[Levi Jones]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

The Bible is always right! The atheists are idiots for thinking that there is no God and that we evolved from monkeys.

Friend, you seem to be on fire for God! Why not head on over to the introduction forum and tell us more about yourself. What Church you attend, your favorite Bible verse and etc.

[Phase2]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

It's impossible to be an atheist and hate Jesus, as atheists don't think he exists. Well, at best they think he's human.

By the way, we didn't evolve from monkeys - we just share common ancestry, as do all living beings on the Earth. Common misconception amongst those who don't understand evolutionary biology. Actually, it's apes we share it with, but that's splitting hairs even more, perhaps. That's what unites us and is truly beautiful. Nature is more wondrous than any story you can imagine.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

[...] Nature is more wondrous than any story you can imagine.

Please do not tell us stories that might be beyond our imagination.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

It's impossible to be an atheist and hate Jesus, as atheists don't think he exists. Well, at best they think he's human.

By the way, we didn't evolve from monkeys - we just share common ancestry, as do all living beings on the Earth. Common misconception amongst those who don't understand evolutionary biology. Actually, it's apes we share it with, but that's splitting hairs even more, perhaps. That's what unites us and is truly beautiful. Nature is more wondrous than any story you can imagine.

Yes, and God created every bit of it. Shout GLORY!!

[grurmio]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Well,


I do actually worship monkeys life style, in particular that from the Bonobos, a kind of chimp from Congo. Even if you think I'm just joking, we should pay attention to their life style, as well as from the other animals, they're not that stupid we think we are, but somehow can think more than some humans I know.


I know that when I say something about the Bonobos everybody will think about their sexy habits and will criticize this, but instead, there's a lot more.

Firstly: they change mates in order to have less genetic problems and create siblings that can be more adapted to the environment, some humans do it in a large scale and create more children that they can rise, the Bonobos don't.

Secondly: they do clean their food before eating, I know some humans that don't do this kind of stuff.

Thirdly: the females decide to whom have sex with, but the males can deny it, masturbate as well, have homosexual relations, or just do nothing as well.

Now to think, what does the Church criticize about masturbation, or to be more specific, the Holy Bible?

Actually, we couldn't get it right from here, cause it says masturbation its always something that has to be related to felling that you must copulate or to reach orgasm. In fact, something everyone can masturbate without feeling good about it and even without reaching an orgasm, but their body, their skin-cells, will be glad to do so, such as in sex.


That solves the problem for the women, cause they will not loss their ova. The men? It is possible to masturbate reaching the orgasm without ejaculation, or even none of them, but it will help their self-defense system.

To say something else, the Bible don't count on asexual terms, saying only Jesus or holy people can be like that. I'm not talking about priest, celibacy is not necessarily being asexual.

That's not true, I don't believe in God, I just don't like the idea of making sex, and I do know some people, even Christians, that just don't like to do it. Just saying that in order to keep ourselves in a nice state we should masturbate at least, it would calm down our anger, it helps us to think faster, as it liberates a lot of proteins, etc.


To anyone that think there must be lust in order to masturbate, saying that's not natural just look at young teenagers that don't know anything about sex would find this comfortable (I did it for myself and had so many troubles to understand what that was about), this is just like eating, cleaning ourselves, sleeping or going to the bathroom.

For those who say this could only be possible through belief of the evolution theory you are once again wrong.


First: the evolution theory, not only the Darwin's one, says that there are plenty of factors that can change men, or animals. Darwin proposed a casualty but now we confirm that proteins, and maybe even an outside factor such as self-called God, or a super protein can change our genes.


Second: every reasonable men can see that a Dog is more intelligent than a Duck, a Duck than a Fish, and a Fish than a Virus. We should know that the duck and the dog most often masturbate themselves, even when raised without any female or male subjects of their species. A lot of birds and even some repitlia members does it, and almost all of the creatures from the mammalia class as well, they should do it, some species are just not smart enough to realize.


*I do know that asexual is not the right term for human, but it is the common sense word for it, I.e: not having interest on sex among another individual partially or fully.


*The pool mislead with the term Agnostic and Atheist and the explanations. You might not believe in the christian God/Jesus but you're still a “Theist” if you do believe in any kind of god/goddess. I call myself an agnostic even tough I dislike the christian beliefs, for this pool i can be considered a Christian Atheist, that means, it lacks the word Christian.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Well,
I do actually worship monkeys life style, in particular that from the Bonobos, a kind of chimp from Congo. Even if you think I'm just joking, we should pay attention to their life style, as well as from the other animals, they're not that stupid we think we are, but somehow can think more than some humans I know.

