters went down.... there are sections of rock layers actually BENT not broken where the land was pushed up as the techtonic plates were moving during the flood while the sediment was still soft. If it took millions of years, there is no way that would have happened. You can't bend rock. And don't throw magma as a theory for that either. It will not work and there is no evidence for it.

God makes the volcanic eruptions and earthquakes for punishment of not following His Word.Praise Jesus...

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: More proof of the Flood

A little more research needs to be had on Alfred Wegener. He was a christian and he was the one to suggest that the continents were once one land mass. A large group of creationists believe this as well because of Genesis where God separated the land from the waters into one place. We believe the continents broke apart during and after the global flood.

I wouldn't dismiss Plate Techtonics as a whole so quickly either. That theory by itself is not just an evolutionist idea. Where do you think earthquakes and volcanic activity mostly occur? Along the edges of the techtonic plates as they bump together.

Evolutionists do try to say that the ocean floor is being pushed up but that's the best they can do. The Grand Canyon is a great example of the existance of the flood. The layers of sediment laid down during that period ... the evidence of mass erosion as the waters went down.... there are sections of rock layers actually BENT not broken where the land was pushed up as the techtonic plates were moving during the flood while the sediment was still soft. If it took millions of years, there is no way that would have happened. You can't bend rock. And don't throw magma as a theory for that either. It will not work and there is no evidence for it.

Through Jesus, all things are possible. He can bend rock like it was wet spaghetti. Surely even a rabid Darwinista like you can comprehend that.

Please make a thread of your own in the "Introductions" section of the forum, so that we can properly greet you. Tell us about yourself, your church, and how you came to find Jesus.

And if you're here to flame us, better take a look at THIS before making an even bigger ass out of yourself.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: More proof of the Flood

I wouldn't dismiss Plate Techtonics as a whole so quickly either.

That would take millions of years. Earth is only 6000 years old. So "Plate Techtonics" is clearly one of those inventions by scientists to steal our money and do useless research. God made everything as it is. No research needed. Case closed.

Psalm 19:1 "The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork."

[Aristotle]

Re: More proof of the Flood

That would take millions of years. Earth is only 6000 years old. So "Plate Techtonics" is clearly one of those inventions by scientists to steal our money and do useless research. God made everything as it is. No research needed. Case closed.

Psalm 19:1 "The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork."

The unbelievers need to heed the words of 1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV 1611)

O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: More proof of the Flood

The unbelievers need to heed the words of 1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV 1611) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

Amen to that brother. It's amazing that people keep believing in scientists even though there are piles of evidence of fraud and plain stupidity. Both those scientists and the people believing them are blind, stupid or both. I suspect satan to have a hand in this.

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 "But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them"