[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Already ridden with numerous scandals and suffering a loss of $60 billion in market cap, Facebook CEO Mark Zukerberg's (first a Jew, then an atheist, and now claims to be a Buddhist) company is now banning images of Jesus suffering on the Cross as "shocking content".

While we might differ with the cathylicks here (you won't find a crucifix in any Landover Baptist Church with Jesus on it because He has risen), this story is one of outrage at the discrimination, an example of Christian hate crime, LIEberal privilege, and persecution.

While it appears that Jesus is already punishing snowflake Zuckerberg, we can give Jesus a hand by boycotting all Facebook advertisers.

FACEBOOK NOW BANS IMAGE OF JESUS ON CROSS
'Shocking' picture cannot include 'excessively violent content'

An image of the San Damiano Cross, showing Jesus in glory, “reigning from his cruciform throne,” has been rejected by Facebook because of its “shocking content.”

“This is what the monitors at Facebook consider excessively violent, sensational, and shocking,” said a statement from Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio.

The university said it had posted a series of ads to Facebook to promote an online degree program for theology, catechetics and evangelization.

Explained Facebook, “Your image, video thumbnail or video can’t contain shocking, sensational, or excessively violent content.”

The university replied in a statement: “And indeed, the Crucifixion of Christ was all of these things. It was the most sensational action in history: man executed his God. It was shocking, yes: God deigned to take on flesh and was ‘obedient unto death, even death of a cross.’

“And it was certainly excessively violent: a man scourged to within an inch of his life, nailed naked to a cross and left to die, all the hate of all the sin in the world poured out its wrath upon his humanity.”

The image shows a fair-skinned Jesus nailed to a cross but virtually no gore.

The slogan with the image is “We teach those who teach the faith.”

The Franciscan statement about the dispute noted “it was not the nails that held Jesus to the cross: he was God, he could have descended from the Cross at any moment. No, it was love that kept him there.”

Facebook did not respond to WND’s request for comment.

http://www.wnd.com/2018/04/facebook-...esus-on-cross/

[Thomas Taylor]

That Joo Zuckerburg just can't stop himself from taking joy in the fact that his forebearers murdered Jesus.

I suppose him and all his pals were shouting "crucify Him" Just like they did in Mark 15:13:

“And they cried out again, Crucify him.”

Typically, he then tried to hide his guilt by banning images of his handiwork from being posted on the feces book.


Beware. The mind of the Joo is a convoluted place.


YIC
TT

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan

Already ridden with numerous scandals and suffering a loss of $60 billion in market cap, Facebook CEO Mark Zukerberg's (first a Jew, then an atheist, and now claims to be a Buddhist) company is now banning images of Jesus suffering on the Cross as "shocking content".

Well, it seems that he is a Jewish Atheist Buddhist.

Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan

While we might differ with the cathylicks here (you won't find a crucifix in any Landover Baptist Church with Jesus on it because He has risen), this story is one of outrage at the discrimination, an example of Christian hate crime, LIEberal privilege, and persecution.

While it appears that Jesus is already punishing snowflake Zuckerberg, we can give Jesus a hand by boycotting all Facebook advertisers.

It's all the SJW fault, they were brainwashed to puke anytime they see rotten meat and this is the result.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Romeo Rovagnati

It's all the SJW fault, they were brainwashed to puke anytime they see rotten meat and this is the result.

Indeed, padrecito! (Even a stopped clock can be right twice a day!)

[BrotherLarry]

I proudly displayed a depiction of Christ on a cross on My Space several years in a row during the Easter season until that site basically became so unpopular that no one saw Jesus suffering. First the joos kill my LORD, then they make Him invisible by starting Fecalbook - a site no True Christian™ should idly peruse without care and caution and diligence.


I love You, Lord Jesus and will always be proud of Your temporary sacrifice on Cavalry.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

I am very sorry if I have caused problems here – I did mention this in my weekly newsletter - I complained to Facebook of the horrible thing that is no more than a graven image and an idol - who are all those little people on it? What is it supposed to mean?

The “crucufix” is pure papist propaganda that celebrates the lies, heresy and persecution of innocent Christians.

The first thing that will strike anyone who actually sees this abomination is that Our Lord is nailed to the cross by 4 nails!!!!

It is a well-known fact that Jesus was pierced by only three nails NOT FOUR! This fact was discovered through inspired reasoning in the 12th century by Albigenses and Waldensians (allies of Baptists in their fight against the Whore of Babylon, the vicar of Rome.)

For your information, this truth is known as “triclavianism” and goes along with the obvious fact that a Roman soldier pierced him with a spear on the left side - NOT THE RIGHT!

Pope Innocent III, from nothing more than the basis of “I am pope so I can say this and nobody who is not a minion of the Anti-Christ can be correct," declared this to be a heresy and maintained that four nails were used and Jesus was pierced on the right side. (How that man could live with himself after that, I simply cannot understand!)

As a result hundreds were burned at stakes all over Europe until Albigenses and Waldensians were extinct!

Until the pope admits he is Satan’s Slave and apologizes and accepts Jesus, that piece of filth should be hidden from the sight of all God’s people! It can then be burned!

And do they do that? No! The worshipers of Mammon actually sell “personalized” copies of this travesty! https://www.catholiccompany.com/san-...15-inch-i4981/

[BrotherLarry]

Brother Bathfire,


I am confessing before the LORD GOD (although this has already been forgiven) that I had a San Damiano cross when I was sinning and making mockery of the LORD as a ring kissing papist. One day I looked at the word "Damiano," and realized it is a form of Damian, which everyone knows is the antichrist in all those Omen movies. Damian's last name was Thorn or Thorne - which is indicative of the crown that the devil assaulted our sweet LORD with on that glorious and terrible day of Good Friday. Suddenly, the pieces fit into place.


This cross is just the antichrist's way (in other words, the pope's way) of making the LORD JESUS CHRIST suffer. This is why it's so important to watch only movies that glorify God and to only wear crosses that are empty because the Lord is no longer on that cross. And it's also important to not name your child Damian.


So many people are ignorant of these importancies.


BrotherLarry
Rev. 22:12