You're an atheist, so it stands to reason that all your friends are imbeciles.

I know that when I say something about the Bonobos everybody will think about their sexy habits and will criticize this, but instead, there's a lot more.

Firstly: they change mates in order to have less genetic problems and create siblings that can be more adapted to the environment, some humans do it in a large scale and create more children that they can rise, the Bonobos don't.

Silly bonobos. They should realise that genes don't exist. And besides, what about God's command to go forth and multiply? I hope you aren't advocating abortion/baby-murder.

Secondly: they do clean their food before eating, I know some humans that don't do this kind of stuff.

See my previous comment about the kind of brain-dead trash that would willingly associate with an atheist like you. Show me a monkey that says Grace before meals and I'll be impressed.

Thirdly: the females decide to whom have sex with

So they're radical feminists? That's hardly a point in their favour.

but the males can deny it, masturbate as well, have homosexual relations, or just do nothing as well.

Genderqueer radical feminist apes are the worst kind of radical feminist apes. I shall pray for Our Lord to strike these vile chimps from the face of the Earth at once.

Now to think, what does the Church criticize about masturbation, or to be more specific, the Holy Bible?

What? We don't criticise the Holy Bible, we obey it. We do criticise people verbally masturbating all over God's Favourite Forums, though.

Actually, we couldn't get it right from here, cause it says masturbation its always something that has to be related to felling that you must copulate or to reach orgasm. In fact, something everyone can masturbate without feeling good about it and even without reaching an orgasm, but their body, their skin-cells, will be glad to do so, such as in sex.

I have no idea what that pornographic gibberish meant, but my body, my eye-cells, is not glad I read it. Begone, demon!

That solves the problem for the women, cause they will not loss their ova. The men? It is possible to masturbate reaching the orgasm without ejaculation, or even none of them, but it will help their self-defense system.

Are you trying to sell us Viagra or something? If we need help in that department, we pray to Our Savior, thank you very much.

To say something else, the Bible don't count on asexual terms, saying only Jesus or holy people can be like that. I'm not talking about priest, celibacy is not necessarily being asexual.

That's not true, I don't believe in God, I just don't like the idea of making sex, and I do know some people, even Christians, that just don't like to do it. Just saying that in order to keep ourselves in a nice state we should masturbate at least, it would calm down our anger, it helps us to think faster, as it liberates a lot of proteins, etc.

Reading your posts certainly isn't calming down my anger. I'd like to liberate a lot of your teeth all over the floor, friend.

To anyone that think there must be lust in order to masturbate, saying that's not natural just look at young teenagers that don't know anything about sex would find this comfortable (I did it for myself and had so many troubles to understand what that was about), this is just like eating, cleaning ourselves, sleeping or going to the bathroom.

Looking at 13-year-olds while touching yourself is not like eating or sleeping, you unspeakable filthbag!

For those who say this could only be possible through belief of the evolution theory you are once again wrong.

I say your post is only explicable though belief in the demonic possession theory.

First: the evolution theory, not only the Darwin's one, says that there are plenty of factors that can change men, or animals. Darwin proposed a casualty but now we confirm that proteins, and maybe even an outside factor such as self-called God, or a super protein can change our genes.

I propose a casualty as well. I'm praying to God to suggest a casualty right now.

Second: every reasonable men can see that a Dog is more intelligent than a Duck, a Duck than a Fish, and a Fish than a Virus.

And a fish is clearly nowhere near as befuddled as a monkey-worshipping atheist who types abominations with one hand.

We should know that the duck and the dog most often masturbate themselves, even when raised without any female or male subjects of their species.

How much time have you spent watching ducks and dogs masturbate? Friend, it sounds like you need a new hobby. Have you ever considered Bible study? You could even learn chess or something, it might not be ideal but it'd certainly be a lot more wholesome than your current obsession with unGodly acts with livestock.

*I do know that asexual is not the right term for human, but it is the common sense word for it, I.e: not having interest on sex among another individual partially or fully.

I don't quite know if human is the right term for you, friend.

