X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bob4God
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Twisted Focus View Post
    Homosexual?? Man are you serious!? I have seen someone post a huge gay pic and he used it to blast Mac's and everyone was fine with it. I post a picture of a lone Warrior fighting and rising above it all, and you call THAT gay? You have a backwards perception on life and what's fair and equal. If you want I can argue with the officer and we'll see how it plays out. I doubt you would want that though.
    Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. -John 14:6

    Nobody can rise above challenges on their own. Only GOD can help them. Anybody who attempts to make it on their own is a sinner and abomination, and might as well be gay. Therefore, you artwork is gay.

    I am not going to infract fellow church members for their scientific research into the dangers of the homosexual agenda of the Apple computer corporation.

    I don't want you to continue arguing with Don because you're just a little know-it-all brat and we have better things to do than to listen to your opinion of what the laws in our Christian nation should be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Twisted Focus
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Homosexual?? Man are you serious!? I have seen someone post a huge gay pic and he used it to blast Mac's and everyone was fine with it. I post a picture of a lone Warrior fighting and rising above it all, and you call THAT gay? You have a backwards perception on life and what's fair and equal. If you want I can argue with the officer and we'll see how it plays out. I doubt you would want that though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob4God
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Twisted Focus View Post
    Biting off more then I can chew? No sir, I simply cannot argue any point with someone so closed minded as you. No matter what I say it won't affect you. You will still go bust people you feel are breaking laws, simply for the satisfaction of ruining their day. Like those homeless people you busted. So we'll leave it at that, I'll be the bigger man and walk away leaving you with a false sense of accomplishment. Have a pleasant evening.

    As for my signature good sir. It is symbolic of 1 man versus' them all. You can take it as Christianity against the other religions in the world, or a struggle you may have had where it was you against the odds, rising above you own expectations. A creative mind isn't always a bad thing.
    Can't admit you lost, huh? I'm sure Don knows how to wear his badge without your help.

    We don't care about what you think your signature means, nor do we care about your homosexual S/M artwork. Keep it off our forums, buddy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Twisted Focus
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Biting off more then I can chew? No sir, I simply cannot argue any point with someone so closed minded as you. No matter what I say it won't affect you. You will still go bust people you feel are breaking laws, simply for the satisfaction of ruining their day. Like those homeless people you busted. So we'll leave it at that, I'll be the bigger man and walk away leaving you with a false sense of accomplishment. Have a pleasant evening.

    As for my signature good sir. It is symbolic of 1 man versus' them all. You can take it as Christianity against the other religions in the world, or a struggle you may have had where it was you against the odds, rising above you own expectations. A creative mind isn't always a bad thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ofc. Don W. Richards
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Twisted Focus View Post
    It's sad that some day you will need to rely on the younger generations you mess with.
    That's it? That's your response? Guess you bit off more than you could chew when you took on ol' Officer Don. By the way, I am alerting a moderator of your offensive image.

    Leave a comment:


  • Twisted Focus
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    It's sad that some day you will need to rely on the younger generations you mess with.
    Last edited by Bob4God; 12-06-2009, 09:05 PM. Reason: Removed senseless plug for Twisted Focus' satanic art

    Leave a comment:


  • Ofc. Don W. Richards
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Twisted Focus View Post
    "Disturbing the peace is a crime generally defined as the unsettling of proper order in a public space through one's actions. This can include creating loud noise by fighting or challenging to fight, disturbing others by loud and unreasonable noise (including loud music or dog barking), or using offensive words or insults likely to incite violence." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disturbing_the_peace)
    Oh no! You mean everything I learned in police academy was wrong!? If only we had you, and Wikipedia, back then to show us the way!

    Quite obviously, this little dyke's behavior certainly did fall under "unreasonable" and "offensive." I don't need you to lecture me on the law, kid.

    From what you have posted officer, she was not disturbing the peace. She firstly was not loud, screaming at the top of her lungs.
    I'm sorry, were you present during this incident? I don't remember seeing any little snot nosed kids running around using Wikipedia for their law reference.

    As for unsettling of proper behavior, she is guaranteed the right to speak in a public place, the KKK do it all the time spouting off nigger every chance they get. So you sir did not have grounds to charge her with disturbing the peace.
    All of the KKK members I have ever met have been nothing but respectful, decent, Christian folks. None of them would think of making such a public, anti-Christian spectacle. And yeah, she does have the right to speak in a public place, as in, "Hi, how are you today," but she doesn't have the right to spit on God's face in public, and she sure doesn't have the right to say the state doesn't have the right to set up plastic nativity scenes. Freedom of speech doesn't protect speech that is anti-American.

