ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

[GOD=life]

As we know, at the end of WW2 when the USA single-handedly liberated Europe (not that they deserved it), Japan had the audacity to cowardly declare war on us. The result was that they got two atom bombs dropped on their heads, which really got them to know their place.

So now we have nothing to worry about, right? WRONG! They figured out that they cannot beats us militarily, so they try to corrupt our children through video games and pokemon.

Once Republicans recapture the white house, we can FORCE them to withdraw all their attacks OR ELSE. To give this some punch, we should throw some ATOM BOMBS on them so they know we're serious.

Reasons this won't lead to political fallout:

• Japan is hated throughout the region -- China hates them, Korea hates them, Russians don't care, etc. They will have no allies.
• They aren't Christians, so the entire Western world won't care about them anyway.
• If the French make a fuss, they can get an atom bomb too and surrender to the USA. Even Europeans think the French smell.
• If Africa makes a fuss, we'll just cut their food aid and they will all die within a year.
• If mooslims make a fuss, they can get an atom bomb on their headscarves too.

My suggestion is to build up the pressure throughout 2010, 2011 and the 2012 election cycle. They KNOW what we are capable of, so hopefully they will retreat in 2010 already. Otherwise, the first order of the new Republican President will be to throw an ATOM BOMB on Japan.

And then we'll hopefully have another few decades of peace from these Christ haters.

ARE YOU WITH ME?? FOR THE CHILDREN!!

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Why wait so long?

[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Why wait so long?

Because the current president is in league with the enemies of the USA.

Hopefully, he'll be impeached though...

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Can't we just let Free Market Fred take care of this?

[Gabriel Reproba]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

I wasn't sure what all the Nip-Related "Pokemon" stuff was all about, so I went to thier home page. What I saw was a headline that MOCKS JESUS:

[A Follower]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

My choice is to kill them all and let God sort them out, because that's how Jesus commanded us to treat foreigners.

1 Corinthians 5
12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? 13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

[Free Market Fred]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Well, I'm afraid that I must raise my voice in objection to this topic.

Atom bombs are a terrible thing. Look at all the property damage they caused in Hiroshima:







This is unacceptable, especially since these days Japan is home to so many big manufacturing corporations. Surely you don't want to destroy the Toyota factory, do you? Even American auto companies like GM and Ford source most of their engine components from Japan. And let's face it, Nikon and Canon cameras are hard to beat. No, it would be a tragic mistake to use conventional nuclear weapons on Japan.

That's why I advocate that instead we use neutron bombs. Unlike primitive atomic and hydrogen bombs, neutron bombs send out a powerful blast of fatal gamma rays, killing people BUT there is only a very small explosive blast. Thus, private property is protected! This is a far more civilized form of warfare.

Neutron bombs do have a few problems though. The intense radiation can damage sensitive electronic microchips. For this reason, you don't want to use them on places where there is a lot of electronics manufacturing, such as Japan's Silicon Valley region. For those areas, I recommend chemical and biological weapons - maybe not quite as fast as neutron bombs, but they get the job done with no property damage.

A win-win situation, as I'm sure you'll all agree.

Praise Jesus!
Brother Fred

[Oakland "Reb" Griner]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Tough to argue with that logic there, Free Market Fred.

A war of conquest would go far in redressing this countries $$ problems, and I for one am certainly tired of only attacking poor countries! Heck, the last prosperous country we attacked was Germany, and they refused to surrender until the whole place was destroyed!

[MarkHenry]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

The international community has banned the use of Atomic Bombs. Plus don't forget that the USA has military stationed in Japan to protect that nation.
Please look up your countries relations with another before suggesting genocide.
And doesn't a commandment say "don't kill"?

Plus pokemon are 10 years old, noone cares about them anymore. Why don't you (US) create something fun for your kids, instead of complaining what about what other people offer you. Noone forces those kids to play with japanese toys, its just that they are the most fun and entertaining.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

The international community has banned the use of Atomic Bombs.

Most interesting, what is "the International Community" going to do about it if one is used? Wag a finger at us?

Plus don't forget that the USA has military stationed in Japan to protect that nation.

They are there to protect Godly US interests from the yellow peril, not protect the slants.

Having read the above, I suppose you have no further argument?

[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

And doesn't a commandment say "don't kill"?

I says not to murder. A murder is an immoral killing. It is not immoral to kill people who try to harm your children, now is it?

We don't want to use an atom bomb on Japan, but as history as taught us, that's the ONLY way they will listen.

[Oakland "Reb" Griner]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

My goodness, I suppose if the UN tells us 17 times to not nuke something we just might have to listen to them.

[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Brother Fred, it is obvious that you have more experience and insight in this area than I do. I salute you.

[True Disciple]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Neutron bombs do have a few problems though. The intense radiation can damage sensitive electronic microchips. For this reason, you don't want to use them on places where there is a lot of electronics manufacturing, such as Japan's Silicon Valley region. For those areas, I recommend chemical and biological weapons - maybe not quite as fast as neutron bombs, but they get the job done with no property damage.

I think chemical/biological weapons are most suitable. Additionally, can we poison their water supplies? Might be old-fashioned, but it still works!

Depends as well on the manufacturing cost of the weapons we use. Maybe we need to make a more detailed cost-effect analysis...

Because the current president is in league with the enemies of the USA.

Hopefully, he'll be impeached though...

Maybe we should pray harder for Obama to get assassinated. I will ask if we can move this item to the top of the prayer list next sunday.

[H. Montague Worthington]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

I think chemical/biological weapons are most suitable. Additionally, can we poison their water supplies? Might be old-fashioned, but it still works!

You're probably too young to remember, but in 1964 the liberal hippies put psychadelic drugs in the Chicago water, and the dirty, drug-addicted, bongo-playing hippies forced Corrupt Big City Mayor Richard M. Daley to nominate John Kennedy---- who won over Richard Nixon because of massive voter fraud by ACORN.

So a poisoned water supply has had catastrophic effects before. But in the name of humanitarianism, I would stick with the nuclear weapons.