*The pool mislead with the term Agnostic and Atheist and the explanations. You might not believe in the christian God/Jesus but you're still a “Theist” if you do believe in any kind of god/goddess. I call myself an agnostic even tough I dislike the christian beliefs, for this pool i can be considered a Christian Atheist, that means, it lacks the word Christian.

Why do you want to sodomise ducks and monkeys?

[grurmio]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

You're an atheist, so it stands to reason that all your friends are imbeciles.

Not really, imbecile is someone who ignores another people comment, just like an ignorant. You are not being one cause you are saying your opinion based on what you have learned, but you might as well think that you misjudging a lot of people, that is a little stupidity.

Silly bonobos. They should realise that genes don't exist. And besides, what about God's command to go forth and multiply? I hope you aren't advocating abortion/baby-murder.

Ok, let's say genes don't exist... But OK: Go forth and multiply! yet, you must provide your family and society a nice environment, but be my guest to act as a rabbit! I surely don't recommend it! No, my recommendation for this times is not to kill, nor make more, but to foster children or at least aiding them.

See my previous comment about the kind of brain-dead trash that would willingly associate with an atheist like you. Show me a monkey that says Grace before meals and I'll be impressed.

Some poor people, that I know cause I live in a poor country doesn't know they have to clean food, the cleaning I say here is using water, not gracing to the Lord. You're just using the same radical terms that USA made to say that communism was Evil, you just don't know me.

So they're radical feminists? That's hardly a point in their favour.

Genderqueer radical feminist apes are the worst kind of radical feminist apes. I shall pray for Our Lord to strike these vile chimps from the face of the Earth at once.

That's different, they're not radical. The church is often much more, and so some politicians. They are free to go and stay. They do not menace their brothers and society. They are just free.

What? We don't criticise the Holy Bible, we obey it. We do criticise people verbally masturbating all over God's Favourite Forums, though.

I used the wrong word, see english is not my first language, Anyway. Where does the Holy Bible specifies that masturbation without lust is a Sin? It just don't.

I have no idea what that pornographic gibberish meant, but my body, my eye-cells, is not glad I read it. Begone, demon!

That was no pornographic, and that was the whole point! You can masturbate without any kind of felling towards sex or willing to do it, not to mention looking at something that is pornographic. To say so, if you got excited by seeing a sexual relation, you are more demon than I, just try to discuss about the theory, not about me, ok?

Are you trying to sell us Viagra or something? If we need help in that department, we pray to Our Savior, thank you very much.

No, that's not Viagra, that's just controlling your brief in order to not reach ejaculation but yet some orgasm or at least aid your body. That's OK if you think it's disgusting, but I rather not wake up late at night having to change my panties and take another shower, that without any kind of lust dream, of course. I'm not trying to sell anything.

Reading your posts certainly isn't calming down my anger. I'd like to liberate a lot of your teeth all over the floor, friend.

I would hug you, but only if you don't mind of course, and look to the nice world we live and try to make it a better place. You are just too stressed, one of the options is that you didn't had much joy yourself or even sex, maybe you're the one that does need some hobbies. You call me friend? Friend to me is to be nice with people, and that is the first thing your God tried to teach, and you just seem to don't get it.

Anyway, if you are my friend that would make you imbecile according to your theory? No, you are not, but you aren't reasoning right now.

Looking at 13-year-olds while touching yourself is not like eating or sleeping, you unspeakable filthbag!

I'm not looking to they and touching myself! I am saying: take for example that teenagers that alone do touch themselves even without looking to pornography or sex contents. Some, such as I was at that age, don't even know about it and do touch their genitals, such as even kids do and often babies believe or not, some masturbate, again, without ejaculation! There is lost boys that grow on the Jungle that do the same.

I say your post is only explicable though belief in the demonic possession theory.

No, my post just reason over facts. You just thinking I'm doing this stuff, but the fact is that I do write about it and I'm still a virgin! Actually I'm probably less lustful than most people here, but that's not about me, that's about science and some semantically misunderstood sentences.

And a fish is clearly nowhere near as befuddled as a monkey-worshipping atheist who types abominations with one hand.

I use two hands cause i know how to use the keyboard, you still don't get
it, don't try to offend me, let's just discuss the theory.

How much time have you spent watching ducks and dogs masturbate? Friend, it sounds like you need a new hobby. Have you ever considered Bible study? You could even learn chess or something, it might not be ideal but it'd certainly be a lot more wholesome than your current obsession with unGodly acts with livestock.