    Resisting arrest, I wasn't there and there's no way for me to obtain any video surveillance (if any).
    So I guess you should shut up then, and stop telling an Officer of the Law how to do his job.

    As for destruction of public property, destruction means that it is in disrepair (say it would not be able to be used) or Graffiti (Meaning willful vandalism of property) Assuming she wasn't thinking "I'll she this cop! I'll track mud in!" This was also not destruction of property. What town / state did this occur in anyway?
    Exactly. She willfully tracked in mud. I didn't see her making any attempts to scrape it off her feet before entering the building!

    Leave a comment:


  • Twisted Focus
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    "Disturbing the peace is a crime generally defined as the unsettling of proper order in a public space through one's actions. This can include creating loud noise by fighting or challenging to fight, disturbing others by loud and unreasonable noise (including loud music or dog barking), or using offensive words or insults likely to incite violence." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disturbing_the_peace)

    From what you have posted officer, she was not disturbing the peace. She firstly was not loud, screaming at the top of her lungs. She was not trying to incite violence, as she more then likely would not want to fight the janitor. As for unsettling of proper behavior, she is guaranteed the right to speak in a public place, the KKK do it all the time spouting off nigger every chance they get. So you sir did not have grounds to charge her with disturbing the peace.


    Resisting arrest, I wasn't there and there's no way for me to obtain any video surveillance (if any). From what you said

    She was clearly out of control and delusional, so I had to push her against the wall, pull her arms behind her back, cuff her, and take her into the station to cool off.
    She was speaking to you, not shoving you or making any threatening gestures (such as a fist). So pushing her against a wall for being delusional, then cuffing her is not resisting arrest. Again you were wrong to do that.

    As for destruction of public property, destruction means that it is in disrepair (say it would not be able to be used) or Graffiti (Meaning willful vandalism of property) Assuming she wasn't thinking "I'll she this cop! I'll track mud in!" This was also not destruction of property. What town / state did this occur in anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ofc. Don W. Richards
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    SATURDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2009

    Apparently there have been a couple of complaints about the plastic nativity scene and the "Jesus is the Reason for the Season" banner in front of city hall.

    A janitor who was polishing baby Jesus' forehead called the police when some smart aleck on her way into the building made a wisecrack about some "separation of church and state" nonsense.

    I insisted that I should respond, and I did.

    The janitor was still out front with the rags and turtle wax when I arrived, and I took his statement.

    He told me the perp was some preppy, east-coast looking dyke, the kind you see on the TV.

    I know the type. I went inside, and asked the receptionist if she had seen anybody by that description. Indeed she had, and the dyke had come in looking for the DMV. I was hot on the trail.

    I sprang into action and flew downstairs. When the elevator door opened, I saw my target. She was waiting in the lobby, pushing buttons on her stupid little cellphone.

    "Excuse me, I need to talk to you" I said.

    She looked up like she hadn't done anything wrong, and asked "what?"

    "We had a report of somebody matching your description disturbing the peace and insulting baby Jesus' shiny forehead, which is actually SUPPOSED to shine because he has a HALO, thanks very much."

    She squinted at me and said, "You're kidding right? All I said was, 'Giving baby Jesus a lubejob in front of a public building? Didn't think you could crap on public decency and separation of church and state at the same time.'"

    I was sickened by her smug attitude. She thought she was really funny.

    I cleared my throat and said, "You're in a Christian town, in a Christian nation, walking on Christian government property. If you don't like it, you can just leave and not come back."

    As is typical of uppity atheist types, she argued with me and blamed God for her attitude: "Look buster, I didn't want to come to this %*#& little town to begin with, but my husband is at the bottom of the totem pole in his career and newbies get transferred to all the crappy little towns and now I have to keep my sanity in an entire state filled with Jesus freaks who use tax dollars to furnish religious icons for their state property so that I can't even apply for a driver's license without seeing virgin mothers and baby saviors in diapers staked to the lawn of city hall!"

    Then she launched into a tirade about how America really isn't based on Christianity and that "many" of the "founding fathers" weren't actually devout Christians, and something about article 11 in the Treaty of Tripoli, quotes from Thomas Jefferson about Christianity being "perverted" and on and on.

    She was clearly out of control and delusional, so I had to push her against the wall, pull her arms behind her back, cuff her, and take her into the station to cool off.

    I explained on the way that it doesn't matter if a few of the founding fathers thought the government should be secular or not, we are a democracy and the majority has the rule. If the majority is Christian and thinks that we should use tax dollars for religious purposes, promote Christianity, and enact laws based on Christian doctrine (that is, God's doctrine) then that is what we are going to do and the minority can just get used to it, or leave.

    She made some arbitrary statement to me that didn't make much sense: "Majority rule, minority rights." All I know is that she used the words "minority" and "rights" in the same sentence and that made my conservative blood boil.

