[Levi Jones]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Lol stupid Christians
What makes you better then the Buddhist?
What makes you better then Hindus?
What makes you better then the Jewish people ?

All of them believe in their religion as much as you Christians do so who are you to tell them that they are wrong and going to hell for their beliefs

The end Ω

We are warning them of their impending doom as the Bible tells us to.

Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

[Cain13]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

But the other religions should be respected who are you to tell them that a religion that the belived In for thousands of years is completely wrong .
Don't you understand though that the bible was written by mortals(not god) thousands of years ago and between those times things have changed and now we relize that many of the things in the bible should not be followed because of the idiocy and extreme nature of some of the rules.




The end Ω

[Levi Jones]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

But the other religions should be respected who are you to tell them that a religion that the belived In for thousands of years is completely wrong .

I'm not the one telling them that. God is.

we relize that many of the things in the bible should not be followed because of the idiocy and extreme nature of some of the rules.

Who gets to pick and choose what we follow?

[Cain13]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Modern society chooses because we now reilize that rules such as: Don't wear clothes made of more than one fabric,Don't cut your hair nor shave,People who have flat noses, or is blind or lame, cannot go to an altar of God,Kill anyone with a different religion.,If a man cheats on his wife, or vise versa, both the man and the woman must die etc. are now too extreme or crazy to follow anymore

God is not a reliable source to cite from because lets face the facts has he ever talked to you( no) the only source you have is book

Also now we reilize that there is a high probability that any writer of the bible who claimed to talk to god may have had scitzophrenia.

The end Ω

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Also now we reilize that there is a high probability that any writer of the bible who claimed to talk to god may have had scitzophrenia

What does any of that have to do with atheistical stupidity?

And your spelling is terrible: is American your second language?

YIC

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

I know there are Atheists out there who seek to abolish religion. I seek to find a balance. Religion is important, it binds the masses and keeps people without direction pointed towards a proper path. However, not all of us need it.

What an arrogant prick!

Religion's OK for the sheep but we super smart elitist atheist people don't need it? Well the meek shall inherit the Earth. You, however, will burn in hell.

Binds "the masses" indeed! You sound like a Jesuit.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

God is not a reliable source

A fitting remark in the "Are Athiestics stupid?" thread. God is the most reliable source imaginable. This makes me wonder what would be a "reliable source" in your book? Hitler? Donald Duck? Your gay parents?

All the while we Christians use the most reliable book from the most reliable source: 2nd Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"



Spending all eternity in Heaven laughing at you burning in Hell is going to be fun.

[Cain13]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Laurence sorry for my spelling but at that time I was half asleep. Also sorry for getting off topic but no one is perfect.
Also it's not called American it's called english

Cranky "god" is not a reliable source because you can actually prove he exist there is not evidence to support that hypothesis, and his book the bible is not reliable because over the thousands of years it has existed it has edited and had things added to it that were not there in the first draft. A reliable sourse in my book would be, well let's say for example, an autobiography or a historical work of nonfiction with citation from people who actually lived through it.

The end Ω

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

you can actually prove he exist

Duh!

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

But the other religions should be respected

No... no they shouldn't.

Jeremiah 10:2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

Deuteronomy 12:30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.

Exodus 23:33 They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

But the other religions should be respected who are you to tell them that a religion that the belived In for thousands of years is completely wrong . . .

. . . there is a high probability that any writer of the bible who claimed to talk to god may have had scitzophrenia.

Hypocrite.

[UNSavedButtheadAtheist]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

No... no they shouldn't.

Jeremiah 10:2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

Deuteronomy 12:30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.

Exodus 23:33 They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.

Think of this, "If all technology and memories were ended in an apocalypse and it was just like the human race had reset itself, and there was no evidence we were ever here, we would rediscover the elements. We would rediscover the planets, we would rediscover the bow and arrow, we would rediscover the telescope, and the radio, the boat, the airplane, the train, the gun, the computer, and the car. They might look different and be used for slighty different purposes, but essentially, we would rediscover them. What we would not "rediscover" is how a jew was born from a girl who was a virgin, and was nailed to a cross, and died, and was resurrected 3 days later. And walked on water. And how if you telepathically talk to him, it will make you go to a happy place."


We would discover all we have learned in science again. It wont be called Hydrogen or Oxygen, but it will be the same exact thing. We wouldn't rediscover ANY religion. Not just christianity.

[UNSavedButtheadAtheist]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Well, irregardless of any other factors, one thing stands out pertaining to all atheists: They have proven there ignorance by rejecting Christ's invitation to adore Him.

Plus, Christians make mincemeat out of atheistic arguments anytime the rear there ugly heads.

>There ugly heads.

Atheists aren't smart?


You just used the wrong "There, their, they're".


You meant "their ugly head".



Learn English.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Atheists aren't smart?

Of course not. If they were smart they would obey Jesus!

John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Are Athiestics stupid?

Think of this, "If all technology and memories were ended in an apocalypse and it was just like the human race had reset itself, and there was no evidence we were ever here, we would rediscover the elements. We would rediscover the planets, we would rediscover the bow and arrow, we would rediscover the telescope, and the radio, the boat, the airplane, the train, the gun, the computer, and the car. They might look different and be used for slighty different purposes, but essentially, we would rediscover them. What we would not "rediscover" is how a jew was born from a girl who was a virgin, and was nailed to a cross, and died, and was resurrected 3 days later. And walked on water. And how if you telepathically talk to him, it will make you go to a happy place."


We would discover all we have learned in science again. It wont be called Hydrogen or Oxygen, but it will be the same exact thing. We wouldn't rediscover ANY religion. Not just christianity.

So what's your evidence that any of this is going to happen? What prophecy are you referring to?

Christ is going to come down from Heaven with a big sword poking out of His mouth and resurrect all the dead then kill all the bad guys like you and throw them into fire forever while gathering the true believers to Heaven. We have actual evidence for this - not some far fetched nonsense made up by an angry person on a masturbation-break in his bedroom.

Matthew 13:41-43
41The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.