I never watched dogs and ducks masturbate, but they do. I've read about and know biology students and veterinarians that confirms it. I do have a lot of hobbies, including religion studies, for example, for Bible studies I go deep on its origins by studying the Sumerian people legends of Gilgamesh, and even the instructions of Shurupagg, that would become the ten commandments on the later Jewish/Christian books. That for not saying about all the other religions across the world.

I don't quite know if human is the right term for you, friend.

Why do you want to sodomise ducks and monkeys?

You saying I'm not human? Well, that's just not reasonable, but I don't care, if only I can discuss this theory. I never said that I want to sodomize animals, I just say that ducks sodomize ducks, and monkeys sodomize monkeys and so some reptiles and lots of birds and mammals. That's normally of their free will! They normally do not rape each other. I'm against rape towards any kind of creature of course and I'm sure that humans can avoid it and criminalize it, but you must not stop what they want from their free will if that will not kill anyone and both parts agreed to do so!

[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I never watched dogs and ducks masturbate, but they do.

Good GRIEF!

I just say that ducks sodomize ducks, and monkeys sodomize monkeys and so some reptiles and lots of birds and mammals.

Surely ducks have more decorum? I cannot imagine ducks being so dirty; dirty, dirty duckies quacking and cruising for other homo duckies in the duck pond.

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Why is this sick person so obsessed with animals sodomizing each other and masturbating? Two posts in and they're already talking about queer ducks.

[Gabriel Reproba]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Why is this sick person so obsessed with animals sodomizing each other and masturbating? Two posts in and they're already talking about queer ducks.

The mind of the atheist is the playground of Satan. And Satan apparently has a gay duck fetish. The atheist scum probably made this:

[grurmio]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

No,

The mind of the atheist is the playground of Satan. And Satan apparently has a gay duck fetish. The atheist scum probably made this:

this according to the Bible or anyone is called satanism, in opposing to theism! Atheists are not none of them, and if anyone didn't pay attention I said I'm Agnostic, but a most likely Christian Atheist. There's difference you should know.

I'm neither theist nor atheist in general. Satan can be called a type of God, even tough I don't believe it also. Secondly I do not make sex with ducks, I'm just saying that's their nature, if you're against them, kill every animal that is queer, I.E. almost everyone of them!

Why would God them live, aren't they the pure chosen ones? They've made out like this since the beginning, I do not blame them for this, nor God, nor nature.

If you want to know if I had any kind of belief I do believe in nature I.E.: physics from its own Greek origin, Physis (φύσις), the word for nature in that language. As you can see, I am rather classified as a Panist Agnostic.

You here are Christian Theists and at the same time Satan, Buddha Atheists! So just don't try to use a word out of the context, this pool description is just ambiguous.

That's what it make it really misplaced and funnier, you're discussing over for something that is not clear! Just try to generalize every situation, the Bible is composed of various situations, that's not about make a conclusion, or discussing, as you could get from Aristotelian manifest against art or representing the reality (just see the cave myth) and don't say that Aristotle is non-sense, cause it has the base for Christianity and Theology laws.

My post are just reading a bunches affirmative sentence, if you don't wanna discuss, then remain silent at least. You are not taking seriously your job, nor making fun of it. When ye speaks that care that your words are better than remaining silent. I did take care for this, I'm not a spammer on the forums.

In the meanwhile, I make no discussion, I'm just affirming sentences. It's useless to discuss with someone that even can't see the literal meaning of some words, and pretend to do it with the Holy Bible, so long then.

My best feelings, and I do hope you try to understand things and the Bible as well! I tell you so, many kids that read the Bible are different than only one, that's really difficult to get the right sense of it, even if using only King John's translation, as you can see you didn't get my text as well, tell a child to read it. But of different cultures, that way you might have a common sense, the other way is just trying do duck the minds of another infants(speaking of the expression), maybe you are duck queers out of this. Disseminating your ideals just between each others, rather like an Virus, I say, this is no more intelligent than one. I did not want to rage on yourselves, but that's just a lost cause. Hope you do believe that someone cannot believe nor in God nor in Satan, your menaces, just don't reach me. And at least those ducks, monkeys, dogs, cats, cows, bulls, pigs etc... are still safe. I will not sodomize a duck, you would kill sodomite animals... Then you just will kill yourselves.

I wouldn't ever join a church that someones speak with such rage with their followers. Keep that mind as well.

