[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

blah blah blah Not one of these creatures would use these terms to identify themselves. blah blah blah

Hey Dr. Doolittle, I'm sure that your in-depth stories about man-on-beast relations will be fascinating, but have you considered following the site rules and making a thread of your own in the Introduction Forum telling us about your relationship with Jesus?

We want to get to know you!



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Homotherium
Apparently this was some sinful pre-flood cat. Thank God, that God drowned this one, but it just shows that roots of anti-Christian gaysexual agenda goes deep in the history! Even though God killed it, it still wise to avoid even mentioning such gaysexual animals.

[Titus Templeton]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

I wonder if we can outlaw biology in all forms. The only way to protect our children. And rapists are basically a product of biology.

[RegofChrist]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.



The 'Satanic Leaf Tailed Gecko' is a sinful reptile which worships Lucifer.

[Ph0enix808]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Flat Worms are VERY satanic

they breed by being homer tranny freaks




Shrimp, The bible says so

[RegofChrist]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Homotherium
Apparently this was some sinful pre-flood cat. Thank God, that God drowned this one, but it just shows that roots of anti-Christian gaysexual agenda goes deep in the history! Even though God killed it, it still wise to avoid even mentioning such gaysexual animals.

Homotherium was also called the 'Scimitar Cat'. (ie a sword which isn't straight)

[anthonyhonciano]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Hello all, I'm a bit concerned about how this thread started that these animals, which were named by humans, are chosen to be banned.

There are a couple of questions I have that I would like clarification on. Since these animals are being banned, based on their names, is this taken into consideration that the words like "cock" and "tit" were not even promiscuous until sexuality started evolving?


Also, why ban them solely on their nicknames? They do have technical names such as "parus major" for the naked mole rat. I mean, if this is a global issue across christianity, why not provide an alternate name?


It seems very premature (and kid like) method of thinking to ban living creatures solely on their shortened name. This is like denying education to any child to teach them the fact that these creatures exist.

[I Man Rastafari]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

is this taken into consideration that the words like "cock" and "tit" were not even promiscuous until sexuality started

Greetings groovdafied. Welcome to Earth and this forum. I do not speak for the Baptists. In fact sometimes they can barely tolerate me but you do not have to be Baptist to know that sexuality started before English was even invented. These Baptists will straighten you out in good order.


Jah Guide!
Trevor

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

They do have technical names such as "parus major" for the naked mole rat.

Parus Major means Great tit, dummy. Besides, Latin is the language of Satan used by the Right hand of Satan, the Pope and his minions. Ever wondered why the darkest part of Americas is called LATIN america!?
Obviously monkey worshipers used the language of God, American, to make these animals even more insulting.

[anthonyhonciano]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

Parus Major means Great tit, dummy. Besides, Latin is the language of Satan used by the Right hand of Satan, the Pope and his minions. Ever wondered why the darkest part of Americas is called LATIN america!?
Obviously monkey worshipers used the language of God, American, to make these animals even more insulting.

There's no need for name calling, I'm only curious how others perceive education and information, and also curious if alternatives were explored for this matter.


Doesn't it seem immature to ban an animal, solely on how humans identify it by name? Am I also correct to assume, that if you and I were to have an educated conversation (or just out of fascination about birds) about the Titmouse bird, that we aren't referring to the vulgar part of the word "tit," based on its urban definition?


It's really about context, and how the people are using the name in the conversation. It's like the technical term for "sex," which is another term for "classification" for male and female. So if I was to point out clothes that are unisex in design, I wouldn't mean that it's for intercourse, but it's clothes designed for both male and female.


Couldn't Christians come up with an alternative, if the above can never be considered? Just like how Christians have the pledge of allegiance to the Christian flag and the traditional American pledge of allegiance, couldn't a different "Christian" name be coined for animals that you feel offensive to its given name?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

There's no need for name calling, I'm only curious how others perceive education and information, and also curious if alternatives were explored for this matter.


Doesn't it seem immature to ban an animal, solely on how humans identify it by name? Am I also correct to assume, that if you and I were to have an educated conversation (or just out of fascination about birds) about the Titmouse bird, that we aren't referring to the vulgar part of the word "tit," based on its urban definition?


It's really about context, and how the people are using the name in the conversation. It's like the technical term for "sex," which is another term for "classification" for male and female. So if I was to point out clothes that are unisex in design, I wouldn't mean that it's for intercourse, but it's clothes designed for both male and female.


Couldn't Christians come up with an alternative, if the above can never be considered? Just like how Christians have the pledge of allegiance to the Christian flag and the traditional American pledge of allegiance, couldn't a different "Christian" name be coined for animals that you feel offensive to its given name?