    I don't understand what rights these precious minorities want that they don't already have. They're never happy! They say they want rights, so we take a popular vote and decide they shouldn't have them, and then they complain about the very democratic process that protects them!

    I'm done trying to understand these people, and I put her away for the afternoon and wrote her some big, fat tickets for disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, lewd behavior in public, and destruction of public property. (She tracked mud into the building.)

    Leave a comment:


  • SUV
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Lefty Graffiti View Post
    Oh yeah, Sister SUV, I hear ya!
    Brother, you remind me so much of our own Don Bozo del Guapo. Do you perhaps know him? Not in the Biblical sense, of course.

    It's only Good for a Man to "Know Him" when the "Him" in question refers to JESUS

    Leave a comment:


  • Lefty Graffiti
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by SUV View Post
    "Dropping acid" is so passe'.....Tasering is the Modern way to go
    Oh yeah, Sister SUV, I hear ya! I know about tasers. Me and some of the dudes at The Psycho Head Shop (where I work, selling lava lamps, rolling papers, etc) found out about tasers the hard way. We were in Mendocino, up the coast north of Frisco, and we took a walk in the woods. Then we came across this big field of pot, hidden among the trees. Well, as you can imagine, we kind of went crazy, picking the stuff and trying to smoke it. Wasn't easy though - pot doesn't burn too well when it hasn't been dried. Anyway, about 10 minutes later this big fat mean Mexican dude comes along with a couple of bad-ass dogs and a shotgun! We offered to share our smoke with him, but he wasn't cool about it at all. He threatened to blow our heads off, and probably would have too if we hadn't shown him our name cards from the head shop, and offered to buy his stash. Plus we told him we were into Jesus, which as it turned out, was his name (Jesus González ). Far out, who would have thought that Jesus had great-great grandkids wandering around the forests of Mendocino. Anyway, he mellowed, but let us have a blast with the taser just to let us know who was boss. What a bummer! We got out of there as soon as we were sober enough to run.

    But at the end of the day, it was cool, you know. We got ourselves a new supplier. Miracles happen when you're turned onto Jesus (the original Jesus, not that González dude - he needs to lighten up).

    Peace!
    Brother Lefty

    Leave a comment:


  • SUV
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Lefty Graffiti View Post
    I just wanna say that you pigs ought to smoke a bong or drop some acid every so often.
    "Dropping acid" is so passe'.....Tasering is the Modern way to go

    Leave a comment:


  • eliot mayfield
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Originally posted by Lefty Graffiti View Post
    Yeah man, I just wanna say that you pigs ought to smoke a bong or drop some acid every so often. Then you'd mellow out, get laid, and stop hitting people with nightsticks.

    When I came back from 'Nam in '73, I was like you, all hyper and full of hate. But then I started getting high, and like, wow, I've seen the light. Finally, I got turned onto Jesus last month, right after smoking some dynamite weed, and now I feel like I'm home at last!

    I also speak to God like the rest of you Christian dudes and chicks. It's really easy rapping with God, especially after taking some Purple Owsley and listening to Hendrix. Everything's cool.

    Peace!
    "Brother" Lefty
    You want us to drop acid on our pigs? that's sick!!! Not even PETA would stoop that low! Even a weak acid would be painful and terrible! It'd also damage the meat and ruin the taste.
    Yes, smoking the bacon is indeed a good idea, especially hickory.
    I'm glad you're talking to Jesus, but I doubt smoking dynamite weeds is a good idea. In fact, I can't even find what a dynamite weed is! It must be bad for you though.
    What's a purple Owsley? It sounds like something bad and quite sinful.
    Oh my goodness! I get it now. You're a homosexual and I get it! A purple owsley is a er, ahem! "peewhacker"


    God, time to disinfect the keyboard so I don't get aids!

    Leave a comment:


  • Meek and Humble
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Go away, crack whore. This is a place for REAL Christians, not filthy disease-ridden hippies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lefty Graffiti
    replied
    Re: Policing Freehold

    Yeah man, I just wanna say that you pigs ought to smoke a bong or drop some acid every so often. Then you'd mellow out, get laid, and stop hitting people with nightsticks.

    When I came back from 'Nam in '73, I was like you, all hyper and full of hate. But then I started getting high, and like, wow, I've seen the light. Finally, I got turned onto Jesus last month, right after smoking some dynamite weed, and now I feel like I'm home at last!

    I also speak to God like the rest of you Christian dudes and chicks. It's really easy rapping with God, especially after taking some Purple Owsley and listening to Hendrix. Everything's cool.

    Peace!
    "Brother" Lefty

    Leave a comment:

Working...