[True Disciple]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

if anyone didn't pay attention I said I'm Agnostic, but a most likely Christian Atheist. There's difference you should know.

The difference between these two people doesn't really matter to our Loving Saviour, who flings all these people into hell for betting the wrong horse, so we don't really bother seeing the difference either.

I'm neither theist nor atheist in general. Satan can be called a type of God, even tough I don't believe it also. Secondly I do not make sex with ducks, I'm just saying that's their nature, if you're against them, kill every animal that is queer, I.E. almost everyone of them!

I always distrusted ducks, ever since the filthy homersexural Walt Disney Company made one to be one of their main characters. And if almost all animals engage in this kind of fornication, then they should all be killed, as ordered in Leviticus 20:13:

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

That's what God says. Get used to it.

Why would God them live, aren't they the pure chosen ones? They've made out like this since the beginning, I do not blame them for this, nor God, nor nature.

Read Romans 1:26-27

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet


God says that homosexuality is unnatural. They haven't been "made out like this." God doesn't fill nature with demon-possessed, sodomite critters. That is what Satan does.

If you want to know if I had any kind of belief I do believe in nature I.E.: physics from its own Greek origin, Physis (φύσις), the word for nature in that language. As you can see, I am rather classified as a Panist Agnostic.

You are a naturist as well. Which sin do you not commit, heathen?

You here are Christian Theists and at the same time Satan, Buddha Atheists! So just don't try to use a word out of the context, this pool description is just ambiguous.

We do not say that Buddha and Satan do not exist, we only say that they are evil enemies of Godly Christianity. All religions that deny the Lord Jesus Christ, like islam, atheism, buddhism, hinduism, wicca, evolutionism, humanism, communism, liberalism, judaism and false christianity, are atheistic.

That's what it make it really misplaced and funnier, you're discussing over for something that is not clear! Just try to generalize every situation, the Bible is composed of various situations, that's not about make a conclusion, or discussing, as you could get from Aristotelian manifest against art or representing the reality (just see the cave myth) and don't say that Aristotle is non-sense, cause it has the base for Christianity and Theology laws.

God's Word is the base of Christianity and Theology laws, not some Greek homosexual. Get your facts straight.

My post are just reading a bunches affirmative sentence, if you don't wanna discuss, then remain silent at least. You are not taking seriously your job, nor making fun of it. When ye speaks that care that your words are better than remaining silent. I did take care for this, I'm not a spammer on the forums.

You seem to be getting more unhinged with every sentence. What the hell are you trying to say here?

In the meanwhile, I make no discussion, I'm just affirming sentences. It's useless to discuss with someone that even can't see the literal meaning of some words, and pretend to do it with the Holy Bible, so long then.

Yeah, go affirm some sentences, whatever you mean with that.

My best feelings, and I do hope you try to understand things and the Bible as well! I tell you so, many kids that read the Bible are different than only one, that's really difficult to get the right sense of it, even if using only King John's translation, as you can see you didn't get my text as well, tell a child to read it. But of different cultures, that way you might have a common sense, the other way is just trying do duck the minds of another infants(speaking of the expression), maybe you are duck queers out of this. Disseminating your ideals just between each others, rather like an Virus, I say, this is no more intelligent than one. I did not want to rage on yourselves, but that's just a lost cause. Hope you do believe that someone cannot believe nor in God nor in Satan, your menaces, just don't reach me. And at least those ducks, monkeys, dogs, cats, cows, bulls, pigs etc... are still safe. I will not sodomize a duck, you would kill sodomite animals... Then you just will kill yourselves.

I understand you get irrationally angry when you are presented the truth, that's what hellbound atheists usually do. That's because you are possessed by demons that cause you to spit incoherent blasphemies on these Godly forums. I advise you to visit a True Christian(tm) demonologist for advise.

I wouldn't ever join a church that someones speak with such rage with their followers. Keep that mind as well.

I'm happy to hear that. We don't want perverted duck-sodomizing queers in our Godly church, thank you.

[grurmio]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

All religions that deny the Lord Jesus Christ, like islam, atheism, buddhism, hinduism, wicca, evolutionism, humanism, communism, liberalism, judaism and false christianity, are atheism.

The world atheistic is composed by three words the prefix a- (negative) Theos(God) and the suffix -ism (ideal). If you put them the same label, that of atheistic, them you're not respecting them, and them might not respect you as well. Use the right word! That's just wrong. Againd if you did study a little Greek language (I'm sure the translator of the Bible did it!) you would get me, but again, you can't be so literal.