I find your aggressiveness and utter lack of concern for the degradation of morality in this world to be rather frightening. So Christians should simply change the reference of some things to ignore the Satanic influence upon society? We should turn a blind eye to the moral destruction of our youth? We should embrace sodomy and science and give our tithes to preservation of nature, or perhaps the department of welfare? Good grief. Why not tell our children that their souls aren't immortal, they don't have to worry about their eternal well-being, and what they do on this earth should count only insofar as it affects others on this earth, rather than focusing on sympathy for the Baby Jesus who hung on the cross for their sins.

[anthonyhonciano]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

I find your aggressiveness and utter lack of concern for the degradation of morality in this world to be rather frightening. So Christians should simply change the reference of some things to ignore the Satanic influence upon society? We should turn a blind eye to the moral destruction of our youth? We should embrace sodomy and science and give our tithes to preservation of nature, or perhaps the department of welfare? Good grief. Why not tell our children that their souls aren't immortal, they don't have to worry about their eternal well-being, and what they do on this earth should count only insofar as it affects others on this earth, rather than focusing on sympathy for the Baby Jesus who hung on the cross for their sins.

Hi Mary, thanks for your response. I was aiming for quite the opposite in my questions, because again I'm very curious how information and education is perceived by different religions and cultures.


My questions weren't recommendations, but just questions.

So Christians should simply change the reference of some things to ignore the Satanic influence upon society?

I didn't recommend to ignore anything. The fact that these animals are being criticized by the human definition, and not for the actual creatures they are is what i'm trying to get clarification on. An example like saying shoot, or shucks (which I'm positive many Christians do say), which can be argued as the derivative of profanity such as sh**, or f***. If "Titmouse" was re-identified, this is the same example.


I believe you're taking my questions way out of context that I'm suggesting we need to sweep the issues under a rug and call it a day. That's not my intent at all. I mean, I understand we all make compromises in life, but I'm actually referring in simple identification of animals that are brutally ignored based on urban definition.

We should turn a blind eye to the moral destruction of our youth?

Are you telling me that the creature itself is evil in nature, or against Christianity? This is where my confusion lies. If the animals are not evil in nature, and can be accepted as God's creatures of life, what other solution is there to protect these animals without having to ban them? Talking about the identification of an animal, or at least making it politically correct in terms for Christianity does not mean that you're required to alter your faith. Nothing can change your faith, but as humans we are given the gift of common sense knowing right to wrong. When we teach others what we believe is correct in the Christian Faith, we are being human and expanding ourselves in the pursuit of knowledge, existence and growth into our faiths. Taking in common sense in this path of Christianity, you are allowing your self the knowledge to continue your growth by not denying what exists.

It's hard to ask these question on black and white text, without hearing or knowing the tone how the message is being delivered. I'm really trying my best to be respectful in these forums, as I'm not battering or name calling anybody. As person in this forum seeking answers, I would have assumed that Christians would be willing to help me better understand the meaning of the religion, and your love for God.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

As person in this forum seeking answers, I would have assumed that Christians would be willing to help me better understand the meaning of the religion, and your love for God.

You're not looking for answers to help you find God, you're looking *at* us the same way Dian Fossey looked *at* gorillas in the mist to find answers to her personal questions. Well you know who played Dian Fossey in the movies?

Sigourney Weaver!

The same harlot who played the "Gate Keeper" (THAT's not sexual!) in Ghostbusters:





Notice any similarities with "Generation X's" moral mascot, Dr. Frank N. Furter?





Coincidence?

I think not.

[anthonyhonciano]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

You're not looking for answers to help you find God, you're looking *at* us the same way Dian Fossey looked *at* gorillas in the mist to find answers to her personal questions. Well you know who played Dian Fossey in the movies?

Sigourney Weaver!

The same harlot who played the "Gate Keeper" (THAT's not sexual!) in Ghostbusters:





Notice any similarities with "Generation X's" moral mascot, Dr. Frank N. Furter?





Coincidence?

I think not.

I never claimed that I'm looking for answers for my love of God, nor am I looking at you as a subject. I never told you my faith or beliefs, as it seems you are pre-judging me, which is fine - we all make judgements.


It also seems we're flying off topic (pun intended), because the questions are being avoided now. How do you protect those animals, with names that you feel are offensive, from being banned from education or basic knowledge?


Or do you wish to only ban these animals to logically deny their existence because their names are similar to the urban definition? How is that fair to life?

[Basilissa]

Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.

It also seems we're flying off topic (pun intended), because the questions are being avoided now. How do you protect those animals, with names that you feel are offensive, from being banned from education or basic knowledge?

Or do you wish to only ban these animals to logically deny their existence because their names are similar to the urban definition? How is that fair to life?

Why on earth would we have to be "fair to life" (whatever it is supposed to mean)?

Anyway. While it is true that at the moment there isn't much we can do to eradicate these sinful species, I trust that President Trump (), once elected, will do everything possible to wipe them out of the face of the earth - and we will celebrate that by eating the last of their species during our Annual Endangered Species Dinner.