[John Scopes]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

There's no need for name calling, I'm only curious how others perceive education and information, and also curious if alternatives were explored for this matter.


Doesn't it seem immature to ban an animal, solely on how humans identify it by name? Am I also correct to assume, that if you and I were to have an educated conversation (or just out of fascination about birds) about the Titmouse bird, that we aren't referring to the vulgar part of the word "tit," based on its urban definition?


It's really about context, and how the people are using the name in the conversation. It's like the technical term for "sex," which is another term for "classification" for male and female. So if I was to point out clothes that are unisex in design, I wouldn't mean that it's for intercourse, but it's clothes designed for both male and female.


Couldn't Christians come up with an alternative, if the above can never be considered? Just like how Christians have the pledge of allegiance to the Christian flag and the traditional American pledge of allegiance, couldn't a different "Christian" name be coined for animals that you feel offensive to its given name?

Welcome to this most fascinating place. You will come to find christians, and evangelicals in particular, to be spectacular examples of retarded evolutionary development. I have compiled volumes of scientific data in my time here, and it never gets boring.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Let me correct your post

Welcome to this most fascinating place. You will come to find Christians (politeness costs nothing), and Evangelicals (neither does capitalizing proper nouns) in particular, to be spectacular examples of retarded (extremely offensive word for those blessed by The Lord) evolutionary development (Evolution is merely a theory and lacks proof.). I have compiled volumes of scientific data in my time here (all of which is ungodly and unreadable), and it never gets boring listening to my own voice whining in the wilderness.

I hope that helps.

[Comatoserocker]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Don't you understand politics? It's not like the president can just say something and it's instantly a law. There's all the stuff with bills and vetoes and all that, and it's not like someone would even have the stupid idea to murder God's wonderful creations. He created them like that, and there was nothing wrong with the designs. But these days, people just have dirty minds and try to incorporate sexuality into everything. God knew this, and it was still His decision to create them this way. You all must be pretty dirty if you find something wrong with a beaver. And about the platypus controversy, they're AUSTRALIAN, not Austrian, and they use their bills to dig in the sand. And animals can't sin, they don't have immortal souls anyways. (Proverbs 12:10, Genesis 1:30, Genesis 1:21, James 3:7)

[Elmer G. White]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Don't you understand politics? It's not like the president can just say something and it's instantly a law. There's all the stuff with bills and vetoes and all that, and it's not like someone would even have the stupid idea to murder God's wonderful creations. He created them like that, and there was nothing wrong with the designs. But these days, people just have dirty minds and try to incorporate sexuality into everything. God knew this, and it was still His decision to create them this way. You all must be pretty dirty if you find something wrong with a beaver. And about the platypus controversy, they're AUSTRALIAN, not Austrian, and they use their bills to dig in the sand. And animals can't sin, they don't have immortal souls anyways. (Proverbs 12:10, Genesis 1:30, Genesis 1:21, James 3:7)

Mr. Comatose,

God Created the platypus (Genesis 1:24). You are right: it is a soulless automaton (Genesis 1:28), a beast. However, God did not Create it to be a sand-digger but an aquatic animal (due to which some consider that it might have been Created as early as Genesis 1:20 but as it is an air-breather, leading Creation Scientists find it more plausible that Genesis 1:24 includes Ornithorhyncus anatinus). Actually, God Created its bill with electroreception that is useful in the Alpine murky Austrian waters, not sand-digging. It is to locate prey. Please, do check your information before posting, as your failures to understand the very basics of Creation Science do not make your credentials regarding Scripture very plausible.



Platypuses were also present as an Ark Kind during the Flood (Genesis 7:21-22) although some Creation Scholars have argued that as an aquatic Mosaic Created Kind it might have survived the floodwaters also being freely pelagic. I'm sure this will be resolved in no time. However, things changed after the Flood with Genetic Entropy. The platypus could not actually sin but that doesn't mean it would have been unaffected by the sin of the first woman (Genesis 3:6). On the contrary, all Creatures suffer from degeneration because of the sin. Thus, sin is an integral part of the platypus's state of existence. This is also clearly stated in the Bible:

Romans 8:22
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

Platypus is among "the Whole Creation", hence, it is affected. And sin can accumulate in various places, also as memes. These memes can be attached to animals as names or evil entities and cause irrevocable damage on the Creatures that matter: men with corruptible souls.

This is no joking matter. Children and adolescents may start experimenting with unnatural sexual acts because they are lured by these Creatures that are also Corrupted as seen in the verse above.

Please do not play with matters that you do not understand!




Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Comatoserocker]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Ok, I admit, I don't know that much about platypuses (or whatever the plural form is) Still, they're one of my favorite animals, in my opinion they're pretty cute, and one of God's more fascinating creations. I mean, it's an egg-laying mammal with a duck bill and a beaver tail! God probably had a heap of fun creating this one. And about the meme problem, it's just the work of humans. Not God's work, so it's not much to worry about. If you want some good memes with nothing sexual, go to cleanmemes.com for a good, clean laugh. But I do understand that God loves all of His creations (aside from Satan and the Devils) I've already looked, but if you search up "bible verses about gods love kjv" on google or whatever search engine, then you could find numerous examples. At the end of the day, animals won't really matter, because us humans will either be in heaven or hell, and the animals...I don't really know, but God sends them somewhere I suppose.He gave created animals for humans to enjoy them, so why not do that? Don't run away from them, fearing that they're perverted or sexual, but instead, just enjoy them.

[Basilissa]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

He gave created animals for humans to enjoy them, so why not do that? Don't run away from them, fearing that they're perverted or sexual, but instead, just enjoy them.

Eww!

I don't know what your definition if "enjoying animals" is, and I'm pretty sure I don't want to know.

Eww!

[Elmer G. White]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Ok, I admit, I don't know that much about platypuses ...I don't really know... I suppose.... why not do that? ...

Dear person,

I do feel for you. This IS the problem. You don't really know but you fill in the gaps with what you feel is right. It is very good that you look for verses about God's Love and I'm sure they are verses you like tremendously. I like them, as well. But the Bible is a Book of incredible richness, it contains much more. It contains also many things about the Fate of those who fail to follow God's Word in every aspect. At the moment you're trying to make it your show by concentrating on the things you love and cherish.

This is called confirmation bias.

It is the same for Spiritual education and for Creation Science. When you find something that fits your preconceptions, you concentrate on that instead of looking fervently for data that opposes your convictions. It is so easy to disregard all that and stay complacent.

God loves. God hates. God decides (Exodus 3:14).

Romans 9:13
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

Malachi 1:3
And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.

God Created Esau (by proxy) but hated him. We don't question. We accept.

As for the platypus. You don't really know much about it, do you? Just that it is cute and adorable. Actually, the males are venomous. They have spurs on their hind limbs. Their poison is strong stuff: enough to make a grown man whine in pain in expectation of worse things in Hell (Matthew 8:12). The platypus is cute but it is much more. You're desecrating it and God's Creation by disregarding its whole being. It is cute and it is fearsome and it is vermin and it is a graceful aquatic beast. You treat the Bible the same way when you disregard its totality.



You refer to Ecclesiastes on another thread. It is a Book of totality, of accepting the dark and the light that were both Created by God. The return of Christ will be a Tremendous manifestation of scorching Love that leaves most of its victims writhing in Hell (Matthew 8:12). It is Love but the whole concept of that Love is still totally alien to you.

When you say "I don't know" you could say "I'm going to find out!". Both in Creation science and regarding the Bible.

I'll be happy to discuss with you further when you show some promise of filling your gaps instead of just looking for confirmation for your feelings.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Comatoserocker]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Don't worry, I knew what platypi (pretty sure that's the plural form) were venomous, they're still kind of cute to me. And Basilissa, don't worry, that's not what I meant by enjoying animals If I did, that would be just plain wrong

[Bezukhov]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Let us not forget, and it grieves me to have to say it, but I must:

The Cockroach. Two species in particular. The German Cockroach, which is probably Lutheran scum.



And the Oriental Cockroach. Who knows what sort of Heathenism they follow.

[LeftHanded Christian]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Remember my Christian Brothers and sisters it was the Lord himself who made us to rule over the animal's of the earth and name them. We shouldn't question these names for they were named these by our ancestors for a reason.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Remember my Christian Brothers and sisters it was the Lord himself who made us to rule over the animal's of the earth and name them. We shouldn't question these names for they were named these by our ancestors for a reason.

Dear Mr. Christian,

I totally agree. If our ancestors had been God-fearing True Believers™ free from sin, we could obviously trust their judgment and their choice of vocabulary. However, where did this vocabulary come from?

Genesis 11:9
Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.

We can clearly see how the languages (and the associated vocabulary) came into existence because of sin. This is no surprise as ever since the Fall of the first woman (Genesis 3:6), mankind has been corrupted together with all Creation until Jesus gave us the choice of removing ourselves from this bondage (Romans 8:22).

So, should we trust their judgment?! Obviously, they were sinners incapable of doing good!

Psalms 14:1
(To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.) The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Without stretching the definition of the verb "to do" we can include the act of "naming things" into its definition. Thus, these ancestors, due to their sinning nature, were incapable of doing good things. Because of this, also their naming practices were corrupted by sin, and this sin - again, due to its hereditary nature (Exodus 20:5) - has been transmitted into American dictionaries.