The difference between these two people doesn't really matter to our Loving Saviour, who flings all these people into hell for betting the wrong horse, so we don't really bother seeing the difference either.

Of course that does matter to your Loving Saviour, since you must know them and respect them to convert them, or at least show what would be the wrong path according to the Bible, you just don't do it as well. The difference is not what they belief, is the language issue...! Anyway, don't go around Qita' Ghazzah and say to a Jew or to a Muslim that they don't believe in God (you would get double-kicked), you say that they believe in another god, such another religions (so they might spare you). If you still say they exist, that doesn't matter, but that's their beliefs, and so, they exist as well.

Read Romans 1:26-27

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.

This is against idols... read: http://www.jesus21.com/content/sex/i...omosexuality_3 as in Levictus. Nothing to say about your usually misunderstood lecture. A kid can get the right sense, you just don't!

Again:

We do not say that Buddha and Satan do not exist, we only say that they are evil enemies of Godly Christianity. All religions that deny the Lord Jesus Christ, like Islam, atheism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Wicca, evolutionism, humanism, communism, liberalism, Judaism and false Christianity, are atheistic.

atheism, evolutionism, humanism, communism, liberalism are not religions but ideals. If you're up to capitalism, it's basically atheist as society system may be, so look up. Jesus was not capitalist, and lived in a imperialistic system. Our now is not that different, and believe or not, that was also what he was against.

God's Word is the base of Christianity and Theology laws, not some Greek homosexual. Get your facts straight.

Theology laws are based on Greek studies, if you knew that Aristotle was born before Jesus you would get what I'm telling about, it's not Aristotle, its his ideals! But since you are still watching the "shadows in the cave", I seriously doubt you'll get what I'm saying. Maybe you should seek your own "Nirvana", "Salvation", Jesus did it, for God sake as you please.

I'm happy to hear that. We don't want perverted duck-sodomizing queers in our Godly church, thank you.

I'm asexual, can't you get it? I don't want sex! Just try to read it clearly before shouting that God will punish me. I'm even baptized as a Catholic, but I dislike its cults as well!

To conclude, I don't know what kind of functional illiteracy you do have. See I'm not that familiar with English language, but even I can understand you. Maybe you're just to lazy to understand people, sentences, I don't know, you should travel and help people, but outside of your comfy rooms and nation, do not complain about themselves. There is your grief, and many religions have the same. Once again, how grief for sure.

[True Disciple]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

The world atheistic is composed by three words the prefix a- (negative) Theos(God) and the suffix -ism (ideal). If you put them the same label, that of atheistic, them you're not respecting them, and them might not respect you as well. Use the right word! That's just wrong. Againd if you did study a little Greek language (I'm sure the translator of the Bible did it!) you would get me, but again, you can't be so literal.

And in what way does this contradict that atheism is simply an "ideal of negativity towards God?" You say that yourself. All religions who are against God, are therefore atheism. If you are against Allah, naturally you aren't an atheist, as Allah is no god, but a pagan idol worshipped by some towelheads in the desert.

Of course that does matter to your Loving Saviour, since you must know them and respect them to convert them, or at least show what would be the wrong path according to the Bible, you just don't do it as well. The difference is not what they belief, is the language issue...! Anyway, don't go around Qita' Ghazzah and say to a Jew or to a Muslim that they don't believe in God (you would get double-kicked), you say that they believe in another god, such another religions (so they might spare you). If you still say they exist, that doesn't matter, but that's their beliefs, and so, they exist as well.

My friend, sin is sin. That atheists and agnostic amongst themselves see a difference is irrelevant; they are both on the broad way that is leading to hell, in contrast with the small way (True Christianity™) that leads to heaven. They both have the option to change their evil ways and turn to True Christianity™. It won't change a thing if they would shout: "I'm an atheist, not an agnostic!" to the Lord Jesus Christ when they are flung into hell.
And jews and muslims are atheists, for they deny the only True Religion. I don't mind being kicked, the jews have done much worse things to Christians in the past.

This is against idols... read: http://www.jesus21.com/content/sex/i...omosexuality_3 as in Levictus. Nothing to say about your usually misunderstood lecture. A kid can get the right sense, you just don't!

