[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

That fact that women are able to carry children makes then if anything the stronger vessel. Man's inability in this area of reproduction does not gives them more rights and privileges than women...

I merely observe that God says - it gives us LESS. Our rôle was demeaned, not our husband's increased.

GENESIS 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorowe and thy conception. In sorow thou shalt bring forth children: and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and hee shall rule ouer thee.
©1611

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

I use the term partner as we are equal I do not own them,they do not own me, we are equal.

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.

We have made a commitment to each other to live our lives together as two equal components of one partnership.

I noticed that you didn't mention your "partner's" gender even once in that hateful rant. What you need to realize is that there is no "committment to each other" there is only a committment to God. You have a job to do as a Man, and your wife has her job to do too. God spells it all out for us in the Holy Bible.

1 Timothy 2:11-15
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

I merely observe that God says

No you "merely observe" what some bronze age men would like you to think god has said so their can control and subjugate women.

I noticed that you didn't mention your "partner's" gender even once in that hateful rant.

That was not a rant, hateful or otherwise, just a statement of the facts.
As for my partners gender, and by inference my sexuality, these things are no concern of yours, we know what they are and are very happy with them that way.

What you need to realize is that there is no "committment to each other" there is only a committment to God. You have a job to do as a Man, and your wife has her job to do too. God spells it all out for us in the Holy Bible.

Not spelt out by god in the , it spells out the wishes of some men scribbling in the dessert hundreds and thousands of years ago.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

Personally I'm rather sick and tired of all of the liebrals who show up here and want to save me from myself.

I like being under the rule of my husband. I like treating him as if Jesus himself was coming home. It's my own way of reading the following scripture.

Ephesians 5:22-24 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

I believe all of us women can step it up a notch if we looked at our cooking, cleaning and children as if we were going to present them to Jesus.

Poor Freddie, you'll never understand the joy of being a real man coming home to a properly managed house where your wife actually puts you first.

[James Hutchins]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

Hey! I thought this was another one of those joke threads, what gives?

[Born Again Bob]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

We have made a commitment to each other to live our lives together as two equal components of one partnership.

You romantics, you.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

I like being under the rule of my husband. I like treating him as if Jesus himself was coming home.

That is your personal choice, while some may feel your choice has been heavily influenced by the conditioning you have been subjected to all of your life, it is still your choice.

What HB is longing for is that the element of choice be removed and all women be forced to live that way.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

That is your personal choice, while some may feel your choice has been heavily influenced by the conditioning you have been subjected to all of your life, it is still your choice.

What HB is longing for is that the element of choice be removed and all women be forced to live that way.

I guess you suggest we have no laws at all? Maybe you should just be allowed to go around killing and raping babies all day long, since it's your "choice", right? You sick freak!

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

I guess you suggest we have no laws at all? Maybe you should just be allowed to go around killing and raping babies all day long, since it's your "choice", right? You sick freak!

Oh I have no objection to reasonable laws, based on Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. A criteria those that you would like to see in force do not match.

[Titus Templeton]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

I read the first post in this thread an all i can say is, wow.
Our modern days aren't that great, i wish we all could get back to that Christain way of living.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

Oh I have no objection to reasonable laws, based on Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. A criteria those that you would like to see in force do not match.

People can only be at liberty within the bounds of decency.

Men and women are NOT equals.

Fraternity means BROTHER-hood. Nothing to do with ladies.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

We have made a commitment to each other to live our lives together as two equal components of one partnership.

I'm looking at this in one of two ways; either it takes 2 of you to struggle through life like 2 one-legged men or you have reduced yourself to the intellectual level of a woman.

Oh I have no objection to reasonable laws, based on Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

Are you some sort of queer French guy bent (and I do mean 'bent) on the rule of the mob?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

People can only be at liberty within the bounds of decency.

The laws you would like to see in force have nothing to do with decency and everything to with men having control over women

Men and women are NOT equals.

YES men and women are different, and those differences should be celebrated, not used as an excuse to subjugate.

If the differences where to be used to determine which gender should be in control then logically it would be the one that gives birth to our children and keeps the human race going. They would be the ones that OWN everything, they would be the ones to control everything, they would be the ones to dictate how we should live our lives. The sperm donors role would be that of servitude to the Mothers of humanity, doing as they command and grateful for any small privileges they grant them. Now of course such a society would be just as undesirable as one where those in control need to have a penis to hold such a position.

Fraternity means BROTHER-hood. Nothing to do with ladies.

A word that has multiple meanings, you give one as it suits your agenda but there are others:

A body of people associated for a common purpose or interest, such as a guild.
A group of people joined by similar backgrounds, occupations, interests, or tastes.

In this context such a word is sexless, in the same way as women ARE an integral part of Man Kind!

[Meek and Humble]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

The laws you would like to see in force have nothing to do with decency and everything to with men having control over women

But men having control over women IS decent...

YES men and women are different, and those differences should be celebrated, not used as an excuse to subjugate.

Wrong.

In this context such a word is sexless, in the same way as women ARE an integral part of Man Kind!

Hardly. Women were created for men, not the other way around.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The Legal Rights of Women

But men having control over women IS decent...

Wrong.

Hardly. Women were created for men, not the other way around.

According to your mythology, which as I have already said was founded by a group of bronze age misogynists who used it as an excuse to control others.

Without women man kind would cease to exist, therefore they are an integral part.