We should question their acts because of all this. Based on Bible Study, your nice hypothesis (I always appreciate hypotheses that are actually testable, so good job even if it was not too productive) fails. It is best we continue warning our Brethren against these abominations.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Just Chris]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Let's forget that Genesis 1:26 says And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So based on this we are allowed to choose the names of animal's and due to this we named them these names for a reason so as such we must accept what names we all picked and never question them. Also no animals are an abomination of God he made them all for a reason. They are his creations and we should accept them as such

[Elmer G. White]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Let's forget that Genesis 1:26 says And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So based on this we are allowed to choose the names of animal's and due to this we named them these names for a reason so as such we must accept what names we all picked and never question them. Also no animals are an abomination of God he made them all for a reason. They are his creations and we should accept them as such

Dear Chris,

I am so happy that you're staying on the Forum and prepared to question your preconceptions. That said, it is time to question them.

Genesis 1:28 - a glorious verse
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Now let us see how you deduce from that:

• Dominion over animals etc. -> We decide what to do with them. OK.
• Deciding over animals and subduing them -> We have the right to give them names. OK, but please remember that the Human languages are a result of sinful degeneration (Genesis 11:7-9).
• God gave us Dominion -> we used it to name the animals -> "we must accept what names we all picked and never question them". Now I'm not following you!

If we augment this claim ("if we decided on something it must never be overturned") and generalize, then everything human beings have ever decided would be beyond criticism "because we did it for a reason".

"A" reason? Are all reasons as reasonable? Questioning one's previous actions - in words or in deeds - is mentioned in the Bible, where it is called "Repentance".

Matthew 12:41
The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.

Matthew 4:17
From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

Repenting, changing our minds is the prerequisite for Salvation. We must be vigilant to see when we have trespassed and ask for forgiveness (Mark 11:25).

If we trespass in words, we must still ask for forgiveness. Naming animals in fornicatory ways is a trespass. It is something to Repent, to ask for forgiveness, to mend our ways. Your logic fails here.

Next issue:

Also no animals are an abomination of God he made them all for a reason. They are his creations and we should accept them as such

1. God Created animals but ever since the Fall (Genesis 3:6), all Creation has been degenerating and losing its original Godly qualities due to genetic entropy. They are no longer perfect, they have been affected by sin.

Romans 8:22
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

2. God Creates things for many reasons. Some of them are for our benefit, some are from our viewpoint abominable. It's His choice (Exodus 3:14):

Isaiah 45:7
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

Lamentations 3:38
Out of the mouth of the most High proceedeth not evil and good?

God can Create these less nice things to teach and to discipline us or simply to test us. Please, read the Book of Job. God can cause abominable sicknesses to fall on nice people just to test them and to assess how pious His followers are. He may give Satan the permission to torture innocent men with exquisite agonies. It is all for our good as with it God can assure that our company in Heaven is of high Spiritual quality which is Good as we'll be spending the Eternity with these people.

Job 2:6-7
And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life. So went Satan forth from the presence of the LORD, and smote Job with sore boils from the sole of his foot unto his crown.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Just Chris]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

What I mean about not questioning there names is the fact that these are the most accepted names byus as the human race as whole. Since we are to rule over all animals the only way for their names to change would be if we as the Lord's of the animals agreed in majority to change them and this will most likely not happen. I hope what I am saying makes since to you Elmer if not then ask me to explain and I shall.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

What I mean about not questioning there names is the fact that these are the most accepted names byus as the human race as whole. Since we are to rule over all animals the only way for their names to change would be if we as the Lord's of the animals agreed in majority to change them and this will most likely not happen. I hope what I am saying makes since to you Elmer if not then ask me to explain and I shall.

I do understand that you're making an appeal to majority. This is indeed walking on thin ice, as the majority choice to name this bird...



...would be 大山雀 and the second choice El carbonero común. That is, if we need a majority vote to decide of things that are good and evil.

In addition, you're making the ad populum fallacy, assuming that something is right because the majority (or your alleged concept of the majority) says it is correct. On the contrary, the majority may well be wrong. The evidence, the content of the claim and its assessment decide if a claim is right. Jesus knew this:

Matthew 7:14
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

This means that when it comes to Spiritual issues, the majority is erring as they fail to choose Jesus and/or worship Him in the correct manner.

The Truth™ is not decided by majority vote, if it were, we'd have to admit that Christians are a pitiful minority on Earth and, hence, we must be wrong. What a disastrous idea it would be!


Yours in Christ,

Elmer