You're using a link to a website that is not considered True Christian™. They, of course, try to hopelessly contrive Scripture, with the intention to make it say everything they like. Read the text, friend, it's as clear as it gets. Homosexuality is unnatural, and God is not pleased.

atheism, evolutionism, humanism, communism, liberalism are not religions but ideals.

Let's face the facts: atheism and evilutionism are both conjectures made by God-mocking perverts to make other people doubt Gods' existence. Both of these religions are based on faith, as neither has any evidence supporting it, except of a few fossils which are likely fabricated by Satan to fool us. Humanists worship themselves, communism is an alternative version of evolutionism and liberals are known to practice secret, extreme sex rituals with homosexuals and aborted fetuses.

Theology laws are based on Greek studies, if you knew that Aristotle was born before Jesus you would get what I'm telling about, it's not Aristotle, its his ideals! But since you are still watching the "shadows in the cave", I seriously doubt you'll get what I'm saying. Maybe you should seek your own "Nirvana", "Salvation", Jesus did it, for God sake as you please.

True Christian Theology is based upon divine revelation. The True Bible was written in 1611 in the English language, and is more based on divine revelation than on the Greek source texts, as Greek proved to be an insufficiently advanced language for God's Word. But naturally, seeing that your religion consists of ducks fornicating one another, it is no wonder that Satan has blindfolded you for truth. Once you reach Salvation™, you will understand what I am talking about.

I'm asexual, can't you get it? I don't want sex! Just try to read it clearly before shouting that God will punish me. I'm even baptized as a Catholic, but I dislike its cults as well!

Read Romans 1:26-27 again. God condemns homosexuality because it is unnatural. Asexuality is unnatural as well, and in direct opposition with God's command (Genesis 9:1):

And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.

You're just as sinful as those Roman-Catholic priests which claim not to have sex as well. Everyone knows that people like these often engage in homosexual acts with children. God will send you to hell for this, my friend.

To conclude, I don't know what kind of functional illiteracy you do have. See I'm not that familiar with English language, but even I can understand you. Maybe you're just to lazy to understand people, sentences, I don't know, you should travel and help people, but outside of your comfy rooms and nation, do not complain about themselves. There is your grief, and many religions have the same. Once again, how grief for sure.

Don't blame me for failing to understand your awful grasp of Godly English. That's not very decent. The only way to help people is to convert them to True Christianity™, which is the only way to get into heaven. We can do that using the internet as well.

So, please, open your heart to accept the truth, instead of randomly spouting blasphemies against your Creator, while manically chewing on your keyboard. This is meant as a friendly advice.

[grurmio]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

And in what way does this contradict that atheism is simply an "ideal of negativity towards God?" You say that yourself. All religions who are against God, are therefore atheism. If you are against Allah, naturally you aren't an atheist, as Allah is no god, but a pagan idol worshipped by some towelheads in the desert.

not negativity in the sense that it might be bad, just the absence of the existence of God. You say it's a idol, but commonly we can say it's a God. What you're a supposed to do is to misplace the word atheist, for you who is not Theist is Satanist, that's your belief, but at least put it right, so I would not come to argue in first place of this. Or call them unsaved, as well.

My friend, sin is sin. That atheists and agnostic amongst themselves see a difference is irrelevant; they are both on the broad way that is leading to hell, in contrast with the small way (True Christianity™) that leads to heaven. They both have the option to change their evil ways and turn to True Christianity™. It won't change a thing if they would shout: "I'm an atheist, not an agnostic!" to the Lord Jesus Christ when they are flung into hell.

same from above.

And jews and muslims are atheists, for they deny the only True Religion. I don't mind being kicked, the jews have done much worse things to Christians in the past.

The same, they're satanist for your church and theists for most common people, but they're not atheists, etymologically speaking.

You're using a link to a website that is not considered True Christian™. They, of course, try to hopelessly contrive Scripture, with the intention to make it say everything they like. Read the text, friend, it's as clear as it gets. Homosexuality is unnatural, and God is not pleased.

I read the text, and still cannot understand your interpretation. Not saying that is not true, but, the other seems more reasonable, and the other one not.

Let's face the facts: atheism and evilutionism are both conjectures made by God-mocking perverts to make other people doubt Gods' existence. Both of these religions are based on faith, as neither has any evidence supporting it, except of a few fossils which are likely fabricated by Satan to fool us.

