[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

To me this looks more like a chicken than a kangaroo

Son, you need to lay off the devil's weed.

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo



I think this looks more like this:



than this:

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

I think this looks more like this:

You are right. On those pictures you can see similar posture on both T-rex and kangaroo. Same with small front legs, head with teeth and and long tail. You are still right, on chicken they are even more visible.

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

So you have posted a drawing that someone has done of an imaginary half dinosaur/half bird and you are trying to use this as evidence.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Did T-Rex have a beak?

No.

Do chickens have beaks?

Yes.

Did T-Rex have teeth?

Yes.

Do chickens have teeth?

No.

CASE CLOSED!

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

It doesn't matter if you can prove that the T-Rex descended from Oprah Winfrey. You still can't use this as an argument to defend atheism or anal sex. You will be in the same exact position that you started out in. Your not a logician, are you? Because your logic is a failure.

[ManyFace]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It seems you have mistakenly neglected to post the image of the skull of this supposed "Killer Kangaroo". I see a lot of your quoted information is from an article on the National Geographic website and BBC, and it looks as though you accidentally omitted the part where on NATGEO they mention that the marsupial had "big powerful forelimbs". I'm sure this was just a mistake, and even though it may outwardly appear to have a vivid contrast to the cherry picked quotes you provided, has no bearing over the credibility of your account of events.

Surely one cannot deny what is in front of their eyes like the images you provided [albeit you forgot to post the carnivorous kangaroo's skull], displaying clear resemblances in anatomical structure. Sure, you and I may not be osteologists who can give a factual accounts using "actual evidence" and "extensive elaboration" on how different these skeletons actually are, but I'll be damned to Hell if it isn't clear in your images that they look at least moderatly alike.

It's just like how Bats are actually just flying descendants of humans. Or how Iguanas are a reptilian version of us. If you look at their skeletons you can clearly see they both have five fingers and rib cages; eerily like us humans. If you look at the image supplied the bat shows a resemblance to us, and if it weren't for the fact that I already knew what it was, I would have assumed it was a very long fingered bipedal canine human morph [God forbid; a monstrosity like that would be a clear byproduct of Sodomy].

Surely those skeleton comparisons are sure fire proof of a reptilian dinosaur being fake, rather the t-rex was always just a giant mammal.


The skeletal head of the Killer Kangaroo


One of the many findings of Tyrannosaurus Rex. Clearly these two skulls are the same.


The Iguana skeleton which clearly depicts similarities to our own skeletons.


A lateral view of a bat skeleton. You see what I mean by very long fingered bipedal canine human morph? Frightening.

I wholeheartedly thank you Doctor for your vague but very convincing account of ancient history. May you ascend to the highest part of heaven and enjoy your eternal rest. Make sure you also high five God when you get there. I heard he was a pretty cool guy; sometimes a bit too harsh or insensitive, but always meaning well apparently. It feels good being under the watch of an omnipresent metaphysical being of absolute yet invisible power. God is like a magician and puppeteer, only a lot older. Speaking of, shouldn't magicians and puppeteers be smote for feigning God and pretending to be false idols?

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It seems you have mistakenly blah, blah, blah...

Dear Two-Faced Evolutionist:

Please hie yourself* to the Introduction Forum and post a proper introduction! We'd really like to get to know you before engaging in any sort of debate! Of course, we won't engage in a debate even after getting to know you, because THIS IS NOT A DEBATE FORUM.

Thank you, and God bless!




*That means get yourself over there real quick-like.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

The Iguana skeleton which clearly depicts similarities to our own skeletons.

I don't know about you, but I don't have a long tail. That thing looks more like a rat than a human being.

[krdulaney36]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

You ppl are OUT OF YOUR MINDS!!! lol, A giant happy Kangaroo that cave ppl kept as pets?? Jesus Christ....lol

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Jesus Christ....lol

Why do you feel the need to laugh at Jesus? Salvation is no joking matter.

[loco73]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Did T-Rex have a beak?

No.

Do chickens have beaks?

Yes.

Did T-Rex have teeth?

Yes.

Do chickens have teeth?

No.


CASE CLOSED!

One of the main issues is the pelvic bone. There are dinosaurs with bird-like pelvic bones - avian pelvic bone dinosaur. That shows the heritage of birds and dinos. And there is a species of birds, whose offspring still got claws on their wings.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

One of the main issues is the pelvic bone. There are dinosaurs with bird-like pelvic bones - avian pelvic bone dinosaur. That shows the heritage of birds and dinos. And there is a species of birds, whose offspring still got claws on their wings.

The main issue is your total lack of regard for your immortal soul!

[loco73]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

The main issue is your total lack of regard for your immortal soul!

Yes, that theory was the same for the 'phlogiston', when people thought, fire was a so called substrance 'phlogiston'. The non-phlogiston-believers just said: "If it exists, isolate it". But the phlogiston believers were not able to. So, the theory fell. The same with the soul.
Isolate it to proof it.....