Tweet
Last night I found my kids watching a "science" show on the TV. Apparently the parental control settings on my cable TV box are not all they are cracked up to be. (I'll update you about my lawsuit against the cable company and Motorola - manufacturer of the box - in future posts.) So after I had whipped all seven of them for watching this trash, I asked them about the lies that they had been hearing. They told me it was all about this "Big Bang" thingamajigger.
While I never had much use for research into LIEberal Papist propaganda like the Big Bang, I felt that as a good parent, I had to find out more about this "theory" so that I could show my children how the Bible falsifies it. Unfortunately, the first hit I found was at Answers In Genesis, that bastion of progressive theological thought that folds at the first sign of an atheist argument. However, they had a decent explanation of the BBT:
Notice how they correctly identify this for what it is: a fаke origin story. Unlike the Scripture, the Big Bang Story isn't fact. Unlike our Holy KJV Bible, the Big Bang Story doesn't base itself on proof or evidence. It is just "a story." Scientists like to call it a "theory" but we know that that is just cloudy wording for "a big guess at a story we made up to tell our kids so they wouldn't be afraid of the dark or of dying, etc.." From now on, it needs to be called the Big Bang Story, or "Big BS" for short.
While the Answers in Genesis people are undoubtedly fuzzy-bunny false Christians who are willing to change their Scriptural "interpretation" (whatever that means) to fit changing social norms, they seem to be at least able to identify a quack story. However, upon reading their definition, it struck me at how immensely idiotic they whole thing is. I found I could disprove it with one swoop of logic. (And I am saddened that the liberal influences inside Answers in Genesis has addled their brains so much that they can't see the simple disproof for themselves!) I will take it slow so that atheists and women can follow along:
1) The Big BS supposedly happened in space.
2) In space, there is a vacuum.
3) No sound travels in a vacuum.
4) A bang is a sound.
5) If there is no sound in space, how can you hear even a small bang, much less a "Big Bang?"
Checkmate.
Now let's elect someone who will stop forcing "stories" down our children's throats and start introducing FACTS back into the classroom. I have a suggestion for the first textbook required under the Palin/Romney administration:
While I never had much use for research into LIEberal Papist propaganda like the Big Bang, I felt that as a good parent, I had to find out more about this "theory" so that I could show my children how the Bible falsifies it. Unfortunately, the first hit I found was at Answers In Genesis, that bastion of progressive theological thought that folds at the first sign of an atheist argument. However, they had a decent explanation of the BBT:
The “big bang” is a story about how the universe came into existence. It proposes that billions of years ago the universe began in a tiny, infinitely hot and dense point called a singularity. This singularity supposedly contained not only all the mass and energy that would become everything we see today, but also “space” itself. According to the story, the singularity exploded, spreading out the energy and space.
This story of origins is entirely fiction. But sadly, many people claim to believe the big-bang model. It is particularly distressing that many professing Christians have been taken in by the big bang, perhaps without realizing its atheistic underpinnings. They have chosen to reinterpret the plain teachings of Scripture in an attempt to make it mesh with secular beliefs about origins.
This story of origins is entirely fiction. But sadly, many people claim to believe the big-bang model. It is particularly distressing that many professing Christians have been taken in by the big bang, perhaps without realizing its atheistic underpinnings. They have chosen to reinterpret the plain teachings of Scripture in an attempt to make it mesh with secular beliefs about origins.
While the Answers in Genesis people are undoubtedly fuzzy-bunny false Christians who are willing to change their Scriptural "interpretation" (whatever that means) to fit changing social norms, they seem to be at least able to identify a quack story. However, upon reading their definition, it struck me at how immensely idiotic they whole thing is. I found I could disprove it with one swoop of logic. (And I am saddened that the liberal influences inside Answers in Genesis has addled their brains so much that they can't see the simple disproof for themselves!) I will take it slow so that atheists and women can follow along:
1) The Big BS supposedly happened in space.
2) In space, there is a vacuum.
3) No sound travels in a vacuum.
4) A bang is a sound.
5) If there is no sound in space, how can you hear even a small bang, much less a "Big Bang?"
Checkmate.
Now let's elect someone who will stop forcing "stories" down our children's throats and start introducing FACTS back into the classroom. I have a suggestion for the first textbook required under the Palin/Romney administration:
Comment