I figured them from myself, not really, you can look to their closeness on anothomy, etc... Do you believe in Virus Evolution, if not please do not avoid getting killed by any kind of flew, do not change medications, they will not evolve! You said it, pay attention, if you truly are against evolution, you should not medicate yourself!

I did not follow any leads, just observe the world, that's learning also. Again, you just use a word out of context, call those their ideologies against Gods, -isms against god, something like anti theists, would do fine.

Humanists worship themselves, communism is an alternative version of evolutionism and liberals are known to practice secret, extreme sex rituals with homosexuals and aborted fetuses.

This is just not lack of study: communism, socialism, capitalism, imperialism are in the same line of thinking. Socialism may be related to evolutionism, and if you want to know its called Neo-Darwinism, that probably becoming you a fascist.

But as well, you can be a Neo-Darwinist independently by being communist, fascist or whatsoever. There are polytical ideals, religion ideals, and society ideals. Those extreme sex rituals is something of the people, not of their society ideals, just get it, if related to something, it might be religion, just read some books about how economics works, and you get it.

True Christian Theology is based upon divine revelation. The True Bible was written in 1611 in the English language, and is more based on divine revelation than on the Greek source texts, as Greek proved to be an insufficiently advanced language for God's Word. But naturally, seeing that your religion consists of ducks fornicating one another, it is no wonder that Satan has blindfolded you for truth. Once you reach Salvation™, you will understand what I am talking about.

I'm not saying what inspires the bible, just that some universal laws were derived from it with a help from those Greek ideals, maybe even more conservative then yours, even if you don't think so. This is history, and if you did studied theology and story of theology you understand it of course. I don't believe that Satan blindfolded me, but do believe that he has blindfolded you, if that wasn't your God itself, or this satanist book! Double fooled and folded! Of course you can do the same game, but well, let live this live that I like.

Read Romans 1:26-27 again. God condemns homosexuality because it is unnatural. Asexuality is unnatural as well, and in direct opposition with God's command (Genesis 9:1):

And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.

Well, i can replenish the earth by helping those people starving in Africa, by planting, raising a Farm, there is difference of "multiply" to "multiply yourselves" like rabbits. I don't know who blindfolded you, but someone might as well, if you trust him, that's OK, none of my business. In your situation I would trust someone someone I've met in the middle of the darkness, but you do. I will not trust a stranger book, or books as this stand the word "bible", oh, it's Greek again... strange... Evolution of languages, no, of course, there is no such, let's speak gutturally.

You're just as sinful as those Roman-Catholic priests which claim not to have sex as well. Everyone knows that people like these often engage in homosexual acts with children. God will send you to hell for this, my friend.

Those priests do not have sex cause they think that's not right, but I think most of them want to. I just don't feel that I must do it, therefore I just don't do it, if I help my friends and brothers multiply themselves I'm being right as well, according to that sentence. But never mind, you don't get it, you are those men in the cave looking at the shadows of the real world. (cave myth_ Plato)

Don't blame me for failing to understand your awful grasp of Godly English. That's not very decent. The only way to help people is to convert them to True Christianity™, which is the only way to get into heaven. We can do that using the internet as well.

I think you must study first, prior to converting someone, and make them study other ways of view to see if they accept this as the Holy Truth, if not, you'll be that stranger at the darkness that give or sell a fish to guy, but don't teach him how to fish so you can keep saying he is useless and ignorant. Of course, so are you, but if he kills and eats you looking for more fishes both will die.

So, please, open your heart to accept the truth, instead of randomly spouting blasphemies against your Creator, while manically chewing on your keyboard. This is meant as a friendly advice.

Literaly, I would rather that you all opened your hearts, since you can't get it as well. You give yours advice and I give mine. Just listen, I rather testify something than believe in something, if I will go to Hell, that's my problem. And you should just let people do it if they want to, as long as both people consent it and do know the consequences, but that's of their choice. If there would be a world where people accept each other and other with rapists, I would go to the another one, not that one is bad or good, but more suitable to a people who just want to leave in peace.

Keep that it in mind: A God that let people rape and live like monsters, is a Satan to me. You're satanist Christians and I'm agnostic for me, in the meanwhile I'm a satanist and you're real Christians for you. Who is to blame? I say there's no Satan them, but just a freak playing with both of us, Satan and God are just his genuine puppets.

That was surely not worthless talking with you, thanks for the study!

Ps: sorry, I meant Plato for the cave myth. Aristotle would be for the notion of heaven and hell.